Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “TANK”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-18-43, -44) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-18-41, -42) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The total uranium in the Tank 38H surface sample was 38.8 mg/L while the sub-surface sample was 35.7 mg/L. The Tank 43H samples contained total uranium concentrations of 27.5 mg/L in the surface sample and 23.4 mg/L in the sub-surface sample. The U-235 weight fraction ranged from 0.62% to 0.63% for the Tank 38H samples and Tank 43H samples. The total uranium concentrations in the table are reasonably consistent with recent Tank 38H/43H sample uranium measurements. The plutonium results in the table are consistent with the range of concentrations measured in recent samples from these tanks with the exception of the Pu-238 value measured in the Tank 43H sub-surface sample. The Pu-238 in the Tank 43H sub-surface sample is higher than any recent measurement by a factor of two. The Cs-137 results show slightly lower concentrations in the surface samples versus the sub-surface samples from each tank. The non-radioactive components of the samples show some differences between the surface and sub-surface samples for each tank.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-18-43,-44) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-18-41, -42) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The total uranium in the Tank 38H surface sample was 38.8 mg/L while the sub-surface sample was 35.7 mg/L. The Tank 43H samples contained total uranium concentrations of 27.5 mg/L in the surface sample and 23.4 mg/L in the sub-surface sample. The U-235 weight fraction ranged from 0.62% to 0.63% for the Tank 38H samples and Tank 43H samples. The total uranium concentrations in the table are reasonably consistent with recent Tank 38H/43H sample uranium measurements. The plutonium results in t he table are consistent with the range of concentrations measured in recent samples from these tanks with the exception of the Pu-238 value measured in the Tank 43H sub-surface sample. The Pu-238 in the Tank 43H sub-surface sample is higher than any recent measurement by a factor of two. The Cs-137 reslts show slightly lower concentrations in the surface samples versus the sub-surface samples from each tank. The non-radioactive components of the samples show some differences between the surface and sub-surface samples for each tank.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Investigation Of Thermolysis Hydrogen Generation Rate In Tank 38 And Tank 50 Waste Samples With Sodium Glycolate

This report contains hydrogen generation rate (HGR) measurements of Tank 38 and Tank 50 radioactive samples with and without added glycolate as a function of temperature. The objective of the Tank 38 and Tank 50 HGR measurements is to extend the knowledge from previous sample thermolysis HGR measurements and augment simulant testing for developing an equation for the Savannah River Site (SRS) Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) thermolysis HGR with and without added glycolate. Tank 38 testing is applicable to the 2H-Evaporator System and associated CSTF waste tanks. Tank 50 HGR measurement is applicable to CSTF tanks and the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). The glycolate concentration used is based on what would be expected to be near the high-end concentration of glycolate (1570 mg/L in Tank 38 and 350 mg/L in Tank 50). The radioactive dose rate of the Tank 38 material was high enough to require use of the flow system in the Shielded Cells. Tank 50 material was less radioactive, so the higher temperatures were investigated in the flow system while the lower temperatures were investigated in the sealed system contained within a radiological hood.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-19-18, -19) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-19-20, -21) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. Overall, the results of the analysis indicate the concentrations of species in the Tank 38H surface sample increased significantly from the previous sample with the sodium concentration increasing from 1.09 M in the previous sample to 3.19 M in the current sample. However, it should be noted that the previous Tank 38H surface sample was very dilute compared with typical Tank 38H samples of the recent past. The Tank 38H sub-surface sample shows a composition fairly similar to the previous sample’s composition. Both the Tank 43H surface and sub-surface samples appear slightly more dilute than the previous samples based on the sodium concentrations. For both Tank 38H and Tank 43H, the subsurface samples appear slightly more concentrated for most species than the surface samples. These results indicate some success in increasing the salt solution concentration and reducing stratification in Tank 38H, but some stratification is still evident in both Tank 38H and Tank 43H.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Investigation of Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation Rate in Tank 28 and Tank 39 Samples

This report contains hydrogen generation rate (HGR) measurements of Tank 28 and Tank 39 radioactive samples with and without added glycolate as a function of temperature. The objective of the Tank 28 and Tank 39 HGR measurements is to extend the knowledge from previous sample thermolysis HGR measurements and augment simulant testing for developing models for the Savannah River Site (SRS) Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) thermolysis HGR with and without added glycolate. Tank 28 testing is applicable to concentrated salt supernate, legacy organic compounds resulting from the F-Canyon processes and boiling in the 3H-Evaporator System. Tank 39 testing is applicable to moderately concentrated salt supernate and organic compounds in fresh waste from the H-Canyon processes. For HGR tests with added sodium glycolate, the glycolate concentrations added to Tank 28 (500 mg/L) and Tank 39 (2000 mg/L) are based on concentrations expected to result in quantifiable HGR between temperatures of 70 °C and the atmospheric pressure boiling point. The added glycolate is much higher than the expected future glycolate concentrations in Tank 28, Tank 39, and similar CSTF tanks.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Characterization of Tank 11H Samples from Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3 - Intermediate and Final Samples

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR unit processes dissolved salt from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. Four interim samples pulled from Tank 11H during and just after the completion of processing of Batch 3 through the TCCR process have been analyzed for 137 Cs activity and density. The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease with each subsequent sample, which is consistent with the addition of decontaminated solution to Tank 11H. When compared to the expected composition from mixing the Tank 10H Batch 3 feed with the material already present in Tank 11H, the bulk chemical composition was as expected. A corrosion control sample collected from Tank 11H in June 2020 showed changes in the chemical composition and 137 Cs activity when compared to the composition measured at the end of Batch 2 processing. As there were no additions made to the tank during this period, these changes were attributed to leaching of the solids present in Tank 11H. Additional analyses of the 4 th interim sample are pending and will be documented in a revision to this report.

11H↗
DOE OSTI2018

Determining the Release of Radionuclides from SRS Tank 12H Waste Residual Solids Following Tank Closure

Eight High Level Waste (HLW) tanks used to store radioactive waste slurries have been emptied and closed at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Performance Analyses (PA) modeling of the release of radionuclides from residual waste solids in these tanks into the environment over extended time periods indicated the most likely risk drivers for environmental contamination. Radionuclide leaching studies were desired to provide additional information regarding the residual waste solubility assumptions used in the models. This report serves to provide equilibrium solubility data for several radionuclides identified as risk drivers and adds to the database of solubility values reported in the previous analogous study with Tank 18F solids. Pore water leaching studies were conducted on actual SRS Tank 12H residual waste solids to support Liquid Waste tank closure efforts and closed tank Performance Analyses. Tank 12H was exposed to extensive mechanical cleaning, caustic aluminum dissolution, and oxalic acid chemical cleaning prior to closure. The methodology utilized for leach testing was developed during previous testing. Slurries of tank residual solids and grout-representative solids in simulated grout pore water solutions (based on SRS groundwater compositions) with pH and E h values expected during the aging of the closed waste tank were produced. The soluble concentrations of selected radionuclides were analyzed versus time to confirm equilibrium conditions were achieved. These are the first leach studies conducted on waste tank residuals exposed to these cleaning conditions.

Eh↗
DOE OSTI2021

A History of Hanford Tank Waste, Implications for Waste Treatment and Disposal

More than 40 years of plutonium processing have left almost 56 million gallons of mixed radioactive waste sequestered in 177 underground tanks on the Hanford Site. Three different processing technologies were employed for plutonium purification in addition to uranium scavenging and fission product removal from the tank waste. All of these chemical processes have contributed to a complex waste stream that varies from tank to tank that presents downstream processing challenges to render the waste into a safe form for long-term storage. The current disposition pathway for Hanford tank waste is vitrification. To maximize waste loading and minimize the number of high-level waste canisters stored in a geologic repository, pretreatment of the waste is required. Both pretreatment and vitrification operations are impacted by the waste composition.

Separations, filtration, ion exchange↗
DOE OSTI2021

Nondimensional convection numbers modeling thermally stratified storage tanks: Richardson's number and hot-water tanks

Thermally stratified storage tank studies have spanned over 50 years to increase the thermal storage efficiency and accurate prediction of the outlet temperature particularly for solar applications. The studies have reviewed and modeled the jet and plume flow phenomena inside the tank due to the inlet mixing and stratification level. Kelvin–Helmholtz and Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities are the major drivers of the mixing in these tanks. Momentum jets deflecting off walls at the bottom of the tank also create significant mixing. Reviewing Richardson models shows that the categorization was based on the range of Reynolds numbers at the inlet. Unfortunately, the use of superficial velocity in calculating the Richardson number results in critical values in the literature ranging from below 0.25 to 100. The most used length scale associated with these flows is an inertial scale based on the tank height or diameter although the mixing can occur at a relatively smaller scale. The various inlet devices and a large span of flow rates experienced in thermally stratified storage tanks requisite the use of the Reynolds number in combination with a convection number for accurate one dimensional models that predict performance over the long-term. The evaluation of peak shifting of electric loads leveraging renewable sources for applications, including residential hot-water tanks, commercial water tanks, and large-scale chilled water storage tanks, require these models. Finally, this paper is focused on establishing the significance of the convection numbers in conjunction with the Reynolds number for modeling the thermal stratification in storage tanks.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-16-80, 81) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-16-82, 83) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The total uranium in the Tank 38H surface sample was 57.6 mg/L, while the sub-surface sample was 106 mg/L. The Tank 43H samples ranged from 50.0 to 51.9 mg/L total uranium. The U-235 percentage was consistent for all four samples at 0.62%. The total uranium and percent U-235 results appear consistent with recent Tank 38H and Tank 43H uranium measurements. The Tank 38H plutonium results show a large difference between the surface and sub-surface sample concentrations and somewhat higher concentrations than previous samples. The Pu-238 concentration is more than forty times higher in the Tank 38H sub-surface sample than the surface sample. The surface and sub-surface Tank 43H samples contain similar plutonium concentrations and are within the range of values measured on previous samples. The four samples analyzed show silicon concentrations somewhat higher than the previous sample with values ranging from 104 to 213 mg/L.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-24-53, -56) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-24-54, -55) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

Savannah River National Laboratory analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support the Enrichment Control Program (ECP) and Corrosion Control Program (CCP). The results indicate the concentrations of most soluble species in the Tank 38H surface sample increased from the previous Tank 38H surface sample. The current Tank 38H subsurface sample shows similar Na, free hydroxide, and anions in comparison to the previous subsurface sample. However, the 38H subsurface sample shows lower concentrations of Al, Ca, Fe, Mn, and Si in comparison to the previous Tank 38H subsurface sample. Measurement of the wt.% insoluble solids in the Tank 38H subsurface sample and associated uncertainty analysis indicates that the calculated average wt.% insoluble solids is 0.45 ± 0.75 wt.%. Significant differences in the concentrations of major components between the Tank 38H surface and subsurface samples indicate significant stratification of solution species between these two locations within Tank 38H.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Salt Tank Testbed: a Test Site Designed to Replicate Floor Buckles Observed in Commercial TES Tanks

A test site has been designed and is under construction to replicate the buckling failure ob-served in several in-service storage tanks for nitrate salts operating up to 565°C. In commercial tanks multiple factors have been identified that influence the floors susceptibility to buck-ling, including: the as-manufactured shape of the floor, high compressive stresses due to thermal gradients and/or friction, fluid inventory and absolute temperature. Based on exten-sive modeling analysis it was determined that similar buckles can be reproduced in a scaled test tank (approximately 9x smaller than a representative commercial tank design). To buckle the scaled tank a radial thermal gradient is generated in the tank with a low fluid level, the fluid level is then increased while maintaining the thermal gradient; based on the modeling results just one of these cycles can plastically deform the tank floor. The test site which is under construction is designed to replicate this damaging cycle at lower temperatures. The goal of testing will be to reproduce this damaging cycle and buckle the scaled test tank floor, allowing proper model validation and a methodology for comparing different tank designs at a smaller (and less costly) scale.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2013

241-AY-101 Tank Construction Extent of Condition Review for Tank Integrity

This report provides the results of an extent of condition construction history review for tank 241-AY-101. The construction history of tank 241-AY-101 has been reviewed to identify issues similar to those experienced during tank AY-102 construction. Those issues and others impacting integrity are discussed based on information found in available construction records, using tank AY-102 as the comparison benchmark. In tank 241-AY-101, the second double-shell tank constructed, similar issues as those with tank 241-AY-102 construction reoccurred. The overall extent of similarly and affect on tank 241-AY-101 integrity is described herein.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

241-AW Tank Farm Construction Extent of Condition Review for Tank Integrity

This report provides the results of an extent of condition construction history review for the 241-AW tank farm. The construction history of the 241-AW tank farm has been reviewed to identify issues similar to those experienced during tank AY-102 construction. Those issues and others impacting integrity are discussed based on information found in available construction records, using tank AY-102 as the comparison benchmark. In the 241-AW tank farm, the fourth double-shell tank farm constructed, similar issues as those with tank 241-AY-102 construction occurred. The overall extent of similar and affect on 241-AW tank farm integrity is described herein.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

241-AP Tank Farm Construction Extent of Condition Review for Tank Integrity

This report provides the results of an extent of condition construction history review for the 241-AP tank farm. The construction history of the 241-AP tank farm has been reviewed to identify issues similar to those experienced during tank AY-102 construction. Those issues and others impacting integrity are discussed based on information found in available construction records, using tank AY-102 as the comparison benchmark. In the 241-AP tank farm, the sixth double-shell tank farm constructed, tank bottom flatness, refractory material quality, post-weld stress relieving, and primary tank bottom weld rejection were improved.

241-AP Tank Farm↗
DOE OSTI2014

SRS Tank 38H and 43H Supernate Foaming Studies and Tank 38H Reel Tape Solids Characterization

Radioactive waste samples retrieved from Savannah River Site (SRS) Tanks 38H and 43H (concentrate receipt and feed tanks, respectively, for the 2H Evaporator system) were evaluated with regard to their tendency to form foams during air sparging. This work was conducted due to recent processing issues and outages in the evaporator that were believed to have resulted from sample foaming. The samples evaluated for foam formation included supernate collected in April of 2014 (near the time of the evaporator outage) as well as historical samples available within the SRNL shielded cells facility. The April samples included one Tank 43H surface sample (HTF-43-14-42), one Tank 43H sub-surface sample (HTF-43-14-43), and one Tank 38H (HTF-38-14-41) surface sample. In addition, two Tank 43H samples (HTF-43-14-8 and HTF-43-14-9) and one Tank 38H sample (HTF-38-14-6) were also evaluated along with a blended sample of various historical Tank 38H and 43H samples. Characterization results for the April samples are also provided. The composition of the samples was similar to historical evaporator system samples received at SRNL.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-16-26, 27) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-16-28, 29) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

Savannah River National Laboratory analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support Enrichment Control Program and Corrosion Control Program. The total uranium in the Tank 38H samples ranged from 20.5 to 34.0 mg/L while the Tank 43H samples ranged from 47.6 to 50.6 mg/L. The U-235 percentage ranged from 0.62% to 0.64% over the four samples. The total uranium and percent U-235 results appear consistent with previous Tank 38H and Tank 43H uranium measurements. The Tank 38H plutonium results show a large difference between the surface and sub-surface sample concentrations and a somewhat higher concentration than previous sub-surface samples. The two Tank 43H samples show similar plutonium concentrations and are within the range of values measured on previous samples. The plutonium results may be biased high due to the presence of plutonium contamination in the blank samples from the cell sample preparations. The four samples analyzed show silicon concentrations ranging from 47.9 to 105 mg/L.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Discovery of the First Leaking Double-Shell Tank - Hanford Tank 241-AY-102

Full text - Long Abstract. A routine video inspection of the annulus region of double-shell tank 241-A Y-102 in August of 2012 indicated the presence material in the annulus space between the primary and secondary liners. A comparison was made to previous inspections performed in 2006 and 2007. which indicated that a change had occurred. The material was observed at two locations on the floor of the annulus and one location at the top of the annulus region where the primary and secondary top knuckles meet (RPP-ASMT-53793). Subsequent inspections were performed. leading to additional material observed on the floor of the annulus space in a region that had not previously been inspected (WRPS-PER-2012-1363). The annulus Continuous Air Monitor (CAM) was still operational and was not indicating elevated radiation levels in the annulus region. When the camera from the inspections was recovered. it also did not indicate increased radiation above minimum contamination levels (WRPS-PER-2012-1363). A formal leak assessment team was established August 10, 2012 to review tank 241-AY-102 construction and operating histories and to determine whether the material observed in the annulus had resulted from a leak in the primary tank. The team consisted of individuals from Engineering. Base Operations and Environmental Protection. As this was a first-of-its-kind task. a method for obtaining a sample of the material in the annulus was needed. The consistency of the material was unknown.and the location of a majority of the material was not conducive to using the sampling devices that were currently available at Hanford. A subcontractor was tasked with the development fabrication.and testing of a sampling device that would be able to obtain multiple samples from the material on the annulus floor. as well as the material originating from a refractory air-slot near the floor of the annulus space. This sampler would need to be able to collect and dispense the material it collected into a sample jar retrieval device for transportation of the material to the 222-S laboratory on the Hanford site for analysis. The subcontractor agency fabricated a remote underground sampler by modifying off-the-shelf robotics and parts. Limited testing of the sampler was conducted using a mock-up of the tank annulus and one simulated material type -a salt block. The mock-up testing indicated that the sampler would be able to maneuver within the confined space and that the device worked with full functionality. A total of six weeks had passed from initiation to implementation of the new sampler in the 241-AY-102 tank annulus. Initial sample material was obtained from the annulus floor using the Off-Riser Sampler System that has been used at Hanford tor years to obtain material from the primary tanks. This could be used at the location near Riser 83 since the material was collected directly from the annulus floor and not from a location on the wall or behind a pipe, as was needed from the two locations near Riser 90. After obtaining a small sample of the material on the annulus floor.this sampler sustained terminal damage due to conduit pipes it had to transverse in order to collect and recover material from this location. Several issues were also encountered during deployment of the new sampler into the annulus near Riser 90. These included: Difficulty fitting the sampler down the 12-inch riser into the annulus due to a small tolerance in the size of the sampler; Failure of sampler components and functions during deployment including the camera. pneumatics.and bearing seals; Delays in the field due to supporting equipment issues including cables. cameras. and scaffolding; and, Low recovery of sample material obtained for analysis. The complications that occurred during deployment and use of the new sampler during the sampling event ultimately resulted in lower recovery of material from these locations in the annulus than was obtained using the Off-Riser Sampler System and limited the analyses that could be performed for determining the origin of the material. Following completion of the sample analyses and the assessment of its construction history and use. there was a consensus among the leak assessment team members that two of the three materials sampled from the annulus floor region were the result of waste leaking from a breach in the primary tank. The probable leak cause was identified as corrosion at high temperatures in a tank whose containment margins had been reduced due to construction difficulties (RPP-ASMT-53793). A formal Lessons Learned was created concerning designing equipment tor unique purposes under time constraints. This document was published in OPEXShare on May 20. 2013. It highlighted some of the issues that arose with the subcontractor sampler development and provided recommendations to prevent a recurrence should this task need to be performed again in the future. The document can be found at http://msa.hanford.gov/opex/lesson.cfm/2013/5/20/3481/AY-102-Annulus-Sampler-Designing-Equipment-for-Unique-Purposes-under-Time-Constraints/.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗