Rapid Development of Instrument Thermal Models: Perspectives and Guidelines from NASA Goddard’s Instrument Design Laboratory
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Kan Yang↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Guidelines”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Rapid Development of Instrument Thermal Models: Perspectives and Guidelines from NASA Goddard’s Instrument Design Laboratory
- The design and development of robotic spaceflight instruments is a critical part of NASA’s vision to discover and expand knowledge for the benefit of humanity - For typical flight instrument projects, thermal engineers will develop initial instrument thermal models over weeks or months, then iterate them over a project’s lifespan – In each iteration, the engineer will: - Refine their thermal models and thermal designs in accordance with updates from other subsystems - Perform trade studies - Solve very detailed and complex analysis problems, including worst-cases and contingencies - Pick hardware and plan for testing and integration - However, prior to a project being established, or for proposal development at an early conceptual stage, the luxury of multiple instrument design iterations may be limited or nonexistent – Within a short timeline, how do you complete a thermal model or explore multiple possible instrument configurations? – What are the critical parameters for your model? Which details do you include or leave out?
Kan Yang↗
Certification Guidelines For Crewed Inflatable Softgoods Structures
To help guide NASA and industry in the development and certification of crewed softgoods structures, this document details the fundamental testing, data, and documents recommended for the evaluation of a softgoods inflatable designed for crewed occupation in a space environment. This is not a requirements document but supports NASA-imposed standards used for certification. This document is intended to support and guide the development of programmatic requirements to demonstrate a design has followed a systematic and comprehensive design, fabrication, and test program.
softgoods↗
Operational Implications from Field Test Results: Sensorimotor Guidelines for Exploration Missions
Two key sensorimotor objectives of the joint NASA-Russian Field Test (FT) study were (1) to quantify functional performance on long duration crewmembers as close to landing as possible, and (2) to develop a recovery timeline back to preflight baseline. The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the FT results and discuss the operational implications for future exploration missions. The NASA and Russian teams conducted a total of 48 Field Tests, including 18 using a reduced Pilot FT (PFT) protocol. The combined PFT/FT cohort included 14 first-time fliers, 4F, and nine cosmonauts who repeated FT during a second mission. The mission durations were 185 ± 42 days, mean ± std. Nominally, the initial postflight session was performed in the medical test at the Soyuz landing site or at the nearby airport (R+2.2 ± 1.3 hrs, mean ± std), and then repeated multiple times throughout the postflight recovery. The common tasks performed across PFT and full FT protocols included sit-to-stand, recovery from fall (prone to stand) and tandem walk, performed in that order of increasing difficulty. The full FT protocol also included seated tasks (eccentric gaze, dysmetria finger to nose, eye-hand coordination on a tablet, grip force discrimination), a standing posture test with an upper body perturbation, a timed up and go mobility test with obstacles, and a dynamic visual acuity task during vertical oscillations. While there was considerable variability in the postflight outcome measures across crewmembers, the level of vestibular/cerebellar and sensorimotor impairment was greater than previously observed during shorter spaceflight missions. Most striking was the higher incidence of motion sickness even without constraining the standard medical interventions. Motion sensitivity prevented some crewmembers from attempting and/or completing the early testing. The recovery timeline varied with task complexity, generally taking longer when either the basis of support was limited (e.g., tandem walk) or visual cues were deprived (eyes closed). Based on this evidence, mission planners need to expect a range of response across individuals and tasks following G-transitions. Individual health assessments are recommended along with development of pre-worked, prioritized content and timelines, with the ability to change roles depending on crew readiness. Handholds and balance aids are recommended to help stabilize the crewmembers to perform specific tasks (e.g., touch screen selection) or to allow the crewmember the ability to rest with onset of symptoms. Based on anecdotal reports and performance on computerized dynamic posturography, multiple testing on landing day appeared to be beneficial for some participants, while others may have pushed beyond their motion tolerance limit in an effort to complete more FT objectives. Instead of delaying planetary surface operations to allow for recovery, our results suggest that early mobility may be important. Early active self-administered retraining, individualized based on the level of initial impairment and motion sensitivity, will enable a more efficient motor learning and enhance crew performance.
S J Wood↗
Electric Propulsion Qualification Guidelines and Best Practices for NASA Small Spacecraft Missions
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Thomas Liu↗
Additional Metadata Guidelines to Improve the Structure and Usability of HDF and NetCDF Files
The Hierarchical Data Format (HDF) and Network Common Data Form (NetCDF) are data file formats created to aid users in the creation or use of scientific data. These file formats are useful for handling large data volumes and hosting extensive metadata as global attributes or variables and are popular with the modeling community. HDF and NetCDF files are largely used with remote sensing data and have been used to support measurements from numerous campaigns, from satellite to aircraft or ground and mobile based measurements. The files from airborne field studies, however, vary greatly in terms of the file structure and the amount and content of metadata. Information relevant to the file that can be useful to the user such as the data producer, location where data was taken, variable descriptions, or information about the instrument might not be included in the file. This metadata might be present in another file in the dataset containing the same data using the International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation (ICARTT) format. Recently, the Aerosols, Clouds, and their Interactions for Earth System Models (MACIE) group started a grassroots effort to develop a set of requirements for the HDF and NetCDF files for field studies, aiming to make the data products more interoperable and usable. Particularly, these requirements seek to make the files more compliant to Climate and Forecast (CF) metadata conventions and to standardize the file structure and the global and variable attributes. These requirements would help to ensure that HDF and NetCDF files contain adequate metadata to better support their use for research, e.g., the modeling community, and to enhance the usability and interoperability of data for research communities at large. To be presented are the details of the MACIE requirements as well as examples of the implementation of these requirements for merge files and lidar observation data files.
Sean Leavor↗
Guidelines for Mapping Reliably Detectable Dye Penetrant Crack Size at External Corners with Fillet Radii
The technical memorandum addresses some concerns with dye penetrant crack sizes stated in Table 1 (and Table 2) of NASA-STD-5009B. Table 1 corner crack size of a = 0.100” and c = 0.150” is reasoned to be larger than it should be based on the original Standard dye penetrant qualification. In the original Standard dye penetrant qualification, surface crack size with depth a = 0.075” x length 2c = 0.150” was qualified with minimum 90% Probability of Detection (POD) with 95% confidence (conf.). No corner crack size was qualified by direct POD testing in original dye penetrant qualification. Standard dye penetrant detectable crack size for radiused corner is not addressed in NASA-STD-5009B.
Dye Penetrant Testing↗
Guidelines for Determining X-ray Shots for Inspection of Cylindrical Parts
For reliable detection of Standard size crack for x-ray radiography, NASA-STD-5009 requires that x-ray angle shall be within +/-5 deg. of assumed crack plane at the point of x-ray intersection with crack. Equations for calculation of shot length and number of shots on a girth weld of a cylindrical part are provided to meet this requirement for selected cases of x-ray set-ups. Crack plane is assumed to be radial-axial with respect to the part geometry. Limit angles other than +/-5 deg. may be chosen. These equations can be used to interpret limit x-ray angle requirements to calculate corresponding shot length and number of shots on a cylindrical part. If certain percent (5-10%) overlap is needed, then the limit angle used in the calculations should be decreased by that percentage so that the overlap area meets the limit angle requirements.
Ajay M Koshti↗
Gateway Small Satellite Deployment Approval Guidelines
The issue of small payloads released from Gateway may become a concern for the space users' community. Man-made objects can stay in the same or crossing orbit for a long time, creating significant hazard for Gateway, other users and sites on the surface of the Moon. It is important to coordinate efforts between organizations and agencies to ensure that Gateway operates safely.
Evgeny V. Menkin↗
Guidelines on Deploying Small Satellites from Gateway
The issue of small payloads released from Gateway may become a concern for the space users' community. Man-made objects can stay in the same or crossing orbit for a long time, creating significant hazard for Gateway, other users and sites on the surface of the Moon. It is important to coordinate efforts between organizations and agencies to ensure that Gateway operates safely. The purpose of this paper is to outline the Gateway Program approach for evaluating the deployment of candidate research payloads from Gateway Modules and/or Visiting Vehicles (VV) docked to the Gateway or vehicles/modules on the route to/from the Gateway.
Evgeny Victor Menkin↗
Status Update on the Pulsed Laser Single Event Effects SEE Test Guideline Desk Reference - A NASA-NRL Collaboration
No abstract provided
Allen, Greg↗
Guidelines for Testing of Polymer Tantalum Capacitors
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
tantalum polymer capacitors↗
Guidelines for Schlieren Systems at Langley Research Center
The original Langley Working Paper (LWP 448) published on July 27th, 1967, provided guidance to NASA Langley Research Center personnel on how to set up conventional path-integrated schlieren flow visualization systems and what pitfalls could be expected with such setups. The guidance and information contained in the document continues to be used for schlieren setups at NASA Langley Research Center to this day.
Schlieren↗
Thermal Environments and Margin Guidelines for NASA’s X-57 “Maxwell” Flight Demonstrator
NASA’s X-57 project includes development and flight demonstration of new electrified propulsion systems and equipment. The system components are designed to operate without active thermal management, which places increased emphasis on the ambient conditions as well as environmental stress screening for the newly designed equipment. Since the X-57 will not be operated outside of the Dryden Aeronautical Test Range at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center, the X-57 team developed a series of reference atmospheres, described in this paper, based on the 2019 Edwards Range Reference Atmosphere to guide system development and testing. These four reference atmospheres include a standard day reference atmosphere that is identical to the 1976 U. S. Standard Atmosphere, a mean operational day atmosphere based on the mean 2019 Edwards Range Reference Atmosphere, and hot and cold day atmospheres based on the ±2σ yearly temperature variations in the Edwards Range Reference Atmosphere. As described herein, these reference atmospheres were then used to develop anticipated operational extremes for thermal cycle testing for the X-57 systems, which were developed from an amalgamation of two standards:SMC-S-016 and DO-160G. The project also adopted thermal margin guidance from SMC-S-016 to set requirements for the development of new electrified propulsion system components.
Thermal environments↗
Moving Zero Energy Office Buildings to the Mainstream: Establishing Design Guidelines and Energy Targets: Preprint
Office buildings represent a significant portion of the commercial sector and are ideal candidates to lead the market towards achieving zero energy or zero energy ready buildings. The variety of sizes and uses for office buildings make them challenging to determine set design guidance that can be deployed across the market. A project committee for ASHRAE’s Zero Energy - Advanced Energy Design Guide (ZE-AEDG) for small and medium office buildings , comprised of members from five major national associations with market-pull in commercial buildings, created design guidance for achieving zero energy office buildings for new construction and major retrofit. This design guidance focuses on the process, providing a pathway for both office owners and design teams to achieve zero energy status. Energy use intensity targets range from 16 kBtu/ft²·yr to 36 kBtu/ft²·yr for the different climate zones were established such that office buildings can be “zero-ready,” that is, having low energy consumption that can easily be offset with renewables, preferably on-site. The design guidance was rooted in extensive energy modeling, as well as case studies of actual office buildings that have achieved high levels of energy performance and met zero energy or zero energy ready status. A unique aspect of the zero-energy guide is that it is not compared against a baseline but focuses on achieving an absolute target. The paper presents process of creating the targets, the selection of strategies to achieve the targets, and sample case studies that show how the cost-sensitive solutions are achievable for the design community. It also presents outreach strategies to deploy market achievable zero energy measures.
buildings↗