Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “UQ”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2015

Report on UQ and PCMM Analysis of Vacuum Drying for UFD S&T Gaps

This report discusses two phenomena that could affect the safety, licensing, transportation, storage, and disposition of the spent fuel storage casks and their contents (radial hydriding during drying and water retention after drying) associated with the drying of canisters for dry spent fuel storage. The report discusses modeling frameworks and evaluations that are, or have been, developed as a means to better understand these phenomena. Where applicable, the report also discusses data needs and procedures for monitoring or evaluating the condition of storage containers during and after drying. A recommendation for the manufacturing of a fully passivated fuel rod, resistant to oxidation and hydriding is outlined.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Imprecise Probability Methods for Weapons UQ

Building on recent work in uncertainty quanti cation, we examine the use of imprecise probability methods to better characterize expert knowledge and to improve on misleading aspects of Bayesian analysis with informative prior distributions. Quantitative approaches to incorporate uncertainties in weapons certi cation are subject to rigorous external peer review, and in this regard, certain imprecise probability methods are well established in the literature and attractive. These methods are illustrated using experimental data from LANL detonator impact testing.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2017

Report on UQ Assessments to support SESAME wire-wrapped bundle experiment

This work assesses the influence of assumptions made when generating a mesh of a wire-wrapped geometry. The contact region between a wire and its adjacent pin is commonly modeled by either embedding the wire to the adjacent pin or trimming the wire so that a gap separates the wire from its adjacent pin. These models are referred to as close-gap and open-gap approaches herein and are applied to two geometries. The first geometry consists of a single pin wire-wrapped subchannel. A polyhedral mesh and a hexahedral mesh are generated. The second and third geometry are a 7-pin and a 19-pinwire-wrapped bundles meshed with polyhedral elements only. Pressure drops are obtained with the STAR-CCM+computational fluid dynamic package. Sensitivity analyses of the mesh density, the mesh type, and the turbulent models are performed. Numerical results show that the best match to the experimental data and to the Cheng-Todreas correlation is obtained with the combination of a hexahedral mesh, the shear stress transport (SST) turbulent model, and the open-gap approach. In the case of the 7-pin geometry, the best results are obtained with the open-gap approach and the SST turbulent model. The 19-pin geometry yields contradictory results to the 7-pin geometry results, and thus will require further investigations.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Estimation, UQ, and Sensitivity Analysis for a New Diagnostic Setup [Slides]

This is for an early career talk I am giving at the Association for Women in Math’s Research Symposium. It provides a general overview of three projects: the first focuses on velocity measurements from optical laser diagnostics, the second focuses on probe alignment and location (metrology), and the third is my Site-Directed Research and Development (SDRD) which focuses on neural networks for image datasets. All three projects have strong uncertainty quantification components.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Comprehensive uncertainty quantification (UQ) for full engineering models by solving probability density function (PDF) equation

This report details a new method for propagating parameter uncertainty (forward uncertainty quantification) in partial differential equations (PDE) based computational mechanics applications. The method provides full-field quantities of interest by solving for the joint probability density function (PDF) equations which are implied by the PDEs with uncertain parameters. Full-field uncertainty quantification enables the design of complex systems where quantities of interest, such as failure points, are not known apriori. The method, motivated by the well-known probability density function (PDF) propagation method of turbulence modeling, uses an ensemble of solutions to provide the joint PDF of desired quantities at every point in the domain. A small subset of the ensemble is computed exactly, and the remainder of the samples are computed with approximation of the driving (dynamics) term of the PDEs based on those exact solutions. Although the proposed method has commonalities with traditional interpolatory stochastic collocation methods applied directly to quantities of interest, it is distinct and exploits the parameter dependence and smoothness of the dynamics term of the governing PDEs. The efficacy of the method is demonstrated by applying it to two target problems: solid mechanics explicit dynamics with uncertain material model parameters, and reacting hypersonic fluid mechanics with uncertain chemical kinetic rate parameters. A minimally invasive implementation of the method for representative codes SPARC (reacting hypersonics) and NimbleSM (finite- element solid mechanics) and associated software details are described. For solid mechanics demonstration problems the method shows order of magnitudes improvement in accuracy over traditional stochastic collocation. For the reacting hypersonics problem, the method is implemented as a streamline integration and results show very good accuracy for the approximate sample solutions of re-entry flow past the Apollo capsule geometry at Mach 30.

42 ENGINEERING↗