Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Guidelines”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30

Guideline for Single-Event Effect (SEE) Testing of System on a Chip (SOC) Devices

The use of complex single and multicore processors with significant cache memory, on-chip peripherals, memory controllers, and high speed input/output (IO) that integrate many of the parts of a traditional computer system is becoming more common in space applications. Such devices are often referred to as system on a chip devices (SOCs), even though the term is used somewhat inaccurately due to the lack of analog and mixed signal subcircuits. These devices are complex combinations of single- or multi-core processors with memory controllers, high-speed input/output (IO), and other peripheral structures that formerly would have been handled by off-chip resources. In the past the processors were tested for single event effects (SEE) separately, and the peripherals were often put into custom application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) along with other resources required by the user. Performance and cost pressures have pushed commercial devices to incorporate many of the functional blocks into a single chip, an SOC. The NASA Electronic Parts and Packaging Program (NEPP) has been examining ways to perform SEE radiation hardness assurance (RHA) testing of these processor-centric SOCs to achieve reasonable understanding of their performance in space missions.

Guertin, Steven M.↗

An Initial Exploration of Improved Numerics within the Guidelines of the Negative Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model

A simple modification to the negative Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model is suggested so that when the turbulence working variable, ~v, is negative, diagonal dominance is increased, as is the tendency for the time-advancement scheme to push e toward positive values. Owing to the fact that the modification is only active when ~v is less than zero, the physical model is left unchanged. Using the proposed modification with a strong implicit solver based on Newton's method, convergence rates can be somewhat improved, with typical reductions in iterations and computer time on the order of 15-50%. The benefits are realized primarily when second- or higher-order accuracy is used for discretizing the convective terms in the turbulence model because of large overshoots that can occur with these schemes at the edges of boundary layers and wakes. For flowfields with few regions of negative ~v, or on very fine meshes where ~v is always greater than zero, little or no benefits should be expected.

Anderson, William K.↗

NAND flash screening and qualification guideline for space application

All space missions have a need for nonvolatile memory (NVM), which maintains data integrity when unpowered. Types of NVM include PROM, EEPROM, NOR Flash, and NAND Flash. PROMs, NOR Flash, and EEPROMs are good choices for storing smaller file size data such as boot code or FPGA configurations. These products have excellent data retention characteristics and can reliably store data for years, unpowered, without any data corruption. They can also be read many times without disturbing the data. Another application of NVM is storage of science and engineering data, which requires large of amounts of memory. The highest density memories available today are SDRAM and NAND Flash. However, the power required to operate and store data in NAND Flash is far less than SDRAM. Wherever high density and low power is required, NAND Flash is very attractive.

Heidecker, Jason↗

Thermal interface materials selection and application guidelines: in perspective of Xilinx Virtex-5QV thermal management

The heat from high-power microdevices for space, such as Xilinx Virtex 4 and 5 (V4 and V5), has to be removed mainly through conduction in the space vacuum environment. The class-Y type packages are designed to remove the heat from the top of the package, and the most effective method to remove heat from the class-Y type packages is to attach a heat transfer device on the lid of the package and to transfer the heat to frame or chassis. When a heat transfer device is attached to the package lid, the surfaces roughness of the package lid and the heat transfer device reduces the effective contact area between the two. The reduced contact area results in increased thermal contact resistance, and a thermal interface material is required to reduce the thermal contact resistance by filling in the gap between the surfaces of the package lid and the heat transfer device.

Tseng, Stephen↗

Rapid Development of Instrument Thermal Models: Perspectives and Guidelines from NASA Goddard’s Instrument Design Laboratory

The Instrument Design Laboratory (IDL), part of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center’s Integrated Design Center (IDC), is a concurrent and collaborative environment which allows for rapid development of science instrumentation concepts within the span of less than two weeks. Science goals set by a Principal Investigator from government, industry or academia are translated into engineering requirements, from which a team of engineers spanning multiple disciplines use an established study process and a suite of analysis tools to work towards an instrument point design. As part of this process, a staff thermal engineer is tasked with designing a thermal control system which meets all incoming thermal requirements, while iterating real-time with other subsystems to ensure compatibility and functionality as a completed system. Thermal engineers on spaceflight projects typically have weeks or months to develop thermal models. However, the severe time limitation in this conceptual study setting makes thermal design particularly difficult, as rapid thermal modeling solely over the span of a few days is required to develop the instrument thermal design and understand the performance over its intended mission, especially if the instrument concept contains multiple thermal challenges such as dynamic environments or high heat dissipating components. In this paper, the authors provide a condensed guide for the most efficient ways to develop thermal models and conduct thermal analysis within the span of one-to-two weeks, as informed by decades of design experience and best practices in the IDL. The authors also focus on quick methods for determining worst-case thermal environments, deciding which modeling details are essential at this early phase, and quantifying the engineering resources necessary for thermal control. This paper concludes with specific thermal design tips for different instrument types across the electromagnetic spectrum.

Kan Yang↗

Planetary Protection Lunar Policy: A Case Study in Balancing COSPAR Guidelines, Scientific Consensus, NASA Policy, and Mission Implementation

With the increase of missions to the Earth’s Moon over the next decade, NASA initiated an assessment and review of the policy and protection of Earth’s Moon to enable scientific exploration. The assessment involved gathering scientific consensus regarding the Earth’s Moon and proposed mission operations considering an understanding of the desired science needs for the Moon. This process involved seeking advice from the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine’s (NASEM) Committee on Planetary Protection, engagement with the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) Planetary Protection Panel (PPP), and consultation within NASA. To begin this process, NASA issued a NASA Interim Directive (NID) 8715.128 entitled, “Planetary Protection Categorization for Robotic and Crewed Missions to the Earth’s Moon” in July of 2019. This NID defined sensitive regions (e.g., permanently shadowed regions) on the Moon and required reporting on missions to these sensitive areas. Meanwhile, a NASEM study on the impact of human activities on lunar polar volatiles and the scientific value of protecting the surface and subsurface regions of the Earth’s Moon from organic and biological contamination was initiated. This resulted in a NASEM report entitled, “Planetary Protection for the Study of Lunar Volatiles” which enabled further dialogue within NASA and with COSPAR. COSPAR PPP then leveraged this scientific consensus along with multi-agency input to develop an updated COSPAR Policy on Planetary Protection in June 2021 resulting in updated mission categorizations for Earth’s Moon (existing Category II for orbiters, and new categories IIa and IIb for landed missions). NASA then updated its current planetary protection policy to apply directly to NASA and NASA partnered missions in NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) 8715.24 entitled, “Planetary Protection Provisions for Robotic Extraterrestrial Missions”. Along with the policy update NASA’s Office of Planetary Protection has worked with mission and programmatic teams to streamline reporting requirements to a simplified checkbox and fill-in-the-blank type of template. Throughout the abovementioned process, open and transparent communication between the policy makers and implementers was essential to ensure a balance with the updated policy, scientific intent, and practicality for each mission to be responsive and achieve mission success, including Artemis I and each of its secondary payloads, Gateway, CAPSTONE and Lunar Trailblazer.

James Benardini↗

Planetary Protection Guidelines

Protecting solar system bodies from contamination by Earth life to enable scientific exploration and protectingEarth from possible harmful biological contamination that may be returned from other solar system bodies.

J Nick Benardini↗