Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Topology optimization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Enabling On-Demand Aerospace Component Manufacturing: Topology Optimization of GE Engine Bracket and Fabrication Using Metal FFF

Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers advantages over conventional manufacturing processes, particularly by reducing the number of parts produced through multistage combined technologies, but these often result in low manufacturing yields or require post-processing. AM facilitates the production of complex geometries with fine features, overhangs, and lattice structures. For instance, Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) technology enables the fabrication of intricate parts that can be easily post-processed by removing residual powder. Laser powder bed AM technologies are widely discussed in the literature due to their design freedom in creating complex geometries, with and without the need for support generation. However, rapid solidification due to a thermal gradient in the build direction, which leads to the formation of columnar grains and warpage, is one of the challenges. To address this challenge, we propose layer-by-layer metal FFF technology, followed by the debinding and sintering process, as an alternative to powder- and laser-based approaches. Furthermore, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) principles are discussed to minimize the need for support generation and enable easy post-processing, thereby improving surface finish to meet high tolerances in fabricating components for aerospace and healthcare applications.

Singh, Abhishek [University of Michigan, Ann Arbor↗
DOE OSTI2024

Optimize Topology, Component Sizes, and Operating Strategy of Participant's Protype: Cooperative Research and Development Final Report

The purpose of the project was to complete testing of Shine Technologies LLC’s prototype power system called “Juicebox 3.0.” Testing of the prototype using NREL’s hardware-in-the-loop capabilities, including a DC power supply programmed to simulate PV module output and provide the JuiceBox 3.0 at the specified power level and with a load bank of sufficient capacity to mimic DC and AC loads connected to the outlets of the Juicebox 3.0. The unit is provided with SAE wire connectors. A photo of a JuiceBox 3.0 unit is shown in Figure 1 below.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
NASA NTRS1990

Topology and boundary shape optimization as an integrated design tool

The optimal topology of a two dimensional linear elastic body can be computed by regarding the body as a domain of the plane with a high density of material. Such an optimal topology can then be used as the basis for a shape optimization method that computes the optimal form of the boundary curves of the body. This results in an efficient and reliable design tool, which can be implemented via common FEM mesh generator and CAD type input-output facilities.

Bendsoe, Martin Philip↗
NASA NTRS1999

Optimization of Aerospace Structure Subject to Damage Tolerance Criteria

The objective of this cooperative agreement was to seek computationally efficient ways to optimize aerospace structures subject to damage tolerance criteria. Optimization was to involve sizing as well as topology optimization. The work was done in collaboration with Steve Scotti, Chauncey Wu and Joanne Walsh at the NASA Langley Research Center. Computation of constraint sensitivity is normally the most time-consuming step of an optimization procedure. The cooperative work first focused on this issue and implemented the adjoint method of sensitivity computation in an optimization code (runstream) written in Engineering Analysis Language (EAL). The method was implemented both for bar and plate elements including buckling sensitivity for the latter. Lumping of constraints was investigated as a means to reduce the computational cost. Adjoint sensitivity computation was developed and implemented for lumped stress and buckling constraints. Cost of the direct method and the adjoint method was compared for various structures with and without lumping. The results were reported in two papers. It is desirable to optimize topology of an aerospace structure subject to a large number of damage scenarios so that a damage tolerant structure is obtained. Including damage scenarios in the design procedure is critical in order to avoid large mass penalties at later stages. A common method for topology optimization is that of compliance minimization which has not been used for damage tolerant design. In the present work, topology optimization is treated as a conventional problem aiming to minimize the weight subject to stress constraints. Multiple damage configurations (scenarios) are considered. Each configuration has its own structural stiffness matrix and, normally, requires factoring of the matrix and solution of the system of equations. Damage that is expected to be tolerated is local and represents a small change in the stiffness matrix compared to the baseline (undamaged) structure. The exact solution to a slightly modified set of equations can be obtained from the baseline solution economically without actually solving the modified system. Sherrnan-Morrison-Woodbury (SMW) formulas are matrix update formulas that allow this. SMW formulas were therefore used here to compute adjoint displacements for sensitivity computation and structural displacements in damaged configurations.

Akgun, Mehmet A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPSAS-NF1676L-18502-DND

1. Aeroelastic tailoring with tow-steered composites 2. Aeroelastic tailoring with functionally-graded metals 3. Wing box topology optimization - Curvilinear rib/spar/stiffener placement - Cellular-based stringer topologies - Optimal topology of lightening holes within ribs/spars - 3D level set methods

Stanley R Cole↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Automated Multi-Robot Assembly of Compliance Optimized Structures

Autonomous assembly of large structures is one of the fundamental challenges on the way towards NASA’s objectives of deep space exploration. In this work, we propose an algorithmic framework to optimize the assembly process of a prescribed target structure by constraining the assembly effort as well as maintaining structural soundness throughout the process. This framework uses structural topology optimization with assembly effort metrics to generate checkpoints for robotic traversal algorithms. Assembly effort is quantified by the Wasserstein metric between consecutive structural configurations during the assembly process. The robotic assembly task is split into two subtasks, where we first optimize for a set of key frames, then perform reconfiguration between consecutive frames. Key frames are optimized by adopting topology optimization techniques to reduce assembly effort and maintain structural integrity during the assembly process, while reconfiguration between key frames is performed using a path planning algorithm with a minimum weight maximum matching approach on a bipartite graph. We employ a Crystalline robot model in which each structural element is capable of locomotion through the structure and locking into place with neighboring elements after reaching its destination. An example assembly of a two-dimensional cantilever beam under volume constraints and structural compliance considerations is presented to demonstrate the approach. Finally, we conclude by discussing possible future extensions to this work, including adoption of better metrics, extension to three-dimensional large-scale problems, and exacting finer control of structural integrity during the path-planning phase.

robotic assembly↗