DOE OSTI2023
An aeroengine micromixing injector, originally designed for lean direct injection of jet fuel, was adapted to work with hydrogen, natural gas, and any blend in between. The ultimate goal of the design was to achieve low NOx emissions when operated on pure hydrogen; to better characterize its performance, flame imaging diagnostics was implemented. Three types of cameras mounted parallel to the injector base and pointing towards the quartz combustor cylinder with the same angle were operated simultaneously: Nikon D90, Dynacolor FB-N9-U, and Phantom v7.1, to capture the visible spectrum, OH* chemiluminescence, and dynamic behavior of the flames, respectively. The current work also includes the overlapping of visible spectrum and OH* chemiluminescence, as an effort to qualitatively define the heat release over the flame area, i.e., UV over visible domain. Additionally, a z-type schlieren configuration was employed to reinforce the presence of some small-scale details occurring near the injector outlet ports. Using the airbox pressure drop, preheat temperature, fuel composition and flame temperature as the factors of study, a Box Behnken model was designed yielding into a 16-points matrix for the operability region, at atmospheric pressure. The main responses were extracted from the OH* images, because of its correlation with the flame heat release, these being the flame area and its average brightness, the heat release area and its center of gravity and leading edge. To assess the importance of the main factors and their interactions, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for each response, considering as significant each contributor with a p-value below 0.05. For these five responses it was found that all four main factors need to be included into the model (most of them because its own significance, others to ensure the model hierarchy), as well as some common interactions as the preheat and flame temperatures or pressure drop and fuel composition, and quadratic terms from fuel composition or flame temperature. Three of the five models presented R2 and coefficient of variance (C.V.) indicators around 0.97 and 5%, respectively; the leading edge ANOVA yielded into R2=0.78 and C.V.=18.88%; and the heat release area showed R2=0.91 and C.V.=24.13%. Lastly, the confinement ratio effect of the combustor over the flame structure was quantified, for three different conditions: the original 80 mm inner diameter and 200 mm length cylinder was compared against a shorter 150 mm tube (same inner diameter) and a narrower 47 mm inner diameter one (same 200 mm length). The length had a smaller effect than the inner diameter, even though both factors were not strong enough to make a significant deviation on most of the flame parameters: the difference was within the repeatability margin of error for the brightness, flame area, and center of gravity and leading edge of the heat release area.
Imaging diagnostics, flame characterization, OH* c↗