Engineering PapersSearch

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “HECC”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

A Comparative Study of Contrail Frequency Indices and GOES-16 Contrail Data Set

Contrail formations have been shown to contribute to the greenhouse effect: they are practically transparent to incoming solar radiation and do little to reflect heat away from Earth but are highly effective at trapping heat within Earth’s atmosphere. To understand the impact contrails have on climate change, contrail frequency indices (CFIs) can be used as a method to quantify aircraft-induced persistent contrails. These indices are capable of tracking long-term contrail formation and identify regions of airspace with the highest contrail formation rates. In this aper, an algorithm is proposed which is capable of using NASA Sherlock and Global Forecast System (GFS) datasets and computing CFIs over large geographic regions and long temporal intervals using NASA Ames’ High-End Computing Capability (HECC) supercomputing system. CFIs are computed using nowcast weather data and previously flown flight tracks. This paper calculated the CFIs of all twenty Air Route Traffic Control Centers in the National Airspace System on October 28th, 2019 and compared the distribution of non-zero CFIs with observed contrail data collected from GOES-16 Satellite data in order to assess the accuracy of the CFI system as a contrail prediction model. It was ultimately determined that the computed CFIs were broadly distributed in the same way as the GOES-16 contrail data and that the individual CFIs computed at the latitude/longitude points at which GOES-16 contrail masks were available had high precision and recall (at 0.75 and 0.86 respectively). While these validation results bode well for the accuracy of the CFI method, the number of provided GOES-16 masks was quite small. Future work should aim to increase the size of the GOES-16 dataset in order to perform a more comprehensive comparison between these two datasets.

Contrails

PALMO: An OVERFLOW Machine Learning Airfoil Performance Database

The OVERFLOW Machine Learning Airfoil Performance (PALMO) database has been created to enable robust modeling of airfoil performance in a variety of applications. The database uses OVERFLOW simulation data second-order accurate in time and fourth-order accurate in space with Spalart-Allmaras turbulence closure. The foundation of the in-development PALMO database is the airfoil base cube. Each base cube includes simulation data parametrized over a range of Mach numbers, Reynolds numbers, and angles-of-attack. This first release of the database includes the NACA 4-series airfoils, with parametrization in airfoil thickness and camber from an NACA 0006 to an NACA 4424. In total, 52,480 NACA 4-series calculations were run on the NASA High-End Compute Capability (HECC) supercomputer and the corresponding airfoil performance coefficients are embedded in the Appendix of this document for public distribution. This provides high-order-accurate simulation data covering a wide range of aerospace design applications, which enables users to develop OVERFLOW-quality airfoil performance look-up tables without additional high-performance computing. In addition to engineering design and analysis of aerospace vehicles, PALMO is well suited to be a benchmark dataset for the development and testing of machine learning methods in aerospace engineering. Downstream surrogate models enable OVERFLOW- quality airfoil performance predictions for any arbitrary combination of camber, thickness, Mach number, Reynolds number, and angle-of-attack within the bounds of the database.

Database

PALMO: An OVERFLOW Machine Learning Airfoil Performance Database

The OVERFLOW Machine Learning Airfoil Performance (PALMO) database has been created to enable robust modeling of airfoil performance in a variety of applications. The PALMO database uses OVERFLOW simulation data second-order accurate in time and fourth-order accurate in space with Spalart-Allmaras turbulence closure. The foundation of the in-development PALMO database is the airfoil base cube. Each base cube includes simulation data parametrized over a range of Mach numbers, Reynolds numbers, and angles-of-attack. This database includes the NACA 4-series airfoils, with parametrization in airfoil thickness and camber from an NACA 0006 to an NACA 4424. In total, 52,480 NACA 4-series OVERFLOW calculations were run on the NASA High-End Compute Capability (HECC) supercomputer. This provides high-order-accurate simulation data covering a wide range of aerospace design applications, which enables users to develop accurate airfoil performance look-up tables without additional high-performance computing. In addition to engineering design and analysis of aerospace vehicles, PALMO is well suited to be a benchmark dataset for the development and testing of machine learning methods in aerospace engineering. This work presents an example PALMO surrogate model that enables accurate airfoil performance predictions for any arbitrary combination of camber, thickness, Mach number, Reynolds number, and angle of attack within the bounds of the database. Airfoil performance tables predicted for an airfoil not used in training the model are used in three-dimensional OVERFLOW simulations to quantify the downstream accuracy on aggregate rotor performance metrics. For the NACA 3415 airfoil, which had no common thickness or camber with the training data, the surrogate predicted and CFD generated tables were within 2.1% of each other in the forward flight lift to drag metric. This suggests that performance tables generated for airfoils within the bounds of the PALMO database will yield aggregate rotor performance predictions on par with tables generated from directly running OVERFLOW airfoil calculations. The PALMO airfoil performance coefficients are available publicly.

Database

User’s Guide for the NASA High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor Data Archive

The datasets contained in this archive are associated with the High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) in the Small Engine Components Compressor Test Facility, colloquially referred to as CE-18, at NASA Glenn Research Center. The archive is accessible at https://storage.googleapis.com/hecc-data/NASA-HECC-Data-Archive.zip. The documentation contained herein provides context for the data hosted on data.nasa.gov. The datasets and accompanying content in this document will be updated periodically as additional data is procured analyzed. The revision of the document is provided by date in the footer, and the revision updates are provided in the Revisions section. Please contact Trey Harrison (email: herbert.harrison@nasa.gov) for inquiries related to the dataset and documentation or to be added to an email list to be notified of updates and additions to the archive.

radial turbomachinery

Scale-Resolving Simulations of a Supersonic Retro-Propulsion Concept For Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing

Supersonic retro-propulsion (SRP) is a deceleration technology that could enable largerpayloads and potentially humans to be brought from space to the surface of Mars safely.Accurate and reliable CFD predictions are needed to help design future Mars entry, descent,and landing (EDL) vehicles due to the cost and limitations of wind tunnel tests. TypicalCFD approaches struggle at points along the Mars EDL trajectory with high enough altitude(low enough ambient pressure) that the SRP motor plumes are over-expanded. This workdemonstrates how high-order scale-resolving simulations on Cartesian AMR grids can provideaccurate and reliable time-averaged aerodynamic loads on the vehicle for this challengingflow regime. Greater than second order convergence in the time-averaged integrated axialforce𝐶𝐴is obtained across the three finest mesh resolutions simulated, and the estimateduncertainty is smaller than the unsteady standard deviation – demonstrating the accuracy andreliability of the method. Although costly, this approach can yield higher confidence in𝐶𝐴thanpreviously obtained in a reasonable turnaround time and is within reach for a few points in thetrajectory (i.e. Mach 2.4, 2.52, and 2.78). Further computational performance and numericalmethods improvements are needed to reduce the cost enough to bring this method into the EDLengineering design cycle.

S&M