Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “UAM”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32

Safety Case for Small Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (sUAS) Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) Operations at NASA Langley Research Center

This Technical Memorandum (TM) is written to provide for dissemination of the methods and safety considerations for operations of small Uncrewed Aerial Systems (sUAS) Beyond Visual Line-of-Sight (BVLOS)at NASA Langley Research Center. It includes the Safety Case used to acquire a BVLOS Certificate of Authorization (COA) from the FAA and is being published to enable others to benefit from this work. The intended operations, subject to approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), will include a combination of Within Visual Line of Sight (WVLOS) and Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) flights, comprising of at most five sUAS operating concurrently, with no more than three operating BVLOS. Flights will occur in a subset of the Langley Air Force Base (LAFB) Class D airspace (KLFI) at a maximum altitude of 400 ft AGL. Most operations within this subset will take place in the City Environment Range Testing for Autonomous Integrated Navigation (CERTAIN) Range. The CERTAIN Range includes airspace inside the borders of NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). Additional airspace over the northern section of CERTAIN will be requested as part of the Certificate of Authorization (COA). NASA LaRC BVLOS operations on the CERTAIN Range can be broken down into five critical components needed to meet the 14 CFR § 91.113 see and avoid requirement: 1) procedural deconfliction with LAFB for UAS operations at or below 400 ft and manned aircraft at or above 900’ AGL; 2) ground equipment for detection of intruder aircraft and to support communications between crewmembers ; 3) sUAS vehicles with advanced onboard automation capable of autonomously maintaining safe separation; 4) BVLOS standardized operating procedures (SOPs); 5) and personnel to execute the flight operations in accordance with the SOPs and respond to airborne contingencies. The introduction of new ground equipment includes the use of the Remote Operations for Autonomous Missions (ROAM) UAS Operations Center, development and use of an Integrated Airspace Display (IAD), use of the L-STAR and GA-9120 radars, and the incorporation of standardized Vertiports. The ROAM Operations Center will be the central point for all BVLOS sUAS operations. All command and control (C2), voice communications and airspace awareness displays will reside inside ROAM. The IAD will provide raw data from ADS-B, FLARM, radar tracks and telemetered GPS vehicle positions for interpretation by an Airspace Monitor. The radars will search the class D airspace around the CERTAIN Range and serve as a backup to procedural deconfliction procedures coordinated with LAFB. In the event of a procedural deconfliction breakdown, radar detections of non-participating aircraft will be available so that the 91.113 see and avoid requirement can still be safely met. Finally, the incorporation of Vertiports will have video and network connectivity that enables large numbers of sUAS launches and recoveries from a single location. This is a continuation of the remote command and control of unpiloted aircraft component focused on evaluating unpiloted aircraft flight crew roles and responsibilities, control interfaces and the associated data links needed to operate a fleet of aircraft within a UAM Ecosystem. This work supports the development of future aviation operational concepts based on an Urban Air Mobility Maturity Level (UML) 4 environment (Patterson, 2020). It is assumed that future airspace will include hundreds of simultaneous aircraft operations within the airspace, therefore scalable operations are essential for enabling this future airspace to become a reality. Follow on work includes envisioned flights that expand operations beyond the CERTAIN range and lead to an effective Maritime Surveillance capability.

Matthew W Coldsnow↗

Sirius: Simulation and Evaluation of Tactical Conflict Management in an Urban Environment

This presentation provides an overview of the SIRIUS framework, updates to the ICAROUS core modules, and highlights the results of recent simulation and evaluation of tactical deconfliction in an urban environment. The SIRIUS simulation framework provides a fast time method for simulation a large number of aircraft in parallel. Updates to the ICAROUS core modules highlighted in the presentation include the evaluation of the encounter type geometry and changes to the resolution type selection based on the encounter type and following right of way (ROW) rules. The main objective of the simulation was to evaluate the use of strategic and tactical conflict management strategies using a set of simulated UAM scenarios.

Andrew Peters↗

Design Optimization Study of Fault Tolerant and Redundant Motor Drivetrains for Urban Air Mobility Vehicles

Fully electric and hybrid electric aircraft will require extremely lightweight and reliable electric motor drivetrains to meet performance and safety goals. It is likely that to meet reliability targets some form of fault tolerance and/or redundancy will need to be used in the electric motor drivetrain. The use of either redundancy or fault tolerance will result in a reduction in drivetrain performance. In this paper, an example design study is carried out comparing redundant and fault tolerant drivetrains based on an example fault tolerant motor topology for a tilt rotor UAM application. Results show a minimal weight penalty for the incorporation of fault tolerance into drivetrains with the example motor explored here.

Thomas Francis Tallerico↗

An Overview of the Proprotor Performance Test in the 14-­ by 22­-Foot Subsonic Tunnel

This work experimentally investigates the aerodynamic behavior of proprotors across a wide range of angles of attack. These flight conditions are intended to be representative of Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle platforms that utilize articulating propulsors to transition from a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) phase typical of a conventional rotor­craft, to an axial mode of forward flight typical of a fixed-­wing aircraft. These data are used to identify the potential limits of lower­ fidelity aerodynamic modeling tools, as well as to inform future acoustic phases of testing. Tests were conducted on two proprotor designs in the NASA Langley 14­- by 22­-Foot Subsonic Tunnel using an articulating propeller test stand. Hover results identified unique flow physics on one of the proprotors, including severe outboard flow separation and perpendicular blade vortex interactions on the outboard portions of the blades. Transition and forward flight conditions yielded very informative trends in terms of both on-­ and off­-axis forces and moments against which low-­fidelity prediction models were compared.

aerodynamics↗

Flying Qualities Analysis and Piloted Simulation Testing of a Lift+Cruise Vehicle with Propulsion Failures in Hover and Low-Speed Conditions

The recent emergence of electric-Vertical Take-Off and Landing (eVTOL) vehicles for Urban Air Mobility (UAM) applications has resulted in a wide variety of configurations with unique stability and control characteristics. NASA is currently conducting research to develop conceptual design tools to accelerate public acceptance of these vehicles which includes requirements for safety during failure scenarios. This paper summarizes progress toward a toolbox for predicting flying qualities of eVTOL vehicles during critical propulsion failures that could impact the allowable design of the vehicle geometry or control system. Key topics include unique vulnerabilities of eVTOL/multirotor vehicles to propulsion failures, relevant flying qualities design metrics, and simulation modeling requirements for assessing flying qualities degradation due to failures. Results of a piloted simulation study conducted in the NASA Ames Vertical Motion Simulator (VMS) are presented. The VMS experiment was designed to assess and validate key handling qualities and safety design metrics for propulsion failures. These results show the correlation between control system design requirements and the degradation in handling qualities for various propulsion failures.

George Altamirano↗

Design Optimization Study of Fault Tolerant and Redundant Motor Drivetrains for Urban Air Mobility Vehicles

Fully electric and hybrid electric aircraft will require extremely lightweight and reliable electric motor drivetrains to meet performance and safety goals. It is likely that to meet reliability targets some form of fault tolerance and/or redundancy will need to be used in the electric motor drivetrain. The use of either redundancy or fault tolerance will result in a reduction in drivetrain performance. In this paper, an example design study is carried out comparing redundant and fault tolerant drivetrains based on an example fault tolerant motor topology for a tilt rotor UAM application. Results show a minimal weight penalty for the incorporation of fault tolerance into drivetrains with the example motor explored here.

Thomas Tallerico↗

CubeSat Active Thermal Control in Support of Advanced Payloads: The Active Thermal Architecture Project

The Active Thermal Architecture (ATA) is an advanced sub-1U Active Thermal Control technology (ATC) for high power payload support in 6U CubeSat form factors and above. The design utilizes a two-stage, single-phase mechanically pumped fluid loop coupled through a two-axis flexible rotary fluid hinge, to reject thermal power to a deployable tracking radiator. A COTS Ricor K508N cryocooler forms the second stage and provides cryogenic cooling to a custom Kevlar detector mount through a TMT pyrolytic graphene thermal strap. Passive vibration isolation and damping technologies prevent the transfer of jitter to the satellite systems. The ATA design utilizes state-of-the-art 3D fabrication techniques such as Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing (UAM) to directly embed the working fluid channels into the HX, radiator, and CubeSat chassis allowing for the miniaturization and simplification of the ATA system into an integrated thermal control solution. This paper will focus on the design and ground-based characterization and qualification of the ATA system and provide performance metrics for its use as a thermal support subsystem for advanced infrared electro-optical CubeSat payloads. The ATA project is funded through a NASA Small Satellite Technology Program (SSTP) and is a partnership between the Center for Space Engineering at Utah State University and the Jet Propulsions Laboratory. The ATA active thermal control system has been raised to a TRL of 6 and hopes to provide payload support to advanced missions such as the SABER-Lite and JPL CIRAS projects.

Mok, Mason↗

An Overview of the Proprotor Performance Test in the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel

This work experimentally investigates the aerodynamic behavior of proprotors across a wide range of angles of attack. These flight conditions are intended to be representative of Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle platforms that utilize articulating propulsors to transition from a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) phase typical of a conventional rotor­craft, to an axial mode of forward flight typical of a fixed-­wing aircraft. These data are used to identify the potential limits of lower­ fidelity aerodynamic modeling tools, as well as to inform future acoustic phases of testing. Tests were conducted on two proprotor designs in the NASA Langley 14­- by 22­-Foot Subsonic Tunnel using an articulating propeller test stand. Hover results identified unique flow physics on one of the proprotors, including severe outboard flow separation and perpendicular blade vortex interactions on the outboard portions of the blades. Transition and forward flight conditions yielded very informative trends in terms of both on-­ and off­-axis forces and moments against which low-­fidelity prediction models were compared.

Nikolas Zawodny↗

m:N Working Group Spring Meeting Summary

On May 9th and 11th, 2023, the NASA-led MultiVehicle (m:N) Working Group and its subgroups [small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS), Large UAS, High Altitude Pseudo Satellite (HAPS), and Urban Air Mobility (UAM)] met in Denver, CO at XPONENTIAL 2023, co-hosted by the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) and Messe Düsseldorf North America (MDNA), for an in-person meeting. The subgroups meet multiple times throughout the year, virtually. Twice a year, however, participants from all the subgroups come together to brief each other on progress, challenges, and path forward ideas for incorporating UAS into the airspace. The m:N working group is co-chaired by Jay Shively (Adaptive Aerospace) and Andy Thurling (Thurling Aero Consulting) and is comprised of members from government, industry, and academia in an effort to identify and reduce barriers to m:N operations. This effort also includes identifying requirements, use cases, and metrics to support organizations and groups, including the FAA and RTCA’s SC-228 Detect and Avoid.

multi-vehicle↗

m:N Working Group

On November 29th and 30th, 2022, the m:N UAS working group and its subgroups [small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS), Large UAS, High Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS), and Urban Air Mobility (UAM)] met at the NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, CA for an in person meeting. The option to dial in remotely and use Conference.IO to engage with questions was offered as well. The subgroups meet multiple times throughout the year, virtually. Twice a year however, participants from all the subgroups come together to brief each other on progress, challenges, and path forward ideas for incorporating UAS into the airspace. The m:N UAS working group is run by Jay Shively (Adaptive Aerospace) and Andy Thurling (Thurling Aero Consulting) and is comprised of members from government, industry, and academia in an effort to identify and reduce barriers to m:N operations. This effort also includes identifying requirements, use cases, and metrics to support organizations and groups including the FAA and RTCA’s SC-228 Detect and Avoid. Each subgroup is run by a government/industry team.

multi-vehicle↗

m:N Working Group Annual Status Report

This document serves as an annual report of m:N Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) subgroup activities, addressed challenges, and roadmaps for the future. The subgroups consist of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS), Large UAS, High Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS), and Urban Air Mobility (UAM). Also included in this report are participant lists for each subgroup (Appendix B) and future roadmap and outreach plans.The subgroups meet in a virtual format multiple times throughout the year. Twice a year, participants from all the subgroups come together as part of the m:N working group to brief each other in person on progress, challenges, and path forward ideas for successful incorporation of UAS into the airspace. Recent m:N in person meetings include: - November 29-30, 2022 at the NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, CA - May 9 & 11, 2023 at AUVSI’s Xponential conference in Denver, CO - The next in person working group meeting is planned for November 28-30, 2023 at NASA Langley in Hampton, Virginia The m:N UAS working group is run by Jay Shively (Adaptive Aerospace) and Andy Thurling (Thurling Aero Consulting) and is comprised of members from government, industry, and academia in an effort to identify and reduce barriers to m:N operations. This effort also includes identifying requirements, use cases, and metrics to support organizations and groups including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA’s) SC-228 Detect and Avoid committee.

multi-vehicle↗

Sim to Flight: Evaluating Flight Path Management Automation in High Density Urban Environments

Combined simulation and flight testing enable the study of single- and multi-aircraft performance of onboard automation systems for dynamic flight path management (FPM). The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is investigating system performance and functional capabilities of such automation for immersion into complex, high density, future operations such as Urban Air Mobility (UAM). This paper provides an overview of a series of interdependent sim-to-flight research activities involving large-scale batch simulations, human-in-the-loop verification, and flight-test validation of a research prototype FPM automation system. Together, they significantly contributed to a functional assessment of FPM automation functionality in a live-virtual-constructive (LVC) operating environment characterized by two live aircraft and hundreds of virtual aircraft interacting in a modeled complex urban airspace. Initial simulation and flight test results, future work, and conclusions are presented.

Advanced Air Mobility↗

Simplified Vehicle Control Concept for a Lift Plus Cruise eVTOL Vehicle

Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (eVTOL) vehicles have the potential to enable cost effective Urban Air Mobility (UAM) applications. These concepts may also pose several challenging handling and control problems, which must be addressed prior to safe and reliable urban operations. This paper investigates a simplified vehicle control concept that is designed to address some of these challenges for a conceptual Lift Plus Cruise vehicle designed by NASA’s Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology (RVLT) project. The command and control architecture for this concept is presented along with preliminary findings. Initial results explore the vehicle performance in an approach to hover transition scenario, designed to explore the challenge of dissipating energy across all flight regimes. Operational concepts with varying aggressiveness are evaluated through changing glideslope and deceleration rates. Preliminary results show that the simplified control concept is effective over these operational conditions, with control strategies and envelope protection limits able to maintain control though aggressive operations despite saturation at steeper slopes with higher deceleration rates. Final results will show piloted simulation evaluations in the the Aerospace Cognitive Engineering Lab – Rapid Automation Test Environment (ACEL-RATE) laboratory at NASA Ames Research Center. The planned tests will build on these operations with additional test cases exploring variations in wind conditions as well as transition-to-hover automation strategies and display information.

simplified vehicle control↗

Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology Lift + Cruise Concept Vehicle Powertrain Dynamic Model

The Lift + Cruise (L+C) is one of several Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology (RVLT) concept aircraft identified by NASA to investigate Urban Air Mobility (UAM) requirements. This six-passenger vehicle has a conventional tube-and-wing configuration, but with eight lift rotors (four on each wing) and a pusher rotor on the tail. This arrangement allows it to take off and land vertically as well as fly like an airplane. This report presents a novel dynamic model of the L+C powertrain built using the Toolbox for the Modeling and Analysis of Thermodynamic Systems (T-MATS) and the Electrical Modeling and Thermal Analysis Toolbox (EMTAT), both of which are NASA-developed toolboxes, and together are capable of modeling hybrid-electric powertrain architectures. This research effort models the complex behavior of the powertrain at the mechanical timescale (15 to 20 ms). The model consists of a turboshaft engine, generator, direct current bus, energy storage management system, gearboxes, and electric propulsor systems coupled together to create a dynamic model that mimics the operation of the multidomain powertrain. Two control algorithms, designed to equalize the power consumed to the power produced, are compared to assess their practicality: (1) independent proportional-integral (PI) control and (2) linear quadratic integral regulator (LQIR) control. Simulation results highlight the key features present in the model and demonstrate its operation under the two control schemes.

revolutionary vertical lift technology↗

Advancing Electric Propulsion Aircraft Evaluation for Urban Air Mobility: Insights from NASA-Ames

This presentation delves into a recent evaluation conducted at NASA-Ames on the Vertical Motion Simulator, focusing on the handling qualities of Distributed Electric Propulsion VTOL (eVTOL) aircraft, specifically tailored for Urban Air Mobility (UAM) applications. The presentation will focus on the recent effort to adapt and refine use of the Aeronautical Design Standard -33 (ADS-33) rotorcraft handling qualities developed by the U.S. Army and NASA to meet the diverse needs of civilian (eVTOL) concept evaluation. A brief discussion of the author’s personal test pilot insights in the early development of military Fly-By-Wire evaluation methods will also be provided. The emergence of innovative eVTOL designs with unique lift capabilities and flight control systems, present both opportunities and challenges, particularly in ensuring safety amidst technological complexity. To navigate these challenges, our investigation examined evaluation criteria designed to accommodate the varied configurations and advanced automation systems inherent in modern eVTOL aircraft. By establishing a standardized approach to evaluation, our research not only fosters innovation but also upholds safety standards in the dynamic landscape of urban air mobility. Through this endeavor, we help to facilitate the seamless integration of novel aircraft capabilities into new operations, contributing to a new era of safe and efficient aerial transportation.

Loran Allen Haworth↗

Advancing Electric Propulsion Aircraft Evaluation for Urban Air Mobility: Insights from NASA Ames

This presentation delves into a recent evaluation conducted at NASA-Ames on the Vertical Motion Simulator, focusing on the handling qualities of Distributed Electric Propulsion VTOL (eVTOL) aircraft, specifically tailored for Urban Air Mobility (UAM) applications. The presentation will focus on the recent effort to adapt and refine use of the Aeronautical Design Standard -33 (ADS-33) rotorcraft handling qualities developed by the U.S. Army and NASA to meet the diverse needs of civilian (eVTOL) concept evaluation. A brief discussion of the author’s personal test pilot insights in the early development of military Fly-By-Wire evaluation methods will also be provided. The emergence of innovative eVTOL designs with unique lift capabilities and flight control systems, present both opportunities and challenges, particularly in ensuring safety amidst technological complexity. To navigate these challenges, our investigation examined evaluation criteria designed to accommodate the varied configurations and advanced automation systems inherent in modern eVTOL aircraft. By establishing a standardized approach to evaluation, our research not only fosters innovation but also upholds safety standards in the dynamic landscape of urban air mobility. Through this endeavor, we help to facilitate the seamless integration of novel aircraft capabilities into new operations, contributing to a new era of safe and efficient aerial transportation.

eVTOL↗

Scoping, Tailoring, and Abstraction Refinement in Hazard Assessment Processes

Hazard assessment is an engineering activity that produces insight into which states of thing being engineered might be hazardous. In aviation contexts, it is often performed for certification credit at both the aircraft and system levels during the early design phase of the system’s lifecycle. However, novel aircraft paradigms such as urban air mobility (UAM)operations might either violate assumptions on which traditional aviation hazard assessment is based or simply possess attributes that would make other approaches more effective. In this paper, we define the key concepts under pinning hazard assessment and identify the limitations and assumptions inherent in hazard analysis. We analyze popular techniques to show how they embody these key concepts. We identify ways in which hazard assessment may be scoped and tailored to an application. And, using worked examples, we discuss how, where, and why such tailoring might be needed, especially in novel contexts.

aviation safety↗