Hydride and Seek: Comparing Crystallographic Hydride Placement Techniques with an Open-Shell Cobalt Complex
Locating hydrides is crucial in organometallic chemistry but difficult to do accurately using X-ray diffraction. Electron diffraction has been proposed as a way to overcome this problem but has not been systematically compared to neutron diffraction and to quantum crystallography (Hirshfeld atom refinement, HAR) to test this hypothesis. Here, we present a comparative analysis of methods for a terminal cobalt hydride complex by comparing a single-crystal neutron diffraction reference structure to results from single-crystal X-ray diffraction with and without Hirshfeld atom refinement (HAR, NoSpherA2), density functional theory (DFT), and electron diffraction (3D-ED/MicroED) refined under kinematical and dynamical formalisms. Conventional X-ray diffraction gives lower precision than neutron diffraction as expected. Despite expected improvements, HAR gives systematic deviation from the neutron benchmark. Interestingly, optimized DFT equilibrium geometries are closer to the neutron value than the value from HAR. On the other hand, electron diffraction with a high-quality data set coupled with dynamical refinement localizes the hydride in difference maps and gives excellent agreement with the neutron data. Dynamical refinement is crucial, as kinematical refinement does not allow assignment of a hydride peak. This cross-modal comparison defines the conditions under which 3D-ED/MicroED delivers high-precision metal–hydride distances for this open-shell cobalt hydride.