IEEE39_IBL_Dataset
IEEE39 with IBL modified system EMT dataset.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
IEEE39 with IBL modified system EMT dataset.
Dataset for EMT simulation of IEEE 39-bus + IBL
Datasets for the calculations reported in "Role of electron correlation on the adenine dimer interaction for non-equilibrium geometries: A benchmark Quantum Monte Carlo study" by L. Washburn, A. Sedova, P. R. C. Kent. J. Chem. Phys. (2026) 165 (5): 054118. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0332651. Includes the molecular geometries, QMCPACK, PySCF, and ORCA inputs and outputs, analysis scripts and files needed to reproduce all the figures and tables.
Emulation through pattern scaling is a well-established method of rapidly producing climate fields (like temperature or precipitation) from existing Earth System Model (ESM) output that, while inaccurate, is often useful for a variety of downstream purposes. Conducting pattern scaling has historically been a laborious process, in large part due to the increasing volume of ESM output data that has often required downloading and storing locally to train on. Here we describe the Pangeo-Enabled ESM Pattern Scaling (PEEPS) dataset, a repository of trained annual and monthly patterns from CMIP6 outputs. This manuscript describes and validates these updated patterns so that users can save effort calculating and reporting error statistics in manuscripts focused on the use of patterns. The trained patterns are available as NetCDF files on Zenodo for ease of use in the impact community, and are reproducible with the code provided via GitHub in both Jupyter notebook and Python script formats. Because all training data for the PEEPS data set is cloud-based, users do not need to download and house the ESM output data to reproduce the patterns in the zenodo archive, should that be more efficient. Validating the PEEPS data set on the CMIP6 archive for annual and monthly temperature, precipitation, and near-surface relative humidity, pattern scaling performs well over a variety of future scenarios except for regions in which there are strong, potentially nonlinear climate feedbacks. Although pattern scaling is normally conducted on annual mean ESM output data, it works equally well on monthly mean ESM output data. We identify several downstream applications of the PEEPS data set, including impacts assessment and evaluating certain types of Earth system uncertainties.
The submission includes the labeled datasets, as ESRI Grid files (.gri, .grd) used for training and classification results for our machine leaning model: - brady_som_output.gri, brady_som_output.grd, brady_som_output.* - desert_som_output.gri, desert_som_output.grd, desert_som_output.* The data corresponds to two sites: Brady Hot Springs and Desert Peak, both located near Fallon, NV. Input layers include: - Geothermal: Labeled data (0: Non-geothermal; 1: Geothermal) - Minerals: Hydrothermal mineral alterations, as a result of spectral analysis using Chalcedony, Kaolinite, Gypsum, Hematite and Epsomite - Temperature: Land surface temperature (% of times a pixel was classified as "Hot" by K-Means) - Faults: Fault density with a 300mradius - Subsidence: PSInSAR results showing subsidence displacement of more than 5mm - Uplift: PSInSAR results showing subsidence displacement of more than 5mm Also, the results of the classification using Brady and Desert Peak to build 2 Convolutional Neural Networks. These were applied to the training site as well as the other site, the results are in GeoTiff format. - brady_classification: Results of classification of the Brady-trained model - desert_classification: Results of classification of the Desert Peak-trained model - b2d_classification: Results of classification of Desert Peak using the Brady-trained model - d2b_classification: Results of classification of Brady using the Desert Peak-trained model
Current data from the AFDC provide locations and many details about EV charging stations, but not estimates of their peak loads or the number of vehicles they can accommodate. This dataset will augment the AFDC charging station locations with estimates of transmission load and vehicle throughput based on engineering specifications of the chargers, charging patterns based on vehicle types, battery capacities, and user behavior.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
For more than 20 years, Argonne National Laboratory’s Vehicle & Mobility Systems Department has assessed how R&D investments by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Transportation Technologies Office and Alternative Fuels and Feedstocks Office affect vehicle energy use and cost. The analyses are performed using Autonomie, Argonne’s full-vehicle simulation tool for energy consumption, performance, and cost. The study covers five time frames ranging from present day through 2050, with more than 30 vehicle classes and applications (10 light duty and >20 medium and heavy duty), as well as six powertrain configurations (conventional, start-stop, hybrid electric vehicle, plug-in hybrid electric vehicle, battery-electric vehicle, and fuel cell electric vehicle) and five fuels (gasoline, diesel, natural gas, hydrogen, and electricity). Low and high technology uncertainty scenarios have been considered to capture a realistic range of outcomes. The resulting datasets include the assumptions used (i.e., efficiency, $/kWh), vehicle-level data (power, energy, weight, and cost), and outputs such as energy consumption, manufacturer’s suggested retail price, and total cost of ownership. These data are critical to stakeholders working in transportation, technology assessment, and long-term R&D planning.