Results for “multiobjective optimization” — Page 3

NASA NTRS1992

Tracing the efficient curve for multi-objective control-structure optimization

A recently developed active set algorithm for tracing parameterized optima is adapted to multiobjective optimization. The algorithm traces a path of Kuhn-Tucker points using homotopy curve tracking techniques, and is based on identifying and maintaining the set of active constraints. Second order necessary optimality conditions are used to determine nonoptimal stationary points on the path. In the bi-objective optimization case the algorithm is used to trace the curve of efficient solution (Pareto optima). As an example, the algorithm is applied to the simultaneous minimization of the weight and control force of a ten-bar truss with two collocated sensors and actuators, with some interesting results.

Rakowska, J.↗

NASA NTRS2005

Design Methods and Optimization for Morphing Aircraft

This report provides a summary of accomplishments made during this research effort. The major accomplishments are in three areas. The first is the use of a multiobjective optimization strategy to help identify potential morphing features that uses an existing aircraft sizing code to predict the weight, size and performance of several fixed-geometry aircraft that are Pareto-optimal based upon on two competing aircraft performance objectives. The second area has been titled morphing as an independent variable and formulates the sizing of a morphing aircraft as an optimization problem in which the amount of geometric morphing for various aircraft parameters are included as design variables. This second effort consumed most of the overall effort on the project. The third area involved a more detailed sizing study of a commercial transport aircraft that would incorporate a morphing wing to possibly enable transatlantic point-to-point passenger service.

Crossley, William A.↗

NASA NTRS2008

Deep Space Network Scheduling Using Multi-Objective Optimization with Uncertainty

We have developed a novel technique to incorporate uncertainty modeling within an evolutionary algorithm approach to multi-objective scheduling, with the goal of identifying a Pareto frontier (tradeoff curve) that recognizes the likelihood of events that can impact the schedule outcome. Our approach is particularly applicable to the generation of multiobjective optimized robust schedules, where objectives are assigned a service level, for example that we require an objective value to be greater than or equal to X with Y% confidence. We have demonstrated that such an approach can, for example, minimize scheduling on less reliable resources, based solely on a resource reliability model and not on any ad hoc heuristics. We have also investigated an alternative method of optimizing for robustness, in which we add to the set of objectives a failure risk objective to minimize. We compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches. Future plans for further developing this technology include its application to space-based observatory scheduling problems.

Johnston, Mark D.↗

NASA NTRS2000

Automated Hardware Design via Evolutionary Search

The goal of this research is to investigate the application of evolutionary search to the process of automated engineering design. Evolutionary search techniques involve the simulation of Darwinian mechanisms by computer algorithms. In recent years, such techniques have attracted much attention because they are able to tackle a wide variety of difficult problems and frequently produce acceptable solutions. The results obtained are usually functional, often surprising, and typically "messy" because the algorithms are told to concentrate on the overriding objective and not elegance or simplicity. advantages. First, faster design cycles translate into time and, hence, cost savings. Second, automated design techniques can be made to scale well and hence better deal with increasing amounts of design complexity. Third, design quality can increase because design properties can be specified a priori. For example, size and weight specifications of a device, smaller and lighter than the best known design, might be optimized by the automated design technique. The domain of electronic circuit design is an advantageous platform in which to study automated design techniques because it is a rich design space that is well understood, permitting human-created designs to be compared to machine- generated designs. developed for circuit design was to automatically produce high-level integrated electronic circuit designs whose properties permit physical implementation in silicon. This process entailed designing an effective evolutionary algorithm and solving a difficult multiobjective optimization problem. FY 99 saw many accomplishments in this effort.

Lohn, Jason D.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Integration of Low-Fidelity MDO and CFD-Based Redesign of Low-Boom Supersonic Transports

A mixed-fidelity low-boom multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) problem is formulated for integration of low-fidelity MDO and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based low-boom inverse design optimization. The mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem aims to enforce the weight consistency for CFD-based low-boom inverse design optimization: the optimum low-boom configuration is designed for the weight at the start of cruise of the same configuration for the low-boom overland mission. Moreover, it also seeks the optimum trades among the maximum takeoff gross weight (MTOGW), cruise Mach, and range for the low-boom overland mission while meeting the requirement of flying a transatlantic overwater mission. A block coordinate optimization (BCO) method is developed to find an approximate solution of the mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem. The BCO method is successfully applied to generate two CFD-based low-boom configurations that closely match two reversed equivalent area targets with ground noise levels below 70 PLdB, respectively. Moreover, these CFD-based low-boom configurations can be obtained with minor wing modifications from the solutions of the low-fidelity MDO problem. The low-fidelity MDO solutions are Pareto points for constrained multiobjective optimization of MTOGW, low-boom cruise Mach, and low-boom range. The best low-boom concept has a predetermined fuselage shape tailored for passengers and main gear storage, carries 40 passengers at seat pitch of 48 in, flies a low-boom overland mission with cruise Mach of 1.8 and range of 2,950 nm, cruises overwater at Mach 1.8 with range of 3,600 nm, satisfies the specified constraints for landing/cruise/takeoff, has MTOGW of 145,164 lb, trims the low-boom cruise flight with fuel redistributions instead of control surface deflections, and has a reversed equivalent area distribution closely matching a target with ground noise level below 70 PLdB.

multidisciplinary optimization↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Integration of Low-Fidelity MDO and CFD-Based Redesign of Low-Boom Supersonic Transports

A mixed-fidelity low-boom multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) problem is formulated for integration of low-fidelity MDO and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based low-boom inverse design optimization. The mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem aims to enforce the weight consistency for CFD-based low-boom inverse design optimization: the optimum low-boom configuration is designed for the weight at the start of cruise of the same configuration for the low-boom overland mission. Moreover, it also seeks the optimum trades among the maximum takeoff gross weight (MTOGW), cruise Mach, and range for the low-boom overland mission while meeting the requirement of flying a transatlantic overwater mission. A block coordinate optimization (BCO) method is developed to find an approximate solution of the mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem. The BCO method is successfully applied to generate two CFD-based low-boom configurations that closely match two reversed equivalent area targets with ground noise levels below 70 PLdB, respectively. Moreover, these CFD-based low-boom configurations can be obtained with minor wing modifications from the solutions of the low-fidelity MDO problem. The low-fidelity MDO solutions are Pareto points for constrained multiobjective optimization of MTOGW, low-boom cruise Mach, and low-boom range. The best low-boom concept has a predetermined fuselage shape tailored for passengers and main gear storage, carries 40 passengers at seat pitch of 48 in, flies a low-boom overland mission with cruise Mach of 1.8 and range of 2,950 nm, cruises overwater at Mach 1.8 with range of 3,600 nm, satisfies the specified constraints for landing/cruise/takeoff, has MTOGW of 145,164 lb, trims the low-boom cruise flight with fuel redistributions instead of control surface deflections, and has a reversed equivalent area distribution closely matching a target with ground noise level below 70 PLdB.

low-boom supersonic transports↗

NASA NTRS2021

Integration of Low-Fidelity MDO and CFD-Based Redesign of Low-Boom Supersonic Transports

A mixed-fidelity low-boom multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) problem is formulated for integration of low-fidelity MDO and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based low-boom inverse design optimization. The mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem aims to enforce the weight consistency for CFD-based low-boom inverse design optimization: the optimum low-boom configuration is designed for the weight at the start of cruise of the same configuration for the low-boom overland mission. Moreover, it also seeks the optimum trades among the maximum takeoff gross weight (MTOGW), cruise Mach, and range for the low-boom overland mission while meeting the requirement of flying a transatlantic overwater mission. A block coordinate optimization (BCO) method is developed to find an approximate solution of the mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem. The BCO method is successfully applied to generate two CFD-based low-boom configurations that closely match two reversed equivalent area targets with ground noise levels below 70 PLdB, respectively. Moreover, these CFD-based low-boom configurations can be obtained with minor wing modifications from the solutions of the low-fidelity MDO problem. The low-fidelity MDO solutions are Pareto points for constrained multiobjective optimization of MTOGW, low-boom cruise Mach, and low-boom range. The best low-boom concept has a predetermined fuselage shape tailored for passengers and main gear storage, carries 40 passengers at seat pitch of 48 in, flies a low-boom overland mission with cruise Mach of 1.8 and range of 2,950 nm, cruises overwater at Mach 1.8 with range of 3,600 nm, satisfies the specified constraints for landing/cruise/takeoff, has MTOGW of 145,164 lb, trims the low-boom cruise flight with fuel redistributions instead of control surface deflections, and has a reversed equivalent area distribution closely matching a target with ground noise level below 70 PLdB.

low-boom supersonic transports↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Uncovering Hazards Using a Multi-Objective Optimization to Explore the Faulty State-Space

Considering resilience when designing complex engineered systems is crucial to ensure the system is safe under unexpected hazardous scenarios. Traditional risk-based approaches, such as Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) are useful for designing the system to mitigate hazardous scenarios that can be identified by the designer, but often require experience or prior knowledge of system failures to generate. More recently, researchers have developed simulation tools that enable the designer to model large sets of hazardous scenarios (driven by both internal faults and external factors) through simulation. While these tools enable a wider scope of fault modes to be evaluated (e.g., by injecting combined set of fault modes or injecting modes at different times), the resulting assessments (like FMEA) still require knowledge of the specific modes to be evaluated. However, failure to analyze a wide variety of fault scenarios can lead to an incomplete picture of the system resilience, especially to "surprise events'' which may be difficult for the designer to identify and predict beforehand. To overcome this challenge, previous work developed a fault sampling approach for resilience simulations which would procedurally-generate a wide variety of potential faults by systematically perturbing the health states of the system. While the resulting fault modes generated covered a much larger space hazards than would be otherwise considered (and identified many unique failure trajectories which would not have otherwise been identified), it also significantly increased the computational cost of the analysis and resulted in the simulation and analysis of a large set of essentially duplicate scenarios. Additionally, as the number of dimensions in the faulty state-space increases, the full elaboration of possible modes becomes computationally infeasible, justifying the use of a more targeted search. To resolve this limitation, this work proposes the use of a multiobjective optimization algorithm to search the health state space for potential fault modes that are both (1) hazardous and (2) unique. To solve this type of problem, this work proposes the use of a cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm. To demonstrate this approach, it will be applied to a model of an autonomous rover which uses line markings to navigate, focusing on potential hazards in the drive system which could cause the rover to crash. To determine the merit of the approach, it will further be compared with the previously-presented range elaboration approach and a random mode generation approach on the basis of computational efficiency and found modes.

Resilience↗

NASA NTRS1997

Metamodels for Computer-Based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations

The use of statistical techniques to build approximations of expensive computer analysis codes pervades much of todays engineering design. These statistical approximations, or metamodels, are used to replace the actual expensive computer analyses, facilitating multidisciplinary, multiobjective optimization and concept exploration. In this paper we review several of these techniques including design of experiments, response surface methodology, Taguchi methods, neural networks, inductive learning, and kriging. We survey their existing application in engineering design and then address the dangers of applying traditional statistical techniques to approximate deterministic computer analysis codes. We conclude with recommendations for the appropriate use of statistical approximation techniques in given situations and how common pitfalls can be avoided.

Simpson, Timothy W.↗

NASA NTRS2002

Eigenstructure Assignment for Fault Tolerant Flight Control Design

In recent years, fault tolerant flight control systems have gained an increased interest for high performance military aircraft as well as civil aircraft. Fault tolerant control systems can be described as either active or passive. An active fault tolerant control system has to either reconfigure or adapt the controller in response to a failure. One approach is to reconfigure the controller based upon detection and identification of the failure. Another approach is to use direct adaptive control to adjust the controller without explicitly identifying the failure. In contrast, a passive fault tolerant control system uses a fixed controller which achieves acceptable performance for a presumed set of failures. We have obtained a passive fault tolerant flight control law for the F/A-18 aircraft which achieves acceptable handling qualities for a class of control surface failures. The class of failures includes the symmetric failure of any one control surface being stuck at its trim value. A comparison was made of an eigenstructure assignment gain designed for the unfailed aircraft with a fault tolerant multiobjective optimization gain. We have shown that time responses for the unfailed aircraft using the eigenstructure assignment gain and the fault tolerant gain are identical. Furthermore, the fault tolerant gain achieves MIL-F-8785C specifications for all failure conditions.

Sobel, Kenneth↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flutter and Stochastic Gust Constraint Studies of the Undeflected CRM using MPhys

Aircraft design must ultimately address gust and flutter characteristics to achieve airworthiness. As modern aircraft continue to become more lightweight and flexible, these aeroelastic phenomena are more likely to drive the design process and should thus be considered early. Designing for ride quality due to typical gust spectra is also of interest to ensure a smooth passenger experience. The present work demonstrates the new implementation of stochastic gust constraints in MPhys/OpenMDAO, in addition to flutter and static stress constraints, among others. Design studies are shown for the NASA Common Research Model, including both fuel burn minimization as well as multiobjective optimization of fuel burn and landing gross weight. Two sets of optimization problems are covered, differing mainly by the gust quantity of interest, which include tip displacement and root bending moment. Fuel burn penalties imposed by the flutter and gust constraints are also discussed.

aeroelasticity↗

NASA NTRS1998

The Other Side of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: Accommodating a Multiobjective, Uncertain and Non-Deterministic World

The evolution of multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) over the past several years has been one of rapid expansion and development. In this paper, the evolution of MDO as a field is investigated as well as the evolution of its individual linguistic components: multidisciplinary, design, and optimization. The theory and application of each component have indeed evolved on their own, but the true net gain for MDO is how these piecewise evolutions coalesce to form the basis for MDO, present and future. Originating in structural applications, MDO technology has also branched out into diverse fields and application arenas. The evolution and diversification of MDO as a discipline is explored but details are left to the references cited.

Lewis, Kemper↗

NASA NTRS2000

An Enhanced Multi-Objective Optimization Technique for Comprehensive Aerospace Design

An enhanced multiobjective formulation technique, capable of emphasizing specific objective functions during the optimization process, has been demonstrated on a complex multidisciplinary design application. The Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser (K-S) function approach, which has been used successfully in a variety of multiobjective optimization problems, has been modified using weight factors which enables the designer to emphasize specific design objectives during the optimization process. The technique has been implemented in two distinctively different problems. The first is a classical three bar truss problem and the second is a high-speed aircraft (a doubly swept wing-body configuration) application in which the multiobjective optimization procedure simultaneously minimizes the sonic boom and the drag-to-lift ratio (C(sub D)/C(sub L)) of the aircraft while maintaining the lift coefficient within prescribed limits. The results are compared with those of an equally weighted K-S multiobjective optimization. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the enhanced multiobjective optimization procedure.

Chattopadhyay, Aditi↗

NASA NTRS1992

Aircraft concept optimization using the global sensitivity approach and parametric multiobjective figures of merit

An extension of our parametric multidisciplinary optimization method to include design results connecting multiple objective functions is presented. New insight into the effect of the figure of merit (objective function) on aircraft configuration size and shape is demonstrated using this technique. An aircraft concept, subject to performance and aerodynamic constraints, is optimized using the global sensitivity equation method for a wide range of objective functions. These figures of merit are described parametrically such that a series of multiobjective optimal solutions can be obtained. Computational speed is facilitated by use of algebraic representations of the system technologies. Using this method, the evolution of an optimum design from one objective function to another is demonstrated. Specifically, combinations of minimum takeoff gross weight, fuel weight, and maximum cruise performance and productivity parameters are used as objective functions.

Malone, Brett↗

NASA NTRS2004

Evolutionary Multiobjective Design Targeting a Field Programmable Transistor Array

This paper introduces the ISPAES algorithm for circuit design targeting a Field Programmable Transistor Array (FPTA). The use of evolutionary algorithms is common in circuit design problems, where a single fitness function drives the evolution process. Frequently, the design problem is subject to several goals or operating constraints, thus, designing a suitable fitness function catching all requirements becomes an issue. Such a problem is amenable for multi-objective optimization, however, evolutionary algorithms lack an inherent mechanism for constraint handling. This paper introduces ISPAES, an evolutionary optimization algorithm enhanced with a constraint handling technique. Several design problems targeting a FPTA show the potential of our approach.

global optimization↗

NASA NTRS1992

Multiobjective shape and material optimization of composite structures including damping

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Saravanos, D. A.↗

NASA NTRS2017

Reconfigurable Cellular Composite Structures for Lighter than Air Vehicles with Scalable Size and Endurance

Engineered non-stochastic cellular materials show promising characteristics on the laboratory scale,with nearly ideal specific stiffness and strength scaling at ultralight mass density. These propertiessuggest performance benefits in any application with combined stiffness and mass constraints, suchas air vehicles. We investigate here the application of re-configurable cellular composite materialsand structures to lighter than air vehicles. We describe the properties and applicability of these materials,provide an example analysis of governing loading conditions associated with airships, showan example optimization method for navigating the design space, and describe how recent advancesin cellular material manufacturing and reconfiguration enable system performance benefits includingnew concepts of operation. Lastly, we propose lighter than air vehicles that are assembled andmaintained in-flight, eliminating structural compromises associated with transitional flight modesand ground handling.Engineered non-stochastic cellular material properties suggest performance benefits in lighter than air vehicles due tostiffness and mass constraints that are intrinsic to the airship design problem. Recent advances in cellular materialmanufacturing and reconfiguration enable system performance benefits including new concepts of operation, such aslighter than air vehicles that are assembled and maintained in-flight, eliminating structural compromises associatedwith transitional flight modes and ground handling. Existing engineered cellular materials display properties allowinglarge large scale airships design as monocoque cellular solids. Inevitable improvements in cellular material propertiesand manufacturing will improve feasibility even further. Given the suggestion that the two most significant technologygaps exist across all current airship projects are manufacturing and assembly processes and ground handling [7],a strategy that encompasses construction and maintenance in flight could provide critical rephrasing of the systemdesign problem through these new concepts of operation. Refactoring of traditional manufacturing, operation, andservice process constraints could extend to other domains in aerospace systems and manufacturing in general.In future work, the complexity of the design task would benefit from a form of optimization in order to find themost suitable geometry for a chosen application. For example, the Sequential Least SQuares Programming (SLSQP)function from within the SciPy Minimize library is a multiobjective constrained optimization method that has beenapplied to fixed wing aircraft design. [17] In this situation it would allow for several objective functions such as drag,bending stiffness, buoyancy and cost of transport to be incorporated into a composite objective function.

Copplestone, Grace↗

NASA NTRS2019

Numerical Investigation and Optimization of a Flushwall Injector for Scramjet Applications at Hypervelocity Flow Conditions

An investigation utilizing Reynolds-averaged simulations (RAS) was performed in order to demonstrate the use of design and analysis of computer experiments (DACE) methods in Sandia’s DAKOTA software package for surrogate modeling and optimization. These methods were applied to a flow- path fueled with an interdigitated flushwall injector suitable for scramjet applications at hyper- velocity conditions and ascending along a constant dynamic pressure flight trajectory. The flight Mach number, duct height, spanwise width, and injection angle were the design variables selected to maximize two objective functions: the thrust potential and combustion efficiency. Because the RAS of this case are computationally expensive, surrogate models are used for optimization. To build a surrogate model a RAS database is created. The sequence of the design variables comprising the database were generated using a Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) method. A methodology was also developed to automatically build geometries and generate structured grids for each design point. The ensuing RAS analysis generated the simulation database from which the two objective functions were computed using a one-dimensionalization (1D) of the three-dimensional simulation data. The data were fitted using four surrogate models: an artificial neural network (ANN), a cubic polynomial, a quadratic polynomial, and a Kriging model. Variance-based decomposition showed that both objective functions were primarily driven by changes in the duct height. Multiobjective design optimization was performed for all four surrogate models via a genetic algorithm method. Optimal solutions were obtained at the upper and lower bounds of the flight Mach number range. The Kriging model predicted an optimal solution set that exhibited high values for both objective functions. Additionally, three challenge points were selected to assess the designs on the Pareto fronts. Further sampling among the designs of the Pareto fronts may be required to lower the surrogate model errors and perform more accurate surrogate-model-based optimization.

Shenoy, Rajiv R.↗