Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Astronaut”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Astronauts' Performance: The Retention and Transfer of Training

The space environment imposes on the astronaut crew significant physiological, psycho-social, and cognitive loads that can not be replicated on the ground. These loads likely impact crew performance. To date, no systematic data collection has taken place to understand the effects of such loads on crew members’ ability to retain trained knowledge and skills, and to transfer such knowledge and skills to novel situations. The research described here was originally designed to be the first such study to systematically collect data on the effects of long duration space flight on training retention and transfer. Because current theories of retention and transfer are based on results obtained in university laboratories using undergraduate students as research participants, and because crew time in space is very expensive, this study was designed to compare the performance of 4 groups of subjects: crew members in space, crew members on the ground, crew-like subjects, and university undergraduate students. Results from the ground-phase of the study reported here demonstrate that crew members’ performance under cognitive load can not be predicted from the performance of university undergraduate students. It is still an open question the extent to which crew members’ cognitive performance in space can be predicted from the performance of crew members on the ground.

training↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Utility of Terrestrial Cardiovascular Disease Data in Astronaut Radiation Risk Assessment – A Case Study Showing Increased Risk with Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is associated with high doses of radiation and is are cognized health risk for astronauts on multiple or long duration exploration missions to the Moon or Mars. Currently, radiation risk assessment is based on background population disease rates and does not consider individual risk factors that may modify analysis, especially at lower radiation doses.

Zarana S Patel↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Incomplete Bone Recovery at the Distal Tibia in Astronauts with Elevated Markers of Bone Turnover

Determining whether bone recovers after prolonged spaceflight is important for understanding the risks to astronaut long-term skeletal health and the limits of bone adaptation. The primary aim of this study was to use second-generation HR-pQCT to examine recovery of bone microarchitecture, density, and strength after long-duration spaceflight. Secondary aims included examining the effect of mission duration and biochemical measures of bone turnover on bone recovery.

Leigh Gabel↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of Individualizing lactobacillus plantarum Supplementation with Precision Health to Preserve Muscle Health in Astronauts During Long Duration Spaceflight

Muscle atrophy is an unfortunate reality seen after spending time in microgravity. Decreases in muscle strength, size, and endurance can negatively impact mission productivity and increase the risk of injury in astronauts. In preparing for long-duration spaceflight aboard future orbiting stations and interplanetary vessels, supplementation with lactobacillus plantarum has been suggested as a possible countermeasure for crew members. Early clinical trials have shown the probiotic to improve muscle strength, endurance, and associated biomarkers, even without significant physical exercise by influencing the gut-muscle-axis. While current onboard exercise protocols have significantly helped limit degradation (as seen below), individualized implementation of this supplement could not only add another layer of protection but also protect against inadequate exercise equipment on future missions due to payload constraints

Precision Health↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Temporal Changes in Astronauts’ Muscle and Cardiorespiratory Physiology Before, During and After Spaceflight

Background: NASA’s planned space exploration missions will require astronauts to safely perform extravehicular activity (EVA) and to safely egress vehicles in a variety of landing scenarios. Prolonged exposure to spaceflight can diminish tolerance for physical activity, decrease cardiovascular and sensorimotor function, and cause loss of bone mineral density, and reduced muscle mass and strength. Although exercise can mitigate these spaceflight-induced physiological decrements, little is known regarding the time-course of changes in muscle and aerobic performance during spaceflight. Furthermore, these exercise countermeasures are not fully protective. For example, maximal aerobic capacity (VO2pk), lower body muscle cross-sectional area, and strength decrease by about 10% to 15% after short- (~ 14 days) and long-duration (~ 6 months) missions on the International Space Station (ISS). Future space missions that are longer in duration and further from Earth will employ exploration vehicles that will have exercise hardware with less robust and more constrained exercise capabilities than of those available on the ISS. Thus, countermeasures will need to be optimized to protect crew health and performance on exploration-class missions that will last up to 3 years. This will require a more detailed understanding of the dynamic effects of spaceflight on human health and performance, and the ability of exercise to protect against this deconditioning, and the interaction of exercise with interrelated factors like nutrition, sleep, and environmental conditions. Methods: We will use standardized research and medical testing protocols previously validated in 1-G and 0-G to quantify the time course and the inter-individual variability of changes in physical performance, including cardiorespiratory fitness, and muscle strength, and endurance, before, during and after spaceflight missions lasting 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Additionally, we will use an extrapolation model to predict changes associated with 2–3-year exploration missions. Additionally, we will monitor in-flight exercise, nutrition, and sleep using in-flight assessment tools. Significance: Our testing protocols will provide valuable information for determining time course of change and the interindividual variability of spaceflight-induced deconditioning of aerobic capacity and muscle strength and endurance over the course of spaceflight missions up to and beyond 1 year. This information will be vital to assess whether humans can be physically ready for deep space exploration, such as on a mission to Mars, using current technology, or if additional mitigation strategies are necessary.

countermeasures↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Research Activities at NASA: “The Hera Astronaut Analog Mission, Astrobee, and the Advanced Composite Solar Sail System”

During this seminar, I will talk about three of the projects I’ve been involved with at NASA in the last few years: - The Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) is a ground-based astronaut analog mission run at NASA’s JSC in Houston to study and evaluate impacts on the crew due to isolation, remoteness, and confined habitation. NASA scientists use the collected data to develop and verify countermeasures to reduce or mitigate psychological and physiological effects for future Deep Space missions. This simulation was a 45-day trip to Mars’s moon Phobos and back with the goal of performing geological operations with complete communications delays in effect. - Astrobee is a new class of free-flying robots that operates in the interior of the International Space Station (ISS). In addition to being a research platform for microgravity free-flying robotics, Astrobee improves the efficiency of ISS operations by providing flight and payload controllers with a mobile camera and a sensor platform. - NASA is developing new deployable structures and material technologies for solar sail propulsion systems destined for future low-cost deep space missions. NASA’s Advanced Composite Solar Sail System (ACS3) uses composite materials in its novel, lightweight booms that deploy from a Cubesat. Data obtained from ACS3 will guide the design of future larger-scale composite solar sail systems that could be used for several deep space exploration missions

International Space Station↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Temporal Changes in Astronauts’ Muscle and Cardiorespiratory Physiology Before, During, and After Spaceflight

Background: NASA’s planned space exploration missions will require astronauts to safely perform extravehicular activity (EVA) and to safely egress vehicles in a variety of landing scenarios. Prolonged exposure to spaceflight can diminish tolerance for physical activity, decrease cardiovascular and sensorimotor function, cause loss of bone mineral density, as well as reduced muscle mass and strength. Although exercise can mitigate these spaceflight-induced physiological decrements, little is known regarding the time-course of changes in muscle and aerobic performance during spaceflight. Furthermore, these exercise countermeasures are not fully protective. For example, maximal aerobic capacity (VO2pk), lower body muscle cross-sectional area, and strength decrease by about 10% to 15% after short- (≈14 days) and long-duration (≈6 months) missions on the International Space Station (ISS). Future space missions longer in duration and further from Earth will employ exploration vehicles that will have exercise hardware with less robust and more constrained exercise capabilities than of those available on the ISS. Thus, countermeasures will need to be optimized to protect crew health and performance on exploration-class missions lasting up to 3 years. This requires a more detailed understanding of the dynamic effects of spaceflight on human health and performance, the ability of exercise to protect against this deconditioning, and the interaction of exercise with interrelated factors like nutrition, sleep, and environmental conditions. Methods: We will use standardized research and medical testing protocols previously validated in 1g and microgravity to quantify the time course and the inter-individual variability of changes in physical performance, including cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength and endurance, before, during, and after spaceflight missions lasting 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Additionally, we will use an extrapolation model to predict changes associated with multi-year exploration missions. Additionally, we will monitor in-flight exercise, nutrition, and sleep using in-flight assessment tools. Significance: Our testing protocols will provide valuable information for determining time course of change and the interindividual variability of spaceflight-induced deconditioning of aerobic capacity and muscle strength and endurance over the course of spaceflight missions up to and beyond 1 year. This information will be vital to assess whether humans can be physically ready for deep space exploration, such as on a mission to Mars, using current technology, or if additional mitigation strategies are necessary.

N Strock↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Inter-Individual Variability in Astronaut Strength Response to Long-Duration Spaceflight May Be Dictated by In-Flight Exercise

Deconditioning induced by prolonged microgravity exposure during spaceflight hinders physical capacity. Examination of pre- to post-flight isokinetic strength measures shows that strength decreases; however, considerable variability between crewmembers exists. As in-flight exercise differs between crew, an examination of exercise training variables contributing to strength preservation is necessary. The purpose of this analysis was to examine in-flight exercise of astronauts who maintain strength compared to those with the greatest decrements in strength from pre- to post-flight.

Alyssa N. Varanoske↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Inter-Individual Variability in Astronaut Strength Response to Long-Duration Spaceflight May Be Dictated by In-Flight Exercise

BACKGROUND: Deconditioning induced by prolonged microgravity exposure during spaceflight hinders physical capacity. Examination of pre- to post-flight isokinetic strength measures shows that strength decreases; however, considerable variability between crewmembers exists. As in-flight exercise differs between crew, an examination of exercise training variables contributing to strength preservation is necessary. The purpose of this analysis was to examine in-flight exercise of astronauts who maintain strength compared to those with the greatest decrements in strength from pre- to post-flight. METHODS: The database of NASA International Space Station (ISS) crew who completed pre- and post-flight knee isokinetic testing (n = 87) was used to identify “responders” (R) and “non-responders” (NR) to in-flight exercise (≥ 90-day flight duration). R were those that maintained or improved strength (mean of knee extension and flexion at 60°/sec) (n = 14; 5.6 ± 7.8%), and NR were those with the most severe decrements (n = 14; -32.8 ± 4.1%) from pre- to post-flight. In-flight daily exercise records (cycle ergometer, treadmill, resistance exercise) were aggregated on a weekly basis. Independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare groups for in-flight exercise variables (i.e., frequency, time, intensity, volume). RESULTS: In-flight cycle ergometer frequency (2.4 ± 0.8 vs. 3.3 ± 1.0 days/wk; p = 0.021), total time (78.5 ± 20.4 vs. 114.0 ± 49.3 min/wk; p = 0.021), and active time (59.3 ± 17.2 vs. 86.9 ± 44.1 min/wk; p = 0.050) were greater in NR than R, but no differences for cycle intensity were observed. Treadmill distance traveled per session was greater in R than NR (4.6 ± 0.8 vs 3.6 ± 1.3 km/sess, p = 0.031), but no differences for treadmill frequency, total time, or active time were observed. Lower body resistance exercise intensity relative to pre-flight body weight was greater in R than NR (110.0 ± 16.5 vs 88.7 ± 25.0%; p = 0.012), but no differences in upper body or core resistance exercise intensity, volume, or frequency existed. CONCLUSIONS: The unique musculoskeletal loading provided by treadmill running at the expense of cycle ergometry, combined with using higher relative lower body loads during resistance training, may contribute to preserving strength in ISS crewmembers during long-duration spaceflight.

Alyssa N. Varanoske↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coding Structures for Seated Row Simulation of an Active Controlled Vibration Isolation and Stabilization System for Astronaut’s Exercise Platform

Simulation for seated aerobic row exercise was a continued task to assist NASA in analyzing a one-dimensional vibration isolation and stabilization system for astronaut’s exercise platform. Feedback delay and signal noise were added to the simulation model. Simulation runs for this study were conducted in two software simulation tools, Trick and MBDyn, software simulation environments developed at the NASA Johnson Space Center. The exciter force in the simulation was calculated from motion capture of an exerciser during a seated aerobic row exercise. The simulation runs include passive control, active control using a Proportional, Integral, Derivative (PID) controller, and active control using a Piecewise Linear Integral Derivative (PWLID) controller. Output parameters include displacements of the exercise platform, the exerciser, and the counterweight; transmitted force to the wall of spacecraft; and actuator force to the platform. The simulation results showed excellent force reduction in the active controlled system compared to the passive controlled system, which resulted in less force reduction.

Simulation↗
NASA NTRS2023

The Lifetime Surveillance of Astronaut Health Newsletter

Welcome to the April 2023 issue of the Lifetime Surveillance of Astronaut Health (LSAH) Newsletter! Along with the familiar subjects in previous issues, this issue will introduce two new sections: Clinic Corner, where Dr. Tim LaVan shares a brief status of the Flight Medicine Clinic, and Formers Corner, where we share images and captions submitted by you and your fellow crewmates!

Tim Lavan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s Handheld Ionizer Tool for Astronauts

NASA’s next human lunar mission will require handheld tools to eliminate dust accumulation as well as electrostatic charge for the upcoming manned missions to the moon in the Artemis Program. The Moon’s lack of substantial atmosphere means the lunar surface is directly exposed to the solar wind, solar UV radiation, and cosmic rays which can cause dielectric charging of the lunar regolith via the photoelectric effect. The result is a layer of highly charged dust that is levitated and transported about a meter off the surface called the “horizon glow” as seen by the Apollo astronauts. The complex lunar electrostatic environment coupled with the surface dust behavior poses a concern for the longevity of surface infrastructures. The Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at NASA’S Kennedy Space Center retrofitted a commercial ionizer and successfully demonstrated that air ionizers are effective at removing dust particles and the static charge in high vacuum. Additional work is planned to establish the optimal voltage and flow characteristic to develop a high-fidelity ground prototype for future flight certification.

Electrostatics↗
NASA NTRS2023

The Digital Astronaut Simulation

The Digital Astronaut Simulation provides a human biomechanics modeling, simulation, and analysis capability that is enabling spaceflight hardware design to incorporate the human dynamic input early in development cycles as well as characterize performance after prototypes are built. The enhanced toolset includes a modified multibody model, updated motion capture marker sets, and refined methods for scaling and inverse kinematics. These provide increased accuracy for applications in exercise and extravehicular tasks in reduced gravity, especially where upper extremity motion is involved. A core capability highlighted is the calculation of ground reaction forces, moments, and center of pressure based on motion capture. Verification and validation efforts include comparison with force platform measurements.

Human Spaceflight↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Temporal Changes in Astronauts’ Muscle and Cardiorespiratory Physiology Before, During, and After Spaceflight

NASA’s planned space exploration missions will require astronauts to safely perform extravehicular activity (EVA) and to safely egress vehicles in a variety of landing scenarios. Prolonged exposure to spaceflight decreases cardiovascular and sensorimotor function, causes loss of bone mineral density, reduces muscle mass and strength, and ultimately diminishes tolerance for physical activity. Although exercise can help mitigate these spaceflight-induced physiological decrements, little is known regarding the time-course of changes in muscle and aerobic performance during spaceflight. Furthermore, these exercise countermeasures are not fully protective. For example, maximal aerobic capacity (VO2pk), lower body muscle cross-sectional area, and strength all decrease by about 10% to 15% after long-duration missions on the International Space Station (ISS). Future long-duration space missions beyond Low Earth Orbit will employ exploration vehicles with less robust exercise hardware and more constrained exercise capabilities (e.g., less operational volume, less active exercise time) than provided on the ISS. Thus, countermeasures will need to be optimized to protect crew health and performance on exploration-class missions lasting up to 3 years. This requires a more detailed understanding of the dynamic effects of spaceflight on human health and performance, the ability of exercise to protect against this deconditioning, and the interaction of exercise with interrelated factors like nutrition, sleep, and environmental conditions.

N.C. Strock↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Determining the Importance of In-Flight Treadmill Running Capabilities for Maintaining Astronaut Health and Performance

BACKGROUND: Physical deconditioning induced via spaceflight is most effectively attenuated through in-flight exercise training. Throughout its evolution, NASA has implemented advancements to in-flight exercise countermeasures, culminating in the triad of devices currently used aboard the International Space Station (ISS): a treadmill (T2), cycle ergometer (CEVIS), and resistance exercise device (ARED). Despite high-quality exercise devices and prescriptions, many crewmembers experience reductions in both aerobic capacity (VO2peak pre-post mean change: -10%) and strength (knee isokinetic pre-post mean change: -15%). As NASA moves towards exploration missions, which will impose greater size, power, and time constraints on exercise systems in addition to physically demanding surface extravehicular activities (EVAs), providing robust capabilities to protect crew health and performance should be prioritized. OVERVIEW: Future missions to the Lunar and Martian surfaces will include EVAs requiring ambulation and greater physical exertion than those in Apollo missions. While the exercise device concepts planned for exploration missions include resistive and aerobic capabilities, they do not allow for ambulation. Specifically, the countermeasure planned for Artemis Lunar transit is a flywheel device, which provides both exercise modalities through a single resistive cable. While more robust than the flywheel, the devices planned for the Lunar orbital space station, and subsequent Mars habitats, will provide distinct aerobic and resistance modalities capable of achieving high intensities. However, these modalities do not include a treadmill. Recent research suggests that greater in-flight running intensity and volume attenuate decrements in aerobic capacity and strength; however, this has not been experimentally confirmed. The Exploration Exercise Treadmill Requirements study is currently underway, aiming to determine the effects of exercising without a treadmill on aerobic capacity, strength, bone density, and sensorimotor function during long-duration spaceflight. DISCUSSION: Providing running capabilities on future exploration missions may help to maintain astronaut physical ability, reduce injury, and promote health. Studies quantifying the effects of using exploration exercise devices are in progress, which will help provide critical recommendations on whether a treadmill is a necessary component of the in-flight training regime. This presentation will discuss the capabilities of exploration exercise devices and the potential implications of not having running capabilities during long-duration spaceflight.

Alyssa N Varanoske↗
NASA NTRS2024

Findings From 9 Years of Renal Stone Surveillance of U.S. Astronauts

INTRODUCTION: Renal stones are thought to be a risk for spaceflight due to urine chemistry changes, induced by microgravity. Asymptomatic stone can have significant medical and mission impact.For9 years astronauts travelling to the International Space Station (ISS) have received pre-and post-flight renal ultrasound, according to a specialized renal ultrasound protocol, to look for renal calcifications or mineralized renal material (MRM).A new ultrasound machine was put in service halfway through the screening program. METHODS: MRM screening data from pre-and post-flight were compared, to look for changes in MRM burden. Pre-and post-flight scans from 42 subjects were compared. Studies were further stratified by old versus new machine. Measures were modeled using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) as defined by the interaction between pre-to postflight, and machine-to-machine. RESULTS: There was no observed statistical change seen in MRM burden pre-to postflight using the new higher-resolution ultrasound machine. DISCUSSION: The new machine gives more precise measurements and allows us to differentiate MRMs from other bright objects seen on ultrasound, such as small blood vessels. These data imply that spaceflight does not increase the risk of renal stone formation, at least out to the length of ISS missions. This data will be used to update NASA’s Human System Risk Board’s risk tracking documents, in-flight Concept of Operations, and our Clinical Practice Guideline.

K Cortez↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Temporal Changes in Astronauts’ Muscle and Cardiorespiratory Physiology Before, During, and After Spaceflight

NASA’s planned space exploration missions will require astronauts to safely perform extravehicular activity (EVA) and to safely egress vehicles in a variety of landing scenarios. Prolonged exposure to spaceflight decreases cardiovascular and sensorimotor function, causes loss of bone mineral density, reduces muscle mass and strength, and ultimately diminishes tolerance for physical activity. Although exercise can help mitigate these spaceflight-induced physiological decrements, little is known regarding the time-course of changes in muscle and aerobic performance during spaceflight. Furthermore, these exercise countermeasures are not fully protective. For example, maximal aerobic capacity (VO2pk), lower body muscle cross-sectional area, and strength all decrease by about 10% to 15% after long-duration missions on the International Space Station (ISS). Future long-duration space missions beyond Low Earth Orbit will employ exploration vehicles with less robust exercise hardware and more constrained exercise capabilities (e.g., less operational volume, less active exercise time) than provided on the ISS. Thus, countermeasures will need to be optimized to protect crew health and performance on exploration-class missions lasting up to 3 years. This requires a more detailed understanding of the dynamic effects of spaceflight on human health and performance, the ability of exercise to protect against this deconditioning, and the interaction of exercise with interrelated factors like nutrition, sleep, and environmental conditions.

N. Strock↗