Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Aerobraking”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

591 records · Page 33
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Releases and Upgrades of Giant Planet Global Reference Atmospheric Models (GRAMs)

• GRAMs are engineering-oriented atmospheric models that estimate mean values and statistical variations of atmospheric properties for numerous planetary destinations – Outputs atmospheric density, temperature, pressure, winds, and chemical composition along a user-defined path – Provide mean values and variability for any point in an atmosphere – Includes seasonal, geographic, and altitude variations – Used by engineering community because of their ability to create realistic atmospheric dispersions; can be integrated into high fidelity flight dynamic simulations of launch, entry, descent, and landing (EDL), aerobraking, and aerocapture • GRAMs are not forecast models • GRAMs are available for: Earth, Mars, Venus, Neptune, Titan, Jupiter, and Uranus • Available through the NASA Software Catalog https://software.nasa.gov/software/MFS-33888-1

atmospheric models↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Performance Analysis of SmallSat Aerocapture at Venus

Aerocapture is a method of spacecraft orbital insertion that has the potential to provide mass savings as compared to aerobraking. In particular, aerocapture at Venus is desirable due to high atmospheric density and potential for science return. While promising, accurate orbital insertion by means of aerocapture requires an active guidance, navigation, and control architecture. This paper documents the initial assessment of the performance of two guidance algorithms, a generalized numerical predictor corrector and the Fully-Numeric Predictor- corrector for Aerocapture Guidance, applied to smallsat aerocapture at Venus using two different simulation environments with equivalent simulation inputs. Nominal trajectory performance is assessed. In addition, Monte Carlo analysis is performed to compare each guidance algorithm’s performance under uncertainty.

aerocapture↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Performance Analysis of SmallSat Aerocapture at Venus

Aerocapture is a method of spacecraft orbital insertion that has the potential to provide mass savings as compared to aerobraking. In particular, aerocapture at Venus is desirable due to high atmospheric density and potential for science return. While promising, accurate orbital insertion by means of aerocapture requires an active guidance, navigation, and control architecture. This paper documents the initial assessment of the performance of two guidance algorithms, a generalized numerical predictor corrector and the Fully-Numeric Predictor-corrector for Aerocapture Guidance, applied to smallsat aerocapture at Venus using two different simulation environments with equivalent simulation inputs. Nominal trajectory performance is assessed. In addition, Monte Carlo analysis is performed to compare each guidance algorithm’s performance under uncertainty.

aerocapture↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aerocapture as an Enabling Technology for Planetary Missions

Aerocapture is an atmospheric maneuver where aerodynamic forces are used to transfer a spacecraft from a hypersonic orbit to a targeted capture orbit. Aerocapture provides large mass benefits over all-propulsive maneuvers that are typically used to enter capture orbits, as the aerodynamic forces of the vehicle in an atmosphere slow down the vehicle rather than using propellant. Additionally, aerocapture is a quick maneuver where the spacecraft enters the target orbit after a short transit through the atmosphere versus similar aero-assist maneuvers like aerobraking, where the vehicle enters the desired orbit incrementally from a highly elliptical orbit and usually takes a time period of the order of months.

Soumyo Dutta↗
NASA NTRS1988

Mars Exploration: Mission and System Analysis of the Split Sprint Mission

The information presented in this report provides detailed mission and system analysis of the Split Sprint Mission to Mars. These data were generated from September 1987 through July 1988 and involved numerous individuals within Program Development. This mission derives its name from the fact that the total mission payload is split between two vehicles, a cargo vehicle, and a piloted vehicle. The cargo vehicle carries the Mars lander and propellant for the piloted vehicle return to Earth. Then approximately 1 1/2 years later, the piloted vehicle carries the crew on a higher energy "sprint” trajectory to Mars. The advantages of the Split Sprint Mission is that the payload for the piloted vehicle is minimized and the crew would be in space for only 14 months. Mission and system data are presented for a Sprint Mission in the year 2004. Many important aspects of the mission were studied in detail. These include orbital lighting and lifetime analysis, Mars parking orbit selection, Earth departure window analysis, lander descent and ascent performance, vehicle aerobraking requirements, mission orbital maneuvers, and many other analyses listed in the Table of Contents. Emphasis was placed on vehicle performance analysis which ranged from recovery of the Earth departure stages to aerocapture of the Earth Return Capsule. There is also a section describing the computer programs that were used for this study. These programs provide many useful tools for future studies of manned planetary missions. This introductory section will give an overall view of the Split Sprint Mission and describe the orbital operations and vehicles that were studied.

Mars Architecture Team↗
NASA NTRS1998

Human Mars Missions: Cost Driven Architecture Assessments

This report investigates various methods of reducing the cost in space transportation systems for human Mars missions. The reference mission for this task is a mission currently under study at NASA. called the Mars Design Reference Mission, characterized by In-Situ propellant production at Mars. This study mainly consists of comparative evaluations to the reference mission with a view to selecting strategies that would reduce the cost of the Mars program as a whole. One of the objectives is to understand the implications of certain Mars architectures, mission modes, vehicle configurations, and potentials for vehicle reusability. The evaluations start with year 2011-2014 conjunction missions which were characterized by their abort-to-the-surface mission abort philosophy. Variations within this mission architecture, as well as outside the set to other architectures (not predicated on an abort to surface philosophy) were evaluated. Specific emphasis has been placed on identifying and assessing overall mission risk. Impacts that Mars mission vehicles might place upon the Space Station, if it were to be used as an assembly or operations base, were also discussed. Because of the short duration of this study only on a few propulsion elements were addressed (nuclear thermal, cryogenic oxygen-hydrogen, cryogenic oxygen-methane, and aerocapture). Primary ground rules and assumptions were taken from NASA material used in Marshall Space Flight Center's own assessment done in 1997.

Interplanetary Mission↗
NASA NTRS2004

A Comparison of Transportation Systems for Human Missions to Mars

There are many ways to send humans to Mars. Credible technical reports can be traced to the 1950's. More recently, NASA has funded major studies that depict a broad variety of trajectories, technologies, stay times, and costs. Much of this data is still valid with direct application to today's exploration planning. This paper presents results comparing these studies with particular emphasis on the in-space transportation aspects of the mission. Specifically, comparisons are made on propulsion systems used for getting the crew and mission equipment from Earth orbit to Mars orbit, descending and ascending from the surface, and returning to Earth orbit. Areas of comparison for each of these phases include crew size, mission mass, propellant mass, delta v, specific impulse, transit time, surface stay time, aero-braking, and others. Data is analyzed to demonstrate either strong trends toward particular technologies or diverging solutions.

Bipropellants↗
NASA NTRS1994

Advanced Mico-Gn&C Technology for Low-Cost Planetary

The new NASA paradigm calls for more frequent, low-cost, small spacecraft missions capable of returning high-value planetary science. This challenge also extends to the rapid insertion of advanced technologies across all spacecraft subsystems as an enabling tool for building these highly capable miniaturized science platforms in the spirit of.

planetary spacecraft tracking gravity-field mappin↗
NASA NTRS2015

SOAREX-8 Suborbital Experiments 2015 - A New Paradigm for Small Spacecraft Communication

In 2015 NASA plans to launch a payload to 280 Km altitude on a sounding rocket from the Wallops Flight Facility. This payload will contain several novel technologies that work together to demonstrate methodologies for space sample return missions and for nanosatellite communications in general. The payload will deploy and test an Exo-Brake, which slows the payload aerodynamically, providing eventual de-orbit and recovery of future ISS samples through a Small Payload Quick Return project. In addition, this flight addresses future Mars mission entry technology, space-to-space communications using the Iridium Short Messaging Service (SMS), GPS tracking, and wireless sensors using the ZigBee protocol. SOAREX-8 is being assembled and tested at Ames Research Center (ARC) and the NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) is funding sensor and communications work. Open source Arduino technology and software are used for system control. The ZigBee modules used are XBee units that connect analog sensors for temperature, air pressure and acceleration measurement wirelessly to the payload telemetry system. Our team is developing methods for power distribution and module mounting, along with software for sensor integration, data assembly and downlink. We have demonstrated relaying telemetry to the ground using the Iridium satellite constellation on a previous flight, but the upcoming flight will be the first time we integrate useful flight test data from a ZigBee wireless sensor network. Wireless sensor data will measure the aerodynamic efficacy of the Exo-Brake permitting further on orbit flight tests of improved designs. The Exo-Brake is 5 sq m in area and will be stored in a container and deployed during ascent once the payload is jettisoned from the launch vehicle. We intend to further refine the hardware and continue testing on balloon launches, future sounding rocket flights and on nanosatellite missions. The use of standards-based and open source hardware/software has allowed for this project to be completed with a very modest budget and a challenging schedule. There is a wealth of hardware and software available for both the Arduino platform and the XBee, all low-cost or open-source. Along with the Exo-Brake hardware and deployment discussion, this paper will describe in detail the system architecture emphasizing the successful use of open source hardware and software to minimize effort and cost. Testing procedures, radio frequency interference (RFI) mitigation, success criteria and expected results will also be discussed. The use of Iridium short messaging capability for space-to-space links, standards-based wireless sensor networks, and other innovative communications technology are also presented.

aerobrake↗