The Lunar Meteoroid Ejecta Environment
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
meteoroids↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Lunar Environments”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
NASA In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Pilot Excavator (IPEX) Digital Twin Autonomy Challenge for Universities
The Lunar Autonomy Challenge is a competition for university students to develop algorithms to autonomously control systems in a realistic lunar environment.
In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU)↗
Wear-Resistance Investigations on Ceramic Coatings for Lunar Dust Mitigation
Lunar dust has posed a major challenge to exploration efforts due to abrasion and impact. This work focuses on fundamental studies on ceramic coatings as candidates for enhanced resistance to impact and wear. As a first step, standard and modified approaches to the method of abrasion testing were explored for options to incorporate lunar regolith as wear media, the effects of which were presented for AL6061-T6 control samples. Following this, wear results for air plasma-sprayed (APS) alumina coatings were investigated due to their superior strength and surface hardness. In addition, APS 8 wt % yttria-stabilized zirconia (8YSZ) coatings were studied for their strength and martensitic transformation toughness. Measurements were made by assessing the mass loss, with a standard scale at various intervals. In addition, surface roughness was measured with a profilometer and features identified with a high-resolution microscope. The findings demonstrated that wear media has a distinct effect on the abrasion. The alumina coatings demonstrated improved wear over 8YSZ. However, the tailorability of 8YSZ makes it an attractive option to continue to modify as a wear-resistant coating to protect against lunar dust abrasion. The results of these measurements provide insight into the wear behavior of future directions in candidate ceramic coatings for the harsh lunar environment.
ceramic coatings↗
Wear-Resistance Investigations on Ceramic Coatings for Lunar Dust Mitigation
Lunar dust has posed a major challenge to exploration efforts due to abrasion and impact. This work focuses on fundamental studies on ceramic coatings as candidates for enhanced resistance to impact and wear. As a first step, standard and modified approaches to the method of abrasion testing were explored for options to incorporate lunar regolith as wear media, the effects of which were presented for AL6061-T6 control samples. Following this, wear results for air plasma-sprayed (APS) alumina coatings were investigated due to their superior strength and surface hardness. In addition, APS 8 wt % yttria-stabilized zirconia (8YSZ) coatings were studied for their strength and martensitic transformation toughness. Measurements were made by assessing the mass loss, with a standard scale at various intervals. In addition, surface roughness was measured with a profilometer and features identified with a high-resolution microscope. The findings demonstrated that wear media has a distinct effect on the abrasion. The alumina coatings demonstrated improved wear over 8YSZ. However, the tailorability of 8YSZ makes it an attractive option to continue to modify as a wear-resistant coating to protect against lunar dust abrasion. The results of these measurements provide insight into the wear behavior of future directions in candidate ceramic coatings for the harsh lunar environment.
ceramic coatings↗
NASA Engineering and Safety Center Technical Bulletin No. 24-04: 6DOF Check Cases
In 2015, the NESC released benchmark Earth-based check-cases for well specified, rigid-body, six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) aero/spacecraft models to promote consistent and accurate flight simulations across multiple Agency tools and facilities. Recently, the NESC expanded upon that effort to add Lunar-based check-cases to support new lunar exploration initiatives. This study produced a smaller, focused set of cases that exercise new and unique features of missions in the lunar environment in comparison with 8 high-fidelity NASA simulation tools and provides a measure of validation for simulations supporting Human Landing Systems.
Flight Mechanics↗
Responsible Exploration Preserving the Cosmos for Tomorrow
Call for insight into the challenges and issues with the responsible and sustainable use of cislunar space and the lunar environment.
Space Sustainability↗
Relation Between Magnetopause Position and Reconnection Rate Under Quasi‑Steady Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure
The lunar environment heliospheric X-ray imager (LEXI) and solar wind–magnetosphere–ionosphere link explorer (SMILE) will observe the magnetopause motion in soft X-rays to understand dayside reconnection modes as a function of solar wind conditions after their respective launches in the near future. To support their successful science mission, we investigate the relationship between the magnetopause position and the dayside reconnection rate by utilizing super dual auroral radar network (SuperDARN) observations and widely used empirical models of magnetopause position (Shue et al. in J Geophys Res 103:17691–17700. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01103, 1998 and Lin et al. in J Geophys Res 115:A04207. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014235, 2010). We select three cases when the interplanetary magnetic field rotates during periods of quasi-steady solar wind dynamic pressure. We first estimate the dayside reconnection rate by calculating the electric field along the open–closed magnetic field boundary (OCB) in the OCB moving reference frame. Then, we estimate the magnetopause position near the local noon by inputting NASA OMNI solar wind data into the empirical magnetopause models. The reconnection rate shows anti-correlation with the magnetopause position that it generally increases as the magnetopause located closer to Earth and vice versa. Our result also confirms that the reconnection rate increases as the empirical coupling efficiency between solar wind and the magnetosphere increases.
Hyangpyo Kim↗
Laser Cutting of Anorthosite and Norite in Vacuum
Lasers have previously been evaluated to cut and drill through rock in high pressure and atmospheric conditions to support deep drilling for oil & gas, as well as breaking or cutting rock near the surface. This research evaluates using lasers to cut rocks in a lunar environment. Anorthosite and norite samples were cut in a rough vacuum (<1 Torr) environment using a continuous wave (CW) 2 kW laser. Power and cutting speed are varied to control the total power input. In total 30, 38mm cuts are performed with power levels ranging from 25% (525 W) to 100% (2100 W) and total energy inputs from 0.090 – 4.34 kJ/cm. The cuts are bisected and inspected with optical and scanning electron microscopy. The bisected areas are measured to determine the specific energy for material removal (J/mm 3 ) and the extent of the heat affected zone.
Laser Cutting↗
The Impact of Meteoroid Streams on the Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment During the LADEE Mission
The scientific objectives of the Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) mission are: (1) determine the composition of the lunar atmosphere, investigate processes controlling distribution and variability - sources, sinks, and surface interactions; and (2) characterize the lunar exospheric dust environment, measure spatial and temporal variability, and influences on the lunar atmosphere. Impacts on the lunar surface from meteoroid streams encountered by the Earth-Moon system are anticipated to result in enhancements in the both the lunar atmosphere and dust environment. Here we describe the annual meteoroid streams expected to be incident at the Moon during the LADEE mission, and their anticipated effects on the lunar environment.
Dust Environment↗
The Generation and Application of Paylaod Thermal Environments for a Lunar Lander Mission
In today’s space industry many organizations develop payloads or other components that will fly on a vehicle or lander developed by a different organization. This creates a challenge for the payload developers of knowing the thermal environment, including effects from the spacecraft, of their instrument because the payload engineers will not have continuous access to an up-to-date thermal model of the spacecraft. To circumvent the vehicle developer having to provide a thermal model of the spacecraft to payload developers for detailed thermal analysis, the vehicle developer can provide environmental data to the payload engineers to apply to their payload model, instead. This data must include the boundary temperatures where the payload is mounted, sink temperatures, and both incident solar and infrared thermal flux. This paper will describe the method used to generate thermal environments for payloads on the Astrobotic Lunar Lander and how those environments were applied to an example payload, the Neutron Measurement at the Lunar Surface (NMLS) instrument. This work is unique because a standard method for generating and delivering payload environments does not exist. Benefits and drawbacks of using this method will also be discussed.
Thermal Environments↗
Validation of Rendered Natural and Artificial Lighting Environments in Real Time Lunar South Pole Simulations
NASA’s Artemis campaign is making heavy use of simulation to help return humans to the lunar surface by the end of the decade. There are several aspects of the lunar surface and its environment which must be accurately modeled before these simulations can be relied upon to influence decisions being made under these programs. Digital Lunar Exploration Sites, a paper submitted to the 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference, outlined the process used to generate the lunar surface in a digital environment. This paper will expand upon this topic and delve into the steps being taken by the NASA Exploration Systems Simulations (NExSyS) team at NASA’s Johnson Space Center (JSC) to properly verify and validate these simulations, with a focus on the visual aspects of the environment. Natural lighting validation relies in part on the wealth of data generated during the Apollo program. Many images taken by Apollo astronauts on the lunar surface have been replicated in the simulated environments to gain confidence in the accuracy of terrain and lighting models. However, because the environment the Artemis astronauts will experience at the Lunar South Pole (LSP) is dissimilar from the near-equatorial Apollo sites, other validation techniques must be applied. At the LSP, the sun crests only about three degrees above the horizon and when combined with the lack of a lunar atmosphere, lighting in this region is often very different than what a human would experience on Earth. Solar illumination, earthshine, human eye response, solar blooming, lunar regolith optical properties, and shadows cast by rocks and crater walls will play a significant role in an astronaut’s ability to safely conduct an Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) or perform a traverse with a lunar rover. Approaches for validation of these aspects of the rendered LSP environment are considered in this paper. In addition to natural lighting, approaches for the validation of artificial lighting models at the LSP are discussed. The JSC Lighting Lab has been studying the illumination profile of the Exploration Infomatics Subsystem (xINFO) lighting on the Exploration EVA Mobility Unit (xEMU). How these lights interact with the solar illumination and the shadows being cast on the lunar surface is of particular interest, so the validity of models representing these lights in a human-in-the-loop virtual reality environment becomes very important. This paper also touches on some of the simulation performance considerations when a Human in the Loop (HITL) is present, which drives the need for real time rendering of the environment. Natural and artificial lighting will play a crucial role to decisions being made when planning and executing missions at the Lunar South Pole (LSP) and it is vitally important to understand the LSP environment before we return.
Lunar↗
Rocket Cratering in Simulated Lunar and Martian Environments
With NASA's planned return to the moon and possibly with lunar outposts being formed, repeated landings at the same site will be necessary. Understanding rocket plume interaction with lunar and Martian surfaces is of paramount importance in order to safely land and protect hardware surrounding the landing site. This work will report on results of three small experiments intended to explore plume impingement onto lunar and Martian surfaces: Handheld Observation of Scour Holes (HOOSH), Handheld Angle of Repose Measurements of Lunar Simulants (HARMLuS), and Mars Architecture Team study (MATS). The first two experiments were performed during two sorties of reduced gravity flights. HOOSH was designed to investigate crater formation as a function of gravitational level (lunar and Martian gravity). HARMLuS was designed to measure the Angle of Failure (related to the angle of repose) at lunar and Martian gravity. Both experiments have complex findings indicative of the hysteretic behavior of granular materials, especially resulting from reduced gravity. The MATS experiment was designed to investigate the effects of regolith compaction on the granular mechanics of crater formation . In general, the granular mechanics is a much stronger function of compaction than gravitation acceleration. Crater formation is greatly enhanced at reduced gravity (resulting in much larger craters). The angle of failure of the lunar simulants increases with decreasing gravitational acceleration, and occasionally becomes infinite for some compactions at lunar gravity. The angle of failure also increases with increasing compaction. While compaction does play a role in the time development of crater formation, the asymptotic behavior is largely unaffected.
Immer, Christopher↗
Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer Integration and Test
The Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) is a NASA collaborative flight project to explore the lunar exosphere. It is being developed through a unique partnership between NASA's Ames Research Center (ARC) and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). Each center brings its own experience and flight systems heritage to the task of integrating and testing the LADEE subsystems, instruments, and spacecraft. As an "in-house" flight project being implemented at low-cost and moderate risk, LADEE relies on single-string subsystems and protoflight hardware to accomplish its mission. Integration and test (l&T) of the LADEE spacecraft with the instruments will be performed at GSFC, and includes assembly, integration, functional testing, and flight qualification and acceptance testing. Due to the nature of the LADEE mission, l&T requirements include strict contamination control measures and instrument calibration procedures. Environmental testing will include electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), vibro-acoustic testing, and thermal-balance/vacuum. Upon successful completion of spacecraft l&T, LADEE will be launched from NASA's Wallops Flight Facility. Launch of the LADEE spacecraft is currently scheduled for December 2012.
Wright, Michael R.↗
An Evaluation of a Passively Cooled Cylindrical Spectrometer Array in Lunar Orbit
This thesis will evaluate a passively cooled cylindrical spectrometer array in lunar orbit characterizing the thermal response in order to provide context for decision-making to scientists and engineers. To provide perspective on thermal issues and controls of space science instruments, a background search of historical lunar missions is provided. Next, a trial science mission is designed and analyzed which brings together the elements of the background search, lunar orbit environment and passive cooling. Finally, the trial science mission analysis results are provided along with the conclusions drawn. Scintillators are materials that when struck by particle radiation, absorb the particle energy which is then reemitted as light in or near the visible range. Nuclear astrophysics utilizes scintillating materials for observation of high-energy photons which are generated by sources such as solar flares, supernovae and neutron stars. SPMs are paired with inorganic scintillators to detect the light emitted which is converted into electronic signals. The signals are captured and analyzed in order to map the number and location of the high-energy sources. The SPM is utilized as it has single photon sensitivity, low voltage requirements and a fast response. SPMs are also compact, relatively inexpensive and allow the usage of lower-cost scintillating materials within the spectrometer. These characteristics permit large-area arrays while lowering cost and power requirements. The ability of a spectrometer to record and identify the interaction of high-energy photons for scientific return is not a trivial matter. Background noise is generated when particles that have not originated from the desired distant source impact the spectrometer. Additionally, thermally induced electrical signals are randomly generated within the SPM even in the absence of light which is referred to as dark current. Overcoming these obstacles requires greater light emittance and energy resolution with reduced dark current. Strong scintillation photon emittance ensures that low energy impacts will produce enough visible photons to be detected by the SPM. Higher energy resolution will ensure that single photon impacts can be distinguished from others of similar wavelength and energy; reduced dark current decreases the generation of random signals not associated with a photon impact. Increasing efficiency in each of these properties in a spectrometer comprised of inorganic scintillators and SPMs requires low temperatures. Low temperature maintenance in a lunar environment presents many unique challenges of its own. Even with the accumulated successes of past missions, the lunar environment remains a thermal challenge for engineers. The lunar orbit thermal environment is driven by radiation from three sources, direct solar radiation, reflected solar radiation from the lunar surface (albedo) and lunar radiation (Clawson 2002). Direct solar radiation values are consistent with those seen in Earth orbit (1325 W/m2) (Clawson 2002). The percentage of solar radiation reflected from the moon is consistently very low with the moon's dark regolith covered surface absorbing nearly 90% of the incident light (Clawson 2002). Yet, it is this absorption that gives the lunar orbit environment one of its most difficult thermal attributes as the absorbed solar radiation is released from the lunar surface as infrared radiation (IR). IR is of a wavelength that is readily absorbed by surfaces designed to function as radiation emitters. It is practical to therefore "choose radiator locations and spacecraft attitude to minimize radiator views to the lunar surface, when possible...pointing the radiator towards the sun to some extent, to minimize its view to the lunar surface, is frequently preferable. (Clawson 2002)" Additionally, the amount of direct solar radiation, lunar IR and albedo an orbiting satellite receives varies from one side of the moon to the other as the moon blocks the sun from view. This environment produces large temperature variations in a satellite's instrumentation, control electronics and propulsion systems which must be understood to characterize operating temperature envelopes.
Waggoner, Jason↗
Analysis of Regolith Simulant Ejecta Distributions from Normal Incident Hypervelocity Impact
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has established the Constellation Program. The Constellation Program has defined one of its many goals as long-term lunar habitation. Critical to the design of a lunar habitat is an understanding of the lunar surface environment; of specific importance is the primary meteoroid and subsequent ejecta environment. The document, NASA SP-8013 'Meteoroid Environment Model Near Earth to Lunar Surface', was developed for the Apollo program in 1969 and contains the latest definition of the lunar ejecta environment. There is concern that NASA SP-8013 may over-estimate the lunar ejecta environment. NASA's Meteoroid Environment Office (MEO) has initiated several tasks to improve the accuracy of our understanding of the lunar surface ejecta environment. This paper reports the results of experiments on projectile impact into powdered pumice and unconsolidated JSC-1A Lunar Mare Regolith simulant targets. Projectiles were accelerated to velocities between 2.45 and 5.18 km/s at normal incidence using the Ames Vertical Gun Range (AVGR). The ejected particles were detected by thin aluminum foil targets strategically placed around the impact site and angular ejecta distributions were determined. Assumptions were made to support the analysis which include; assuming ejecta spherical symmetry resulting from normal impact and all ejecta particles were of mean target particle size. This analysis produces a hemispherical flux density distribution of ejecta with sufficient velocity to penetrate the aluminum foil detectors.
Edwards, David L.↗
Space Suit Radiator Performance in Lunar and Mars Environments
During an ExtraVehicular Activity (EVA), both the heat generated by the astronaut's metabolism and that produced by the Portable Life Support System (PLSS) must be rejected to space. The heat sources include the heat of adsorption of metabolic CO2, the heat of condensation of water, the heat removed from the body by the liquid cooling garment and the load from the electrical components. Although the sublimator hardware to reject this load weighs only 3.48 lbs, an additional eight pounds of water are loaded into the unit of which about six to eight are sublimated and lost; this is the single largest expendable during an eight-hour EVA. Using a radiator to reject heat from the Astronaut during an EVA, we can significantly reduce the amount of expendable water consumed by the sublimator. Last year we reported on the design and initial operational assessment tests of our novel radiator designated the Radiator And Freeze Tolerant heat eXchanger (RAFT-X). Herein, we report on tests conducted in the NASA Johnson Space Center Chamber E Thermal Vacuum Test Facility. Up to 800 Btu/h of heat were rejected in lunar and Mars environments with temperatures as cold as -150 F. Tilting the radiator did not cause an observable loss in performance. The RAFT-X endured freeze / thaw cycles and in fact, the heat exchanger was completely frozen three times without any apparent damage to the unit. We were also able to operate the heat exchanger in a partially frozen configuration to throttle the heat rejection rate from 530 Btu/h at low water flow rate down to 300 Btu/h. Finally, the deliberate loss of a single loop heat pipe only degraded the heat rejection performance by about 2 to 5%.
Nabity, James↗
Space Suit Radiator Performance in Lunar and Mars Environments
During an ExtraVehicular Activity (EVA), both the heat generated by the astronaut's metabolism and that produced by the Portable Life Support System (PLSS) must be rejected to space. The heat sources include the heat of adsorption of metabolic CO2, the heat of condensation of water, the heat removed from the body by the liquid cooling garment and the load from the electrical components. Although the sublimator hardware to reject this load weighs only 3.48 lbs, an additional eight pounds of water are loaded into the unit of which about six to eight are sublimated and lost; this is the single largest expendable during an eight-hour EVA. Using a radiator to reject heat from the Astronaut during an EVA, we can significantly reduce the amount of expendable water consumed by the sublimator. Last year we reported on the design and initial operational assessment tests of our novel radiator designated the Radiator And Freeze Tolerant heat eXchanger (RAFT-X). Herein, we report on tests conducted in the NASA Johnson Space Center Chamber E Thermal Vacuum Test Facility. Up to 800 Btu/h of heat were rejected in lunar and Mars environments with temperatures as cold as 150 F. Tilting the radiator did not cause an observable loss in performance. The RAFT-X endured freeze/thaw cycles and in fact, the heat exchanger was completely frozen three times without any apparent damage to the unit. We were also able to operate the heat exchanger in a partially frozen configuration to throttle the heat rejection rate from 530 Btu/h at low water flow rate down to 300 Btu/h. Finally, the deliberate loss of a single loop heat pipe only degraded the heat rejection performance by about 2 to 5%.
Paul, Heather↗
NASA space vehicle design criteria- environment. Meteorid environment model - 1969 /near earth to lunar surface/
Meteoroid environment model for cometary origin near earth to lunar surface
Cour-Palais, B. G.↗