SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Shell Buckling Knockdown”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

44 records · Page 3

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2018

Buckling Imperfection Sensitivity of Conical Sandwich Composite Structures for Launch-Vehicles

Structural stability can be an important consideration in the design of large composite shell structures and therefore it is important to understand the buckling response of such structures. It is well known that geometric imperfections can significantly influence the buckling response of such structures by causing the buckling loads to be significantly lower than the theoretical buckling load of a geometrically perfect shell structure. Results are presented of an analytical study on the buckling imperfection sensitivity of large-scale conical sandwich structures for launch vehicles. In particular, representative structures from the Space Launch System launch-vehicle development activities will be considered. The study considered composite sandwich conical structures with multiple sandwich core thicknesses and facesheet layups consisting of tape and fabric composite layups. The results of this analytical study indicate that there is conservatism in the NASA current buckling knockdown factor of 0.33 for conical shell structures. Therefore, it is suggested that the buckling response of composite sandwich cones be further investigated through buckling tests and analytical predictions to potentially revise the buckling design recommendations for conical composite structures.

Sleight, David W.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Buckling Behavior of Conical-Cylindrical Shells and Design Considerations for Launch-Vehicle Applications

Traditionally, launch vehicles are constructed with a series of buckling-prone thin-walled cylindrical and conical shells, in which the buckling behavior of these shells has been well studied and buckling design guidance exists. Conical-cylindrical shell geometry is now being utilized for launch-vehicle stage adapters and payload adapters due to advances in manufacturing and numerical techniques, but there is no available buckling design guidance for this nontraditional combined geometry. In order to provide design recommendations, the buckling behavior and imperfection sensitivity of conical-cylindrical shells and how it differs from the conical and cylindrical components needs to be better understood. From this premise, it is possible to investigate whether or not the buckling knockdown factor guidelines for conical and cylindrical shells outlined in NASA SP-8019 and NASA SP-8007, respectively, are still applicable. The results in this paper will show that the current recommendations are not appropriate in some cases. In addition, it was observed that the large rotations and displacements near the transition between the cone and cylinder can have a larger effect on the buckling load than the presence of radial imperfections for conical-cylindrical shells, which is different than conical and cylindrical shells. More interesting is the fact that design modifications to increase the buckling capability of a conical-cylindrical shell such as adding reinforcement, which may add mass, will make the shell more sensitive to imperfections. The increased imperfection sensitivity may negate the increase in buckling capability that was thought to be achievable. In the end, it may be more beneficial to design a conical-cylindrical shell in which the buckling behavior is dominated by the more predictable geometric nonlinearity, which may lead to an overall lower buckling load, but a lower knockdown factor may be possible since it will not be as sensitive to the less-known radial imperfections.

Buckling↗

NASA NTRS2016

Buckling Knockdown Factors for Composite Cylinders

The buckling performance of thin-walled cylindrical shells is well known to be sensitive to small geometric and loading imperfections. During design, this sensitivity is typically accounted for by multiplying the predicted buckling load of a geometrically perfect structure by an empirical design factor known as a buckling knockdown factor (KDF). The most widely used source of KDFs for cylindrical launch-vehicle structures is NASA SP-8007. However, general composite shells are outside the original scope of SP-8007, and a universal KDF of 0.65 for all composite shell designs has been used in several recent NASA studies, though the technical justification is unclear. If the NASA SP-8007 is used to calculate KDFs for composite cylinders, the original assumptions and limitations should be understood and care must be taken. Additionally, the universal KDF of 0.65 is thought to be unconservative for certain designs and is therefore not recommended .

Buckling Knockdown Factors↗

NASA NTRS2016

Buckling Design and Imperfection Sensitivity of Sandwich Composite Launch-Vehicle Shell Structures

Composite materials are increasingly being considered and used for launch-vehicle structures. For shell structures, such as interstages, skirts, and shrouds, honeycomb-core sandwich composites are often selected for their structural efficiency. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to understand the structural response, including buckling, of sandwich composite shell structures. Additionally, small geometric imperfections can significantly influence the buckling response, including considerably reducing the buckling load, of shell structures. Thus, both the response of the theoretically perfect structure and the buckling imperfection sensitivity must be considered during the design of such structures. To address the latter, empirically derived design factors, called buckling knockdown factors (KDFs), were developed by NASA in the 1960s to account for this buckling imperfection sensitivity during design. However, most of the test-article designs used in the development of these recommendations are not relevant to modern launch-vehicle constructions and material systems, and in particular, no composite test articles were considered. Herein, a two-part study on composite sandwich shells to (1) examine the relationship between the buckling knockdown factor and the areal mass of optimized designs, and (2) to interrogate the imperfection sensitivity of those optimized designs is presented. Four structures from recent NASA launch-vehicle development activities are considered. First, designs optimized for both strength and stability were generated for each of these structures using design optimization software and a range of buckling knockdown factors; it was found that the designed areal masses varied by between 6.1% and 19.6% over knockdown factors ranging from 0.6 to 0.9. Next, the buckling imperfection sensitivity of the optimized designs is explored using nonlinear finite-element analysis and the as-measured shape of a large-scale composite cylindrical shell. When compared with the current buckling design recommendations, the results suggest that the current recommendations are overly conservative and that the development of new recommendations could reduce the acreage areal mass of many composite sandwich shell designs by between 4% and 19%, depending on the structure.

Schultz, Marc R.↗

NASA NTRS2001

On the Accuracy of Probabilistic Bucking Load Prediction

The buckling strength of thin-walled stiffened or unstiffened, metallic or composite shells is of major concern in aeronautical and space applications. The difficulty to predict the behavior of axially compressed thin-walled cylindrical shells continues to worry design engineers as we enter the third millennium. Thanks to extensive research programs in the late sixties and early seventies and the contributions of many eminent scientists, it is known that buckling strength calculations are affected by the uncertainties in the definition of the parameters of the problem such as definition of loads, material properties, geometric variables, edge support conditions, and the accuracy of the engineering models and analysis tools used in the design phase. The NASA design criteria monographs from the late sixties account for these design uncertainties by the use of a lump sum safety factor. This so-called 'empirical knockdown factor gamma' usually results in overly conservative design. Recently new reliability based probabilistic design procedure for buckling critical imperfect shells have been proposed. It essentially consists of a stochastic approach which introduces an improved 'scientific knockdown factor lambda(sub a)', that is not as conservative as the traditional empirical one. In order to incorporate probabilistic methods into a High Fidelity Analysis Approach one must be able to assess the accuracy of the various steps that must be executed to complete a reliability calculation. In the present paper the effect of size of the experimental input sample on the predicted value of the scientific knockdown factor lambda(sub a) calculated by the First-Order, Second-Moment Method is investigated.

Arbocz, Johann↗

NASA NTRS1998

Towards a Probabilistic Criterion for Preliminary Shell Design

Thin-walled stiffened or unstiffened, metallic or composite shells are widely used structural elements in aeronautical and space applications. Buckling strength, which is a major concern in all these areas, is affected by the uncertainties in the definition of loads, material properties, geometric variables, engineering models and the accuracy of the analysis tools used in the design phase. The NASA design criteria monographs from the late sixties account for these design uncertainties by the use of a lump sum safety factor or the so-called "knockdown" factor gamma, which usually results in an overly conservative design. In the present paper a new, reliability based, probabilistic design procedure for buckling critical imperfect isotropic shells is proposed. It essentially consists of a stochastic approach based on a new, improved "knockdown" factor lambda(sub a) that is not as conservative as the traditional one. It is felt that by quantifying and understanding the "problem uncertainties" such as initial imperfections and their influence on the design variables, one can develop a better engineered, better designed and safer system.

Arbocz, Johann↗

NASA NTRS2012

Validation of Lower-Bound Estimates for Compression-Loaded Cylindrical Shells

The traditional approach used in the design of stability critical thin-walled circular cylin- ders, is to reduce unconservative buckling load predictions with an empirical knockdown factor. An alternative analysis-based approach to determine a lower bound buckling load for cylinders under axial compression is to use a lateral perturbation load to create an initial imperfection and determine the buckling load while that load is applied. This paper describes a preliminary e ort to develop a test capability to verify this approach. Results from tests of three aluminum alloy cylinders are described and compared to nite element predictions.

Haynie, Waddy T.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Design, analysis, and tests of a structural prototype Viking aeroshell. I - Aeroshell design and analysis. II - Test procedure and test results.

Two near optimum full-scale Viking aeroshell prototypes (140 deg ring-stiffened conical shells), differing only in base ring size, were designed and tested under uniform pressure to buckling failure. Part I describes the computerized design procedure which iterates between a design program based on approximate equations to determine skin and ring gages and ring spacings, and a sophisticated system of shell of revolution programs for more accurate analysis as a basis for redesign. Part II discusses fabrication techniques, test procedures, and test results. Both buckling and prebuckling data are compared with the theoretical predictions of Part I. Appropriate buckling knockdown factors for this type of construction are identified. Measured strains in skin and rings agreed well with theoretical predictions and the buckling pressure was in close agreement with the design ultimate pressure.

Heard, W. L., Jr.↗