Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Common Research Model (CRM)”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

FLEET Velocimetry in the Common Research Model’s Wing Wake

Femtosecond laser electronic excitation tagging was used to make velocity measurements in the wake of the wing of the Common Research Model (CRM). Experiments were performed in the NASA Langley Research Center’s National Transonic Facility over a range of tunnel operating conditions. Pressures ranged from 205 to 411 kPa, temperatures from 278 to 323 K, and Mach from 0.1 to 0.9. Velocity was also determined over a range of model angles of attack. Time-averaged velocity results were obtained in both air and nitrogen, while single-shot velocity was obtained under certain tunnel operating conditions. Spatially-resolved, two dimensional, single component velocity measurements were achieved using a newly-developed laser scanning technique, which proved sufficiently sensitive to measure an approximately 5% velocity deficit in the wing wake region of the CRM.

Daniel T Reese↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroservoelastic Control Law Development for the Integrated Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation Wind-Tunnel Test

The NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project seeks to “explore and develop technologies and concepts for improved energy efficiency and environmental compatibility for fixed wing subsonic transports” [1]. The IAWTM project is a subproject within AATT and is a joint Boeing/NASA effort to, in part, demonstrate the active control systems necessary to employ high-aspect ratio wings for improved aerodynamic efficiency. The aircraft configuration under study for the IAWTM project is a generic jet transport based on the NASA Common Research Model (CRM) whose wing aspect ratio has been increased to 13.5 (as opposed to nominal CRM aspect ratio of 9) and whose development is given in Ref. [2]. A semi-span model of the high-aspect-ratio CRM with 10 trailing edge control surfaces is currently being fabricated and will be delivered to the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT). There, several tests will be conducted to demonstrate maneuver load alleviation (MLA), gust load alleviation (GLA), active flutter suppression (AFS), and drag reduction, all at transonic conditions. A layout of the wind tunnel model is shown in Fig. 1. The wind-tunnel model is a spar/pod wing design with a relatively rigid fuselage attached to a mounting structure (seen in Fig. 1), which in turn is attached to a load balance behind the tunnel wall. Shims exist that can be attached to force the load to go through the fuselage rather than through the balance so as not to damage the balance in the event of flutter. The spar/pod design is similar to that used in the Boeing truss-braced wing aeroelastic model tested in the TDT in 2013 [3]. There is a central spar running the span of the wing to which the pods are attached that form the aerodynamic shape of the wing. The pods are constructed of ribs for attachment to the spar and skins to create the outer mold line. There are ten active control surfaces that will be used for the test objectives discussed above. Three of these (two outboard ailerons and one inboard aileron) are high-speed electrohydraulic actuators, and the remaining seven are low-speed mini-plane flaps, which have slower servo motors that will be used primarily for drag and maneuver load reductions. Control laws must be developed for each test (MLA, GLA, AFS, and drag reduction) and must be able to work in tandem when two or more control strategies are being tested simultaneously (e.g., when control laws to mitigate maneuver loads and gust loads operate simultaneously). The development of these control laws requires accurate mathematical representations of the aerodynamics, structural dynamics, and control surface dynamics of the system. Taken together, this mathematical representation—which is often in state-space form— is the ASE model. Three low-order ASE models of differing fidelities were developed for the IAWTM test and will be presented here. The differences in fidelity appeared in the aerodynamic modeling—one model assumed purely linear aerodynamics, while the other two models used different techniques to linearize the aerodynamics about a nonlinear mean. Furthermore, simple observer-based full-state feedback controllers for each test (MLA, GLA, AFS, and drag reduction) were designed from these low-order ASE models and implemented in a higher-order, nonlinear computational ASE simulation to assess the effectiveness of each controller. Observers were designed from each of the three lower-order ASE models, and each (linear) observer was then used as an estimate of the nonlinear dynamics of the system. Using the estimated states and the full-state feedback controller, control surface commands were fed back to the higher-order, nonlinear ASE system. The insight gained during this development will be applied to control law development for the physical IAWTM wind-tunnel test.

Josiah M Waite↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis and Comparison of Surface Roughness Effects on Pressure Data from SLS Wind Tunnel Test

Unsteady flows are becoming a more characterized field of study as advancements in technology is allowing for more high-speed, time-resolved data acquisition. It is important to understand these flows as the shock-wave boundary-layer interactions and separation they are involved with can generate extreme loads caused by high pressure and temperature on the body of a flight vehicle. It is vital to characterize these loads, as they can impede upon the structural integrity of a high-speed system. A common instrument utilized today to characterize pressure distributions caused by unsteady flows are unsteady pressure transducers. Set flush with the surface of a flight vehicle or wind tunnel model, these transducers can provide a pressure distribution, capturing the frequency of unsteady loads that could impinge upon the test article. A couple negative aspects of this instrumentation is that they are expensive, have long lead times, and a pressure distribution can only be determined in one discrete location where the transducer is installed. An optical diagnostic known as unsteady pressure-sensitive paint (uPSP) can help to satisfy these deficiencies. This is a spray paint that can be applied to a surface of a model to provide a global pressure distribution across the whole painted region.2 A complete picture of the fluid dynamic pressures occurring on the surface of a test article can be analyzed, especially in locations where it may have been impossible to install a transducer. Pressure-sensitive paint is also less expensive than traditional pressure transducers, which are, on average, about $2,000 each including the cost of installation.3 Unsteady PSP will not replace unsteady pressure transducers, but the transducers can be used to validate the PSP response to the flow and measure frequencies higher than the frequency response of the paint. One issue that can arise using these tools simultaneously, is that the surface roughness of the uPSP can affect the pressure readings of the transducers. Applying the uPSP to the surface of the model is going to affect the flow in some way as the topography of the model is now different than if it was not painted. One study with steady PSP conducted by Amer, Obara, and Liu at NASA Langley concluded that the PSP surface roughness was minimally intrusive at different test conditions with various lift, drag, etc., however, it was noted that data from some pressure transducers had decreased, likely due to the uneven application of the PSP in the localized region of the transducers.9 Sugioka et. al. tested various formulations of uPSP to study surface roughness effects on a Common Research Model (CRM) in transonic flow. The influence of uPSP on the surface of the model, depending on how it was formulated, was noted to have the possibility of relocating the shock wave present in the flow. This study was conducted to examine and compare transducer data acquired in December 2017 of a 4% scale model of the Space Launch System (SLS) performed at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (UPWT). One goal of the test was to demonstrate to the customer the potential of the uPSP system developed at NASA ARC. The effect of uPSP on transducer signals also became an interest in this experiment and is the reason for this data analysis. The results of this study were discussed with the SLS team to help them make decisions regarding the next test on an SLS model with the PSP and Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel teams.

pressure-sensitive paint↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

FUN3D Analyses in Support of the 1st AIAA Stability and Control Prediction Workshop

The 1st AIAA Stability and Control Prediction Workshop was created to establish best practices for the prediction of stability & control derivatives using computational fluid dynamics and assess the limitations of these computational methods when those best practices are applied. The inaugural workshop considers the ONERA version of the NASA/Boeing Common Research Model(CRM), which includes the wing, body, horizontal tail, and a vertical tail designed by ONERA. Wind tunnel tests have been conducted for this configuration with longitudinal tests having been previously published, in addition to unpublished data at small sideslip angles that will serve as ‘blind’ data for workshop data comparisons. Participants were provided a ‘family’ of unstructured grids for the full-span ONERA CRM model with the wind-tunnel sting included. This family of mixed-element grids consists of 5 levels of refinement (tiny, coarse, medium, fine, and extra fine) with surface and volume mesh scaling, resulting in a size range of 14.6 to 53.4 million nodes. In addition, a medium refinement mesh has been provided for the ONERA CRM configuration without a sting to evaluate the sting’s impact on static longitudinal stability characteristics. In addition to these workshop-provided grids, the present work also considers an equivalent ‘family’ of computational grids generated using Heldenmesh™, a rapid grid generation software by Helden Aerospace Corporation for creating high-quality, three-dimensional, mixed-element unstructured meshes. Because of the authors’ familiarity with this software, these additional grids were generated as a comparison to the workshop-provided grids and to better understand the implications of using volume-mirrored grids for stability and control predictions. The present work will contribute to the workshop with test case data generated using the NASA FUN3D code, a parallelized, unstructured, node-based, finite-volume discretization, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow solver. Numerical simulations will be conducted using the Quadratic Constitutive Relationship (QCR) version of the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model with negative turbulence variable provisions. Both steady and2nd-order, time-accurate simulation results are to be generated and compared for select test cases, as time permits, to investigate their impact on FUN3D predictions. The present work will consider the three primary workshop test cases: (1) grid convergence study, (2) Mach number effect on static stability, and (3) wind tunnel sting increments. Additionally, data will be provided for the two optional test cases, which include:(1) static stability derivative calculations and (2)sideslip angle sweeps. In each of the test cases, the vehicle is stationary, and the body is assumed to be rigid, where vehicle deformation has been accounted for in the model configuration geometry. For all test cases, longitudinal and lateral force and moment aerodynamic coefficients will be provided for the total configuration, in addition to a component-level breakdown that includes the port wing, starboard wing, fuselage, and tail.

CFD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Model Preparation Areas for Propulsion Airframe Integration Testing at the NASA Langley Research Center

Currently, there are three major NASA Langley facilities that perform Propulsion Airframe Integration (PAI) testing. These include the National Transonic Facility (NTF), the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel, and the 4-Foot Supersonic Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel. While each of these facilities have their respective model preparation areas, one model preparation area, located at the NTF complex, focuses on high mass flow blowing systems in support of other Langley Research Center facilities. The application of PAI requires special attention to the air delivery system interaction with the model. These interactions focus on the tares across the force and moment balance. The interactions are a result of the mass flow and pressure of the air through the system and the efficiency of the inlet and nozzle geometries. While this paper does not characterize any specific propulsion system, it does focus on the mass flow and pressure requirements for risk-reduction planning of such systems prior to installation in a designated wind tunnel. An example of model and nozzle sizing will be presented for the Tail Cone Thruster (TCT) variant of the Common Research Model (CRM).

PAI↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transonic Lift and Drag Predictions using Wall Modelled Large Eddy Simulations

Wall-modelled Large Eddy Simulations (WMLES) of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM) at transonic conditions and various angles of attacks leading up to and including shock-induced flow separation are performed using the LAVA computational framework. The simulations are shown to accurately predict the lift curve slope and the onset of separation characterized by the break in the pitching moment. Furthermore, careful assessment of skin-friction drag at cruise condition and its subsequent decrease with increasing angles of attack are shown to be in agreement with viscous sublayer resolving Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes(RANS) simulations. The small differences between WMLES and RANS appear to be of the same order as differences seen between two RANS models at the cruise-point. Some sensitivity is observed to the coefficient used in the subgrid scale model, although this can be reconciled by noting the low chord- and shock-incidence Reynolds numbers (Rex≈106) seen in the outboard regions of the wing, along with the uncertainties associated with tripping and the numerical transition that occurs near the leading edge. Among the primary drawbacks seen in the WMLES predictions is the subdued increase in wave-drag with increasing angle-of-attack and the shock intensity when compared with experimental data. Preliminary assessment suggests that additional span- and stream-wise grid resolution is likely needed in mid- and out-board portions of the wing to better resolve the shock-induced separated flow and to further investigate prediction accuracy of unsteady temporal characteristics of the problem.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Real-Time Drag Optimization of Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model with Distributed Flap System

This paper presents a real-time drag optimization study of the aspect ratio 13.5 Common Research Model (CRM) with a distributed mini-plain flap system. A surrogate aerodynamic model of the aspect ratio 13.5 CRM is developed based on an aerodynamic database computed by a transonic panel method to capture the aerodynamic coefficients as functions of the angle of attack, flap deflections, and Mach number. A recursive least-squares parameter estimation algorithm is designed to estimate the aerodynamic parameters of the surrogate model. The estimated surrogate model is then used in an on-line drag optimization strategy based on an adjoint method. The results of the real-time drag optimization indicate a drag reduction of 2.46% for Mach 0.80, 3.37% for Mach 0.85, and 1.95% for Mach 0.88. The results show the convergence of all parameter estimates.

Drag Optimization↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Icing Formation Strains on Airfoil Skin

Aircraft icing has long presented a safety hazard to the aerospace industry. One problem inherent to aircraft icing is predicting the adhesive properties of the ice-aircraft interface; values commonly reported span multiple orders of magnitude, making shedding prediction and surface evaluation difficult. An effort has been undertaken at the NASA Glenn Research Center to understand the cause of the scatter in the data. Geometry dependencies, variation in testing procedures, and residual stresses in ice samples have previously been identified as significant contributors to the problem. Residual stresses were singled out for this study, which investigated the strains at the leading edge of a Common Research Model (CRM) wind tunnel model in the NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel. Sprays were conducted at a particle size median volumetric diameter (MVD) of 20 µm, with liquid water contents (LWC) spanning from 0.4 to 3.0 g/m3. Total temperatures were varied between 0 and -25 °C, and test section velocity between 51 and 118 m/s. The leading edge was instrumented with custom strain gages, resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), optical fibers, and a pressure mat. Results indicate Δ strains, which were the difference between recorded strains and those predicted from isotropic thermal expansion of aluminum, below -400 µε with consistent patterns of strain across a wide variety of tunnel conditions. Isotropic, linear elastic finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted by varying the temperature of simplified airfoil and ice geometries, producing similar strains to those observed in testing. This allowed induced stresses to be predicted. Predicted stresses were above the expected tensile strength for ice, and suggest a source for previously observed cracking in tunnel ice.

Ice Adhesion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multiscale Mesh Adaptation for Transonic Aeroelastic Flutter Problems

This work applies multiscale mesh adaptation with refine to reduce spatial discretization error of aeroelastic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Benchmark flutter models, such as the pitch and plunge NACA64A-010 airfoil and the benchmark supercritical wing, are studied with both a linearized frequency-domain solver and time-marching CFD coupled to a modal structural solver in FUN3D. The undeformed NASA Common Research Model (CRM), an aeroelastic jig shape variant of the CRM, is also studied with the linearized frequency-domain approach. For these cases, the adaptation process converges to comparable flutter predictions to hand-generated meshes but with smaller node counts. However the additional disciplines of the linearized frequency-domain analysis, the mesh deformation, and the unsteady finite-volume solver create robustness challenges that need to be addressed before it can be applied as a fully automated process for complex transonic aeroelastic problems. In particular, negative volumes are observed to be an issue for FUN3D’s linear elasticity mesh deformation solver when moving the adapted meshes.

Aeroelasticity↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Modeling and CFD Simulation of Wind-Tunnel Scale Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model

This paper presents an aeroelastic modeling and simulation study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind-tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with distributed flaps. A vortex-lattice VSPAERO model of the CRM model is developed. A transonic small disturbance/integral boundary layer correction method is implemented in the VSPAERO model to account for the transonic and viscous flow effects. The structural deformation of the CRM model is calculated using a NASTRAN equivalent beam model. The VSPAERO model is coupled to the NASTRAN equivalent beam model to provide a rapid aero-structural analysis. A validation of the VSPAERO aeroelastic model is conducted by comparing the results to FUN3D CFD aeroelastic simulation results. An aerodynamic database is generated using the developed VSPAERO aeroelastic model for the real-time drag optimization and maneuver load alleviation study of the wind-tunnel scale CRM model.

Aeroelastic Modeling↗
NASA NTRS2022

Experimental and Computational Icing Simulation for Large Swept Wings

The purpose of this final report is to summarize the key results, findings and contributions of a large, multi-organization, multi-year effort focused on swept wing icing and aerodynamics. This research effort was jointly sponsored by NASA, FAA and ONERA and was supported by Boeing and the Universities of Illinois, Virginia, and Washington. The overall goal of this research was to improve the experimental and computational simulation capability for icing on large swept wings typical of commercial transports. This research included both ice accretion and aerodynamic studies using the NASA Common Research Model (CRM) as the reference geometry. For this work, a 65% scaled version—CRM65—was used as the full-scale baseline airplane geometry. This program marks the first non-proprietary research to generate and document full-scale swept wing ice accretions in an icing tunnel and then conduct semispan wing aerodynamic testing on scaled ice accretions at high Reynolds number (i.e., up to 11.9×106). During this work, several new experimental and computational techniques were developed or documented and new knowledge about swept wing icing aerodynamics was identified. All are documented in this report.

Aircraft icing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Gust Load Alleviation Control and Gust Estimation for a High Aspect Ratio Wing Wind Tunnel Model

This paper presents the gust load alleviation (GLA) study of the aspect ratio 13.5 Common Research Model (CRM) wind-tunnel model. This study details the design of the GLA controller in preparation for wind-tunnel testing in the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel at NASA Langley Research Center. An aeroservolastic (ASE) model was first reduced using a model reduction method that takes advantage of the sinusoidal steady-state response. Then, the reduced model was used to design an extended-state Kalman filter which estimates the states and the sinusoidal gust input. The GLA control was then derived using the optimal control solution to a multi-objective cost function. The results of the GLA controller indicate a 75.6% reduction in wing-root strain while maintaining robust stability margins. The final paper will include performance under sub-optimal conditions, e.g., sensor noise, uncertainty in gust frequency, etc..

Christopher Forte↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Gust Load Alleviation Control and Gust Estimation for a High Aspect Ratio Wing Wind Tunnel Model

This paper presents the gust load alleviation (GLA) study of the aspect ratio 13.5 Common Research Model (CRM) wind-tunnel model. This study details the design of the GLA controller in preparation for wind-tunnel testing in the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel at NASA Langley Research Center. An aeroservolastic (ASE) model is first reduced using a model reduction method that takes advantage of the sinusoidal steady-state response. Then, the reduced model is used to design an extended-state Kalman filter which estimates the states and the sinusoidal gust input. The GLA control is then derived using the optimal control solution to a multi-objective cost function. The results of the GLA controller indicate a 69.07% reduction in wing-root strain without sensor noise and 68.45% reduction with sensor noise, while maintaining robust stability margins. An adaptive GLA controller is developed for uncertain gust frequency and shows a 71.03% reduction in wing root strain compared to the non-adaptive control reduction of just 39.19%.

Christopher Forte↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Numerical Simulation of An Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model with Trailing Edge Mini-Flaps

This paper presents an aeroelastic modeling study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with trailing edge mini-flaps. FUN3D is used for the aeroelastic steady and unsteady simulations at Mach 0.85 and dynamic pressure 230 psf. The aeroelastic simulation results are compared with the in-house developed VSPAERO aeroelastic model results. The incremental aerodynamic coefficients predicted by FUN3D and VSPAERO are close except when the mini-flap deflection angle is 10˚. The control reversal behavior is observed for the wing tip mini-flap. A series of dynamic pressure sweep simulations are performed to determine the control reversal onset point. Unsteady simulation results show that there is no buffet phenomenon observed at angle of attacks 0˚ and 2˚ when the mini-flap is deflected 10˚. The mini-flap oscillation simulations show the nonlinear behavior appears when the deflection angle is about 4˚.

Mini-flap↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multi-Objective Optimal Control of High Aspect Ratio Wing Wind Tunnel Model

This paper presents the design of a multi-objective optimal controller for the 13.5 aspect ratio Common Research Model (CRM) wind tunnel model. A Pareto front analysis is performed to provide the optimal tradeoff between the competing objectives - gust load alleviation, maneuver load alleviation, and drag minimization - so that the weighting matrices for the control law are selected optimally. Also presented are two formulations of the controller: a state feedback with Kalman filter design, and an output feedback form where sensors are used directly for feedback control. The controller demonstrates a reduced peak-to-peak strain of 45.78% while also reducing drag and mean bending moment. An output feedback formulation for gust load alleviation is formulated and produces a 53% reduction in the strain response due to a gust input.

Gust Load Alleviation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Simulation of Wind Tunnel Scale Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model with Trailing Edge Mini-Flaps

This paper presents a computation study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with trailing edge mini-flaps using FUN3D. The aeroelastic simulations are conducted under free-air and inside wind tunnel conditions. The NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamic Tunnel (TDT) is a closed circuit and slotted-test-section with a 16 ft ×16 ft test section. The structure mode shapes are extracted from the latest updated NASTRAN Finite-Element Model (FEM) model. A dynamic pressure sweep is performed to determine the control reversal boundary of the trailing edge mini-flaps. The wind tunnel wall interference effects on the mini-flap control derivatives are analyzed based on the simulations.

Aeroelastic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Analyses Performed in Support of a Wind Tunnel Test of a Boundary-Layer Ingestion Configuration

Boundary Layer Ingestion (BLI) has been proposed as a technology with the potential to decrease fuel burn. However, one major concern for BLI configurations is the potential degradation of the flow quality, both on the airframe and at the fan face, resulting from the tightly integrated propulsor. A wind tunnel test was performed in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the NASA Langley Research Center to investigate the flow quality ingested by a tail cone thruster configuration, similar to the Single Aisle Turboelectric Aircraft Concept with Aft Boundary Layer Ingestion (STARC-ABL). The wind tunnel model was a modified version of the Common Research Model (CRM) to include an aft-mounted, flow-through propulsor. The experimental data obtained from the wind tunnel test provide insight into the flow and enables an assessment of the accuracy of the USM3D-ME flow solver for predicting the flow at the fan face, which will be crucial for fan design purposes. Both grid refinement and turbulence model studies were performed for the Clean and Cruise MFP configurations at the condition corresponding to ReMAC = 5 million, Mach = 0.8, and alpha = 2 deg. The selected grid refinement level and turbulence model were then used to perform simulations over the range of conditions considered in the NTF wind tunnel test. The condition sweep comparisons illustrate favorable agreement with the experimental data over the entire range of conditions and for all Mass Flow Plug (MFP) configurations. The largest differences were observed for the Idle MFP configuration, with approximately 3% difference observed between USM3D-ME and the experimental data. Future work should investigate the impact of higher fidelity turbulence models and grid adaptation on the USM3D-ME predictions.

CRM↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeropropulsive Assessment of a BLI Tail-Cone Thruster Propulsion System for the NASA Common Research Model and a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration

This paper presents an investigation into the potential benefits of a boundary layer ingestion(BLI) aft fuselage propulsion system, or tail-cone thruster (TCT), when applied to two transport category aircraft: a conventional tube-and-wing configuration based on the NASA Common Research Model (CRM) and a transonic truss-braced wing (TTBW) configuration. Through the ingestion of low-momentum flow developed over the airframe of an aircraft, the TCT propulsion system technology can reduce overall power consumption and hence fuel burn and emissions. However, an accurate assessment of this potential requires the application of high-fidelity analysis tools that can capture the relevant propulsion-airframe integration effects, at least to first order. Toward this end, the present study employs aeropropulsive analysis tools based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations to estimate the power savings coefficient, measured relative to equivalent non-BLI configurations of a given airframe. Results indicate shaft power savings of 4.1% and 5.9% can be obtained for the boundary-layer ingesting TCT configuration of the CRM and TTBW, respectively. The present study also examines the coupling between airframe aerodynamics and the inlet flow distortion experienced by the TCT of a given aircraft configuration through airframe component sensitivity studies.

AATT↗