Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “burnable absorbers”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

Fundamental Studies of Tritium Formation and Diffusivity in Pure and Defective Zircaloy-4 Getters

Zirconium (Zr) and its alloys are used as fuel cladding in nuclear reactors. These materials have their low absorption cross-section for thermal neutrons and have good mechanical and thermal properties. In addition, they are used as tritium getters in tritium-producing burnable absorber rods (TPBARs), in the form of nickel-plated Zircaloy-4 tubes. To produce 3 H, the breading blankets such as lithium aluminate are irradiated in pressurized water. 3 H produced in this process is captured by the getter and 3 H reacts chemically with Zr to form metal hydride (ZrTx). The precipitation of metal hydride results in not only the volume increase and hydrogen embrittlement of zircaloy but also changes in getter’s chemical properties. This degrades the getter’s performance. Therefore, understanding the behavior of 3 H (such as diffusion and solubility) in zircaloy is important to understand getter performance.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Light Water Reactor LEU+ Lattice Optimization

Commercial light water reactor (LWR) operators and fuel vendors in the United States are exploring potential changes to nuclear fuel that include low-enriched uranium plus (LEU+) designs to further improve operational economics (e.g., extend cycle length). LEU+ fuel is fuel with a maximum enrichment between 5 wt% and 10 wt% 235 U; it allows for higher assembly burnup but likely requires additional reactivity control, e.g., increased burnable absorbers. This report examines possible LEU+ fuel lattice design changes using the lattice physics code, SCALE/Polaris. An optimization driver called the Metaheuristic Optimization Tool (MOT) is used to automate domain space exploration and optimization of LEU+ lattice designs. Heuristics from previous LWR lattice optimization studies were used to construct the objective function and define the domain space for optimization. This work successfully demonstrated that the optimization algorithms of MOT can generate feasible, nonproprietary LEU+ lattice designs (GE14 10 × 10 and Westinghouse 17 × 17) that meet the constraints of traditional LWR lattices while extending cycle length.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Investigating Hydrogen Isotope Exchange Reactions on Lithium Aluminate Pellets in TPBAR (FY22 Report)

We developed a novel operando Raman spectroscopy method for investigation of hydrogen (H) isotope exchange reactions in the lithium aluminate (γ-LiAlO 2 ) that allows modeling of tritium behaviors in high temperature and in an irradiated environment. The lithium aluminate pellet is a main component in the Tritium-Producing Burnable Absorber Rod (TPBAR). We used deuterium ( 2 H or D) as a surrogate to simulate tritium ( 3 H or T). We used a surface analysis tools in situ/operando Raman spectroscopy to observe the transformation OH and OD compositional changes. We also used ToF-SIMS to analyze the lithium aluminate pellet control sample to build the base line for future in situ/operando analysis. To conduct operando Raman spectroscopy, we developed a custom reaction cell with a detachable micro heater using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and 3D printing techniques. Multiple versions were developed and tested. Using the new reaction cell, we demonstrated operando Raman spectroscopy of water (H 2 O) and deuterated water (D 2 O) with nitrogen (N 2 ) exposure onto the lithium aluminate (LiAlO2) pellet specimen, respectively, using a wet gas injection setup. We also successfully developed a detachable microheater that can heat up to ~250°C for ~90 mins. The Raman spectra did not show clear H 2 O and D 2 O characteristic peaks, which indicates that introducing H 2 O and D 2 O onto the surface of the pellet is challenging due to its dense structure nature. Our efforts suggest that various improvements are needed, such as increasing reaction cell operating gas pressure and thinning pellet sample thickness, to obtain meaningful measurements.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

First-Principles Studies of Tritium Species Dissociability & Diffusivity Across the Interface of Nickel-Plated Zircaloy-4

Zirconium (Zr) and its alloys (Zircaloy-4) are widely used in nuclear reactors due to their low neutron adsorption cross-section and excellent corrosion resistance. In tritium-producing burnable absorber rods (TPBARs), the metal getter tube located between the cladding and the γ-LiAlO 2 pellets is composed of nickel (Ni)-plated Zircaloy-4, which is used to capture tritium ( 3 H) species (mainly 3 H 2 and 3 H 2 O) generated from γ-LiAlO 2 pellets during irradiation. The 3 H-related products transfer to the surface of metal Ni upon adsorption and dissociation to form new 3 H species and diffuse into the Zircaloy-4 getters to form metal hydrides (Zr 3 H x ). Therefore, exploring 3 H species ( 3 H 2 , 3 H 2 O) dissociation on the surface of Ni and diffusion across the interface of Ni-plated Zircaloy-4 getters can provide a better understanding of 3H species formation and transport from pellets into the getters.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Pressurized Water Reactor Gadolinia Pin Location Optimization

This report presents the results of lattice optimization studies performed to find optimum locations for gadolinia burnable absorber (BA) rods in pressurized water reactor (PWR) lattice fuel designs. Initial excess reactivity suppression allows core designers to further improve operational economics by extending cycle length. Gadolinia BAs are commonly used in boiling water reactor assembly designs for this purpose. In recent years, gadolinia absorbers have been used in PWR designs owing to their longer effectiveness for reactivity suppression compared with common BAs used in PWR assemblies. This report examines the optimum gadolinia pin placement in 17 × 17 PWR lattices at different fuel and gadolinia concentrations for optimized lattice performance, using the SCALE/Polaris lattice physics code. The completed work is continuation of the Light Water Reactor LEU+ Lattice Optimization (ORNL/TM-2021/2366) project. An optimization driver called the metaheuristic optimization tool (MOT) is used to automate domain space exploration and optimization of the lattice designs. Heuristics from previous light-water reactor (LWR) lattice optimization studies were used to construct the objective function and define the domain space for optimization. This work successfully demonstrated that the optimization algorithms of MOT can generate feasible, nonproprietary PWR lattice designs with gadolinia.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Hydrogen and Deuterium Reactivity with Carbon Surface Impurities on the TPBAR Getter Ni Plate Studied in situ with Environmental XPS

Tritium for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Tritium Readiness Program is produced in tritium-producing burnable absorber rods (TPBARs) inserted into light-water nuclear reactors. The rods are stainless-steel-clad tubes with a permeation barrier coating and internal components. The internal components have been designed and selected to produce and retain tritium. The TPBAR incorporates a Ni-plated Zircaloy-4 getter tube to capture tritium and prevent it from reaching the rod cladding and permeating into the environment. The role of the Ni coating is to protect the Zircaloy-4 getter from oxidation while allowing for maximum tritium permeability. Ubiquitous surface impurities on the Ni, such as carbon, could limit its protective functionality and permeability if they exist in relatively large concentrations. The reactivity of impurity carbon with permeating tritium can also result in tritiated hydrocarbon impurities on the gas phase. The goal of this work is to determine quantitatively the chemical state and reactivity of potential Ni coating impurities in actual TPBAR getter samples. Using Environmental X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (eXPS), a very sensitive gas/surface chemistry diagnostic, we reveal in situ the source and evolution of carbon on the Ni surface at different hydrogen and deuterium pressure conditions, and how carbon reactivity may result in hydrocarbon gas-evolution at application-relevant temperatures.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Assessment and Planning of HFIR Test Articles

Burnable absorbers (BAs) are introduced into nuclear fuels to aid in controlling the activity of the irradiated fuel at the beginning of life in a light water reactor (LWR). This improves the efficiency of the reactor since it allows for higher enrichments (> 5 % 235 U) to be used in a LWR, which increases the burnup limit and therefore the cycle length. The purpose of the BA is to absorb neutrons to prevent power peaking, and the concentration of BA is consumed under irradiation. In order to understand the effect of the BAs on the microstructure and thermophysical properties of the fresh and irradiated fuel, neutron irradiation tests will be carried out at the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). These tests will include Gd 2 O 3 doped UO 2 fuels with concentrations that vary from 4 to 10 weight % Gd 2 O 3 .

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

First-Principles Studies of Tritium Species Diffusivity Across the Interfaces of Ni-NiZr Alloy-Zircaloy-4

A tritium producing assembly, also known as tritium producing burnable absorber rods (TPBARs), consists of a metal getter tube located between the cladding and γ-LiAlO2 pellets. The metal getter tube is composed of a nickel (Ni) layer coated on Zircaloy-4. The getter assembly is used to capture tritium (3H) species (mainly 3H2 and 3H2O) generated from γ-LiAlO2 pellets during irradiation. Exploring 3H species (3H2, 3H2O) dissociation on the Ni surface and diffusion in the Ni layer and across the interface of Ni-plated Zircaloy-4 getters can provide insights on tritium transport and retention in the pellets and the getter materials. . In FY25, based on the ideal interface model of Ni-Zircaloy-4 generated in FY24, we will further explore the diffusion pathways of 3H across such Ni-ZrNi-alloy layer-Zircalory-4 interfaces under different conditions, including with oxide/hydroxide clusters on the Ni layer, and impurities located in ZrNi-alloy and Zircalory-4 layers. Due to the size limitation of DFT simulation, we will separate the 3-layer system into 3 sub-systems: Ni-ZrNi interface, ZrNi alloy layer, ZrNi-alloy-Zircaloy-4 interface, and simulate the diffusion barriers for tritium.

diffusion barrier↗

Fabrication and Characterization of MiniFuel Specimen

Burnable absorbers (BAs) are used in UO 2 fuels to tune the reactivity in a light water reactor (LWR) particularly at the beginning of life of the fuel. BAs are elements that have high neutron absorption cross sections and because of this property can prevent power peaking. The addition of BAs reduces the reactivity at the beginning of life, and this in turn allows for the increase of enrichments from > 5 % 235 U up to ~ 10 %. This also enables the increase of the burnup limit to 75 GWd/MTU and the cycle length to 24 months. The BA are eventually consumed under irradiation, and their concentration is diminished at roughly 10-20 GWd/MTU. The objective of this report is to fabricate UO 2 fuels that have been doped with BAs (Gd 2 O 3 in this case) and subsequently irradiate them in the high flux isotope reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The test specimen that are fabricated include 4 and 8 weight % Gd 2 O 3 doped UO 2 to investigate the influence of the BAs on the thermophysical properties and microstructure of the fresh and irradiated fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Coated U3Si2 pellets with enhanced water and steam oxidation resistance

A method of forming a water resistant boundary on a fissile material for use in a water cooled nuclear reactor is described. The method comprises coating the fissile material, such as a pellet of U3Si2 and/or the grain boundaries, to a desired thickness with a suitable coating material, such as atomic layer deposition or a thermal spray process. The coating material may be any non-reactive material with a solubility at least as low as that of UO2. Exemplary coating materials include ZrSiO4, FeCrAl, Cr, Zr, Al—Cr, CrAl, ZrO2, CeO2, TiO2, SiO2, UO2, ZrB2, Na2O—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3 glass, Al2O3, Cr2O3, carbon, and SiC, and combinations thereof. The water resistant layer may be overlayed with a burnable absorber layer, such as ZrB2 or B2O3—SiO2 glass.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Tritium diffusion and formation in the bulk and defective surface of γ-LiAlO2 pellets: First-principles investigation

In tritium-producing burnable absorber rods (TPBAR), γ-LiAlO2 is used in the form of an annular ceramic pellet enriched with the 6Li isotope. When irradiated in a pressurized water reactor (PWR), the <sup>6</sup>Li pellets absorb neutrons and produce tritium (<sup>3</sup>H) through <sup>6</sup>Li + n <sup>3</sup>H + α. The 3H chemically reacts with the metal getter where it is captured and leads to formation of a metal hydride. For TPBARs to enable effective tritium production in PWRs, we investigated the <sup>3</sup>H diffusion pathways in the bulk and surface of γ-LiAlO<sub>2</sub> with different concentrations of lithium defects. The calculated results for bulk and low-index surfaces, thermal conductivity, 3H activation energy barriers, and the 3H diffusion coefficients in γ-LiAlO<sub>2</sub> are in good agreement with the available experimental values. In the bulk, our results show that the smallest activation energy barrier is 0.63 eV for substitutional <sup>3</sup>H diffusion with a diffusion coefficient of 3.25x10<sup>-12</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s. After <sup>3</sup>H diffused from bulk to the surface, it could form different species (such as <sup>3</sup>H<sub>2</sub>, <sup>3</sup>H<sub>2</sub>O, C<sup>3</sup>H<sub>4</sub>) depending on the surface structure, vacancy types and the impurity carbon. Our results indicate that the <sup>3</sup>H<sub>2</sub> is the main product from γ-LiAlO<sub>2</sub> pellets. As the number of V<sub>Li</sub> vacancies and <sup>3</sup>H atoms increases under irradiation (<sup>3</sup>H-rich condition), <sup>3</sup>H<sub>2</sub>O release could increase from the surface of γ-LiAlO<sub>2</sub> pellets.

Jia, Ting↗

3D printing of additive structures for nuclear fuels

A method for manufacturing a nuclear fuel compact is provided. The method includes forming an additive structure, consolidating a fuel matrix around the additive structure, and thermally processing the fuel matrix to form a fuel compact in which the additive structure is encapsulated therein. The additive structure optionally includes a vertical segment and a plurality of arm segments that extend generally radially from the vertical segment for conducting heat outwardly toward an exterior of the fuel compact. In addition to improving heat transfer, the additive structure may function as burnable absorbers, and may provide fission product trapping.

Terrani, Kurt A.↗

3D printing of additive structures for nuclear fuels

A method for manufacturing a nuclear fuel compact is provided. The method includes forming an additive structure, consolidating a fuel matrix around the additive structure, and thermally processing the fuel matrix to form a fuel compact in which the additive structure is encapsulated therein. The additive structure optionally includes a vertical segment and a plurality of arm segments that extend generally radially from the vertical segment for conducting heat outwardly toward an exterior of the fuel compact. In addition to improving heat transfer, the additive structure may function as burnable absorbers, and may provide fission product trapping.

Terrani, Kurt A.↗

VERA neutronics high-fidelity benchmark for a modern PWR core design

Nearly 20 years since the origin of the infamous 'Kord Smith Challenge', and after 10 years and hundreds of millions of dollars invested by the US Department of Energy into the development of the Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA), the capability to accurately simulate a modern pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel cycle at the fuel rod level with high-fidelity Monte Carlo (MC) stochastic transport methods still evades us. The deterministic methods in VERA make approximations that allow it to be successfully benchmarked against measured data from hundreds of PWR fuel cycles, but none of these benchmarks provided information at the local fuel rod level or allowed quantification of these approximations' impact for modern PWR reload designs. Using MPACT to establish the estimated isotopic distributions and thermal hydraulic conditions in a recent and challenging reactor design, a 2D quarter-core benchmark problem was established and solved consistently with both MPACT, the 51-energy group deterministic transport solver in VERA, and Shift, the continuous-energy MC transport solver in VERA. Impacts of energy groups, ray spacing, and scattering treatment were evaluated. Though MPACT has been previously shown to perform well compared to MC methods for initial Cycle 1 cores with only fresh fuel, this is the first benchmark of MPACT for a challenging modern reload core with depleted fuel and burnable absorbers. This work establishes additional credibility for the methods in MPACT and highlights the efficiency of these methods relative to those in use by MC-based tools. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

P{sub N} source expansion nodal method in MPACT for boiling water reactors

This paper describes the one-node P{sub N}-Source Expansion Nodal Method (SENM) axial solver for the 2D/1D method recently implemented in MPACT to support Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) analysis. Since the BWR has a more complicated design and strong burnable absorber, the existing PN-Nodal Expansion Method (NEM) axial solver in MPACT may not be sufficient to accurately represent the intranodal flux and source profiles for BWRs. The one-node P{sub N}-SENM has been implemented in this work to reduce the axial spatial discretization error for BWRs. From numerical results, we verify that the P{sub N}-SENM can improve the accuracy of the pin power prediction, and confirm that P{sub N}-SENM can use more than a 1.5 times larger axial mesh size than P{sub N}-NEM to have similar accuracy for the BWR GE14 3D assembly problem. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Assessment of Core Physics Characteristics of Extended Enrichment and Higher Burnup LWR Fuels using the Polaris/PARCS Two-Step Approach. Vol. I: PWR Fuel

Nuclear fuel with extended enrichment (235U enrichment within 5-8 wt%) is one of the evolutionary changes that have been pursued in recent years by commercial light water reactor operators and fuel vendors to improve the fuel cycle economy and operation performance of a nuclear plant. This work assesses the performance of the Polaris/PARCS two-step approach in core physics modeling of the pressurized water reactor cores with extended enrichment fuel, referred to as “LEU+” in this report. A representative LEU+ core with a 24-month fuel cycle developed by Southern Nuclear Company (SNC) was modeled using this two-step approach. A representative LEU core with an 18-month fuel cycle was also modeled to provide a reference for the LEU+ core. As expected, significantly more burnable poison absorbers were used in the LEU+ core to accomodate its higher fuel enrichment. Nine different fuel assembly types were modeled using Polaris for each core to generate the assembly cross sections, which were then processed by GenPMAX to prepare the cross-section data for PARCS. The average specific powers of each fuel batch in each core were derived from VERA results and higher specific powers in fresh assemblies were found in the LEU core due to its less total uranium loading included in the VERA LEU model, given that the total core power was assumed to be the same for both cores. PARCS models were developed to simulate the steady-state operations of both cores. PARCS results on the LEU+ core were first compared with the VERA results for verification purpose; good agreements were seen in soluble boron and burnup distribution results, indicating that the Polaris/PARCS modeling and simulation were correctly implemented. Core physics parameters calculated by PARCS, at zero power physics tests, beginning of cycle (BOC), and end of cycle conditions (EOC), were compared between the LEU+ core and the LEU core, including soluble boron concentration, burnup distributions, assembly and pin power peaking factors, fuel temperature reactivity coefficients, moderator temperature and density reactivity coefficients, control rod worth, and shut down margin. The main differences in PARCS results between the LEU+ and the LEU cores are summarized below: 1)The critical boron concentrations were found to be much higher in the LEU+ core than in the LEU core (1582 vs. 1335 ppm for peak values). 2)Higher assembly radial power peaking factors (1.4 vs. 1.3 for peak values), 2D pin peaking factors (1.53 vs. 1.42 for peak values), and 3D pin peaking factors (1.89 vs. 1.81 for peak values) were found in the LEU+ core than in the LEU core. 3)Significantly higher reactivity coefficients of moderator temperature (and density) were found in LEU+ than in LEU.4)Significantly lower control rod worth at EOC were found in LEU+ than LEU for all but one control banks.5)Significantly lower shut down margins were found in the LEU+ core than in the LEU core. The Polaris/GenPMAX/PARCS code suite was found to be capable of modeling the LEU+ PWR core for steady-state operations and no unexpected results in core physics parameters were observed, in spite of that a) several bugs in PARCS were identified and workarounds were used; b) several features were found lacking in the current version of PARCS that would be useful for core modeling. A list of requests for bug fixes and feature upgrades for PARCS originated from this work were transmitted to the code developers. The assessments on the performance of the Polaris/PARCS two-step approach in core modeling for boiling water reactor with LEU+ fuel is ongoing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A new generation of uranium coincidence fast neutron collars for assay of LWR fresh fuel assemblies

The active uranium neutron coincidence collar provides a means of non-destructively assaying the fissile linear density of Light Water Reactor fresh fuel assemblies containing low enriched uranium. These neutron collars can operate in two modes: a thermal and a fast mode. In fast mode, a neutron collar has an added cadmium (Cd) liner in the sample cavity of the detector to reduce the impact of the burnable poison (thermal neutron absorber) on the detector signal (doubles). The main advantage for operating in fast mode is a detected signal that is less dependent of the burnable neutron poison content and thus less dependent on facility operator declarations. The drawback is that operating in fast mode requires a longer measurement time (~hour vs tens of minutes for thermal mode) to achieve the statistically needed precision in the measurements. The trend in the modern reactor fuel assemblies is moving to higher burnup by using higher initial enrichment and, consequently, a higher number of burnable poison rods to compensate the initial neutron reactivity. The increase of the burnable poison loading has motivated the development of a new generation of high efficiency fast neutron collars to allow practical measurements in-field by nuclear inspectors. This paper describes the development and performance evaluation of a new generation of neutron collars, for both boiling water reactor (BWR) and pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuels, jointly developed between the US Department of Energy, through Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Euratom Safeguards Directorate of the European Commission. In this work, we present here calibrations with reference fuel assemblies at Los Alamos National Laboratory as well as the results of in-field measurement campaigns in fuel fabrication plants with modern commercial fuel assemblies. The experimental results show that a typical PWR verification can be made in a total time of 30 min with an uncertainty in the measured mass of 2% at one standard deviation (1σ). A BWR verification can be made in 47 min with an uncertainty in the measured mass of 1.9% at 1σ, or a total time of 20 min with 1σ uncertainty in the measured mass of 2.5%.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗