SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Second Quarter Transportation Report Fiscal Year 2023
This report satisfies the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) commitment to prepare a quarterly summary of waste shipments to the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC) in Area 5.
FY2022 First Quarter Transportation Report
FY23 Third Quarter Transportation Report (Apologies again for the long review time on this file, DOE-EM policy is to not review the document unless it has been through the STIP process)
The collection and disposal of human wastes, such as urine and feces, in a spacecraft environment are performed in an aesthetic and reliable manner to prevent degradation of crew performance. The waste management system controls, transfers, and processes materials such as feces, emesis, food residues, used expendables, and other wastes. The requirements, collection, transport, and waste processing are described.
This paper reports the co-hydrotreatment of the heavy bio-oil fraction with waste cooking oil (WCO) using NiMo/γ-Al 2 O 3 catalyst, followed by the distillation of resulting deoxygenated oil and the characterization of resulting fuel cuts. The heavy BTG bio-oil fraction was obtained by removing the very reactive light-oxygenated compounds via rotary evaporation, subsequently mixed with 1-butanol. The resulting oil was blended with WCO and subjected to a two-step co-hydrotreatment process. The first step, called “stabilization,” is aimed at saturating highly reactive hydrogen-deficient compounds. The second step, called “deoxygenation,” aimed to remove bio-oil oxygen, primarily as H 2 O. This study examined the impact of varying bio-oil concentrations (0, 10, 20, 30, 40 wt.% of WCO) on the upgraded oil's yield, composition, and fuel properties. The resulting hydrotreated oil was distilled into gasoline-range, kerosene-range, and diesel-range hydrocarbons at <150 °C, 150 to 250 °C, and 250 to 350 °C, respectively. The yield of the hydrotreated oil indicates that as the bio-oil concentration increases, the amounts of coke (0.7 to 2.4 %) and water (2 to 10 wt. %) increase while the organic layer yields decrease (80 to 63 %). The coke yield was comparable to the coke yield obtained when co-processing the pyrolytic lignin fraction. This suggests that coke is formed from both the sugar oligomers and the lignin-derived oligomers. The UV-fluorescence analysis on the hydrotreated oil shows that more polycondensed and conjugated ring compounds formed as the bio-oil concentration is increased. These compounds are precursors of coke. FTIR results showed that most raw materials were converted to biofuels after the hydrotreatment. To achieve less than 1 wt. % of coke yield, blends with up to 20 wt. % pyrolysis oil should be used. An increase in bio-oil concentration leads to a slight increase in gasoline yield and a decrease in kerosene and diesel yields. The identified carbon species found in the fuel cuts include n-paraffin, iso-paraffin, cycloparaffin, and aromatics. Further, the jet fuel cut (kerosene) was characterized by density, surface tension, and viscosity. Our product conforms to the standard specifications for sustainable aviation fuels (Jet A-1). Further research is suggested to fine-tune the operating parameters for achieving reduced coke yield and enhanced kerosene yield.
This panel focused on challenges and lessons learned in radioactive waste packaging, transportation, compliance, and receipt for fabricators of radioactive waste packaging. World-wide companies are urged to participate. Participants provided their perspectives and suggestions on how to increase efficiencies through eliminating inconsistencies between specifications and other requirements to provide products at a reasonable cost and enhance communication to enable better service. Panelists with presentations: PACTEC (Bill Smart); Waste Packaging Strategy and Challenges at Whiteshell (Miles Smith); Challenges and Lessons Learned in Radwaste Packaging, Transportation, Compliance and Receipt (Dan Payne)
Planning of activities related to waste storage, transportation, and disposal requires involvement and engagement on the parts of both regulators and stakeholders. There have been challenges felt by both parties, which has led to discussions about how to best proceed with projects not just from a technical perspective, but how to create better relationships between the general public and scientific community. This panel was designed to highlight lessons learned, best practices, and next steps in anticipated projects. This panel focused on the current efforts undertaken by initiatives to involve stakeholders for the success of ISF Storage and Disposal facilities. For example, two license applications were submitted to the US NRC by two private entities - Interim Storage Partners (WCS, Inc, and Orano) and Holtec, Inc./ELLA - for consolidated ISF in West Texas and in NM (respectively). This panel discussed elements needed for success in engaging various stakeholders at all levels of the project life cycle, and can include lessons learned from previous projects. Panelists with presentations: Stakeholder Engagement in SNF Storage and Disposal (Miriam Juckett); Stakeholders, Siting and Nuclear Waste Disposal -Thoughts on a Path Forward (Jim Hamilton)
The results are reported of a preliminary feasibility screening study for providing long-term solutions to the problems of handling and managing radioactive wastes by extraterrestrial transportation of the wastes. Matrix materials and containers are discussed along with payloads, costs, and destinations for candidate space vehicles. The conclusions reached are: (1) Matrix material such as spray melt can be used without exceeding temperature limits of the matrix. (2) The cost in mills per kw hr electric, of space disposal of fission products is 4, 5, and 28 mills per kw hr for earth escape, solar orbit, and solar escape, respectively. (3) A major factor effecting cost is the earth storage time. Based on a normal operating condition design for solar escape, a storage time of more than sixty years is required to make the space disposal charge less than 10% of the bus-bar electric cost. (4) Based on a 10 year earth storage without further processing, the number of shuttle launches required would exceed one per day.
This study focuses on the transport properties of hexavalent chromium, specifically the chromate anion, to improve predictive models and environmental remediation strategies for Cr(VI) migration. Using 53 Cr Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, the research quantifies chromate in multicomponent electrolytes replicating nuclear waste conditions at the Hanford Site in Washington State. The consistency of the 53 Cr NMR signal integral with chromate concentration, despite varying matrix compositions, establishes it as a reliable concentration indicator. The transport properties of chromate in an alkaline solution were assessed using relaxation-based measurements via saturation recovery and Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill experiments, determining spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation times. These measurements, combined with the Bloembergen-Purcell-Pound equation, helped estimate the rotational correlation time and the 53 Cr self-diffusion coefficient using Stokes-Einstein-Debye and Stokes-Einstein equations. Direct measurements were obtained through pulsed field gradient stimulated echo 53 Cr NMR spectroscopy. Monte Carlo simulations further estimated uncertainty propagation. The results enhance comprehension of chromate transport and highlight prospects for identifying transport properties of NMR-active nuclei, traditionally considered unreachable.
Methods of isolation and elimination of waste products in spacecraft cabins are described. The role of waste products in the environment, collection and transport of waste products to storage containers, or to recovery systems, preservation of waste products, and storage and removal of waste products are among the factors discussed. Regeneration of the waste products to recover water and/or oxygen, is briefly considered.
This NASA study, performed at the request of the AEC, concludes that transporting radioactive waste (primarily long-lived isotopes) into space is feasible. Tentative solutions are presented for technical problems involving safe packaging. Launch systems (existing and planned), trajectories, potential hazards, and various destinations were evaluated. Solar system escape is possible and would have the advantage of ultimate removal of the radioactive waste from man's environment. Transportation costs would be low (comparable to less than a 5 percent increase in the cost of electricity) even though more than 100 space shuttle launches per year would be required by the year 2000.
Analyzed the extent to which biomass can contribute to the decarbonization of transportation as electrification of the light-duty fleet increases.
Abstract not provided.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) operates a low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal site at Material Disposal Area G, in Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA. Area G has been the primary LLW disposal site for Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) since the 1960's. In addition to LLW, Area G is host to a variety of other wastes, the disposition of which must be determined before closure of the site. A probabilistic Radiological Risk Assessment (RRA) for Area G is used in order to support decision making regarding some wastes that are not addressed in the extant Area G Performance Assessment (PA) and Composite Analysis (CA). Between 1979 and 1987, 33 special shafts were augered into the Bandelier Tuff at Area G. This volcanic tuff is present across Pajarito Plateau on the eastern slopes of the Jemez Mountains, and varies widely in its consistency, from weakly indurated non-welded layers to welded layers that uphold the mesa cliffs of the Plateau. These mesas are home to LANL, Area G, and the townsites of Los Alamos and White Rock, with residences about 1400 m from Area G. The 33 Shafts were lined with steel casing, and contain remote-handled (RH) transuranic wastes (TRU) resulting from experiments and analysis performed in special glove boxes at the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) facility at LANL. Some of these wastes originated as used nuclear fuel. The purpose of the Area G RRA is to evaluate the potential future risk to humans and the environment from the RH TRU in the 33 Shafts in the context of the risk associated with the surrounding wastes at Area G. The analysis is responsive to expectations outlined in DOE Order 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, and is informed by the Manual and Guidance accompanying DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. Because the waste meets the definition of TRU, the regulatory context necessarily takes into consideration the regulation governing the disposal of TRU from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): 40 CFR 191, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes. Given the broader regulatory context for the RRA, the analysis is subject to different assumptions from those made in the existing DOE O 435.1 PA and CA, such as allowing for future occupation of the site. The analysis begins with a comprehensive evaluation of features, events, processes, and exposure scenarios (FEPS) for Area G and the wastes it contains. These FEPSs are screened to eliminate from further consideration those of extremely low probability and/or consequence, and a conceptual site model (CSM) is subsequently developed. The scope and structure of the Area G RRA Model is informed by this CSM, and the Area G RRA Model is developed using the GoldSim systems analysis modeling platform. This paper presents the initial version of a defensible, transparent, and reasonably realistic model, which is based on the state of knowledge of the wastes, the site, and the FEPSs that govern contaminant transport from wastes into the environment and subsequent exposures to humans and other biota. Probabilistic model input distributions represent uncertainties inherent in the real and modeled systems. The results of the Area G RRA Model inform decisions regarding the disposition of the RH TRU in the 33 Shafts. (authors)
The OPTIMUS{sup TM} product line of packages was developed with the purpose of providing a versatile and modular packaging option for shipping problematic wastes and fissile material contents. The product line includes a high-activity design in the OPTIMUS-H and a low activity design in the OPTIMUS-L. The two variants utilize a singular containment vessel design, that is enclosed in different protective components that offer different levels of shielding along with thermal and impact protection. The thick shielding provided by the OPTIMUS-H packaging allows for higher activity contents than the OPTIMUS-L to be transported. But the lightweight design of the OPTIMUS-L packaging allows for more packages to be transported in a single shipment. The containment vessel design shared between the two packages provides leak-tight containment of all radioactive contents along with the capabilities to easily leak test and the option to inert and backfill the contents, as necessary, prior to each shipment of the package. Together the OPTIMUS package designs offer significant flexibility and are capable of handling a wide variety of waste materials and other radioactive contents. One of the primary contents covered in the initial design effort for these packages is TRU waste contents beyond the standard waste materials that are compliant with the WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria. More specifically, the initial content of interest is TRU Waste drums containing sealed containers with potentially flammable gases. While there are multiple other packaging options available for transporting standard WIPP compliant TRU wastes, the goal of the OPTIMUS packages is to offer a superior option for transporting both standard TRU wastes as well as the more problematic non-compliant wastes, among other contents. The non-compliant TRU waste contents explicitly included for the OPTIMUS packages are standard aerosol cans and DOT 3E lecture bottles. However, the methods applied for the package containment can be easily adjusted to cover other sealed container types with potentially flammable gases. The primary challenges with including these items are both the obvious issue of potential for flammable gases (e.g. aerosol propellants) in the package, but also the uncertainty in the exact state of the contents. Because these desired contents are waste materials, the characterization of the materials present in the waste may include some uncertainties. For example, though it may be known that there are one or more aerosol cans in a TRU waste drum, it may not be known if this can is full, spent, or anywhere in between. Also there may be equal uncertainty in the contents of the aerosol can, specifically in the potentially flammable propellant remaining in the can. To include these types of non-compliant items as acceptable contents for the package, the methods utilized in the safety analyses of the OPTIMUS packages must consider all of the uncertainties in the characterization of the waste. The methods utilized cover a range of concerns with transporting contents of this nature including pressure buildup, gas generation, and gaseous combustion for demonstrating the containment of the package. The ability to transport these problematic contents in the OPTIMUS packages gives TRU waste generating sites the option to relocate these drums to an offsite location where the non-compliant items can be properly managed through removal or destruction. (authors)
Presentation needed to give to Waste Generator attendees that ship waste to NNSS and enter shipments on HAZTRAK.
This study addresses the DOE National Laboratory Program on Hanford Tank Waste Cleanup Research and Development, focusing on tank waste retrieval, transport, and closure. Millions of gallons of high-level waste are stored in the double shell tanks (DSTs) at Hanford site. The waste is stored in the primary tank, while the secondary shell acts as a buffer between the primary tank and environment. The DSTs’ bottoms could be corroded due to the corrosive waste properties and contents. Therefore, they are being emptied, and refurbishment is needed before waste storage continues. SRNL addresses the refurbishment of still operational DSTs bottoms with a two-layer refurbishment approach. We propose that the bottom layer consists of a high-density cementitious material to shield the epoxy top layer from radioactive residuals, while the top layer serves as an epoxy sealant. This work focuses on the experimental evaluation on the formulation and testing of the epoxy layer.