SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
In the version of the article initially published, the x axes in Figs. 2b,d and 5a,b originally read “T -1 (K -1 )” and have now been amended to “1000 T -1 (K -1 )” in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
In the version of this article initially published, the ATLAS Collaboration author names, affiliations and acknowledgements were omitted and have now been included in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
Correction to: Naturehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07311-5 Published online 17 April 2024. In the version of this article initially published, an erroneous grey hexagon appeared next to the bottom label in Fig. 3a. It has now been removed from the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
Correction to: Naturehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08455-0 Published online 22 January 2025. In the version of the article initially published, the affiliations of Hana A. Chang (Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA) and Ron Milo (Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel) were incorrect and have now been amended in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
Following publication of this article, concerns were raised about the unambiguous identification of the compound structures using diffraction as well as the original claims of material novelty. We acknowledge that the original claims of material novelty were subject to misinterpretation—their intention was to indicate that the materials were new to the prediction platform, not necessarily new to science. The article text has been updated to reflect this in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
Correction to: Naturehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07117-5 Published online 13 March 2024 In the version of the article initially published, several errors were present and have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article and Supplementary Information. The main results, conclusions, and our interpretations of the data remain unchanged. See the new Supplementary Information Section S15 for a more detailed description of the errors corrected and the resulting effects on the analysis. Data processing and methods corrections Overflight count correction: We previously used pre-computed source coverage data for some Carbon Mapper campaigns that was computed differently than was required for our analysis. We have re-computed Carbon Mapper source coverage based on flightline polygons and source coordinates. Transition point computation, well sites: The updated version now correctly compares the cumulative emissions distribution of simulated well site emissions with that of aerially detected sources (rather than plumes) when computing the transition point. Transition point computation, midstream: Additionally, the transition point calculation has been corrected to exclude aerially detected midstream emissions below the transition point, which was previously leading to double counting of these emissions. This error was not present for upstream (well site) emissions. Calculation errors Unit error: We corrected a specific unit conversion error affecting well site emissions in the Kairos Fort Worth dataset. Across all datasets, we also correct the conversion factor for converting from standard volume to mass for midstream emissions. Sorting error: We correct code that was applying incorrect sorting when computing correction factors to account for partial detection at well sites. Small typographical corrections were made in Fig. 1b and SI Section S4.1. Data processing and methods corrections Overflight count correction: We previously used pre-computed source coverage data for some Carbon Mapper campaigns that was computed differently than was required for our analysis. We have re-computed Carbon Mapper source coverage based on flightline polygons and source coordinates. Transition point computation, well sites: The updated version now correctly compares the cumulative emissions distribution of simulated well site emissions with that of aerially detected sources (rather than plumes) when computing the transition point. Transition point computation, midstream: Additionally, the transition point calculation has been corrected to exclude aerially detected midstream emissions below the transition point, which was previously leading to double counting of these emissions. This error was not present for upstream (well site) emissions. Calculation errors Unit error: We corrected a specific unit conversion error affecting well site emissions in the Kairos Fort Worth dataset. Across all datasets, we also correct the conversion factor for converting from standard volume to mass for midstream emissions. Sorting error: We correct code that was applying incorrect sorting when computing correction factors to account for partial detection at well sites. Small typographical corrections were made in Fig. 1b and SI Section S4.1. The following practices may help researchers conducting similar analyses avoid making similar errors: 1, Clear, accessible documentation explaining the interpretation of all columns in data input tables and all internal variables within the model, 2, Simple cross-check calculations computed before and after unit conversions.
In the version of this article initially published, four people were missing from the alphabetical list of IMG/M Data Consortium members: Lauren V. Alteio of the Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Jeffrey L. Blanchard of the Biology Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA; Kristen M. DeAngelis of the Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA; and William Rodriguez-Reillo of the Research Computing Division, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. The error has been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the article.
In the version of this article originally published, the present address for Petr Popov was incorrectly listed as ‘Koltech Institute of Science & Technology, Moscow, Russia’. The correct present address is ‘Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia’. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the paper.
Correction to: Nature Methods 14, 909–914, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4388 (2017), published online 7 August 2017. In the version of this article initially published, the authors erroneously reported the search mode that was used for ProSightPC 3.0 in the Online Methods and in Supplementary Table 3. The results presented in Fig. 5 were obtained with ‘absolute mass’ search mode, not ‘biomarker discovery’ search mode. The ‘biomarker discovery’ search mode of ProSightPC 3.0 looks for subsequences of those contained in the annotated proteoform database (e.g., truncated forms from degradation and/or cleavage). This search mode is expected to generate similar numbers of identifications as Informed-Proteomics, but is also expected to take dramatically longer (~480 CPU hours). Unfortunately, because of these heavy computational requirements, the authors were unable to complete an analysis using this search mode. They chose to use ‘absolute mass’ mode to illustrate the effect of search mode and database choice on the results. ‘Absolute mass’ mode is the most restrictive of the search modes illustrated in Fig. 5, as it searches only for proteoforms explicitly listed in the proteoform database within a user-defined mass tolerance. In addition, in the supplementary information originally published online, Supplementary Table 3 incorrectly stated that ProSightPC v3.0 was used in ‘biomarker discovery’ mode. ‘Absolute mass’ mode was the mode actually used in this comparison. These errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this article and in the associated supplementary information.
Correction to: Nature Methodshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02660-z, published online 12 May 2025. This article was originally published under standard Springer Nature license (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.). It is now available as an open-access paper under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, © The Author(s). The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
Correction to: Scientific Data, published online 25 May 2022 The order of the column headings was incorrect in Table 1, meaning values were listed under the wrong descriptions. This has been corrected in the pdf and HTML versions of the article.
In the version of this article initially published, two errors in authorship were made. First, Tatiana Rynearson of the School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island was mistakenly omitted from the final author list. Second, Kurt LaButti of the Joint Genome Institute was mistakenly omitted from the final author list and replaces Alicia Clum due to a staffing change at the Joint Genome Institute. These authorship omissions were not identified until after the work had been published. We are updating the authorship to appropriately recognize the contributions of these authors. The error has been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the article.
In the original version of this Article, the ORCID ID for S. Eley was omitted. In addition, the original version of Figure 1 was incorrectly labelled as Figure 1a. These errors have now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the Article.
The original PDF and HTML versions of this Article contained an error in the Acknowledgements section. In the Acknowledgements section MEG Energy Corp. was incorrectly acknowledged for financial support.
In the version of this article initially published, Figs. 1–3, Table 1 and the Supplementary Information presented more models than were present in the accepted version of the article, and which were not discussed in the text. The Supplementary Information has been revised and the figures and table are now updated in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
In the published HTML version of this article, the affiliations of the authors of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia were unfortunately marked incorrectly.
In the original HTML version of this article, one affiliation of the author V. O. Tikhomirov was missing. He is affiliated to the following two affiliations: P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia and National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia. The original article has been corrected.
The Zotero Robust Links extension automatically creates an archival copy (memento) of the URI of an item ingested into a Zotero library. The extension can also manually be triggered to create mementos. The software also contains a "translator" that enables the export of "robustified" items with Robust Links-enhanced HTML code.