Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “PBA”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

39 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2011

Development of the International Space Station (ISS) Fine Water Mist (FWM) Portable Fire Extinguisher

NASA is developing a Fine Water Mist Portable Fire Extinguisher for use on the International Space Station. The International Space Station presently uses two different types of fire extinguishers: a water foam extinguisher in the Russian Segment, and a carbon dioxide extinguisher in the US Segment and Columbus and Kibo pressurized elements. Changes in emergency breathing equipment make Fine Water Mist operationally preferable. Supplied oxygen breathing systems allow for safe discharge of a carbon dioxide fire extinguisher, without concerns of the crew inhaling unsafe levels of carbon dioxide. But the Portable Breathing Apparatus (PBA) offers no more than 15 minutes of capability, and continued use of hose based supplied oxygen system increases the oxygen content in a fire situation. NASA has developed a filtering respirator cartridge for use in a fire environment. It is qualified to provide up to 90 minutes of capability, and because it is a filtering respirator it does not add oxygen to the environment. The fire response respirator cartridge does not filter carbon dioxide (CO2), so a crew member discharging a CO2 fire extinguisher while wearing this filtering respirator would be at risk of inhaling unsafe levels of CO2. Fine Water Mist extinguishes a fire without creating a large volume of air with reduced oxygen and elevated CO2. From a flight hardware design perspective, the fine water mist fire extinguisher has two major elements: (1) the nozzle and crew interface, and (2) the tank. The nozzle and crew interface has been under development for several years. It has gone through several design iterations, and has been part of more than 400 fire challenge and spray characterizations. The crew and vehicle interface aspects of the design will use the heritage of the CO2 based Portable Fire Extinguisher, to minimize the disruption to the crew and integration impacts to the ISS. The microgravity use environment of the system poses a set of unique design requirements specifically for the tank. The nozzle requirements drive a tank pressure that is 2-5 times higher than any commercially available water mist systems. Microgravity requires deliberate separation of gas and water, facilitated by a bladder, a diaphragm, a piston, or separate tanks. This paper will describe the design details of the tank and the nozzle, and discuss the trade studies that informed the decisions to select the tank and nozzle configuration.

Clements, Anna L.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Development of the International Space Station (ISS) Fine Water Mist (FWM) Portable Fire Extinguisher ICES Abstract

NASA is developing a Fine Water Mist (FWM) Portable Fire Extinguisher (PFE) for use on the International Space Station. The International Space Station presently uses two different types of fire extinguishers: a water foam extinguisher in the Russian Segment, and a carbon dioxide extinguisher in the US Segment and Columbus and Kibo pressurized elements. Changes in emergency breathing equipment make Fine Water Mist operationally preferable. Supplied oxygen breathing systems allow for safe discharge of a carbon dioxide fire extinguisher, without concerns of the crew inhaling unsafe levels of carbon dioxide. But the Portable Breathing Apparatus (PBA) offers no more than 15 minutes of capability, and continued use of hose based supplied oxygen system increases the oxygen content in a fire situation. NASA has developed a filtering respirator cartridge for use in a fire environment. It is qualified to provide up to 90 minutes of capability, and because it is a filtering respirator it does not add oxygen to the environment. The fire response respirator cartridge does not filter carbon dioxide (CO2), so a crew member discharging a CO2 fire extinguisher while wearing this filtering respirator would be at risk of inhaling unsafe levels of CO2. FWM extinguishes a fire without creating a large volume of air with reduced oxygen and elevated CO2. The following paper will discuss the unique functional and performance requirements that have been levied on the FWM PFE. In addition, the NASA ISS specific fire standards will be described which were developed to establish acceptable extinguisher performance. The paper will also discuss the flight hardware design. The fin e water mist fire extinguisher has two major elements: (1) the nozzle and crew interface, and (2) the tank. The nozzle and crew interface have been under development for several years. They have gone through several design iterations, and have been part of more than 400 fire challenge and spray characterizations. The crew and vehicle interface aspects of the design will use the heritage of the CO2 based Portable Fire Extinguisher, to minimize the disruption to the crew and integration impacts to the ISS. The microgravity use environment of the system poses a set of unique design requirements specifically for the tank. The nozzle requirements drive a tank pressure that is 2-5 times higher than any commercially available water mist systems. Microgravity requires deliberate separation of gas and water, facilitated by a bladder, a diaphragm, a piston, or separate tanks. This paper will describe status of the project to date, the design details of the tank and the nozzle, and discuss the trade studies that informed the decisions to select the tank and nozzle configuration.

Clements, Anna L.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Amphiphilic Block Copolymers for Flocculation and Hydrophobization of Legacy Waste Suspensions in Flotation Driven Dewatering Operations

There exists a degrading legacy fuel pond at the Sellafield site (UK), known as the First-Generation Magnox Storage Pond (FGMSP). After being placed into a passive care and maintenance regime resulting in a long storage period, the fuel rods, primarily their cladding, corroded in the pond forming magnesium hydroxide based sludges and suspended material. These ponds are a grave concern to the British government in terms of hazard and risk reduction. Therefore, decommissioning of these ponds is a top priority beginning with the contaminant retrievals process [1]. The pond has accumulated significant quantities of waste materials amongst the skips of fuel, including but not limited to: large inventories of corroded Magnox sludge, fuel rod fragments, metal fragments (from fuel skips), concrete degradation products (from the pond infrastructure), wind-blown sand, and other materials such as bird guano and animal remains. This challenge requires a chemically robust technology to complete sludge retrievals [2]. As nuclear is different, a more stringent process operation criteria is required. From the criteria, flotation was selected as a viable technology. Flotation involves the application of collector molecules which modify the hydrophobicity of suspended particles allowing them to adsorb to rising bubbles. As some particles lack inertia for flotation due to their size, dual flocculant/collector agents can be deployed for greater particle recovery, in this case, amphiphilic diblock copolymers. Two copolymers of Poly(acrylic acid)-b-poly(n-butyl acrylate) (or PAA-b-PnBA), of different hydrophobic chain lengths (PBA) were synthesized for flotation campaigns. Flotation has shown promise to be a valuable rapid dewatering strategy for decommissioning of legacy waste ponds whilst upholding the required operational criteria. This research has shown: PAA-b-PnBA copolymers promote flocculation of Mg(OH){sub 2} particulates. Diblock copolymers retain more fluid than traditional surfactant based collectors wrt. relative particulate recovery performance- where longer PnBA chain length polymers performed best. Performance appears to be hydrodynamically limited due to over-flocculation of Mg(OH){sub 2}. Potential to combine with sedimentation for high particle recovery with low fluid carryover.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗