Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “spacecraft missions”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1991

Graphical Planning Of Spacecraft Missions

Mission Planning Graphical Tool (MPGT) computer program provides analysts with graphical representations of spacecraft and environmental data used in planning missions. Designed to be generic software tool configured to analyze any specified Earth-orbiting spacecraft mission. Data presented as series of overlays on top of two-dimensional or three-dimensional projection of Earth. Includes spacecraft-orbit tracks, ground-station-antenna masks, solar and lunar ephemerides, and coverage by Tracking Data and Relay Satellite System (TDRSS). From graphical representations, analyst determines such spacecraft-related constraints as communication coverage, infringement upon zones of interference, availability of sunlight, and visibility of targets to instruments.

Jeletic, J. F.↗
NASA NTRS2009

Xenia Mission: Spacecraft Design Concept

The proposed Xenia mission will, for the first time, chart the chemical and dynamical state of the majority of baryonic matter in the universe. using high-resolution spectroscopy, Xenia will collect essential information from major traces of the formation and evolution of structures from the early universe to the present time. The mission is based on innovative instrumental and observational approaches: observing with fast reaction gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with a high spectral resolution. This enables the study of their (star-forming) environment from the dark to the local universe and the use of GRBs as backlight of large-scale cosmological structures, observing and surveying extended sources with high sensitivity using two wide field-of-view x-ray telescopes - one with a high angular resolution and the other with a high spectral resolution.

Hopkins, R. C.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In Situ Small Spacecraft Missions Utilizing Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environments Technology

There is considerable interest in utilizing Small Spacecraft beyond low Earth orbit. In November of 2018, successful data relay operations of the MarCO CubeSats during the entry, descent, and landing (EDL) of the Mars InSight mission showed the viability of using CubeSats for interplanetary missions. Additional testament to the promise of Small Spacecraft class rideshare missions is the upcoming Artemis-1 flight test that will launch thirteen 6U CubeSats, as well as the establishment of NASA’s SIMPLEx program which will conduct stand-alone planetary science missions that launch with a primary payload. It is anticipated that continued innovations in Small Spacecraft capabilities combined with small EDL systems will expand the range of potential missions to allow for in situ investigations. Recently, NASA invested in the development of a new, efficient and capable ablative thermal protection system (TPS), utilizing 3-D Weaving. The new dual layer TPS, Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET), is tailorable, scalable, robust, mass efficient and capable of supporting in situ missions across the solar system. Combining the HEEET entry system with innovative Small Spacecraft technology will substantially expand the range of Small Spacecraft mission applications by offering the capability for high speed entry or aerocapture at destinations with atmospheres. This paper will describe the HEEET aeroshell system and highlight various mission concepts including a dual technology demonstration mission that is under development and other concepts to deliver instruments for planetary science.

Heatshield↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In Situ Small Spacecraft Missions Utilizing Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environments Technology

There is considerable interest in utilizing Small Spacecraft beyond low Earth orbit. In November of 2018, successful data relay operations of the MarCO CubeSats during the entry, descent, and landing (EDL) of the Mars InSight mission showed the viability of using CubeSats for interplanetary missions. Additional testament to the promise of Small Spacecraft class rideshare missions is the upcoming Artemis-1 flight test that will launch thirteen 6U CubeSats, as well as the establishment of NASA’s SIMPLEx program which will conduct stand-alone planetary science missions that launch with a primary payload. It is anticipated that continued innovations in Small Spacecraft capabilities combined with small EDL systems will expand the range of potential missions to allow for in situ investigations. Recently, NASA invested in the development of a new, efficient and capable ablative thermal protection system (TPS), utilizing 3-D Weaving. The new dual layer TPS, Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET), is tailorable, scalable, robust, mass efficient and capable of supporting in situ missions across the solar system. Combining the HEEET entry system with innovative Small Spacecraft technology will substantially expand the range of Small Spacecraft mission applications by offering the capability for high speed entry or aerocapture at destinations with atmospheres. This paper will describe the HEEET aeroshell system and highlight various mission concepts including a dual technology demonstration mission that is under development and other concepts to deliver instruments for planetary science.

Small Spacecraft↗
NASA NTRS1985

The dynamics of the solar maximum mission spacecraft capture and redeployment on STS 41-C

The repair of the Solar Maximum Mission (SMM) spacecraft during STS 41-C evidenced the first manned rendezvous and capture of a previously-launched, operational satellite. The following paper will examine the dynamics of the SMM satellite during capture and redeployment, including the unsuccessful manned maneuvering unit grapple attempt. Recovery of the satellite will be described, subsequent to the large disturbance torque input. The events which transpired during orbiter proximity operations with the SMM reveal an environment which places a unique set of requirements on spacecraft attitude control systems and hardware. A number of conclusions are drawn concerning these requirements in light of future spacecraft control system designs.

Grady, K. J.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Preliminary design of a meteoroid/orbital debris shield system for a Mars mission spacecraft

A preliminary design of a spacecraft shield system to defeat meteoroids and orbital debris during a Mars mission is presented. The mission scenario is first defined in terms of stage times which include LEO, transit, low-Mars orbit, and Mars surface periods. The environment definitions for earth-orbital space debris, planetary meteoroids, and interplanetary meteoroids are next introduced. Shield system design approaches incorporate stochastic simulation, hydrocode analyses, hypervelocity impact testing, and optimization techniques. Structural design trades presented include spacecraft configuration, mission schedule, penetration risk, and total standoff distance between the bumper and wall.

Robinson, J. H.↗
NASA NTRS1999

Pyroshock Environments Characterized for Spacecraft Missions

Pyrotechnic shock, or pyroshock, is the transient response of a structure to loading induced by the ignition of pyrotechnic (explosive or propellant activated) devices. These devices are typically used to separate structural systems (e.g., separate a spacecraft from a launch vehicle) and deploy appendages (e.g., solar panels). Pyroshocks are characterized by high peak acceleration, high-frequency content, and short duration. Because of their high acceleration and high-frequency, pyroshocks can cause spaceflight hardware to fail. Verifying by test that spaceflight hardware can withstand the anticipated shock environment is considered essential to mission success. The Earth Observing System (EOS) AM-1 spacecraft for NASA's Mission to Planet Earth is scheduled to be launched on an Atlas IIAS vehicle in 1999, and the NASA Lewis Research Center is the launch vehicle integrator for this NASA Goddard Space Flight Center spacecraft. The EOS spacecraft was subjected to numerous ground shock tests to verify that its scientific instruments and avionics components will withstand the shock-induced vibration produced when the spacecraft separates from the launch vehicle. Shock test data from these tests represent the third largest available pyroshock database in the United States. Future spacecraft missions will directly benefit from the knowledge gained from these tests. The payload separation system used for EOS is a new system that operates by firing six separation nuts. This system was tested to verify its functional operation and to characterize the resulting shock levels. The launch vehicle contractor (Lockheed Martin Astronautics) and spacecraft contractor (Lockheed Martin Missiles & Space) completed 16 separation test firings. This resulted in an unusually large amount of pyroshock data. Typically, only one or two pyroshock test firings are performed for a spacecraft mission. Because of the size of this separation system shock database, engineers were able to perform unique statistical analyses to characterize the distribution of the test data. For example, it was proven that the shock data follow a lognormal distribution, a concept often assumed but rarely proven. The test-to-test repeatability of the shock source level was analyzed, and the effects of various test configurations and separation nut production lots were examined and quantified. Engineers investigated the change in shock level as the shock traveled from the spacecraft separation interface to the avionics components of the upper stage and analyzed the effects of the structural fidelity (simulator versus real) of the components and their weight on vibrational response. In addition, the shock attenuation with distance and across joints was quantified and compared with concepts originally generated in 1970, and the effects of separation nut preload and firing sequences effects were examined. Because of this EOS shock testing and the analyses performed at NASA Lewis, a significant amount of new information on pyroshock and its characteristics is now available to the aerospace industry. We hope that this information will help future spacecraft test planners to perform better and cheaper spacecraft separation shock tests and to better understand their test data.

Hughes, William O.↗
NASA NTRS2023

Increasing Diversity on Spacecraft Mission Teams Reduces Risk

Many of the NASA spacecraft sent into Earth orbit and throughout the Solar System are competitively selected and led by principal investigators (PIs). These senior scientists are responsible for directing research activities, managing the use of funds, and reporting to the funding agency. Additionally, the European Space Agency (ESA) has competitively selected missions that are led by ESA-nominated project scientists and include instruments that are overseen by PIs. Usually, the PIs and project scientists form a science working team that provides scientific leadership of the mission. These NASA and ESA PI roles require a deep understanding of the mission’s scientific goals and engineering design aspects. And, importantly, these roles also require skills in team management.

Kathleen E. Mandt↗
NASA NTRS1978

PC-403: Pioneer Venus multiprobe spacecraft mission operational characteristics document, volume 3

The Pioneer Venus spacecraft primary and backup operational modes and operational limitations for maneuvers, roll references transfer, attitude determination, spacecraft power discipline and spacecraft thermal discipline, are described. The functions and operations of the large and small probes, as well detailed performance in the normal operating modes and backup modes are presented.

Barker, F. C.↗
NASA NTRS2012

Design of Spacecraft Missions to Remove Multiple Orbital Debris Objects

The amount of hazardous debris in Earth orbit has been increasing, posing an evergreater danger to space assets and human missions. In January of 2007, a Chinese ASAT test produced approximately 2600 pieces of orbital debris. In February of 2009, Iridium 33 collided with an inactive Russian satellite, yielding approximately 1300 pieces of debris. These recent disastrous events and the sheer size of the Earth orbiting population make clear the necessity of removing orbital debris. In fact, experts from both NASA and ESA have stated that 10 to 20 pieces of orbital debris need to be removed per year to stabilize the orbital debris environment. However, no spacecraft trajectories have yet been designed for removing multiple debris objects and the size of the debris population makes the design of such trajectories a daunting task. Designing an efficient spacecraft trajectory to rendezvous with each of a large number of orbital debris pieces is akin to the famous Traveling Salesman problem, an NP-complete combinatorial optimization problem in which a number of cities are to be visited in turn. The goal is to choose the order in which the cities are visited so as to minimize the total path distance traveled. In the case of orbital debris, the pieces of debris to be visited must be selected and ordered such that spacecraft propellant consumption is minimized or at least kept low enough to be feasible. Emergent Space Technologies, Inc. has developed specialized algorithms for designing efficient tour missions for near-Earth asteroids that may be applied to the design of efficient spacecraft missions capable of visiting large numbers of orbital debris pieces. The first step is to identify a list of high priority debris targets using the Analytical Graphics, Inc. SOCRATES website and then obtain their state information from Celestrak. The tour trajectory design algorithms will then be used to determine the itinerary of objects and v requirements. These results will shed light on how many debris pieces can be visited for various amounts of propellant, which launch vehicles can accommodate such missions, and how much margin is available for debris removal system payloads.

Barbee, Brent W.↗