Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “LiP”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

572 records · Page 32

Wall Modeled Large Eddy Simulations for NASA’s Jet Noise Consensus Database of Single-Flow, Round, Convergent Jets

A campaign of wall-modeled large-eddy simulations (WMLES) using structured curvilinear overlapping grids has been performed with the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics(LAVA) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software to predict jet noise for single-stream axisymmetric round jets. The simulations address the new Prediction Uncertainty Reduction(PUR) technical challenge within the context of NASA’s Commercial Supersonic Technology(CST) project. The goal of PUR is to quantify and reduce uncertainties from scale-resolving simulations to assess noise characteristics of next generation quiet supersonic commercial jets during takeoff and landing conditions where the noise from the exhaust jet dominates. The focus of this effort is to generate a simulation database for single-stream axisymmetric round nozzles at several conditions both for static (no ambient co-flow), which is the focus of this article, and in-flight (flight stream co-flow) conditions, which are beyond the current scope. Nine different flow conditions ranging in jet exit Mach number from 0.38 to 1.0 with nozzle temperature ratios (NTR) from 0.84 to 2.7 have been conducted. Details of the structured overset grids, numerical discretization and wall-model are provided. Near-field comparisons to PIV data show great agreement for both velocity and normal stresses, however a systematic TKE overshoot at the nozzle exit is seen in the lip line shear-layer. A permeable Ffowcs Williams Hawkings (FWH) surface, enclosing the jet, is used to predict far-field noise from the simulated flow-field. Comparison of CFD predictions to microphone array measurements demonstrate excellent agreement within the resolved frequency range. A systematic under-prediction of far-aft observer angles larger than 150 degrees has been observed across all simulations. We achieved a cost reduction of an order of magnitude for these WMLES compared to an earlier study of this configuration due to algorithmic and software improvements. The accuracy of the results and short turnaround time demonstrate that WMLES within the LAVA framework is a cost-effective approach for jet noise predictions that could soon be incorporated into the design cycle of jet noise reduction technologies.

CST↗

Design and Analysis of A Jet Stretcher for High-Altitude Supersonic Free Jet Testing

A jet stretcher can be used to extend the region of clean flow for a test article in a supersonic free jet. The device acts to shield the article from shock waves reflected from the free jet shear layer. It can also allow for overexpanded nozzle operation through blocking shocks emanating from the nozzle lip, enlarging the potential test envelope. The FUN3D computational fluid dynamics solver was used to test a design process for developing jet stretchers. The inner surface of the axisymmetric jet stretcher was obtained from a streamline extracted from a free flight simulation around a notional test article at the intended test condition of Mach 3.2, 53,000 ft. The test article and jet stretcher were then simulated in a free jet nozzle exhaust, and the flowfield within a notional inlet aperture was compared between the installed and free flight calculations. Ambient pressure was increased until separation within the free jet nozzle finally induced disturbances at the inlet. The jet stretcher was shown to provide clean flow to the inlet at cell pressure ratios up to 2.8. A process for trimming the axisymmetric jet stretcher was also tested. This was intended to provide blockage relief for complex test articles, aiding with starting, as well as reducing weight and fabrication cost. The trimmed jet stretcher performed identically to the axisymmetric model at slightly-overexpanded conditions, but at cell pressure ratios above 1.3 allowed disturbances from the trailing edge to reach the inlet.

free jet↗

Design and Analysis of A Jet Stretcher for High-Altitude Supersonic Free Jet Testing

A jet stretcher can be used to extend the region of clean flow for a test article in a supersonic free jet. The device acts to shield the article from shock waves reflected from the free jet shear layer. It can also allow for overexpanded nozzle operation through blocking shocks emanating from the nozzle lip, enlarging the potential test envelope. The FUN3D computational fluid dynamics solver was used to test a design process for developing jet stretchers. The inner surface of the axisymmetric jet stretcher was obtained from a streamline extracted from a free flight simulation around a notional test article at the intended test condition of Mach 3.2, 53,000 ft. The test article and jet stretcher were then simulated in a free jet nozzle exhaust, and the flowfield within a notional inlet aperture was compared between the installed and free flight calculations. Ambient pressure was increased until separation within the free jet nozzle finally induced disturbances at the inlet. The jet stretcher was shown to provide clean flow to the inlet at cell pressure ratios up to 2.8. A process for trimming the axisymmetric jet stretcher was also tested. This was intended to provide blockage relief for complex test articles, aiding with starting, as well as reducing weight and fabrication cost. The trimmed jet stretcher performed identically to the axisymmetric model at slightly overexpanded conditions, but at cell pressure ratios above 1.3 allowed disturbances from the trailing edge to reach the inlet.

free jet↗

High Risk Spacecraft Materials Offgassing

NASA-STD-6001B, Determination of Offgassed Products (Test 7), provides the offgassing characteristics under standardized conditions for materials and assembled articles to be located within habitable spacecraft environments. Experience with Test 7 has found certain material types to be of higher risk for offgassing undesirable compounds aboard spacecraft than others. Formaldehyde and acrolein are historically high T value offgassed components of the offgassed compound target list because they have low spacecraft maximum allowable concentration (SMAC) values assigned by the JSC Toxicology Group. Carbon disulfide, benzene, acrylonitrile, and furan are additional target compounds of concern due to their lower thresholds of toxicity as determined by the JSC Toxicology Group. Materials offgassing siloxanes are also of concern due to their degradation effects on environmental control and life support system (ECLSS) components and performance. Spacecraft materials and articles defined in this manuscript as high risk were identified after examining and condensing data for these compounds of concern from approximately 3000 tests performed over 30 years. Summaries of high risk material and article types based on highest Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) T values are also presented. Historical analysis shows high risk components are produced largely from test materials and articles in the general categories of electronic/powered components, foams, paints/coatings/films, adhesives/tapes, epoxy/resins, liquids/gels, Nomex® with surface treatments, markers/pens/inks, dry film lubricants, thermoplastics, hygiene items (deodorants, lip balms), and silicone rubber. These data are intended to be a resource for spacecraft materials and processes managers, designers, and toxicologists. High risk materials and articles intended for use aboard spacecraft should be tested in accordance with NASA-STD-6001B Test 7.

Vanessa D Buchanan↗

Wind Tunnel Test of A Scale Model of A Venus Probe to Determine Aeroacoustics Environment

The Zephyr probe for NASA’s DAVINCI project is being designed to fly to Venus and collect measurements to characterize the Venusian atmosphere while it descends towards the surface. Despite a slow descent speed as the probe approaches the surface, the very dense atmosphere means the vibro-acoustic environment that the probe must withstand could be very harsh. A wind tunnel test campaign was conducted to characterize the surface-pressure fluctuations (acoustics) on the external surface of the probe during the descent. The goal was to provide forcing functions for vibro-acoustic analysis of all instruments inside the probe. A 25% scale-model of the Zephyr probe was manufactured, instrumented with 18 microphones, and tested in two wind tunnels located in the Fluid Mechanics Lab at NASA Ames Research Center at velocities ranging from 13 m/s to 48 m/s. Trip strips were added to the model to ensure a turbulent boundary layer on the model. Microphones were located appropriately to provide spectra of pressure fluctuations in regions with different flow characteristics as well as for calculating various two-point statistics. The acoustic spectra measured in the wind tunnel tests were scaled up to flight-scale using the estimated flight trajectory information. Besides fluctuating surface-pressure measurements, hot-film velocity measurements as well as smoke-laser flow visualization were conducted to better understand the flow around the probe. Lastly, several different geometry configurations were tested to see whether any reduction in acoustic levels could be achieved, but none of the configurations that were tested offered significant improvements. The flow visualization showed 3 primary flow regimes on the model: an attached turbulent boundary layer on the front of the model, a region of separated flow upstream of the flared lip, and a large, separated wake at the rear of the model. The acoustic spectra generally show three different shapes corresponding to these flow regions, with the highest levels seen at the rear of the model, and directly in front of the drag plate. The scaled overall levels of pressure fluctuations were found to be high: in the range of 130dB to 155dB.

planetary probe↗

Approaches and possible improvements in the area of multibody dynamics modeling

A wide ranging look is taken at issues involved in the dynamic modeling of complex, multibodied orbiting space systems. Capabilities and limitations of two major codes (DISCOS, TREETOPS) are assessed and possible extensions to the CONTOPS software are outlined. In addition, recommendations are made concerning the direction future development should take in order to achieve higher fidelity, more computationally efficient multibody software solutions.

Lips, K. W.↗

Obstacles to high fidelity multibody dynamics simulation

The authors take a wide ranging look at issues involved in the dynamic modeling of complex, multibodied orbiting space systems. The nature of the multibody problem is reviewed and capabilities and limitations of two major codes (DISCOS, TREETOPS) are assessed. Problem areas that limit accuracy or contribute to uncertainty in the modeling, simulation process are identified. As a specific case, the significance of including, or of not including, second-degree geometric nonlinearity in the elastic displacement field (foreshortening) is evaluated. Conclusions and recommendations are made concerning the direction future development should take to achieve higher-fidelity and more computationally efficient multibody software solutions.

Lips, K. W.↗

Squeeze flow and compaction behavior of toughened polyimide matrix composites

The main emphasis was placed upon the squeeze flow and compaction behavior of the Lewis Research Center (LaRC) research project series polyimide matrix composites. The measurement of squeeze film flow behavior was performed by a plastometer which monitors the change of thickness of a prepreg specimen laid between two parallel plates under the specified temperature and pressure history. A critical evaluation of the plastometer data was attempted by examining the morphology of the specimen at various points during the squeeze flow. The effects of crosslinks (Mc) of resin, imidization (B-ataging) condition, and pressure on the squeeze flow behavior were examined. Results are given.

Lee, Byung Lip↗

Comparison of ORSAT and SCARAB Reentry Analysis Tools for a Generic Satellite Test Case

Reentry analysis is essential to understanding the consequences of the full life cycle of a spacecraft. Since reentry is a key factor in spacecraft development, NASA and ESA have separately developed tools to assess the survivability of objects during reentry. Criteria such as debris casualty area and impact energy are particularly important to understanding the risks posed to people on Earth. Therefore, NASA and ESA have undertaken a series of comparison studies of their respective reentry codes for verification and improvements in accuracy. The NASA Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT) and the ESA Spacecraft Atmospheric Reentry and Aerothermal Breakup (SCARAB) reentry analysis tools serve as standard codes for reentry survivability assessment of satellites. These programs predict whether an object will demise during reentry and calculate the debris casualty area of objects determined to survive, establishing the reentry risk posed to the Earth's population by surviving debris. A series of test cases have been studied for comparison and the most recent uses "Testsat," a conceptual satellite composed of generic parts, defined to use numerous simple shapes and various materials for a better comparison of the predictions of these two codes. This study is an improvement on the others in this series because of increased consistency in modeling techniques and variables. The overall comparison demonstrated that the two codes arrive at similar results. Either most objects modeled resulted in close agreement between the two codes, or if the difference was significant, the variance could be explained as a case of semantics in the model definitions. This paper presents the main results of ORSAT and SCARAB for the Testsat case and discusses the sources of any discovered differences. Discussion of the results of previous comparisons is made for a summary of differences between the codes and lessons learned from this series of tests.

Kelley, Robert L.↗