Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “DISPOSAL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30

WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT (WIPP): THE NATIONS' SOLUTION TO NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL ISSUES

In the southeastern portion of my home state of New Mexico lies the Chihuahauan desert, where a transuranic (TRU), underground disposal site known as the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) occupies 16 square miles. Full operation status began in March 1999, the year I graduated from Los Alamos High School, in Los Alamos, NM, the birthplace of the atomic bomb and one of the nation’s main TRU waste generator sites. During the time of its development and until recently, I did not have a full grasp on the role Los Alamos was playing in regards to WIPP. WIPP is used to store and dispose of TRU waste that has been generated since the 1940s because of nuclear weapons research and testing operations that have occurred in Los Alamos, NM and at other sites throughout the United States (U.S.). TRU waste consists of items that are contaminated with artificial, man-made radioactive elements that have atomic numbers greater than uranium, or are trans-uranic, on the periodic table of elements and it has longevity characteristics that may be hazardous to human health and the environment. Therefore, WIPP has underground rooms that have been carved out of 2,000 square foot thick salt formations approximately 2,150 feet underground so that the TRU waste can be isolated and disposed of. WIPP has operated safely and successfully until this year, when two unrelated events occurred in February 2014. With these events, the safety precautions and measures that have been operating at WIPP for the last 15 years are being revised and improved to ensure that other such events do not occur again.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Deep Borehole Disposal Research: Geological Data Evaluation Alternative Waste Forms and Borehole Seals

This report documents deep borehole disposal research during FY2014, as directed by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Used Fuel Disposition (UFD) Campaign. These research efforts are principally directed at advancing the deep borehole disposal project to the implementation of a full-scale Research, Development, and Demonstration (RD&D) project. Activities of particular relevance to this goal include evaluation of guidelines for selection of a deep borehole field test site, analyses of deep borehole disposal of alternative waste forms, and technical planning for borehole seals research.

Arnold, Bill W.↗

Generic Crystalline Disposal Reference Case

A generic reference case for disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in crystalline rock is outlined. The generic cases are intended to support development of disposal system modeling capability by establishing relevant baseline conditions and parameters. Establishment of a generic reference case requires that the emplacement concept, waste inventory, waste form, waste package, backfill/buffer properties, EBS failure scenarios, host rock properties, and biosphere be specified. The focus in this report is on those elements that are unique to crystalline disposal, especially the geosphere representation. Three emplacement concepts are suggested for further analyses: a waste packages containing 4 PWR assemblies emplaced in boreholes in the floors of tunnels (KBS-3 concept), a 12-assembly waste package emplaced in tunnels, and a 32-assembly dual purpose canister emplaced in tunnels. In addition, three failure scenarios were suggested for future use: a nominal scenario involving corrosion of the waste package in the tunnel emplacement concepts, a manufacturing defect scenario applicable to the KBS-3 concept, and a disruptive glaciation scenario applicable to both emplacement concepts. The computational approaches required to analyze EBS failure and transport processes in a crystalline rock repository are similar to those of argillite/shale, with the most significant difference being that the EBS in a crystalline rock repository will likely experience highly heterogeneous flow rates, which should be represented in the model. The computational approaches required to analyze radionuclide transport in the natural system are very different because of the highly channelized nature of fracture flow. Computational workflows tailored to crystalline rock based on discrete transport pathways extracted from discrete fracture network models are recommended.

Environmental Protection↗

Performance Specification for Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister Systems (Rev.2)

This performance specification document addresses use of a standardized transportation, aging, and disposal (STAD) canister system in the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) waste management system. This document was developed to support STAD canister system studies and potential research, development, and demonstration activities. Requirements in this specification may evolve with time based on results from analyses, experiments, design studies, system evaluations and demonstrations, as well as other factors. A STAD canister system consists of a canister, together with a storage or aging overpack/module/vault, a shielded transfer cask (STC), a site transporter, a transportation overpack, and a transportation skid. Three sizes of circular cross section STAD canister variants are specified in this document. The small STAD canister capacity is four pressurized water reactor (PWR) or nine boiling water reactor (BWR) SNF assemblies. The medium STAD canister capacity is 12 PWR or 32 BWR SNF assemblies. The large STAD canister capacity is 21 PWR or 44 BWR SNF assemblies. Using standardized canisters for SNF facilitates the interface between storage at an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) or a DOEowned interim storage facility (ISF), transportation between facilities, and disposal at a repository. Multiple STAD canisters may be stored in a single storage overpack and/or a single transportation overpack. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements currently used for storage and transportation are adopted for the STAD canister system. Approved approaches (guidance) in NRC storage and transportation documents are also adopted as requirements for the STAD canister system to facilitate obtaining NRC Certificates of Compliance (CoCs) for STAD canister systems. Performance specifications in this document are also informed by STAD canister disposability in various geologic media and consideration of ISF (and geologic repository) handling facility design, operations, and licensing requirements.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Rationale for the Performance Specification for Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister Systems (Rev.1)

This document provides the rationale for the specifications for the standardized transportation, aging, and disposal (STAD) canister systems provided in Performance Specification for Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister Systems, FCRD-NFST-2014-000579, Rev. 2, referred to as STAD Spec herein. The STAD Spec was developed to support STAD canister system studies and potential research, development, and demonstration activities. Requirements in the specification may evolve with time based on results from analyses, experiments, design studies, system evaluations and demonstrations, as well as other factors. The STAD canister system consists of a canister, together with a storage or aging overpack/module/vault, a shielded transfer cask (STC), a site transporter, a transportation overpack, and a transportation skid. Three sizes of circular cross section STAD canister variants are specified. The small STAD canister capacity is four pressurized water reactor (PWR) or nine boiling water reactor (BWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) assemblies. The medium STAD canister capacity is 12 PWR or 32 BWR SNF assemblies. The large STAD canister capacity is 21 PWR or 44 BWR SNF assemblies. There are 60 specifications in the STAD Spec that cover the STAD canister general design attributes, canister safety functional requirements, operational considerations, materials, storage and aging system requirements, and transportation system requirements. The 60 specifications are derived from regulatory requirements, regulatory guidance, STAD canister disposability considerations, and interim storage facility (ISF) and geologic repository handling facility considerations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Data Validation Package - June 2016 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site

This event included annual sampling of groundwater and surface water locations at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site. Sampling and analyses were conducted as specified in Sampling and Analysis Plan for US. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Sites (LMS/PRO/S04351, continually updated, http://energy.gov/lrnldownloads/sampling-and- analysis-plan-us-department-energy-office-legacy-management-sites). Samples were collected from 15 monitoring wells and two surface locations at the disposal site as specified in the draft 2011 Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site. Planned monitoring locations are shown in Attachment 1, Sampling and Analysis Work Order. A duplicate sample was collected from location 0179. One equipment blank was collected during this sampling event. Water levels were measured at all monitoring wells that were sampled. See Attachment 2, Trip Reports for additional details. The analytical data and associated qualifiers can be viewed in environmental database reports and are also available for viewing with dynamic mapping via the GEMS (Geospatial Environmental Mapping System) website at http://gems.lm.doe.gov/#. No issues were identified during the data validation process that requires additional action or follow-up.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Data Validation Package - July 2016 Groundwater Sampling at the Gunnison, Colorado, Disposal Site

Groundwater sampling at the Gunnison, Colorado, Disposal Site is conducted every 5 years to monitor disposal cell performance. During this event, samples were collected from eight monitoring wells as specified in the 1997 Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Gunnison, Colorado, Disposal Site. Sampling and analyses were conducted as specified in the Sampling and Analysis Plan for US Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Sites (LMS/PRO/S04351, continually updated, http://energy.gov/lm/downloads/sampling-and­ analysis-plan-us-department-energy-office-legacy-management-sites). Planned monitoring locations are shown in Attachment 1, Sampling and Analysis Work Order. A duplicate sample was collected from location 0723. Water levels were measured at all monitoring wells that were sampled and seven additional wells. The analytical data and associated qualifiers can be viewed in environmental database reports and are also available for viewing with dynamic mapping via the GEMS (Geospatial Environmental Mapping System) website at http://gems.lm.doe.gov/#. No issues were identified during the data validation process that require additional action or follow-up.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Lakeview, Oregon, Disposal Site

9.1 Compliance Summary The Lakeview, Oregon, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I Disposal Site was inspected September 16 and 17, 2015. Other than some ongoing concern with erosion-control rock riprap degradation, the disposal cell was in good condition. Some minor fence repairs and vegetation removal, and minor erosion repair work along the west site fence is planned. Inspectors identified no other maintenance needs or cause for a follow-up or contingency inspection. Disposal cell riprap is evaluated annually to ensure continued long-term protection of the cell from erosion during a severe precipitation event. Degradation of the rock riprap was first observed at the site in the mid-1990s. Rock gradation monitoring of the riprap on the west side slope has been performed as part of the annual inspection since 1997 to determine the mean diameter (D 50 ) value. As prescribed by the monitoring procedure, the rock monitoring is routinely conducted at random locations. However, at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) request, the 2015 rock monitoring approach deviated from the normal procedure by using a pre-established monitoring grid in a subset area of the west side slope. This changed the monitoring approach from random sampling to biased sampling. The D 50 value measured during the 2015 gradation monitoring is 2.39 inches, which falls below the original D 50 design size range of 2.7–3.9 inches for the Type B size side slope riprap. At NRC’s request, rock durability monitoring was added to the gradation monitoring in 2009 to monitor durability by rock type. Results of the 2015 durability monitoring showed that74 percent of the total rock sampled is durability class code A rock with an assigned durability class of “highly durable” or durability class code B “durable” rock, and that over 90 percent of the 3-inch or larger rock is durability class code A or B. The rock durability classifications are further explained in Section 9.4.2.2.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Special Analysis: 2017-001 Disposal of Drums Containing Enriched Uranium in Pit 38 at Technical Area 54, Area G

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) generates radioactive waste as a result of various activities. Operational waste is generated from a wide variety of research and development activities including nuclear weapons development, energy production, and medical research. Environmental restoration (ER), and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) waste is generated as contaminated sites and facilities at LANL undergo cleanup or remediation. The majority of this waste is low-level radioactive waste (LLW) and is disposed of at the Technical Area 54 (TA-54), Area G disposal facility. This special analysis, SA 2017-001, evaluates the potential impacts of disposing of this waste in Pit 38 at Area G based on the assumptions that form the basis of the Area G PA/CA. Section 2 describes the methods used to conduct the analysis; the results of the evaluation are provided in Section 3; and conclusions and recommendations are provided in Section 4.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Annual Summary of the Integrated Disposal Facility Performance Assessment 2012

An annual summary of the adequacy of the Hanford Immobilized Low-Activity Waste (ILAW) Performance Assessment (PA) is required each year (DOE O 435.1 Chg 1,1 DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 1;2 and DOE/ORP-2000-013). The most recently approved PA is DOE/ORP-2000-24.4 The ILAW PA evaluated the adequacy of the ILAW disposal facility, now referred to as the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF), for the safe disposal of vitrified Hanford Site tank waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Updated Erosion Analysis for Material Disposal Area G, Technical Area 54, Los Alamos National Laboratory

Material Disposal Area G (MDA G), located within Technical Area 54 (TA-54) is used to dispose radioactive waste at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Technical Area 54 is located on LANL property on the Pajarito Plateau between the communities of Los Alamos and White Rock (Figure 1-1). The MDA G disposal facility is currently in operation (Figure 1-2). Waste is generally placed in large rectangular pits, numbered 1-39, and cylindrical shafts within MDA G.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Stabilization of Spherical Rescorcinol Resin in Grout- Maintenance of the Hanford Integrated Disposal Performance Assessment FY 2018

Operation of the low activity waste vitrification facility (LAW) part of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) at Hanford will generate several solid secondary waste (SSW) streams including used process equipment, contaminated tools and instruments, decontamination wastes, highefficiency particulate air filters (HEPA), carbon absorption beds, silver mordenite iodine sorbent beds, and spent ion exchange resins (IXr), all of which are to be disposed of in the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). The baseline treatment method in the IDF Performance Assessment (PA) for SSW is solidification/stabilization using cementitious material. The Hanford Mix 5 has been identified as the baseline grout for encapsulation of debris SSW (HEPA filters) and solidification/stabilization of non-debris SSW (carbon absorption beds, silver mordenite iodine sorbent beds, and spent ion exchange resins). Hanford Mix 5 is a blend of ASTM (C150-18) Type I-II cement (OPC), Class F fly ash (FA), water, BASF Pozzolith 80 and BASF Master Fiber M100 (fiber) that is currently used for disposal of debris in carbon steel containers (B25) in Hanford’s 200 West Area Low Level Waste Burial Ground trenches.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Configuration Management History Report for the RH LLW Disposal Facility Project

This document outlines and summarized the configuration management process that was used for the RHLLW Disposal Facility design and turnover to operations in support of process readiness reviews. The project was originally solicited as a design-build-operate contract, but awarded as a design-build project only to Areva Federal Services in 2014. The RHLLW requirements were captured in two documents: 1) SPC-1437, Design-Build-Operate Performance Specification for the Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Project; and 2) TFR-483, Technical and Functional Requirements for the Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Project. TFR-483 and SPC-1437 outlined the requirements for the facility and SPC-1437 documented additional requirements regarding quality, design, and construction. A Code of Record (COR) was generated during conceptual design and updated during final design to document the design-basis codes and standards (INL/EXT-10-20044).

42 ENGINEERING↗

Technical & Programmatic Solutions for DPC Direct Disposal: Engineering Cost Analysis Support - Scoping

This memo describes the engineering technical and costing analysis support needed for identifying and evaluating technical and programmatic solutions for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in dual-purpose canisters (DPCs), and the resources planned to provide that support. The Technical and Programmatic Solutions (T&PS) work scope is intended to identify and evaluate the range of feasible options available for DPC direct disposal, considering the range of DPC designs in the existing fleet and a range of generic geologic disposal concepts. It will also identify changes to the way DPCs are loaded, and/or additional hardware that could be installed in DPCs as they are loaded, to improve disposability (chiefly, post closure criticality control). These two thrusts are the focus of engineering support to the work package.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Regional Geologic Evaluations for Disposal of HLW and SNF: Alluvial Basins of the Basin and Range Province

The DOE Spent Fuel and Waste Technology (SFWT) R&D Campaign supports research on crystalline rock, shale (argillite) and salt as potential host rocks for disposal of HLW and SNF in a mined geologic repository. Modeling involving these host rocks for the generic GDSA reference cases has assumed saturated conditions at repository depths. In order to test two-phase flow capabilities of the GDSA flow and transport models, the SFWT Campaign is developing an unsaturated zone reference case. Alluvial basin-fill deposits within the Basin and Range province have unsaturated zones that can be as thick as 600 meters, although the thickness is typically much less. Basin-fill alluvium has been considered as a potential medium for HLW disposal in the US since the 1950s (NAS,1957; Smyth et al., 1979; Winograd, 1981). Attributes considered favorable for HLW disposal in alluvium in the Basin and Range province include an arid environment, low water flux , high sorption capacity (from clay s and zeolites), and ease of construction and stability of repository openings (Hardin et al., 2012). Hardin et al. (2012) also address the thermal issues inherent in the design of a HLW repository in alluvium with low thermal conductivity, which are not discussed in this report.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Current and Projected Future Disposed Inventory Estimate for Trenches 31 and 34 for Performance Assessment and Composite Analysis

The purpose of this environmental calculation file (ECF) is to document and project future disposed radionuclide inventory estimates for the two currently active trenches in burial ground 218-W-5, which are designated as Trenches 31 and 34. This ECF also documents the current disposed radionuclide inventory estimate for the balance of the trenches in burial ground 218-W-5, which consist of 11 inactive trenches. All inventories were derived from disposal records maintained in the Solid Waste Information Tracking System (SWITS) database and are decayed corrected to a common date of January 1, 2070 to facilitate summation. This ECF supports modeling for performance assessment (PA) and composite analysis (CA) of waste facilities on the Hanford Site Central Plateau.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Preclosure Risk Assessment for Deep Borehole Disposal

This report presents a preclosure radiological safety assessment for deep borehole disposal (DBD) of nuclear wastes. The primary purpose of the safety assessment is to identify risk factors for disposal operations, to aid in design for an engineering demonstration of technology for DBD. The assessment is based on a conceptual design for disposal packages and borehole systems that was developed previously. It considers operational steps that could be used for actual DBD, with internal and external initiating off-normal events, to develop insights that can be applied to an engineering demonstration that would be performed without using any form of nuclear waste. This research was performed as part of the deep borehole field test (DBFT). Based on revised U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) priorities in mid-2017, the DBFT and other research related to a DBD option was discontinued; ongoing work and documentation were closed out by the end of fiscal year (FY) 2017. This report was initiated as part of the DBFT and documented as an incomplete draft at the end of FY 2017. The report was finalized by Sandia National Laboratories in FY2018 without DOE funding, subsequent to the termination of the DBFT, and published in FY2019. iii

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Summary of Investigations on Technical Feasibility of Direct Disposal of Dual-Purpose Canisters

This study has evaluated the technical feasibility of direct disposal in a geologic repository, of commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) of existing designs. The authors, representing several national laboratories, considered waste isolation safety, engineering feasibility, thermal management, and postclosure criticality control. The 3-year study concludes that direct disposal is technically feasible for most DPCs, depending on the repository host geology. Postclosure criticality control, and thermal management strategies that allow permanent disposal within 150 years, are two of the most challenging aspects. This document summarizes technical results from a series of previous reports, and describes additional studies that can be done especially if site-specific information becomes available from one or more prospective repository sites.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗