Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

Alloying Interlayers for Anode‐Less Lithium‐Metal Polymer Batteries

Anode‐less lithium‐metal batteries potentially offer further increased energy densities. However, the Coulombic efficiency (CE) of lithium plating and stripping, as a classical measure of Li inventory reversibility, is commonly still insufficient for achieving long‐lasting rechargeable batteries. Herein, the potential benefits of employing thin (20 nm) metal interlayers of Ag, Pt, and Au on Cu to alloy with Li in Cu||Li half‐cells and induce homogeneous Li plating with poly(ethylene oxide)‐based electrolytes are investigated. Interestingly, not all alloying interlayers enable a higher CE compared to neat Cu foil with 84%—specifically Ag@Cu with only 81%, while the best performing one, Au@Cu, provides a substantially increased CE of 91%. While generally the formation of “dead lithium” is found to be the major source of CE, this appears to be less pronounced in the case of Au@Cu, indeed. Further improvement can be achieved by carefully adjusting the cell voltage to a region in which the continuous de‐/alloying is suppressed, yielding a further enhanced CE of 94%, thus highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach to design suitable electrode chemistries and designs beyond a “simple” material improvement.

anode-less battery↗

High Current-Density-Charging Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by Double-Layer Protected Lithium Metal Anode

The practical application of lithium (Li) metal anode (LMA) is still hindered by non-uniformity of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), formation of "dead" Li, and continuous consumption of electrolyte although LMA has an ultrahigh theoretical specific capacity and a very low electrochemical redox potential. Herein, we report a facile protection strategy for LMA using a double layer (DL) coating that consists of a polyethylene oxide (PEO)-based bottom layer which is highly stable with LMA and promotes uniform ion flux, and a cross-linked polymer-based top layer which prevents solvation of PEO layer in electrolytes. Li deposited on DL-coated Li (DL@Li) exhibits a smoother surface and much larger size than that deposited on bare Li. The LiF/Li 2 O enriched SEI layer generated by the salt decomposition on top of DL@Li further suppresses the side reactions between Li and electrolyte. Driven by the abovementioned advantageous features, the DL@Li||LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 cells demonstrate capacity retention of 92.4% after 220 cycles at a current density of 2.1 mA cm -2 (C/2 rate) and stability at a high charging current density of 6.9 mA cm -2 (1.5C rate). These results indicate that the DL protection is promising to overcome the rate limitation of LMAs and high energy-density Li metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Regulating Li Nucleation and Growth Heterogeneities via Near-Surface Lithium-Ion Irrigation for Stable Anode-Less Lithium Metal Batteries

The inhomogeneous nucleation and growth of Li dendrite combined with the spontaneous side reactions with the electrolytes dramatically challenge the stability and safety of Li metal anode (LMA). Despite tremendous endeavors, current success relies on the use of significant excess of Li to compensate the loss of active Li during cycling. Herein, a near-surface Li + irrigation strategy is developed to regulate the inhomogeneous Li deposition behavior and suppress the consequent side reactions under limited Li excess condition. The conformal polypyrrole (PPy) coating layer on Cu surface via oxidative chemical vapor deposition technique can induce the migration of Li + to the interregional space between PPy and Cu, creating a near-surface Li + -rich region to smooth diffusion of ion flux and uniform the deposition. Moreover, as evidenced by multiscale characterizations including synchrotron high-energy X-ray diffraction scanning, a robust N-rich solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) is formed on the PPy skeleton to effectively suppress the undesired SEI formation/dissolution process. Strikingly, stable Li metal cycling performance under a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm -2 at 2.0 mA cm -2 with merely 0.5 × Li excess is achieved. The findings not only resolve the long-standing poor LMA stability/safety issues, but also deepen the mechanism understanding of Li deposition process.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

The Origin of Improved Performance in Boron‐Alloyed Silicon Nanoparticle‐Based Anodes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Stabilizing the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) remains a key challenge for silicon‐based lithium‐ion battery anodes. Alloying silicon with secondary elements like boron has emerged as a promising strategy to improve the cycle life of silicon anodes, yet the underlying mechanism remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, how boron concentration influences battery performance is systematically investigated. These results show a near‐monotonic increase in cycle lifetime with higher boron content, with boron‐rich electrodes significantly outperforming pure silicon. Additionally, silicon‐boron alloy anodes exhibit nearly three times longer calendar life than pure silicon. Through detailed mechanistic analysis, alternative contributing factors are systematically ruled out, and it is proposed that improved passivation arises from a strong permanent dipole at the nanoparticle surface. This dipole, formed by undercoordinated and highly Lewis acidic boron, creates a static, ion‐dense layer that stabilizes the electrochemical interface, reducing parasitic electrolyte decomposition and enhancing long‐term stability. These findings suggest that, within the SEI framework, the electric double layer is an important consideration in surface passivation. This insight provides an underexplored parameter space for optimizing silicon anodes in next‐generation lithium‐ion batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Suppressing Chemical Corrosions of Lithium Metal Anodes

In this study, the lithium metal anode is essential for next-generation high-energy-density rechargeable Li-metal batteries. Although extensive studies have been performed to prolong the cycle life of Li-metal batteries, the calendar life, which associates with the chemical corrosion of Li metal in liquid electrolytes, has not been quantitatively understood. Here, by combing the titration gas chromatography method and cryogenic focused ion beam, a quantitative relationship between the chemical corrosion rate and electrochemically deposited Li morphology in various liquid electrolyte systems is established. It has been identified that the corrosion rate is dominated by the porosity of the deposited Li. The larger the porosity of deposited Li has, the faster the corrosion rate will be. Strategies to mitigate the chemical corrosion on Li thus to extend the calendar life of Li-metal batteries are further proposed. By strictly controlling the stacking pressure during Li plating, Li deposits with ultra-low porosity can be achieved, suppressing the corrosion rate to 0.08 ± 0.16%/day compared with 1.71 ± 0.19%/day of the high-porosity Li.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Probing the Effectiveness in Stabilizing Lithium Metal Anodes through Functional Additives

A variety of electrolyte additives were comprehensively evaluated to understand their relative capability in stabilizing lithium metal anode. Although the Li||Cu test is an effective test to rule out ineffective additives, a reliable assessment of individual additives cannot be obtained just by a single evaluation method. Therefore, various methods must be combined to truly assess the stabilization of a lithium anode. Moreover, it was also discovered that a significant depletion of electrolytes occurred during the end-of-life of the lithium batteries, which partially contributed to the sudden failure of the lithium batteries during cycling. However, the main culprit of the sudden failure was identified as the significant increase in the resistance of the lithium metal anode. Further, when used as an additive, cyclic fluorinated carbonates are the most effective in stabilizing the lithium anode and improving the cycling performance of lithium batteries among all the common additives. Despite its cost-effectiveness, the additive in the conventional electrolyte approach provides insufficient protection for lithium metal due to the complete consumption of the additive materials, which is necessary to repair the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). Therefore, it is suggested that a larger ratio (>15 wt %) of the SEI former should be employed to achieve effective lithium stabilization.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Polymer-Stabilized Liquid Metal Nanoparticles as a Scalable Current Collector Engineering Approach Enabling Lithium Metal Anodes

Dendrites and dead lithium formation over prolonged cycling have long been challenges that hinder the safe implementation of metallic Li anodes. In this study, we employ polymer-stabilized liquid metal nanoparticles (LM-P NPs) of eutectic gallium indium (EGaIn) to create uniform Li nucleation sites enabling homogeneous lithium electrodeposition. Block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(acrylic acid) (PEO-b-PAA) were grafted onto the EGaIn surface, forming stabilized, well-dispersed NPs. Using a scalable spray coating approach, LM-P NPs were fabricated on copper current collectors, providing lithiophilic PEO sites and interactive carboxyl groups to guide Li deposition. The Li-EGaIn alloying process greatly reduced the Li + diffusion barrier, enabling fast Li transport through the coating layer, resulting in decreased nucleation overpotential. Therefore, about five times lower Li nucleation overpotential was obtained on the LM-P modified Cu with an optimal composition of the polymers than the bare Cu substrates. DFT computations was used to reveal the binding properties between the LM-P layer and Li. Due to the regulated Li plating/stripping process, as-obtained 30 μm Li anodes paired with LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 (NCM8 11 ) with a negative/positive electrode capacity (N/P) ratio ~ 10 exhibited stable cycling performance at 0.5C for over 250 cycles, with an average Coulombic efficiency of 99.55%. Ultrathin Li (1 μm) anodes with an N/P ratio ~ 0.6 were also demonstrated in Li|LiFePO 4 cells, which examined the stabilization of Li by LM-P NPs and monitored practical loadings of Li anodes that are close to anode-free systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Holistic Stabilization of the Anode in Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries Through a Ternary Alloy Fusion

The anode in lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) is plagued by not only inhomogeneous lithium (Li) deposition, but also by parasitic side-reactions. Often, a thick anode (∼400 µm) is used to compensate for these drawbacks, lowering gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. In this work, we demonstrate a ternary alloy anode fabricated via scalable thermal fusion of Li with aluminum (Al) and tellurium (Te) to cohesively address these issues. The Al–Li skeleton serves to homogenize Li deposition as well as reinforce the anode, allowing it to be rolled down to low thicknesses. Te incorporation suppresses the reaction of Li with polysulfides (Li 2 Sn) to form lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) and electrolyte degradation. It can also facilitate the formation of polytellurosulfides (Li 2 Te x Sy), which are far more conducive to Li + -ion diffusion. Even under a lean electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratio of 8 µL mg −1 and a low negative/positive (N/P) ratio of 3, capacities over 900 mA h g −1 at a C/5 rate are obtained in cells with Li–Te–Al anodes with a capacity retention of 80% after 70 cycles. In comparison, the baseline lithium-metal anode retains only 35% after 50 cycles. Furthermore, the Li–Te–Al anodes confer a 24% boost to gravimetric energy density at the pouch cell level.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Comparative Study of Vinylene Carbonate and Lithium Difluoro(oxalate)borate Additives in a SiO x /Graphite Anode Lithium-Ion Battery in the Presence of Fluoroethylene Carbonate

The SiO x /graphite composite is recognized as a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), owing to the high theoretical capacity of SiO x combined with the excellent stability of graphite. However, the inherent disadvantage of volume expansion in silicon-based anodes places significant challenges on the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and severely degrades the electrochemical performance. Rational formulation of electrolyte, including its additives, is crucial in accommodating and optimizing the composition of the SEI and enhancing the cell performance. In this work, we present a comparative study of vinylene carbonate (VC) and lithium difluoro(oxalate)borate (LiDFOB) additives combined with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) in the electrolyte for SiO x /graphite∥LiNi 1–x–y–z Co x Mn y Al z O 2 full cells. VC outperformed LiDFOB as an additive, delivering higher capacity cycling, higher Coulombic efficiency, and better cycle stability up to 400 cycles. XPS and impedance analyses reveal that LiDFOB contributed to SEI/CEI with both a lower proportion of LiF and a higher proportion of poly(VC), which tended to produce higher cell impedance. XRD and XANES further indicated that using the LiDFOB additive, the NCMA cycled to a shallower degree than that of the VC additive. Although the VC additive maintained a higher capacity up to 400 cycles, microstrain and SEM analyses show a higher strained NCMA along with clear evidence of cracking over the surface of the NCMA particle in VC-based electrolyte but not in LiDFOB. In conclusion, this suggests that the negative influence of LiDFOB at the anode (inferior SEI) supersedes the negative impact of both a cracked NCMA and a deeper cycled NCMA and SiO x -based anode.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Localized High–Concentration Electrolytes with Low–Cost Diluents Compatible with Both Cobalt–Free LiNiO 2 Cathode and Lithium–Metal Anode

High-nickel layered oxide cathodes and lithium-metal anode are promising candidates for next-generation battery systems due to their high energy density. Nevertheless, the instability of the electrode–electrolyte interphase is hindering their practical application. Localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) present a promising solution for achieving uniform lithium deposition and a stable cathode–electrolyte interphase. However, the limited choice of diluents and their high cost are restricting their implementation. Four novel cost-effective diluents and their performance with highly reactive LiNiO 2 cathode and Li-metal anode are reported here. The results show that all the LHCE cells exhibit a Coulombic efficiency of >99.38% in Li | Cu cells and a capacity retention of >85% in Li | LiNiO 2 cells after 250 cycles. Advanced characterizations unveil that the stable cell operation is due to well-tuned electrode–electrolyte interphases and Li deposition morphology. In addition, online electrochemical mass spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry reveal that the gas generation and heat-release are greatly reduced with the LHCEs presented. Altogether, the study provides new insights into the role of diluents in LHCEs and offers valuable guidance for further optimization of LHCEs for high energy density lithium-metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Hyperconjugation-controlled molecular conformation weakens lithium-ion solvation and stabilizes lithium metal anodes

Tuning the solvation structure of lithium ions via electrolyte engineering has proven effective for lithium metal (Li) anodes. Further advancement that bypasses the trial-and-error practice relies on the establishment of molecular design principles. Expanding the scope of our previous work on solvent fluorination, we report here an alternative design principle for non-fluorinated solvents, which potentially have reduced cost, environmental impact, and toxicity. By studying non-fluorinated ethers systematically, we found that the short-chain acetals favor the [gauche, gauche] molecular conformation due to hyperconjugation, which leads to weakened monodentate coordination with Li + . The dimethoxymethane electrolyte showed fast activation to >99% coulombic efficiency (CE) and high ionic conductivity of 8.03 mS cm -1 . The electrolyte performance was demonstrated in anode-free Cu$∥$LFP pouch cells at current densities up to 4 mA cm -2 (70 to 100 cycles) and thin-Li$∥$high-loading-LFP coin cells (200–300 cycles). Overall, we demonstrated and rationalized the improvement in Li metal cyclability by the acetal structure compared to ethylene glycol ethers. We expect further improvement in performance by tuning the acetal structure.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Increasing the Pressure‐Free Stripping Capacity of the Lithium Metal Anode in Solid‐State‐Batteries by Carbon Nanotubes

Abstract Lithium metal is the key anode material for solid‐state‐batteries as its successful implementation will drastically increase their energy and power densities. However, anode contact loss during stripping leads to dendrites upon plating and subsequent cell failure. Design strategies to mitigate these issues are crucial to enable the use of lithium metal anodes. This paper reports the dissolution kinetics of composite anodes made of lithium metal and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with a garnet‐type solid electrolyte (SE). In addition to an enhancement of the effective diffusion within the anode, its dissolution is fundamentally changed from being 2D to 3D. By maintaining contact with the SE, the CNTs facilitate lithium transport to the interface, which yields more than 20 mAh cm −2 discharge capacity at 100 µ A cm −2 without the application of external stack pressure ( > 1 MPa). Conclusions drawn from electrochemical data on the anode microstructure are validated using cryo‐focused‐ion‐beam scanning electron microscopy and correlated with the mechanical properties. Micro‐indentation, acoustic analysis, and stress–strain testing show that mechanical properties of the anode, like yield strength and hardness, are adjustable. Overall, it is shown that the mechanical and electrochemical properties of Li–CNT composite electrodes can be tailored to suit the requirements of a practical cell.

Fuchs, Till↗

Non‐Linear Kinetics of The Lithium Metal Anode on Li 6 PS 5 Cl at High Current Density: Dendrite Growth and the Role of Lithium Microstructure on Creep

Abstract Interfacial instability, viz., pore formation in the lithium metal anode (LMA) during discharge leading to high impedance, current focusing induced solid–electrolyte (SE) fracture during charging, and formation/behaviour of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI), at the anode, is one of the major hurdles in the development of solid‐state batteries (SSBs). Also, understanding cell polarization behaviour at high current density is critical to achieving the goal of fast‐charging battery and electric vehicle. Herein, via in situ electrochemical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements, performed with freshly deposited lithium microelectrodes on transgranularly fractured fresh Li6PS5Cl (LPSCl), the LiǀLPSCl interface kinetics are investigated beyond the linear regime. Even at relatively small overvoltages of a few mV, the LiǀLPSCl interface shows non‐linear kinetics. The interface kinetics possibly involve multiple rate‐limiting processes, i.e., ion transport across the SEI and SE|SEI interfaces, as well as charge transfer across the LiǀSEI interface. The total polarization resistance R P of the microelectrode interface is determined to be ≈ 0.8 Ω cm 2 . It is further shown that the nanocrystalline lithium microstructure can lead to a stable LiǀSE interface via Coble creep along with uniform stripping. Also, spatially resolved lithium deposition, i.e., at grain surface flaws, grain boundaries, and flaw‐free surfaces, indicates exceptionally high mechanical endurance of flaw‐free surfaces toward cathodic load (>150 mA cm −2 ). This highlights the prominent role of surface defects in dendrite growth.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Tackling issues of lithium metal anodes with a novel polymeric lithicone coating

Lithium metal (Li) has been hindered from as anodes in commercial batteries for over 50 years, due to two main issues: continuous formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and lithium dendritic growth. In this work, we report a new strategy to tackle these issues, i.e., using molecular layer deposition (MLD) to grow an ionically conducting but electrically insulating polymeric lithicone coating, an Li-containing triethanolamine (LiTEA). Our electrochemical tests revealed that this LiTEA coating could serve as an exceptional protection layer over Li anodes. Consequently, the LiTEA-coated Li electrodes could achieve a superior cyclability of > 10000 Li stripping/plating cycles at a current density of 5 mA cm -2 and a long cyclability of > 5500 cycles at 2 mA cm -2 in Li||Li symmetric cells without failures, under a fixed areal capacity of 1 mAh cm -2 . Characterizations using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron microscopy verified that Li + ions could be easily extracted through and deposited under the LiTEA coating during the stripping/plating processes. Consequently, this LiTEA coating significantly inhibited the formation of SEI and Li dendrites. This underlies the long cycling lifetime of the LiTEA-coated Li||Li cells. Coupling with the nickel-rich LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathodes, more encouragingly, the LiTEA-coated Li anodes could remarkably extend the cyclability and sustainable capacity of the resultant Li||NMC full cells. Finally, we also demonstrated that the performance of Li||NMC cells could be further improved through combining an LiTEA-coated Li anode with an Li 2 S-modified NMC811 via atomic layer deposition (ALD). Thus, this study is inspiring for developing high-energy Li||NMC lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Improving Cycling Performance of Anode-Free Lithium Batteries by Pressure and Voltage Control

The anode-free lithium (Li) batteries (AFLBs) have great potential to provide higher energy density than most other batteries. However, the performance of AFLBs is very sensitive to pressure and other operating parameters, especially for coin cells widely used in AFLB investigations. Therefore, optimizing cell assembly parameters and test protocol is critical to get reliable and comparable results in this field. In this work, the operating voltage range of AFLBs using a localized high concentration electrolyte has been optimized. The morphology of the deposited Li in AFLBs is much more indicting to the pressure than other type of batteries due to the absence of anode active material (i.e. Li) as a pressure cushion layer in the as prepared cells. With an optimized cycling protocol, a thin layer of uniform nucleation sites can be formed in the initial cycle which will facilitate smooth Li desposition/stripping in the subsequent cycles of AFLBs. The solid electrolyte interphase layer formed under optimized pressure and uniform pressure distribution exhibits a good mechanical stability even after long-term cycling. In conclusion, with an optimized cell configuration, the internal pressure in the coin cells has been optimized to improve the cycling performance of AFLBs (Cu||NMC811) with 72% of capacity retention in 100 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗