Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Gen-IV”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2015

Preliminary Design of Critical Function Monitoring System of PGSFR

A PGSFR (Prototype Gen-IV Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor) is under development at Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. A critical function monitoring system of the PGSFR is preliminarily studied. The functions of CFMS are to display critical plant variables related to the safety of the plant during normal and accident conditions and guide the operators corrective actions to keep the plant in a safe condition and mitigate the consequences of accidents. The minimal critical functions of the PGSFR are composed of reactivity control, reactor core cooling, reactor coolant system integrity, primary heat transfer system(PHTS) heat removal, sodium water reaction mitigation, radiation control and containment conditions. The variables and alarm legs of each critical function of the PGSFR are as follows; - Reactivity control: The variables of reactivity control function are power range neutron flux instrumentation, intermediate range neutron flux instrumentation, source range neutron flux instrumentation, and control rod bottom contacts. The alarm leg to display the reactivity controls consists of status of control drop malfunction, high post trip power and thermal reactivity addition. - Reactor core cooling: The variables are PHTS sodium level, hot pool temperature of PHTS, subassembly exit temperature, cold pool temperature of the PHTS, PHTS pump current, and PHTS pump breaker status. The alarm leg consists of high core delta temperature, low sodium level of the PHTS, high subassembly exit temperature, and low PHTS pump load. - Reactor coolant system integrity: The variables are PHTS sodium level, cover gas pressure, and safeguard vessel sodium level. The alarm leg is composed of low sodium level of PHTS, high cover gas pressure and high sodium level of the safety guard vessel. - PHTS heat removal: The variables are PHTS sodium level, hot pool temperature of PHTS, core exit temperature, cold pool temperature of the PHTS, flow rate of passive residual heat removal system, flow rate of active residual heat removal system, and temperatures of air heat exchanger temperature of residual heat removal systems. The alarm legs are composed of two legs of a 'passive residual heat removal system not cooling' and 'active residual heat removal system not cooling'. - Sodium water reaction mitigation: The variables are intermediate heat transfer system(IHTS) pressure, pressure and temperature and level of sodium dump tank, the status of rupture disk, hydrogen concentration in IHTS and direct variable of sodium-water-reaction measure. The alarm leg consists of high IHTS pressure, the status of sodium water reaction mitigation system and the indication of direct measure. - Radiation control: The variables are radiation of PHTS, radiation of IHTS, and radiation of containment purge. The alarm leg is composed of high radiation of PHTS and IHTS, and containment purge system. - Containment condition: The variables are containment pressure, containment isolation status, and sodium fire. The alarm leg consists of high containment pressure, status of containment isolation and status of sodium fire. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Overview of PGSFR Project

The long-term plan for advanced SFR development was authorized by Korean Atomic Energy Commission (KAEC) in 2008 and updated in 2011, which will be carried out toward the construction of a SFR prototype plant called PGSFR (Prototype Gen-IV Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor) by 2028. The primary purpose of PGSFR is to demonstrate the technology reducing radioactive waste of spent nuclear fuel from nuclear power plants (NPP) in Korea. There are 24 NPPs in operation nationwide covering 30% of domestic electricity demand. The spent nuclear fuel is currently stored in the on-site storage pool of NPPs. Then, it has become a critical issue to ensure technical options to handle spent nuclear fuel in the long term basis to secure the sustainable operation of NPPs. PGSFR is a pool type sodium-cooled fast reactor with the power of 150 MWe or 400 MWth. PGSFR uses metallic fuel to make use of inherent safety characteristics of metallic fuel. The spent nuclear fuel will be processed using pyro-process to produce U-TRU-Zr fuel for PGSFR. But the initial core shall be loaded by low enriched U-Zr fuels. PGSFR has two intermediate loops with two intermediate heat exchangers (IHX) for each loop to deliver the generated heat from the core to power conversion system. There a steam generators producing super-heated steam in each loop. There are four decay heat removal circuits; two passive and two active ones. The reactor building is built on a seismic isolation base mat which can significantly mitigate seismic vibration of major components in the reactor building. The reactor building has a containment structure to isolate the reactor building under specific accident conditions and also provide structural integrity at the time of aircraft impact accident. PGSFR project is the national development program of Korea to construct the first SFR in Korea by 2028. The primary goal of PGSFR is the demonstration of reduction of radioactive waste from spent nuclear fuel by incineration in PGSFR. SFRA will flexibly cope with the licensing environment to minimize the uncertainty in licensing and safety concerns. The successful construction of PGSFR will bring Korean nuclear industry a step closer to guarantee the sustainable operation of NPPs nationwide and finally most importantly will solve the spent nuclear fuel issue of Korea. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

PGSFR Core Design and Performance Characteristics

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) has developed a Prototype Generation-IV Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (PGSFR) as a representative of Gen-IV concepts. The final PGSFR core will be composed of transuranic (TRU) fuels to transmute LWR spent fuels and self-recycled its fuels, in combination with a pyro-processing facility. However, the initial POSFR core consists of low enriched uranium (LEU) fuels in order to: 1) provide an irradiation test for TRU fuels and structural materials, 2) keep pace with the development of pyro-processing technology, and 3) obtain operational experience on the reactor systems and components. During the first phase of PGSFR development plan (2012-2015), the power level was decided to be 150 MWe from many trade-off studies using different power level. The PGSFR uranium core performance characteristics at the initial, transition and equilibrium states have been carried out. In this paper, the PGSFR core design and related performance characteristics are introduced. The PGSFR uranium core design was performed at the initial/transition/equilibrium core based on the candidate fuel management scheme. It was confirmed that this design can satisfy surely all design limit and requirement. The chapter 4 of PGSFR Preliminary Safety Information Document (PSID) published in December 2015 contains the detailed information and characteristics of PGSFR core. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Safety Analyses of Design Basis and Design Extended Condition Events for the PGSFR

KAERI (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) has been developing the PGSFR (Prototype Gen-IV Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor), which is a pool type sodium-cooled fast reactor with the thermal power of 392.2 MWt, uses metallic fuel of U-10%Zr for a core. The preliminary specific design of PGSFR is completed in 2015. The main parts of PGSFR consist of PHTS (Primary Heat Transport System), IHTS (Intermediate Heat Transport System), two SG (Steam Generator), and DHRS (Decay Heat Removal System). The main feature of PGSFR in safety is from the adoption of metallic fuel core, leading to inherent reactivity feedback mechanisms and high thermal conductivity. In this work, safety analysis on DBE (Design Basis Event) and DEC (Design Extended Condition event) for PGSFR preliminary specific design is conducted using MARS-LMR code. Conservative and best-estimated approaches are applied to DBA and DEC, respectively. It is found that the most severe accidents in the AOO, DBA class 1, DBA class 2, and DEC are LOF, OPS, TOP and ULOF event, respectively. And all analysis results are found to meet safety acceptance criteria requirements. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

R and D activities on VHTR materials at KAERI - 18496

KAERI started VHTR materials R and D in 2006 as part of its role in supporting the development of key technology for the nuclear research and development program. Over the past ten years, research has been conducted on various materials including Alloy 617 for an IHX and hot gas duct, 9Cr-1Mo for an RPV, graphite for a reflector and the support structures in the core region, Cf/C and SiCf/SiC composites for a control rod, and Fe-Si, SiC, Hastelloy{sup R}, and other novel metals for an SI process reactor. Mechanical properties including creep and fatigue, environmental effects, and irradiation behaviors have also been heavily evaluated as part of the materials research. Most of the results have been contributed to the GEN-IV VHTR materials collaboration. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Helium Brayton Cycle Design for Advanced High Temperature Reactor System

Gen-IV reactors have many advantages over current generation reactors. Higher outlet temperatures in these next generation reactors allow for other power cycles to be considered, such as the helium Brayton cycle. Additionally, the higher temperatures allow the energy to be utilized in other industrial applications. The advanced high temperature reactor concept utilizes the helium Brayton cycle for electricity production. The system consists of four components shown in Fig. 1. This includes a turbine, recuperator, precooler, and compressor. The helium coolant exits the secondary heat exchanger (SHX) at a high temperature and enters the turbine. Helium spins the turbine causing the generator to spin producing electricity. The pressure and temperature drop as the coolant travels through the turbine. The helium enters a recuperator where the cold side stream exiting the compressor is heated up. Helium then travels through a precooler where water is used to cool down the helium before entering the compressor. Helium enters the compressor where the temperature and pressure of the coolant increase. Compressed helium travels through the recuperator heating up to the desired temperature before entering the SHX again. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

SAS4A model development for the analysis of postulated severe accidents in metal fuel sodium fast reactors

The SAS4A code has been designed to simulate the events that occur in Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR) during the initiating phase of severe unprotected accidents. The initial SAS4A models were focused on the behavior of oxide fuel cores. An effort to expand the SAS4A models for the analysis of metal fuel cores is currently underway. This paper describes the status of the SAS4A metal fuel model development and presents initial results from the simulation of a postulated fuel assembly blockage accident in the Prototype Gen-IV Sodium Fast Reactor (PGSFR). (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Analysis on the Heat Transfer Phenomena Inside the Scaled-Down VHTR RCCS Riser Experiment

Very High Temperature gas-cooled Reactor (VHTR) that is one of GEN-IV reactors has been developed for the purpose of hydrogen production. VHTR is characterized by high operating temperature and stepped-up inherent safety given by passive safety systems such as Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS). In case the active heat removal system losses its capability, RCCS significantly contributes to the inherent safety of VHTR by removing the decay heat transferred from the reactor core to the reactor vessel. Therefore, the performance of RCCS is the key parameter to ensure the safety of the reactor. Several computation and experiment researches on the performance of RCCS have been conducted. There are two types of RCCS depending on its coolant; one is the air-cooled type and the other is water-cooled type. This study focused on the former type. Due to the excessive height of the prototype RCCS, experiment facilities were constructed in reduced scale. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) constructed the quarter-scale RCCS experiment facility, NACEF and Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) has constructed half-scale experiment facility, NSTF. University of Wisconsin (UW) also has the quarter-scale experiment facility and Texas A and M University has conducted separate effect test on the jet effect at the upper plenum of RCCS. From the reduced scale experiment result, the performance of RCCS such as a heat removal rate of RCCS and a peak temperature of reactor vessel were evaluated. When the reduced-scale result is applied to the prototype, however, a distortion could be brought about due to the reduced height of RCCS in the experiments. Especially, if the heat transfer regime inside the riser which roles as a heat exchanger to discharge the decay heat into the atmosphere is not identical, the riser wall temperature and the consequent reactor vessel temperature of the prototype could be incorrectly predicted. Thus, the convective heat transfer phenomena inside the riser duct both in the reduced scale and in the prototype is necessary to be investigated. In this study, the preliminary analysis on the heat transfer phenomena inside the RCCS riser was conducted. The subjects of the analysis were the prototype RCCS riser of PMR 200, and its scaled-down experiment facilities, NACEF. First, the geometry, flow and thermal conditions of the riser in PMR200 RCCS and NACEF were introduced with a scaling method. And then, the heat transfer regimes and the heat transfer coefficient corresponding to each condition were predicted using correlation and CFD calculation. Finally, planned activities including the experiment was introduced. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Electrochemical Behavior of Lanthanum in Molten LiF-NaF-KF 'Flinak' Eutectic Salt

In order to develop the Fluoride High- Temperature Reactor, an emerging Gen-IV reactor concept, a primary coolant cleanup system must be developed to allow online reprocessing of the primary molten fluoride salt. This research is focused on the determination of electrochemical properties of rare earths (REs) in molten fluoride salt related to the FHR. The FHR utilizes two fluoride salts. These fluoride salts are LiF-NaF-KF (46.5-11.5-42 mol%), melting point 454 deg. C, also known as 'Flinak', and LiFBeF{sub 2} (33-67 mol%), melting point 459 deg. C, also known as 'Flibe'. Flibe is selected as the primary coolant salt due to its low neutron cross-section (Li{sup 7}-enriched), superior heat transfer properties, and low melting point. However, due to the beryllium content in Flibe, it is highly toxic to humans and Flinak is preferred for the secondary and tertiary coolant salts. The work presented here is specifically focused on the behavior of lanthanum trifluoride (LaF{sub 3}) in molten Flinak. Furthermore, updated data and analysis regarding the electrochemical behavior of dysprosium trifluoride (DyF{sub 3}) is also presented. Previous work related to this topic was presented at the 2016 ANS winter conference. The goal of this research is to develop a contaminant cleanup system for the primary loop of the FHR.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Preliminary Development of a Nuclide Inventory Code for HTGR

Nuclide inventory calculation for a reactor core is the basis of radiation protection, shielding design and radioactive environmental impact assessment of the power plant. HTR-PM (high-temperature gas-cooled reactor pebble-bed module) under construction in China is one of the candidates for Gen-IV advanced nuclear power system.1 In the design stage of HTR-PM, KORIGEN has been utilized in the inventory calculation.2 However, the current version of KORIGEN was developed several decades ago. In order to improve the design capability of the analysis code package for HTR-PM, a new computer code for nuclide inventory calculation called NUIT (Nuclide Inventory Tool) is being developed based on the DEPTH3 code. The NUIT code tries to utilize accurate and efficient burnup solvers, incorporate well-validated and most recent nuclear data libraries, and provide user-friendly IO interface. This paper presents the preliminary work in the development of NUIT.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Study on Neutronics Calculation Method of SCWR with Annular Fuel Assembly

Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor (SCWR) is one of Gen-IV reactor systems for its advantages over LWRs, such as high thermal efficiency, simplified reactor system and economics. Annular fuel was proposed by MIT to supplant conventional solid fuel and improve power density in LWRs. Annular fuel is cooled from both inside and outside of the fuel. Thus a lower fuel temperature and cladding surface temperature can be achieved with higher power density. SCWRs will benefit from this advantage because high cladding temperature (usually over 650 degree C) is one challenge of SCWRs. Using annular fuel in SCWRs is very promising. This is also because the inner hole of the annual fuel can provide extra neutron moderation. Supercritical water density is too low to provide enough moderation. Different analysis codes have been developed all over the world to carry out SCWR pre-conceptual core design. Yamaji et al. developed SRAC/ASMBURN/COREBN to study Japan version of SCWR. Monti et al. used ERANOS to analyze HPLWR (High Performance Light Water Reactor). WIMS-D4/CITATION was also used to calculate HPLWR by Tashakor et al.. These codes employ a two-step method used in PWRs calculation. Lattice/Assembly calculation is carried out as the first step. In the second step, few group constant of different fuel assembly types is then used in core calculation. MCNP had also been used to study SCWR by Watta et al.. Due to large computation time cost, it's used mostly to analyze fuel assembly or core performance rather than pre-conceptual design, in which much optimization is needed. In this research, a neutronics calculation code for SCWR is developed using two-step method. This code is verified by comparing with Monte-Carlo code. Fuel assembly homogenization method is studied to improve the code accuracy.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Methodology of Experiment Design for Improving Transient Critical Heat Flux Model Development

One phenomenon that contributes to nuclear fuel and clad failure mechanisms is the departure from nucleate boiling (DNB). Accident scenarios such as reactivity-initiated accidents (RIAs) provide conditions where the frequency of boiling crisis is much more likely to occur and on much shorter time scales than loss of coolant (LOCA) or loss of flow (LOFA) accidents. Here, boiling crisis in the form of DNB is attributed to transient-induced heat flux values that exceed the critical heat flux (CHF). The resulting effects, such as bubble crowding and eventual dryout, can affect flow boiling heat transfer and compromise the structural integrity of nuclear reactor materials. The focus of the work proposed here lies in developing a rigorous process using out-of-pile testing, under simulated RIA conditions, to determine the transient critical heat flux of cladding materials, without contributions from aforementioned radiation-induced effects that have been observed during in-pile experiments. This study provides a road-map for developing and performing experiments that simulate the power profile and energy deposition aspects of transient events, specific to RIAs, on the laboratory scale. The goal of our project is to observe and measure DNB in an annular flow channel around a single heater rod that is operating and nominal thermal hydraulic conditions of a PWR. It is also an aim of these experiments to determine how to quantify the gap between SS and transient CHF cases, based on state-dependent properties of the cladding material type that is being interrogated. Traditionally, CHF is determined as a combination of four factors: hydraulic diameter, system pressure, mass flow, fluid quality. The authors propose that an additional measureable quantity, which is dependent on the structural properties of the cladding material itself, is partly reasonable for the difference between measured and model-developed CHF values. Using a carefully metered approach will allow for several key concepts to be realized: compensation for transient-based effects to current models for CHF; adaptation of current models for different cladding material types, including Gen-IV concept materials; and implementation of a correction factor to account for both power transient-based and radiation-induced effects on the CHF that have not yet been accounted for.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Need for research and training reactors for advanced reactor designs

Full text of publication follows. Research and training reactors have served a valuable role in helping train workforce for currently operating fleet of light water reactors. These research and training reactors have been used in reactor laboratory classes to familiarize the students with such vital concepts as approach to criticality, reactor period, neutron moderation, reactivity, flux distribution and leakage, etc. As the industry moves toward advanced non-light-water reactor designs, it is critical that research and training reactors be developed and deployed at university campuses to help train the new generation of nuclear and non-nuclear engineers who are likely to design, build, and operate these advanced reactors. Among the designs currently being pursued for nuclear power generation include molten salt, sodium cooled, and gas cooled designs, with options for various fuel forms. Thus, industry and DOE in collaboration with academic institutions should devise plans on how to familiarize the next generation of nuclear workforce with hands-on experience necessary for such designs. These research and training reactors will play a vital role in familiarizing the future workforce with hands-on experience with concepts associated with fast spectrum reactors, gas cooled reactors, and other features not associated with light water reactors. In addition to classical nuclear engineering concepts, these advanced research and training reactors can also be used for hands-on training as well as for research on features being considered in the design of GEN-IV reactors: cyber security for digital control room operations, hybrid energy system, hydrogen generation, district heating, autonomous control... (author)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2010

Next Generation Nuclear Plant Methods Technical Program Plan

One of the great challenges of designing and licensing the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) is to confirm that the intended VHTR analysis tools can be used confidently to make decisions and to assure all that the reactor systems are safe and meet the performance objectives of the Generation IV Program. The research and development (R&D) projects defined in the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Design Methods Development and Validation Program will ensure that the tools used to perform the required calculations and analyses can be trusted. The Methods R&D tasks are designed to ensure that the calculational envelope of the tools used to analyze the VHTR reactor systems encompasses, or is larger than, the operational and transient envelope of the VHTR itself. The Methods R&D focuses on the development of tools to assess the neutronic and thermal fluid behavior of the plant. The fuel behavior and fission product transport models are discussed in the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program plan. Various stress analysis and mechanical design tools will also need to be developed and validated and will ultimately also be included in the Methods R&D Program Plan. The calculational envelope of the neutronics and thermal-fluids software tools intended to be used on the NGNP is defined by the scenarios and phenomena that these tools can calculate with confidence. The software tools can only be used confidently when the results they produce have been shown to be in reasonable agreement with first-principle results, thought-problems, and data that describe the “highly ranked” phenomena inherent in all operational conditions and important accident scenarios for the VHTR.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Generation IV benchmarking of TRISO fuel performance models under accident conditions: Modeling input data

This document presents the benchmark plan for the calculation of particle fuel performance on safety testing experiments that are representative of operational accidental transients. The benchmark is dedicated to the modeling of fission product release under accident conditions by fuel performance codes from around the world, and the subsequent comparison to post-irradiation experiment (PIE) data from the modeled heating tests. The accident condition benchmark is divided into three parts: the modeling of a simplified benchmark problem to assess potential numerical calculation issues at low fission product release; the modeling of the AGR-1 and HFR-EU1bis safety testing experiments; and, the comparison of the AGR-1 and HFR-EU1bis modeling results with PIE data. The simplified benchmark case, thereafter named NCC (Numerical Calculation Case), is derived from ''Case 5'' of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Program (CRP) on coated particle fuel technology [IAEA 2012]. It is included so participants can evaluate their codes at low fission product release. ''Case 5'' of the IAEA CRP-6 showed large code-to-code discrepancies in the release of fission products, which were attributed to ''effects of the numerical calculation method rather than the physical model''[IAEA 2012]. The NCC is therefore intended to check if these numerical effects subsist. The first two steps imply the involvement of the benchmark participants with a modeling effort following the guidelines and recommendations provided by this document. The third step involves the collection of the modeling results by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and the comparison of these results with the available PIE data. The objective of this document is to provide all necessary input data to model the benchmark cases, and to give some methodology guidelines and recommendations in order to make all results suitable for comparison with each other. The participants should read this document thoroughly to make sure all the data needed for their calculations is provided in the document. Missing data will be added to a revision of the document if necessary.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2010

Next Generation Nuclear Plant Methods Technical Program Plan

One of the great challenges of designing and licensing the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) is to confirm that the intended VHTR analysis tools can be used confidently to make decisions and to assure all that the reactor systems are safe and meet the performance objectives of the Generation IV Program. The research and development (R&D) projects defined in the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Design Methods Development and Validation Program will ensure that the tools used to perform the required calculations and analyses can be trusted. The Methods R&D tasks are designed to ensure that the calculational envelope of the tools used to analyze the VHTR reactor systems encompasses, or is larger than, the operational and transient envelope of the VHTR itself. The Methods R&D focuses on the development of tools to assess the neutronic and thermal fluid behavior of the plant. The fuel behavior and fission product transport models are discussed in the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program plan. Various stress analysis and mechanical design tools will also need to be developed and validated and will ultimately also be included in the Methods R&D Program Plan. The calculational envelope of the neutronics and thermal-fluids software tools intended to be used on the NGNP is defined by the scenarios and phenomena that these tools can calculate with confidence. The software tools can only be used confidently when the results they produce have been shown to be in reasonable agreement with first-principle results, thought-problems, and data that describe the “highly ranked” phenomena inherent in all operational conditions and important accident scenarios for the VHTR.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗