Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “liquefaction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

Unlocking the biofuel power of cover crop in Washington State: Enhancing potential through hydrothermal liquefaction

This study evaluates cover crops in Washington State (WA) as a renewable feedstock for hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), supported by techno-economic (TEA) and life cycle (LCA) analysis. In the Pacific Northwest, fallow land is the common winter practice, generating no income for farmers. Over three years, field trials at two representative sites—Puyallup (cool, wet) and Othello (irrigated, no-till)tested triticale, hairy vetch, crimson clover, winter pea, and fava bean preceding cash crops. Biomass yields, composition, soil impacts, and net revenue were assessed across removal treatments. HTL conversion produced 32–37 wt% biocrude, lower than 48 wt% for sewage sludge, with modeled cradle-to-grave carbon intensities of 26–31 g CO 2 e/MJ and minimum fuel selling prices (MFSP) of $\$$6.75–$\$$7.18 per gallon gasoline equivalent (GGE), comparable to other lignocellulosic feedstocks. No significant changes were observed in soil carbon, nitrogen, or subsequent cash crop yields after cover crop removal. Farmer profitability was possible, particularly for triticale and hairy vetch at $\$$60 per dry ton. To address seasonal variability, blending with wastewater sludge was evaluated. All scenarios delivered >70 % carbon intensity reductions relative to fossil fuels, and with Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits, MFSPs below $\$$2.5 GGE were achievable. These results demonstrate that cover crops can generate new revenue streams for farmers while serving as a flexible, low-carbon feedstock. Integrating cover crops with waste biomass offers a practical pathway to expand the bioeconomy and support year-round renewable fuel production.

Biofuels↗

Valorizing Hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase via nanofiltration: Enhancing biocrude production from algal biomass

The hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase (HTL-AP), a nutrient- and carbon-rich waste byproduct of the HTL process, can be recirculated to enhance biocrude production efficiency. To avoid dilution of the HTL feedstock and reduced fuel quality associated with recirculating untreated HTL-AP, this study investigated nanofiltration to concentrate organic compounds and separate nutrients from HTL-AP of three algal biomass sources: an algal wastewater treatment system and two from harmful algal blooms in lakes. Up to 99% of the organics were recovered in the concentrated HTL-AP (retentate), and significant increases in both permeate flux and permeation of nitrogenous compounds were achieved by increasing HTL-AP temperature to 45 °C and pH to 11. Recirculating the concentrated HTL-AP increased biocrude yield by 70%-116% and reduced biocrude nitrogen content by up to 12%. The carbon and energy capture in the biocrude also increased by 66% and 68%, respectively.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Mesophase pitch-based high performance carbon fiber production using coal extracts from mild direct coal liquefaction

Mild direct coal liquefaction (autogenous pressure, no catalyst, no H2 gas) of Springfield coal in fluid catalytic cracking decant oil is shown to effectively produce coal extract precursors to spinnable mesophase pitch. Here this work demonstrates that the coal extract can be thermally treated to obtain mesophase pitch in a facile one-step process, bypassing the production of an intermediate isotropic pitch. Furthermore, the presence of 25 wt.% coal in the initial slurry can increase the yield to mesophase pitch nearly twofold and yield to carbon fiber by approximately 70%. The coal extract-derived mesophase pitch was melt-spun and heat treated to produce carbon fiber with graphitic texture, high modulus (>400 GPa) and tensile strength up to 943 MPa. Overall, this work demonstrates that coal can be effectively utilized to markedly amplify the mesophase pitch and carbon fiber yield from fluid catalytic cracking decant oil by relatively simple processing, while conserving utility as a precursor to high performance carbon fiber and potentially other high value graphitic products.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF AN ENGINEERING SCALE HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION SYSTEM

This work evaluates the Modular Hydrothermal Liquefaction System (MHTLS), an engineering-scale, integrated continuous HTL plant operated at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), for converting realistic wet wastes into energy-dense biocrudes. The production campaigns discussed here processed algae, sewage sludges, lignocellulosic blends, Industrial food waste, and engineered food-waste slurries at 350?°C and around 200?bar, with nominal feed rates of ~12?L?h?¹. We report biocrude yields and composition, establish mass and elemental (C, N) balances, and quantify energy performance via heater duties, heat-exchanger behavior, and system-level efficiencies. Biocrudes contained 76–80?wt?% C (dry, ash-free) with HHVs of 38-41?MJ?kg?¹, substantially higher than feed materials HHVs of 16.6–26.1?MJ?kg?¹ and approaching petroleum fuels. Dry, ash-free biocrude yields of 32–53?wt?% corresponded to 43–71?wt?% carbon yields, with 18–40?wt?% of feed carbon routed to the aqueous phase. Thermal efficiencies were 50-65%, and total energy efficiencies, including reactor heat input, were 35-55%. A counter-current tube-in-tube heat exchanger delivered U values of 200–450?W?m?²?K?¹, with fouling-induced declines impacting heat recovery and heater duty. The analysis highlights three priorities for the process intensification of HTL: robust, fouling-resistant heat recovery, hydrodynamically suitable reactor and heat-exchanger designs, simplified and predictable solids management, and biocrude-water separation.

Biocrude production↗

Methane liquefaction with an active magnetic regenerative refrigerator

This manuscript reports liquefaction of methane using an active magnetic regenerative refrigerator (AMRR). The AMRR used to cool from 285 K to 135 K has two identical regenerators fabricated with adjacent layers of four ferromagnetic refrigerants, each with sequentially lower Curie temperatures and lesser masses from hot to cold temperatures. The dual multilayer regenerators were assembled in opposition with a single cold region between them. For this set of experiments equal mass of helium gas was pumped through all layers of the regenerators during the two flow steps of the four-step AMR cycle. After successfully reaching 135 K, a compact condensing coil-fin tube heat exchanger (HEX) with a small storage vessel was mounted in the cold region of the dual regenerator assembly to be cooled during the hot-to-cold helium flow from alternatively demagnetized regenerators. The cold HEX was used to cool and liquefy a process stream of methane gas supplied at 295 K and different pressures in different runs. Further, by measuring time to liquefy a known volume of methane at three different pressures, cooling powers of the AMRR as a function of temperature were determined. The resultant data were compared to those predicted by the AMRR performance model. Conclusions from these experiments and suggestions for future work are presented.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Effects of temperature and time on supercritical methanol Co-Liquefaction of rice straw and linear low-density polyethylene wastes

We report that biofuels are particularly attractive and play an increasingly important role in sustainable energy. However, biofuels originating from lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) are extremely challenging because of their low carbon content, low stability, and high oxygen content. This work evaluates the supercritical methanol (scMeOH) co-liquefaction of rice straw and linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) at temperature range of 240-340 °C for 0-2 h, to obtain hydrocarbons (HCs)-rich oil and carbon-rich solid product. Results show that reaction temperature dominated the yield and properties of products, but not the holding time. Among parameters tested, 30.07 wt% oil yield with 75.79% HCs content and 33.05 wt% oil yield with 70.91% HCs content were obtained at 300 °C for 1 h and 1.5 h, respectively. Simultaneously, the remaining solid products were still as high as 53.85 wt% with a carbon content of 79.59% and 48.28 wt% with carbon content of 81.34% under 300 °C for 1 h and 1.5 h, respectively. Ultimate analysis, FT-IR, TGA, and SEM show that solid products could be used as sustainable carbon resources, and solid fuel rather than soil amendment because of risk of micro plastic or adsorbent due to smooth surface without pores.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Rheology and engine performance of very low sulfur fuel oil blended with 10% fast pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction oils in a 2-stroke crosshead engine

The performance and emissions for a downscaled single-cylinder 2-stroke crosshead engine were determined for a very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) when blended with 10 wt.% fast pyrolysis (FP) or hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) bio-intermediates. The FP and HTL oils were derived from biomass and were observed to contain lower molecular weight (MW) hydrocarbons than neat VLSFO (which was evaluated as a baseline comparison). The addition of either biofuel reduced the overall viscosity of the VLSFO. Aging tests at 50, 90, and 120°C showed that the dynamic viscosity of VLSFO increased with exposure time up to two weeks. Similar trends were observed for the FP and HTL blends, but a pronounced spike in viscosity occurred for these fuels during the early period of exposure. None of the viscosity increases exceeded the operational limits of fuel system pumps. Engine performance studies were conducted under low, medium and high load operational settings. The relative performance of the test fuels was highly dependent on operating condition. In general, the engine results for the three test fuels were similar, but modest improvements in brake thermal efficiency and brake specific fuel consumption were observed, which may be attributed to the heightened reactivity of low molecular weight fraction of the FP and HTL oils.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge – effect of four reagents on relevant parameters related to biocrude and $\mathrm{PFAS}$

Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) can convert wet biomass into crude-like oil and has potential to degrade pollutants during the thermal depolymerization process. To avoid negative environmental impacts from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in sewage sludge after its final disposal, we comprehensively evaluated catalytic destruction of PFAS in sludge through HTL. Here the results showed that adding red mud to HTL was beneficial for the biocrude yield and significantly increased the carbon conversion efficiency and energy recovery of the hydrothermal process. HTL at 300 °C for 2 h degraded > 96% of spiked perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The mass of spiked perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and pre-existing perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), however, increased in the HTL product streams. The remaining PFAS after HTL mainly stayed in the biocrude phase. Our findings indicated that HTL under the studied condition was not able to degrade all PFAS existed in sewage sludge. Although adding red mud could improve the HTL performance with respect to biocrude, this reagent did not improve the removal of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs). As a matter of fact, the hydrothermal process amended with the selected reagents resulted in increased mass of PFBS, PFHxA, and PFHpA in the HTL products due to degradation of PFAA precursors. Thus, other treatment approaches for PFAS removal from sewage sludge need to be identified to prevent possible contamination of environments receiving PFAS-containing sludge.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Electrocatalytic oxidation of hydrothermal liquefaction-derived aqueous phase for on-site wastewater treatment and H 2 production

Electrocatalytic oxidation (ECO) is a promising method for generating molecular hydrogen (H 2 ) while simultaneously treating the aqueous phase (AP) from hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of biomass-derived feedstocks such as algae, food waste, sludge, and wood. This study highlights the impact of HTL-AP composition on ECO performance, mainly activity, stability, and efficiency in a batch and flow electrolyzer. We demonstrated current efficiency (CE) for chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal ranges from 14% to 85% in the flow electrolyzer with electrode stability increasing from 20 to ≥2,800 h. Decreasing the applied potential enhances the CE. High ammonium content can accelerate deactivation, yet chloride ions appear to aid oxidation of organic compounds and enhanced anode stability. A preliminary energy and H 2 balance for an HTL sewage sludge plant shows that the HTL-AP contains sufficient COD to produce all the H 2 needs for bio-oil hydrotreating, with a 26% surplus available for other uses.

Electrolysis↗

Roadmap for Deployment of Modularized Hydrothermal Liquefaction: Understanding the Impacts of Industry Learning, Optimal Plant Scale, and Delivery Costs on Biofuel Pricing

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a promising technology for converting abundant organic wastes into fuels. Previous techno-economic analyses (TEAs) of HTL have been used to estimate the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of biofuel products, but these analyses often assume a bespoke plant design where each plant operates under unique process conditions and neglect transportation costs. However, transportation costs must be included in realistic TEAs, and further, a mass-produced fixed-scale modular plant design approach may be more effective than case-by-case plant design, provided that there is sufficient market capacity to benefit from modularization. This study estimates fuel price behavior in the presence of transportation costs and benefits stemming from modular plant design. This analysis indicates that a modular process capable of handling 60 dry tons per day (DTPD) is optimal, resulting in a ~25% reduction in MFSP (from $4.70/GGE, fully upgraded) at complete market feedstock utilization compared with case-by-case design. The associated cost reductions are attributable to learning benefits and modularization. Several HTL deployment “roadmaps” are then explored, with each roadmap consisting of different periods of case-by-case design followed by adoption of a modularized approach. A period of nonmodular industry growth up to market saturation of ~7% followed by implementation of modular plant design strikes a balance between the investment risk and learned cost reductions associated with modular plant design. However, if bespoke plants built during this period of nonmodular growth saturate more than 23% of available feedstock, learned cost reductions are significantly diminished. Here, this study points to the potential benefits of modularized and decentralized waste-to-energy processes when the modularization follows an optimal deployment strategy.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Microalgae Conversion to Biofuels and Biochemical via Sequential Hydrothermal Liquefaction (SEQHTL) and Bioprocessing: 2020 State of Technology

A preliminary techno-economic analysis (TEA) was developed for the fiscal year 2020 state of technology (SOT) assessment to evaluate the benefits and risks for a large-scale microalga hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) system based on most recent testing results. The focus of the study is directed toward the conversion system, which consists of five processes: two-stage sequential HTL (SEQHTL), biocrude upgrading to final fuels, bioprocessing for co-product generation, hydrogen generation, and steam cycle. In this system, algae biomass with corn stover supplement during the lower algae productivity seasons (winter, fall, and spring) to match the maximum algae seasonal production rate in summer is employed to maintain a constant plant capacity in all the seasons. Algae only (summer season) or algae/corn stover blended feedstock (other seasons) are sent to a two-stage SEQHTL process. In stage I, the carbohydrates in the feedstock are extracted and separated from the residual solid. The residual solid from stage I is further converted to biocrude in the SEQHTL stage II step. The biocrude is upgraded to final fuel products in an upgrading process. The extract stream from HTL stage I is sent to the bioprocessing section for co-product generation via fermentation of carbohydrate. Lactic acid (LA) is assumed to be the co-product based on current bioprocessing testing results.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Upgrading of Wastewater-Grown Microalgae: 2021 State of Technology

The fiscal year (FY) 2021 State of Technology (SOT) Assessment for the hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of wastewater (WW)-grown microalgae and biocrude upgrading system was completed and reported here. An industrial partner, Gross-Wen Technologies (GWT), provided algae feedstock cultivated on a revolving algal biofilm (RAB) system by using the primary effluent from a water resource recovery facility (WRRF). This provided algae was tested at PNNL for HTL processing. The experimental results provided the major design basis of the HTL process of the SOT baseline case. The primary effluent of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD) of Greater Chicago was assumed to be the nutrients source for algae growth and the algae yield data per gallon wastewater provided by GWT were used to estimate the total algae production rate and thus the HTL conversion plant scale. Considering different cultivation technologies and wastewater streams with different flow rates and nutrients contents can be used to produce algae, this SOT assessment just provided an example case study for WW-grown algae based HTL conversion to fuels systems. A preliminary economic analysis was developed based on process simulation results. Sensitivity analysis was implemented to evaluate cost impacts of plant scales, potential cost improvements and other key factors.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Wet Waste Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Biocrude Upgrading to Hydrocarbon Fuels: 2021 State of Technology

Each year the U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) assesses progress in their research and development efforts toward sustainable production of renewable fuels (DOE 2016) through the annual state of technology (SOT) assessment. The SOT assessment evaluates the impact of the year’s research progress on the modeled minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) for selected biofuel conversion pathways and measures the current state of the technology relative to defined goal case projections. Supply chain sustainability analysis to track and guide research toward improved greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy usage, water usage and other environmental metrics for the pathway is performed by Argonne National Laboratory (Cai et al. 2018, 2020). Technical and cost targets for a projected goal case set for the year 2022 were previously established for the wet waste hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and biocrude upgrading pathway and summarized in a design report (Snowden-Swan et al. 2017). Process performance advancements made for HTL and biocrude hydrotreating have resulted yearly reductions in the modeled MFSP relative to the initial SOT (2018) (Snowden-Swan et al. 2020, 2021). This report summarizes the research and associated techno-economic analysis (TEA) for the pathway 2021 SOT. Methods and economic assumptions for the nth plant analysis used for the TEA are consistent with the design report (Snowden-Swan et al. 2017), with the exception of updates in the modeled cost year (2016) and income tax rate (21%).

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Integration of Autothermal Oxidation into Hydrothermal Liquefaction

This report examines incorporating a mild oxidation process, in traditional Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL). The focus is on improving efficiency through heat recovery and autothermal operations. In WAO, pressurized and heated sludge, mixed with air, undergoes combustion reactions, generating CO 2 and other gases. A novel aspect is using reactor effluent heat to pre-heat incoming sludge, minimizing energy needs and enabling autothermal reactions at specific solids concentrations. The report discusses many advantages of this embodiment of the HTL process, which could eliminate heat exchangers by leveraging heat from oxidation. This approach simplifies operations.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Profitability, Scalability and Optimized Siting for Waste-to-Energy Supply Chains: A Case Study on Hydrothermal Liquefaction

Waste-to-Energy (WtE) conversion technologies have the potential to simultaneously reduce waste volumes, treatment-related emissions, and carbon intensity while producing valuable energy services. However, questions remain regarding under which conditions emerging WtE technologies are feasible to deploy. In this project, we develop an optimized siting method for WtE technologies to assess cost-effective WtE processor locations, throughput scales, and profitability. We apply the model using Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL) as an example WtE technology. We develop calibrated capital and operating expense cost curves based on literature data to study the techno-economic characteristics of WtE supply chains. Prior to solving the siting optimization, we analyze the model parameters to describe organic waste management system behavior under four different HTL deployment configurations: Co-Processing, where HTL plants send biocrude to existing conventional refineries via assumed pipelines; Co-Location, where biorefineries are co-located with HTL plants; and two alternative Standalone Biorefining cases, where distributed HTL plants transport biocrude intermediate via either assumed pipelines or trucking to centralized biorefineries. We also define and apply several feedstock gate fee calculations, representing different revenue distribution options, to investigate how bioproduct value could impact WtE supply chain economics in terms of waste producer and processor profit or cost reduction.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Evaluate Synergies of Using Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Anerobic Digestion Treatment Technologies for Wastewater Resource Recovery Facilities (CRADA 516 Final Report)

The research focuses on utilizing a new anaerobic digestion (AD) configuration to treat the aqueous by-product generated by hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of sewage sludge. This report found that for Anaerobic Digestion for HTL By-product, Anaerobic biofilms can degrade some HTL wastewater contaminants, but co-digestion is essential to address nutrient deficiencies and optimize performance. Without AD, toxicity of HTL aqueous streams may limit broader adoption in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) used an innovative reactor design, involving a dynamic membrane anaerobic bioreactor to promote biofilm growth, improving contaminant degradation. The tree-like structure inside the reactor supports biofilm development with recirculation enhancing microbial activity. Overall, a 70% chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was achieved, although nutrient supplementation is required for stability. The reactor achieved a diverse microbial community, including methanogens and bacteria capable of degrading phenols and aromatics.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Sustainable Aviation Fuel from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Wet Wastes

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) uses heat and pressure to liquefy the organic matter in biomass/waste feedstocks to produce biocrude. When hydrotreated the biocrude is converted into transportation fuels including sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Further, by liquifying the organic matter in wet wastes such as sewage sludge, manure, and food waste, HTL can prevent landfilling or other disposal methods such as anerobic digestion, or incineration. A significant roadblock to the development of a new route for SAF is the strict approval process, and the large volumes required (>400 L) for testing. Tier α and β testing can predict some of the properties required for ASTM testing with <400 mL samples. The current study is the first to investigate the potential for utilizing wet-waste HTL biocrude (WWHTLB) as an SAF feedstock. Herein, several WWHTLB samples were produced from food waste, sewage sludge, and fats, oils, and grease, and subsequently hydrotreated and distilled to produce SAF samples. The fuels (both undistilled and distilled samples) were analyzed via elemental and 2D-GC-MS. Herein, we report the Tier α and β analysis of an SAF sample derived originally from a WWHTLB. The results of this work indicate that the upgraded WWHTLB material exhibits key fuel properties, including carbon number distribution, distillation profile, surface tension, density, viscosity, heat of combustion, and flash point, which all fall within the required range for aviation fuel. WWHTLB has therefore been shown to be a promising candidate feedstock for the production of SAF.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Structurally Diverse Lignins: Insights into Biocrude Yield, Fuel Properties, and Reaction Mechanisms

Lignin holds significant promise as a feedstock for biocrude production via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). Although lignin HTL has been widely studied, the specific depolymerization pathways associated with distinct lignin structures remain largely unexplored. This study investigates the HTL of four structurally diverse lignins: alkaline (AL), dealkaline (DAL), organosolv (OL), and lignosulfonate (LS) across 270–310 °C to elucidate structure-specific mechanisms governing biocrude yield and composition. AL and OL achieved the highest yields (16.8 ± 0.3% and 16.8 ± 2.5%), with AL-derived biocrude showing the highest carbon content (70.2 ± 0.0%) and HHV (31.0 ± 0.2 MJ/kg). In contrast, DAL and LS produced lower yields and inferior fuel quality due to higher sulfur content and lower carbon enrichment. The structures of AL and DAL, containing fewer methoxy groups, produced guaiacol-rich biocrudes (46.6% and 69.5%). Methylation in AL formed alkyl guaiacols and veratroles, while DAL favored side-chain oxidation. OL retained complex structures, forming syringols and desaspidinol, which contributed to heavier biocrude compounds. Sulfonate groups in LS were stabilized mostly as sulfides, leading to elevated sulfur content. These findings provide mechanistic insight into how lignin structure governs HTL behavior, enabling targeted control of biocrude yield and quality for renewable fuel production.

biocrude↗