Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “CASKS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2015

French management model for sustainable transportation of used fuel - 15376

Safe and efficient transportation of radioactive material is key to the success of our industry. Used fuel transports are inherently complex due to the nature of the material and the high visibility. Only a few countries have developed comprehensive used fuel transportation systems that require a wide range of equipment, services and expertise. In the many countries, such as the Unites States, where interim consolidated storage, recycling or geological repository are not available yet, similar systems will have to be implemented. For more than 50 years AREVA TN has safely shipped more than 7,000 used fuel transport casks. The transportation system that was initially developed in the 1970's has been adapted and enhanced over the years to meet more restrictive regulatory requirements and evolving customer needs, and to address public concerns. The numerous 'lessons learned' have offered data and guidance that have allowed for also efficient and consistent improvement over the decades. Based on AREVA TN extensive expertise, this paper will describe the different phases and milestones that need to be met to set up, license and operate a successful used fuel transportation management system. Transportation of spent fuel in France could not be performed effectively and efficiently without strong collaboration with Electricite de France (EDF) who plays a critical role as the shipper. EDF will provide a nuclear operator's perspective on the most critical aspects of a successful used fuel transportation program. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Developing generic design alternatives for dry storage of used nuclear fuel at an interim storage facility - 15480

The Department of Energy (DOE) is beginning to lay the groundwork for implementing interim storage of used nuclear fuel (UNF) as recommended by the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future in their report to the Secretary of Energy published on January 26, 2012. These plans include activities to 1) establish one or more Interim Storage Facilities (ISF) using consent-based siting, and 2) prepare for large-scale transport of UNF. The Administration released its Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (Strategy) on January 11, 2013. The Strategy includes a phased, adaptive, and consent-based approach to siting and implementing a comprehensive management and disposal system. The Strategy calls for an operational Pilot ISF by 2021, a Larger ISF by 2025, and a geological repository by 2048. The DOE Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project (NFST) prepared a report in April 2013 titled, -A Project Concept for Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation.- This report developed the functions and requirements necessary for development of a Pilot and Larger ISF to meet the framework outlined in the Strategy as follows: - The UNF inventory is limited for the Pilot and Larger ISF as described in the Strategy. - It is assumed that bare fuel will be received in reusable transportation casks in significant quantities for the larger ISF and will not be solely limited to the receipt of fuel in dry storage canister (DSC) as is the Pilot ISF. This assumption was made because the method for accepting UNF from the utilities once the larger ISF begins operating has not yet been decided. - UNF storage alternative concepts identified in previous reports must be more fully developed to support alternative analysis. The purpose of this topic is to report on the development of the generic design alternatives that have been evaluated for the receipt and storage of the UNF at the initial Pilot ISF and Larger ISF. The generic design alternatives have been developed over the past few months by collaboration between the DOE and industry experts experienced in UNF facilities. The design alternatives will enable volunteer host communities to investigate generic design alternatives that could be fully developed for a site-specific location based on their unique design requirements. The design alternatives provide flexibility for additional capabilities to be developed and executed in a modular fashion such that expansion from a Pilot ISF to a Larger ISF could be achieved in an orderly manner. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Streamlining analysis capabilities for SNF management - 15490

A comprehensive, integrated data and analysis tool-the Used Nuclear Fuel-Storage, Transportation and Disposal Analysis Resource and Data System (UNF-ST and DARDS) -is being developed for the US DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project (NFST). The overarching goal of UNF-ST and DARDS is to provide a comprehensive controlled source of technical data integrated with key analysis capabilities to characterize inputs to the overall US waste management system from reactor power production through ultimate disposition. UNF-ST and DARDS seamlessly integrates a unified SNF system relational database and key analysis capabilities to simplify and automate the performance of accurate and efficient SNF related analyses to support numerous DOE waste management and fuel cycle activities. Hence, UNF-ST and DARDS enables decision making relative to design, safety, and licensing of SNF systems and facilities by providing the best information available. Automated analysis sequences have been deployed to characterize the discharge inventory and perform criticality, thermal, and dose analyses using time-dependent data. UNF-ST and DARDS provides cask-specific as-loaded safety analysis including criticality, thermal and dose evaluations, as well as results visualization. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Preliminary evaluation of removing used nuclear fuel from shutdown sites - 15568

A preliminary evaluation of removing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from 12 shutdown nuclear power reactor sites was conducted. At these shutdown sites the nuclear power reactors have been permanently shut down and the sites have been decommissioned or are undergoing decommissioning. The shutdown sites were Maine Yankee, Yankee Rowe, Connecticut Yankee, Humboldt Bay, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Trojan, La Crosse, Zion, Crystal River, Kewaunee, and San Onofre. The evaluation was divided into four components: (1) characterization of the SNF and greater-than-Class C low-level radioactive waste (GTCC waste) inventory, (2) a description of the on-site infrastructure and conditions relevant to transportation of SNF and GTCC waste, (3) an evaluation of the near-site transportation infrastructure and experience relevant to shipping transportation casks containing SNF and GTCC waste, including identification of gaps in information, and (4) an evaluation of the actions necessary to prepare for and remove SNF and GTCC waste. Every site was found to have at least one off-site transportation mode option for removing its SNF and GTCC waste; some have multiple options. Experience removing large components during reactor decommissioning provided an important source of information used to identify the transportation mode options for the sites. Especially important in conducting the evaluation were site visits, through which information was obtained that would not have been available otherwise. Extensive photographs taken during the site visits proved to be particularly useful in documenting the current conditions at or near the sites. It is expected that additional site visits will be conducted to add to the information presented in the evaluation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Preliminary Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel from Shutdown Sites - An Update - 16057

An updated preliminary evaluation of removing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from 13 shutdown nuclear power reactor sites was conducted. At these shutdown sites the nuclear power reactors have been permanently shut down and the sites have been decommissioned or are undergoing decommissioning. The shutdown sites were Maine Yankee, Yankee Rowe, Connecticut Yankee, Humboldt Bay, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Trojan, La Crosse, Zion, Crystal River, Kewaunee, San Onofre, and Vermont Yankee. The evaluation was divided into four components: (1) characterization of the SNF and greater-than-Class C low-level radioactive waste (GTCC waste) inventory, (2) a description of the on-site infrastructure and conditions relevant to transportation of SNF and GTCC waste, (3) an evaluation of the near-site transportation infrastructure and experience relevant to shipping transportation casks containing SNF and GTCC waste, including identification of gaps in information, and (4) an evaluation of the actions necessary to prepare for and remove SNF and GTCC waste. Every site was found to have at least one off-site transportation mode option for removing its SNF and GTCC waste; some have multiple options. Experience removing large components during reactor decommissioning provided an important source of information used to identify the transportation mode options for the sites. Especially important in conducting the evaluation were site visits, through which information was obtained that would not have been available otherwise. Extensive photographs taken during the site visits proved to be particularly useful in documenting the current conditions at or near the sites. It is expected that additional site visits will be conducted to add to the information presented in the evaluation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Coupling the Modeled Structural Transmissibility of a Used Nuclear Fuel Conveyance to Over the Road Data - 16215

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology, has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct research and development activities related to storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). The mission of the UFDC is to identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel and HLW generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The Storage and Transportation staff within the UFDC is responsible for addressing issues regarding the long-term or extended storage (ES) of UNF and its subsequent transportation. Current information is insufficient to determine the ability of UNF, including high-burnup fuel, to withstand shock and vibration loads that could occur when UNF is shipped by rail from nuclear power plant sites to a storage or disposal facility after extended storage. In order to make this determination, the magnitude of the transportation loads transmitted to the UNF must be quantified. Previous preliminary modeling work has shown how the structural transmissibility of the transport system can affect the magnitude of these loads and the importance of modeling all aspects of the transport system (i.e. rail car, transport cradle, cask, canister, and fuel). The work presented herein proposes a methodology for determining the structural transmissibility of a hypothetical transport system, and conditions existing over the road test (OTR) data to predict the performance of the hypothetical system. This method utilizes the modeled frequency response of the hypothetical system to scale the existing OTR acceleration data. This work will be relevant in creating models of a UNF conveyance during transport. As such, preliminary work in coupling the rail vehicle dynamics code NUCARS{sup C}, a general purpose multi-body rail vehicle dynamics simulation package developed by Transportation Technology Center Inc. (TTCI), to existing models of UNF during transport are also discussed herein. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

An Evaluation of Standardized Canisters in the Waste Management System - 16317

Development of a standardized canister system represents an opportunity to develop an integrated approach to addressing storage, transportation, and disposal issues in the waste management system. However, regardless of timing and method, deployment of such a system would have the potential to cause significant system-wide impacts. This evaluation expands upon previous standardized-canister system evaluations and compares continued loading of dual-purpose canisters (i.e., the status quo) with loading of standardized canister systems in the near term, that is, before repository requirements are known and/or before operating reactors shut down. This evaluation quantitatively compares order-of-magnitude costs and logistics for different standardization scenarios with those of status quo scenarios, provides insight into quantifiable impacts of loading standardized canister systems in the near term, tests system-level analysis tools and associated input, and identifies scenarios for further analysis. This is a technical paper that does not take into account the contractual limitations under the Standard Contract (10 CFR Part 961). As work on assessing standardized canister system scenarios has progressed, new data for at-reactor and interim storage facility (ISF) operations have been collected and/or generated to provide more realism at the system level, and past scenarios were re-evaluated with this new information. In addition, new scenarios were developed and analyzed that focused on (1) bare fuel transported from reactors to an ISF in re-usable bare fuel casks and deferring deployment of a standardized canister system to the ISF, (2) alternative acceptance strategies based on conclusions from previous systems architecture studies, and (3) the impacts of having to accommodate spent fuel in differently sized canisters for different potential repository geologies. Results of this evaluation indicate that shifting the loading of standardized canisters from the reactor to the ISF does not result in a significant change in total system cost. Results also show that some alternative acceptance strategies could reduce the number of years that spent nuclear fuel (SNF) stays on-site at reactors for cases involving standardized canisters (consistent with previous results that looked at dual-purpose canisters). Finally, incorporating the new at-reactor loading data of small standardized canisters shows a significant system-wide cost reduction when compared to previous estimates of at-reactor loading of small canisters. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Waste Management Processing Projects in the PRC - 16551

EnergySolutions continues to provide waste treatment solutions in the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). In 2015 ES had completed installation of systems at two different Nuclear power sites (Haiyang, an AP-1000{sup TM} site and Yangjiang, a CPR1000 site). This paper discusses progress on these two projects, and provides new information regarding the operation of the systems. The Yangjiang project became operational in the fall of 2015 while the Haiyang project will be done is nearly done with commissioning and is waiting for reactor operations. Haiyang Project: In the Shandong Province on China's northeast coast, EnergySolutions, as part of a consortium with China Power Investment (CPI) and Yuanda Environmental Protection Engineering Company (a PRC state-owned company), has designed and constructed the site's Site Rad Waste Treatment Facility (SRTF). The SRTF provides solid waste processing services for up to 8 AP-1000s{sup TM}. The SRTF performs the following functions: 1. Five year storage for HICs containing spent resin and filters from the nuclear power plants' waste liquid systems (WLS); 2. Sorting and Compaction System for solid waste generated from Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) operations. This system implements: a) Real time radiography to screen 200 liter waste drums for prohibited items, b) Pre-compaction, c) High Resolution Gamma Spectrophotometry (HRGS) for waste characterization, d) Supercompaction, e) Solidification of compacted drums inside overpack drums which are filled with 60 MPa compressive strength grout, and f) Automatic drum lidding which crimps the drum lid to the drum body. 3. Laundry services for NPP anti-contamination clothing. 4. At the nuclear islands, EnergySolutions is providing mobile liquid waste processing systems that utilize EnergySolutions Advanced Liquid Processing System ALPS{sup TM}/Advanced Injection Method System AIM{sup TM} processing systems to supplement the NPP's WLS system when radionuclide concentrations exceed release criteria. The spent resins and filters from the nuclear power plants are placed in EnergySolutions supplied HICs, dewatered using EnergySolutions Self Engaging Dewatering System (SEDS{sup TM}), and then placed in EnergySolutions 8-120B Type B cask for the transport of the HIC between the NPP and the SRTF and, ultimately, to a disposal site once it is ready for operations Yangjiang Project: EnergySolutions is providing liquid waste treatment system (TEU) and solid waste treatment system (TES) for Yangjiang units 3 and 4 for the China Nuclear Power Engineering Company (CNPEC). The Yangjiang site is located approximately 300 kilometers west of Hong Kong. The TEU system processes floor drain, chemical drain, and process drain tanks liquids to achieve a release concentration less than 37 Bq/l. The TES system receives spent resin and filters into HIC containers which are dewatered and subsequently transported to the Yangjiang sites QT building where they are stored for a period of up to 5 years or until a disposal site are available. TEU (Liquid waste treatment) consists of the following unit operations: - ALPS{sup TM}/AIM{sup TM} system, which includes two separate 8 vessel water treatment systems that consist of granular activated carbon (GAC), cation, anion ion and mixed bed media ion exchange (IX) columns; and: - A reverse osmosis system for final polishing, - TES (solid waste system), - SEDS (Self Engaging Dewatering System), - Shielding for the loading and storage of HICs, - Shielded transport container for the transfer of HIC to the QT building for storage, - Shielded transfer bell for the transport of spent filters from the NPP operating area to HIC. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Validation of MVP code with HTC critical experiments

In the 1980's, a series of high burnups critical experiments (HTC) was conducted at the Apparatus B experimental facility in Valduc with the support of the IRSN and AREVA NC. Four series of experiments were designed to assess profit associated with actinide-only burn-up credit in the criticality safety analysis for fuel handling (Phases 1 and 2), pool storage (Phase 3) and spent fuel cask (Phase 4) conditions. The HTC rods, specifically fabricated for the experiments, were designed to simulate a typical pressurized water reactor uranium oxide spent fuel. In order to validate the MVP-2.0 code and relatively new nuclear data libraries for the criticality safety analysis, the HTC critical experiments were analyzed using the MVP-2.0 code with JENDL-4.0, ENDF/B-VII.1 or JEFF-3.2. The effective neutron multiplication factor k{sub eff} values were obtained through analyses of all phases of the HTC experiments. It was shown that averaged values of k{sub eff} using JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1 were in good agreement with experimental results for all the phases, while those using JEFF-3.2 showed slight underestimation. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

A Novel Mobile Examination and Remediation Facility for On-Site Remediation of Dry Storage Systems - 18389

Most of the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in dry storage in the United States is safely and securely stored in dual-purpose (i.e., storage and transportation) canisters [1]. However, some of the SNF is stored in storage-only (i.e., non-transportable) packages, or packages that may become nonconforming for continued storage or transportation for a variety of reasons. Currently, the capability to remediate dry storage systems (DSSs) for SNF that are not transportable or that need to be repaired to maintain confinement boundary integrity during storage service does not exist without on-site access to a spent fuel pool. Hence, there is a potential future need for a mobile facility with remediation capabilities that can be used at multiple storage installations. These capabilities would permit needed repairs to an existing DSS to support continued storage or for the dry transfer of fuel to a new conveyance suitable for transport, if necessary. This is a technical paper that does not take into account the contractual limitations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). Under the provisions of the Standard Contract, DOE does not consider spent nuclear fuel in canisters to be an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed to contract amendment. To the extent discussions or recommendations in this paper conflict with the provisions of the Standard Contract, the Standard Contract provisions prevail. A novel design concept for a Mobile Examination and Remediation Facility (MERF) is proposed with functions and capabilities to remediate a DSS. The proposed MERF would be a multi-purpose facility, remotely operated and computer-controlled with semi-automated equipment to allow trained operators to safely perform remediation activities while keeping worker radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable. It would include a shielded rotating platform with support towers and would use commercial off- the-shelf examination and repair equipment. A slip ring arrangement underneath the rotating platform would allow for the power supply without impeding the continuous rotation and would simplify cable management. The support towers would be mounted on the rotating platform, and each tower would have vertical and horizontal positioning capability for axial and radial tool location. The rotating platform would be attached to the main MERF structure. Capabilities would include visual, surface, and volumetric examinations to fully characterize physical conditions on canister surface before and after a repair; repair techniques, e.g., laser beam welding, friction stir welding, or cold spray, to perform needed remediation activities; and associated equipment for surface preparation such as cutting and grinding equipment. The proposed design would be simple, modular, robust, economically viable, and easily transportable and would have a small footprint. The modular design would present several advantages including compatibility with a variety of different DSSs, on-site assembly, and transportability; it also would be built in interchangeable sections to facilitate decontamination. Further, shielding would be supplemented through interface with the existing transfer cask and storage overpack. Robustness and canister stability would be achieved using pneumatic holders and steel support structures designed with vibration absorbers to reduce impacts and/or a 'pendulum' effect during a seismic event. Thus, the proposed MERF would be designed to: (i) minimize handling of an affected DSS to the extent practicable, (ii) provide radiation shielding and minimize dose to operators and the public during remediation activities, and (iii) enable examination, repair, and repackaging. This paper describes the proposed MERF design concept and capabilities, main components, equipment, different modes of operation, and operating procedures. Structural and safety assessments would need to be performed before final design, licensing, and deployment. The MERF is evaluated with respect to regulatory impact (first of a kind, prior experience), operational impact (safety, security, staffing, ongoing operations, constraints), worker dose (low, medium, high), cost (low, medium, high), schedule (duration, time sequence), and technology readiness level. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Design and Licensing of Irradiated Uranyl Nitrate Liquid Containers and Applicable Loading and Packaging System - 18481

Irradiated highly enriched uranyl nitrate liquid (HEUNL) solutions are typically residual materials resulting from the processing of uranium target materials in the production of radioisotopes. Traditionally, these residual materials have been processed and stored at the site of origin, due to the lack of an option for packaging, transportation and disposition. Modern alternatives to process, stabilize, package and dispose of these materials have been developed, but until recently there has not been a viable Type B package solution that could be used to ship these materials in sufficient quantities to justify the cost of an off-site disposition strategy. For this reason, most facilities that generate irradiated HEUNL materials have implemented on-site storage tanks or containers, resulting in the significant accumulation of HEUNL inventories worldwide. This paper provides an overview of the design and licensing activities for the development of sealed irradiated HEUNL transport containers to permit safe transportation of this material in the NAC Legal Weight Truck (NAC-LWT) cask. A description of the robust HEUNL container, licensing and fabrication is also presented. In addition, NAC has developed a specialized loading system to optimize the process to load, package and un-package HEUNL materials to minimize worker exposure during loading, and execute the packaging process efficiently for safe transport and retrieval. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Richard Hodes Memorial Award Lecture - Development and Certification of New Type-B Containers for the Recovery of High-Activity Sealed Sources - 18710

The US Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Off-Site Source Recovery Program (OSRP) has successfully completed a project to design, test, and certify two new Type-B transportation packages. Since about 2011 a shortage of these containers has significantly constrained the recovery and disposal of commercially licensed high activity radioactive sealed sources. These new packages will enable NNSA/OSRP to transport a majority of the high-activity Cs-137 and Co-60 devices encountered in the coming years and decades. The 435-B is an unshielded, leak-tight container, which can be used to ship common shielded devices, such as the teletherapy source drawers and irradiators that contain high-activity Co-60 and Cs-137 sources. The 380-B is a much larger, leak-tight, lead-shielded Type B cask capable of transport by truck, rail, ship, or air. Additionally, to encourage and facilitate the development of transportation capacity, DOE/NNSA intends to make the design documentation available at no cost to commercial vendors. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy's Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Planning Project

The U.S. Department Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) is laying the groundwork for implementing interim storage, including associated transportation, per the Administration's Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High- Level Radioactive Waste, and to develop a foundation for a new nuclear waste management organization. The organization within DOE-NE that is responsible for this planning is the Office of Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation (NFST). The technical work to support this planning effort is being conducted by DOE's national laboratories. DOE's overarching goal is to develop options for decision-makers on the design of an integrated waste management system. The goal is to develop an integrated plan to (1) implement interim storage; (2) improve the overall integration of storage as a planned part of the waste management system; (3) prepare for the large-scale transportation of SNF and high-level waste (HLW), with an initial focus on removing SNF from the shutdown reactor sites; and (4) develop the foundational information, resources, and capabilities needed to support future implementation decisions and actions. Near-term objectives are to (1) develop and maintain an integrated plan to accomplish the Administration's Strategy goals, (2) improve integration of storage as a planned part of the waste management system, (including evaluating standardization of dry cask storage systems), (3) develop and evaluate design options for an integrated waste management system, (4) develop and apply systems analyses to provide quantitative estimates of system impacts of utility actions' impacts on the system and inform future decisions, (5) prepare for the large-scale transportation of SNF and HLW, (with an initial focus on removing SNF from the shutdown reactor sites), and (6) establish and maintain a unified, integrated SNF database and analysis system to characterize the input to the waste management system. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Fission Gases in Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analysis

Historically all fission products, including fission gases have been included in the criticality analysis of many spent fuel pools (SFP). For transport casks ISG-8 Rev. 3 states, 'Credit for neutron absorbing isotopes other than those identified in Tables 1 and 2 should be accompanied by assurance that such isotopes are non-volatile, and non-gaseous,..' Recent questions from the NRC have challenged using fission gases in spent fuel pool criticality analyses, noting that the time the fuel is contained in the spent fuel pool can be long. This paper establishes a conservative approach for using some of the fission gases in the criticality analysis. Calculations have been performed for Indian Point Unit 2 to determine the impact of the fission gas release. The calculations have been run with the noble gases reduced by 32%, the halogens reduced by 10% and the Rb reduced by 44%. At 43 GWd/MTU, the impact of reducing the isotopes described here is only 0.0014 in k. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Overview of the US Nuclear Science User Facilities

Specialized and often unique and expensive instrumentation, adapted for use on radioactive materials, is essential to conduct research in the area of nuclear energy. Much of this equipment is located in facilities dedicated for such work that have been built and maintained over many decades. The Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) was established in 2007 under the US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) in order to bring these capabilities together with those innovative ideas from researchers at universities, national laboratories, small business, and industry that might not have regular access to reactors, hot cells, transportation casks, radiologically qualified instrumentation, and associated expertise. Early descriptions of the originally named Advanced Test Reactor National Scientific User Facility have been given. Through a competitively reviewed proposal process, the NSUF offers access to these capabilities and expertise at no cost to the user to promote research that will address the mission of DOE-NE. As a national organization comprised of a number of partner facilities across the US and located at National Laboratory, university, and industry sites, the NSUF supports materials science studies directed at irradiation effects in nuclear fuels and materials as well as in-pile and post irradiation examination (PIE) instrumentation development. The NSUF has created a Nuclear Fuels and Materials Library (NFML) of previously irradiated materials that users may access for their studies. Expanding the library for future applications of advanced technologies and novel concepts is an important objective of the NSUF. The NSUF has established and maintains the Nuclear Energy Infrastructure Database (NEID) as a tool for both DOE-NE and the nuclear energy research community. The extensive catalogue of capabilities is intended to aid DOE-NE, NSUF, and researchers more effectively and efficiently utilize the available capabilities. (authors)

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Perspectives on Previous DOE Transportation Acquisition Efforts - 19049

The Department of Energy (DOE) is planning for future large-scale transport of commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) and High-Level Radioactive Waste (HLW) to eventual disposal and/or storage facilities. Various options for procuring transportation services are being evaluated. To inform this work, a review of past comments received on DOE transportation acquisition activities in the early 1990's through 2016 was conducted. Through the course of data collection, staff analyzed comments submitted from ten DOE initiatives from DoE's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) and DoE's Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE). This paper summarizes and outlines key themes arising from these comments. Past issues identified by a wide variety of commenters (nuclear industry and cask vendors, nuclear utilities and purchasers, states, Tribes, local governments, rail carriers, nongovernmental organizations, trade organizations, engineering firms, and members of the public) were examined. These issues concerned DoE's activities to make maximum use of the private sector to transport and store SNF and HLW. The key themes analyzed include: Uniqueness of the Shipping Campaign, Views on Privatization, Industry Risk and Privatization, Unclear Roles and Responsibilities, and Responsibilities Recommended for DOE to Maintain. This paper concludes by discussing lessons that can be learned from analyzing these public comments and what that may mean moving forward in the U.S. radioactive waste management program. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Execution Strategy Analysis (ESA) Origin Sites Readiness Model - 19073

This is a technical paper that does not take into account the contractual limitations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). Under the provisions of the Standard Contract, DOE does not consider spent nuclear fuel in multi-assembly canisters to be an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed to contract amendment. To the extent discussions or recommendations in this paper conflict with the provisions of the Standard Contract, the Standard Contract provisions prevail. The DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition (SFWD) Integrated Waste Management System (IWMS) program is developing an Execution Strategy Analysis (ESA) Origin Sites Readiness Model using the Goldsim{sup TM} software application to provide information on potential future approaches for removing SNF and HLW from origin sites such as commercial nuclear power plant sites. The purpose of this ESA model is to apply integrated waste management system analysis, system engineering, and decision analysis principles to inform future decisions regarding potential future nuclear waste management system architectures. The ESA Origin Sites Readiness Model is a dynamic simulation modeling capability. It is developed for use in the analysis and comparison of potential future implementation strategies associated with an integrated nuclear waste management program. The model is designed to be independent of the destination of the SNF or HLW so the results from the Origin Sites Readiness Model are equally applicable to a wide range of scenarios involving shipments to generic destinations in an integrated waste management system. The model explicitly takes significant assumptions, uncertainties, and risks into account. Currently, the ESA Origin Sites Readiness Model includes 14 shutdown sites (Maine Yankee, Yankee Rowe, Connecticut Yankee, Vermont Yankee, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Zion, Kewaunee, Fort Calhoun, Trojan, Rancho Seco, Humboldt Bay, San Onofre, and Crystal River) and is designed to be modular so that other sites can be added in the future. The model also includes multiple transportation modes (heavy haul truck, rail, and barge), activities related to the acquisition of transportation assets such as railcars and transportation casks, and site-specific considerations of on-site and near-site transportation infrastructure. The model was developed using the ESA process with Subject Matter Experts (SME); it incorporates uncertainty and risks and provides a structured, systematic methodology for evaluating potential SNF campaign scenarios. The model also complements other system-level logistics tools being developed by SFWD. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Alternate Packaging Options for Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste Disposal at WIPP - 19093

Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (Sandia) began a remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) repackaging campaign two weeks before the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) shutdown in February 2014. Since a contract with Nuclear Waste Partnerships (NWP), the WIPP Management and Operation (M and O) contractor, was already in place for certified visual examination (VE) and dose-to-curie (DTC) support, repackaging continued and was completed in October 2015. Twenty-five 55-gallon drums of RH TRU waste were packaged, awaiting certification and shipment to WIPP. However, in February 2017 at the National TRU Program (NTP) Corporate Board meeting, Sandia learned that RH TRU waste normally transported in removable lid canisters (RLCs) and 72-B casks was not being accepted for disposal when WIPP re-opened after the shutdown. One option, shielded container assemblies (SCAs), was available and approved for RH TRU waste disposal at the WIPP. Sandia made the decision to pursue the use of SCAs. The use of SCAs allow RH TRU waste to be shipped as contact-handled (CH) in HalfPACTs, emplaced on the floor of the WIPP instead of in boreholes in the walls, if the dose rate is less than 200 millirem/hour on contact. The RH TRU waste remains on the WIPP inventory as RH. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗