Using Secondary Craters to Assess Strength Differences Between Neighboring Surface Units
Introduction: An issue with Martian remote sensing studies is the difficulty directly inferring surface and crustal material properties. For direct measurements we currently rely on the instruments of landed missions, like InSight. However, these are limited to specific locations (i.e., Elysium Planitia for InSight). To understand how results from in situ missions apply to other parts of Mars’ crust, we would like to apply a methodology that uses remote sensing. We are exploring using secondary craters, which are often thought of as nuisances when finding accurate relative ages, to get at these properties. An upside of secondary craters is that they form by ejecta blocks moving at relatively slow speeds (compared to primary impacts), which lets them reside in a different crater scaling regime [1], one that is more sensitive to the crust’s effective strength (Yeff) and its porosity. Secondary Crater Scaling: There are multiple parameters that influence the size of secondary craters, but we can measure craters in ways that isolate the dependence of crater size to just Yeff. We focus on secondary clusters that have impacted into distinct but bordering geological units. These secondaries can be used to determine Yeff thanks to one important fact: all the secondaries in this cluster are from the same distant primary, and as a result, the ejecta velocity, median block sizes, and densities are expected to be the same (at least to first order). Thus, variations between crater size on the two units are due to material property differences (i.e. Yeff). Thanks to the steep size frequency distributions (SFD) of secondaries [2], observable secondary crater sizes are tightly clustered, and we can simply use differences in median secondary sizes between two geologic units to constrain the ratio of Yeff. We are also able to use the SFD of our counting areas to check if our counted craters are secondaries (i.e. have a steep distribution), and if the two crater counting areas are from the same source (and thus have the same power law slope), but are offset from each other at around the same factor as the median difference.