Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Critical Benchmarks”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30

SU-F-207-09: Evaluating the Dosimetric Accuracy of Extended Field-Of-View CT Reconstructions Using Clinical Data with Real Patient Geometries

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of dose calculations performed with CT images reconstructed using extended field of view (FOV) algorithms. Methods: In this study we selected 6 radiotherapy patients (3 head and neck & 3 chest/pelvis) whose body circumferences extended past the 50 cm scan FOV in the treatment planning CT. Images acquired on a Siemens Sensation Open scanner, were reconstructed using the standard FOV (sFOV) and two different extended FOV algorithms, eFOV and HDFOV. A physician and dosimetrist identified the radiation target, critical organs, and external patient contour. A benchmark CT was created for each patient, consisting of an average of the 3 CT reconstructions with a density override applied to regions containing truncation artifacts, and was used to create an optimal radiation treatment plan. The plan was copied onto each reconstruction without density override and dose was recalculated. Results: The native sFOV dose calculations had the largest deviation from the benchmark (0.4 – 6.0%). Both the HDFOV and eFOV calculations showed improvement over the sFOV. For patients with a smooth patient contour, the HDFOV calculation had the least deviation from the benchmark (0.1–0.5%) compared to eFOV (0.4–1.8%). In cases with large amounts of tissue and irregular skin folds, the eFOV deviated the least from the benchmark (0.2–0.6%) compared to HDFOV (1.3–1.8%). It was observed that the eFOV scan has large image artifact in air with an average HU of −600 compared to the ideal of −1000. In these cases, the artifact in air appears to attenuate the dose and compensate for the missing tissue density. The HDFOV demonstrated minimal artifact in air. Conclusion: Both eFOV and HDFOV provide improved dose calculation accuracy. The HDFOV reconstruction provides a clearer patient border than the eFOV allowing for well-defined density overrides to be applied with minimal air artifact. This research was supported by Siemens Medical Solutions.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

Preliminary Chlorine Worth Study Benchmark Evaluation

The Chlorine Worth Studies (CWS) experiments with polyvinyl chloride (PVC with chemical formula (C 2 H 3 Cl) n ), chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC with chemical formula (C 9 H 11 Cl 7 ) n ), and high density polyethylene (HDPE with chemical formula (CH 2 ) n ) were a series of measurements performed at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC). The purpose of the CWS experiments was to perform integral experiments that were highly sensitive to the thermal 35 Cl(n,γ) reaction and matched the sensitivities of aqueous chloride operations at the plutonium facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The CWS experiments were performed on the Planet critical assembly machine at NCERC and utilized weapons grade plutonium (WGPu) plates as fuel. The design process and design of the CWS experiment were discussed previously. This paper discusses the benchmark evaluation of the experiment, intended for the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP). Criticality calculations were performed with MCNP version 6.3. Results presented here are preliminary, as the benchmark has not yet been submitted to the ICSBEP.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Mox powder calculation improvement: OECD Benchmark proposal and cristal - Rib results - 14228

In the framework of the WPNCS Expert Group on Uncertainty Analysis for Criticality Safety Assessment, we propose a blind numerical benchmark. Since the WPNCS Expert Group on Experimental Needs had highlighted the poor database of representative experiments of low-moderated MOX powders, this blind benchmark is focused on MOX wet powders Three PuO{sub 2} contents are proposed: 100%, 30% and 12.5%. Two Pu isotopic vectors are considered: a conservative one (0%, 71%, 17%, 11%, 1% for {sup 238}Pu up to {sup 242}Pu) and a realistic one obtained from reprocessed LWR 30 GWd/T fuels. For these 6 cases the powder moisture rate is 3%. The MOX fissile medium is a sphere surrounded by 20 cm water reflector. The required results are the calculated k{sub eff} and the associated prior uncertainty. Using benchmarks experiments, contributors should provide the projected-k{sub eff} and the corresponding posterior uncertainty. CRISTAL-V2 results based on JEFF3.1.1 nuclear data are presented. As an example, in the 30% PuO{sub 2} challenging case, the calculation uncertainty is decreased from 1160 pcm (1 σ) down to 450 pcm using EOLE and MASURCA critical Pu experiments. This uncertainty depends slightly on 'conservative' or 'realistic' Pu because the representativity factor does not vary significantly with the Pu vector. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Nuclear Data Adjustment for Nonlinear Applications in the OECD/NEA WPNCS SG14 Benchmark -- A Bayesian Inverse UQ-based Approach for Data Assimilation

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety (WPNCS) proposed a benchmark exercise to assess the performance of current nuclear data adjustment techniques applied to nonlinear applications and experiments with low correlation to applications. This work introduces Bayesian Inverse Uncertainty Quantification (IUQ) as a method for nuclear data adjustments in this benchmark, and compares IUQ to the more traditional methods of Generalized Linear Least Squares (GLLS) and Monte Carlo Bayes (MOCABA). Posterior predictions from IUQ showed agreement with GLLS and MOCABA for linear applications. When comparing GLLS, MOCABA, and IUQ posterior predictions to computed model responses using adjusted parameters, we observe that GLLS predictions fail to replicate computed response distributions for nonlinear applications, while MOCABA shows near agreement, and IUQ uses computed model responses directly. We also discuss observations on why experiments with low correlation to applications can be informative to nuclear data adjustments and identify some properties useful in selecting experiments for inclusion in nuclear data adjustment. Performance in this benchmark indicates potential for Bayesian IUQ in nuclear data adjustments.

FOS: Computer and information sciences↗

Nuclear Data Adjustment for Nonlinear Applications in the OECD/NEA WPNCS SG14 Benchmark—A Bayesian Inverse UQ-Based Approach for Data Assimilation

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety has proposed a benchmark exercise to assess the performance of current nuclear data adjustment techniques applied to nonlinear applications and experiments with low correlation to applications. This work introduces Bayesian inverse uncertainty quantification (IUQ) employing scientific machine learning surrogate models as a method for nuclear data adjustments in this benchmark, and compares IUQ to the more traditional methods of generalized linear least squares (GLLS) and Monte Carlo Bayes (MOCABA). Posterior predictions from IUQ showed agreement with GLLS and MOCABA for linear applications. Here, when comparing GLLS, MOCABA, and IUQ posterior predictions to computed model responses using adjusted parameters, we observe that the GLLS predictions failed to replicate the computed response distributions for nonlinear applications, while MOCABA showed near agreement, and IUQ used the computed model responses directly. We also discuss observations on why experiments with low correlation to applications can be informative to nuclear data adjustments and identify some properties useful in selecting experiments for inclusion in nuclear data adjustment. Performance in this benchmark indicates potential for Bayesian IUQ in nuclear data adjustments.

Bayesian calibration↗

Reactor Physics Measurements and Benchmark Specifications for Oak Ridge Highly Enriched Uranium Sphere (ORSphere)

In the early 1970s Dr. John T. Mihalczo (team leader), J.J. Lynn, and J.R. Taylor performed experiments at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) with highly enriched uranium (HEU) metal (called Oak Ridge Alloy or ORALLOY) in an effort to recreate GODIVA I results with greater accuracy than those performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory in the 1950s. The purpose of the Oak Ridge ORALLOY Sphere (ORSphere) experiments was to estimate the unreflected and unmoderated critical mass of an idealized sphere of uranium metal corrected to a density, purity, and enrichment such that it could be compared with the GODIVA I experiments. Additionally, various material reactivity worths, the surface material worth coefficient, the delayed neutron fraction, the prompt neutron decay constant, relative fission density, and relative neutron importance were all measured. The critical assembly, material reactivity worths, the surface material worth coefficient, and the delayed neutron fraction were all evaluated as benchmark experiment measurements. The reactor physics measurements are the focus of this paper; although for clarity the critical assembly benchmark specifications are briefly discussed.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

A New Era of Nuclear Criticality Experiments: The First 10 Years of Planet Operations at NCERC

Planet is a vertical-lift assembly machine currently located at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) at the Nevada National Security Site. In the past, Planet resided at Technical Area-18 in Los Alamos, New Mexico, as part of the Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility (LACEF). Following the de-inventorying of LACEF, the Planet assembly was relocated to NCERC in 2008 and became fully operational in June of 2011. The Class Foils experiment, which involves stacking highly enriched uranium foils to obtain a critical configuration, was the first critical experiment performed on Planet. As a major component of the Nuclear Criticality Safety Class taught for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, the Class Foils experiment allows personnel from all over the DOE complex to handle nuclear material and to complete the approach to critical safely and successfully. This paper describes the Planet vertical assembly and recent engineering upgrade and a selection of the experiments that have been performed on Planet since its transition to NCERC 10 years ago.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

A New Era of Nuclear Criticality Experiments: The First 10 Years of Godiva IV Operations at NCERC

The work presented in this paper focuses on the first 10 years (2011–2020) of Godiva IV operations at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC). Godiva IV is a fast burst critical assembly constructed of approximately 65 kg of highly enriched uranium fuel alloyed with 1.5% molybdenum for strength. Godiva is one of the last such critical assemblies in the United States and can be used for studies of super-prompt-critical behavior as well as irradiations and demonstrations. An overview of the startup of Godiva IV at NCERC is given followed by a summary of the experiments performed utilizing Godiva IV over the first 10 years of operation at NCERC.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Determination of critical experiment correlations using the sampler sequence within scale 6.2 - 14602

The validation of neutron transport methods used in nuclear criticality safety analyses is required by consensus American National Standards Institute/American Nuclear Society (ANSI/ANS) standards. In the last decade, there has been an increased interest in correlations among critical experiments used in validation that have shared physical attributes and which impact the independence of each measurement. The statistical methods included in many of the frequently cited guidance documents on performing validation calculations incorporate the assumption that all individual measurements are independent, so little guidance is available to practitioners on the topic. Typical guidance includes recommendations to select experiments from multiple facilities and experiment series in an attempt to minimize the impact of correlations or common-cause errors in experiments. Recent efforts have been made both to determine the magnitude of such correlations between experiments and to develop and apply methods for adjusting the bias and bias uncertainty to account for the correlations. This paper describes recent work performed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory using the Sampler sequence from the SCALE code system to develop experimental correlations using a Monte Carlo sampling technique. Sampler will be available for the first time with the release of SCALE 6.2, and a brief introduction to the methods used to calculate experiment correlations within this new sequence is presented in this paper. Techniques to utilize these correlations in the establishment of upper subcritical limits are the subject of a companion paper and will not be discussed here. Example experimental uncertainties and correlation coefficients are presented for a variety of low-enriched uranium water-moderated lattice experiments selected for use in a benchmark exercise by the Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety Subgroup on Uncertainty Analysis in Criticality Safety Analyses. The results include studies on the effect of fuel rod pitch on the correlations, and some observations are also made regarding difficulties in determining experimental correlations using the Monte Carlo sampling technique. (authors)

42 ENGINEERING↗

IER 498: Godiva-IV CAAS benchmark [Slides]

This presentation discusses the benchmark of the IER 498: Godiva-IV criticality accident alarm system (CAAS). It details the goal of the project which is to create a CAAS benchmark capability for Godiva-IV in order to create a shielding benchmark for NCSP software and data, to add geometrically diverse benchmark/benchmarks to the ICSBEP Handbook, to enable more precise measurements at NCERC, and to help assure CAAS performance is as-stated. It also states that work was completed on CED-1 in 2019 and that future work includes the completion of CED-2 in 2020.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Optimization of a dry, mixed nuclear fuel storage array for nuclear criticality safety - 14339

A dry storage array of used nuclear fuel at the Idaho National Laboratory contains a mixture of more than twenty different types of research and test reactor fuels. Significant neutronic interaction occurs between fuel canisters within this large storage arrangement of 636 fuel storage canisters. Nuclear criticality safety is maintained primarily by moderation control and through control of neutron interaction and leakage provided by the credited geometry. Over the nearly forty years of operation the collected fuels are now arranged in a configuration that does not minimize the system neutron multiplication factor (k{sub eff}). This creates a concern since the entire remaining facility storage capacity cannot be utilized without exceeding the system minimum subcritical state (k{sub safe}) for ensuring nuclear criticality safety. This work determines a more optimal arrangement for the stored fuels with a goal to minimize the system k{sub eff}, but also with a minimum of potential fuel canister relocation movements. The ultimate goal is to establish a solution for this multiple-objective optimization problem by finding the Pareto Front for maximum k{sub eff} reduction versus the number of canister relocations. The process first required additional analysis of the array by Monte-Carlo neutron transport codes (specifically, MCNP) to gain a greater understanding of the interaction characteristics of the disparate fuel types. Some stored fuels are composed of primarily metallic and oxide components that provide very little inherent moderation, while other fuel types contain graphite or zirconium-hydride which can contribute a significant amount of moderation. These factors cause a complex relationship within a fuel arrangement with respect to thermal utilization and axial leakage probability. The new MCNP analysis was utilized to develop a simplified spreadsheet-based empirical model which simulates the array k{sub eff} result. This empirical model was benchmarked against additional MCNP calculations for various arrangements and then employed in the optimization analysis. A Tabu metaheuristic and stochastic approximation optimization was applied to the empirical model with the optimization function to minimize the array k{sub eff}. The optimization algorithm interrogated the empirical model to determine the optimal rearrangement for up to sixty canister movements. The Pareto Front was found, which shows that a limited number of canister relocation movements could allow the existing thirty-one empty array positions to be filled with common research reactor fuels while also yielding a reduction in the overall array k{sub eff} relative to the current arrangement. This will impart an improvement in the facility utilization while also offering an enhancement in the safety margin. The reduction in array reactivity has been confirmed by a final set of MCNP calculations with the proposed new arrangements. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A New Era of Nuclear Criticality Experiments: The First 10 Years of Comet Operations at NCERC

Comet is a general-purpose, heavy-duty, vertical-lift assembly designed for flexibility in conducting a variety of critical experiments. It is currently located at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) in Nevada. In the past, Comet resided at Technical Area-18 in Los Alamos, New Mexico, as part of the Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility (LACEF). The Comet assembly was relocated to NCERC in 2008 and became fully operational in June of 2011. The first critical experiment performed on Comet at NCERC was a verification of one of the previous configurations of the Zeus experiment series. Over the next 10 years, many additional experiments followed including other Zeus configurations as well as completely new designs. This paper discusses the Comet vertical-lift assembly, the transition from LACEF to NCERC, and a selection of experiments that have been performed on Comet during its first 10 years of operation at NCERC.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Critical and Californium Source-Driven Noise Analysis Subcritical Measurements with an Unreflected Cylindrical Tank of Mixed Uranium-Plutonium Nitrate Solution

The reported experiments were performed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) at the Battelle Northwest Laboratory’s (now Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) critical experiments facility at Hanford, Washington in 1981 and used 16 days of critical facility time, not including 10 days for setup and removal of ORNL equipment. These measurements were to assess the capability of the Cf source-driven noise analysis (CSDNA) method to measure the subcriticality (keff) of mixed U-Pu nitrate solutions. In addition to the CSNDA measurements, measurements were also performed near delayed criticality where CSDNA measurements cannot be performed. This report documents the experiments that were not reported at that time by presenting the ORNL experimental results and any online analysis performed during and shortly after the measurements. The mixed nitrate solution had a U concentration at 188 grams per liter (g/L), a Pu concentration of 280 g/L, free acid normality of 2.80, H ion molarity of 5.9 and a specific gravity of 1.754 g/cm 3 , a 240 Pu isotopic content of 7.981 wt. %, and a 235 U isotopic content of 0.724 wt. %. The stainless-steel tank for the solution had an inside diameter of 35.38 cm, an outside diameter of 35.53 cm, a height of 56.72 cm, and bottom thickness of 0.9525 cm. A Zircaloy pipe with a 3.1496 cm outside diameter, a 2.7788 cm inside diameter, and bottom thickness of 0.635 cm was available for insertion of the Cf source in the center of the fissile solution. The Cf source was also located at the outside surface of the tank (solution height varied from 10 to 53 cm) and in the center of the solution (solution height varied from 10 to 60.7 cm). The CSDNA measurements were not analyzed online to determine the subcritical neutron multiplication factors. At all subcritical states, the break frequency noise analysis data was fitted to obtain the prompt neutron decay constant. The neutron multiplication factors were determined for the two configurations of the measurements near delayed criticality. The subcritical neutron multiplication factors from the CNSDA measurements can be obtained with further analysis. However, the near delayed critical configuration, the prompt neutron decay constants, the count rates, and the measured cross and auto power spectral densities can be calculated directly for benchmarking. Much of data presented in this report are from ORNL notes—not in the ORNL logbooks. For the final benchmark analysis, the data from the Battelle Northwest Laboratory (which operated the critical facility in 1981) critical facility logbook should be consulted and be incorporated where appropriate. The purpose of this report is to document the experimental information for the measurements performed so that at a later date researchers could perform the required uncertainty and calculational analyses and documentation to use these data for an International Criticality Safety Benchmark Program (ICSBEP) or Nuclear Energy Agency benchmark. The data from these measurements are available from the ORNL Records Management Services Department, and the logbook is available from ICSBEP at Idaho National Laboratory. Preparation of the present report is part of a larger cooperative effort between Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to document more than 15 undocumented critical and subcritical experiments enumerated in ORNL/TM-2019/18 and performed by ORNL at ORCEF and other USDOE critical experiments facilities using more than 500 operational days of critical facility time.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent flow in rod bundle with spacer grids

Pressurized water nuclear reactor fuel assemblies are made of fuel rods held by spacer grids, which are the core components of the nuclear power plants. Hot fuel rods are cooled by the coolant water flow, and the spacer grids with mixing vanes distort the mainstream, producing the swirling flow which can enhance the heat transfer to improve CHF (Critical Heat Flux). Heat transfer between fuel rods and coolant is a crucial part of thermal-hydraulic analysis. For the purpose to improve the thermal hydraulic performance of the fuel assemblies, many experiments have been conducted to understand the flow structures and three-dimensional behaviors of the turbulence in the rod bundle sub-channels and then to optimize the design of the spacer grid. In the experimental work, which requires lots of efforts to get reliable data, LDA (Laser Doppler Anemometry) and PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry) are generally used to measure the velocity profile and turbulent intensity in the sub-channels. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is another useful way to study the characteristics of the detailed flow condition and heat transfer phenomena in the subchannels. The main issue of the single-phase CFD is to accurately predict the flow and turbulence characteristics. RANS method is generally used to simulate the induced lateral velocity and the heat transfer process. With the development of computer technology, some more precise but previously time-consuming turbulent models, such as LES (Large Eddy Simulation), are gradually used for the simulation of rod bundle flow with current advanced CPU resources. Ikeno and Kajishima explained the decay of swirling turbulent flow in the rod bundle using LES method. Benhamadouche acquired the turbulence induced forces on the central rod of the rod bundle through performing the LES of the flow downstream the spacer grid. Chang and Tavoularis conducted hybrid simulations with SAS SST and LES of a 5 x 5 rod bundle, and several vortices were identified in the vicinity of the vanes and the generation mechanisms, evolution progress and influence on the velocities of these vortices were clarified. In the paper we present CFD simulations of turbulent flow in rod bundle sub-channels with spacer grids of two different experiments. One is MATiS-H benchmark experiment with scaled spacer grids, which is conducted by KAERI, and is used as a CFD benchmark test, and the other is a 5 x 5 rod bundle with typical spacer grids using PIV technology, with the cooperation of Harbin Engineering University. The main objectives of the calculations are to validate LES methodology by the benchmark experiments.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A New Era of Nuclear Criticality Experiments: The First 10 Years of Flattop Operations at NCERC

The Flattop critical assembly was built and operated from 1958 through 2004 at the Pajarito Site (Technical Area-18), home to the Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility. Flattop was disassembled in 2005 and refurbished over the course of 3 years. In 2008, Flattop was installed in the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) located in the Device Assembly Facility at the Nevada National Security Site. Startup of Flattop with a uranium core occurred in 2011. This paper details the first 10 years of Flattop operations at NCERC (2011–present).

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Guide for Using ENDF/B-VIII.0 Nuclear Data with MCNP

This report provides guidance for using the ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data that were released in 2018 and 2020 with MCNP. Appendix A: Obtaining and installing the new ENDF/B-VIII.0 ACE nuclear data. Appendix B. Obtaining & using XSDIR files that include ENDF/B-VIII.0 data. Appendix C: ENDF/B-VIII.0-based ACE files for neutron cross-sections. A listing of the available temperatures and ZA numbers for neutron cross-sections (ACE files with suffix .nnC). Appendix D: ENDF/B-VIII.0-based ACE files for thermal scattering law (TSL) data, $S$(α,β). A listing of the available thermal scattering $S$(α,β) data (ACE files with suffix .nnT) The next section below provides guidance for modifying existing $\textit{mcnp}$ input files to use the ENDF/B-VIII.0 data. Detailed results from running several benchmark suites for nuclear criticality safety with both ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data are reported in. It is important to note that this report deals only with TSL data released in 2020. With the original release of ENDF/B-VIII.0 in 2018, the ACE files for neutron cross-sections were contained in a directory called Lib80X and the ACE files for TSL data were contained in a directory called ENDF80SaB. A few years later, it was determined that many of the TSL data files had been generated with faulty data or with incorrect processing, and a new set of ACE files for TSL data was created, with the corrected files contained in directory ENDF80SaB2.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗