Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “CFD simulations”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

CFD Simulation of Helium Flow Loop Test Section

A helium flow loop is being assembled at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to analyze heat transfer enhancement for systems such as blanket and divertor components. To efficiently identify optimum geometries for heat transfer enhancement in these applications, simulation work is performed to optimize test section designs that are built and tested in the helium flow loop that operates at 4 MPa and a mass flow rate of 100 g/s. Different ribbed geometries that examine rib shape, rib height, rib orientation, rib spacing, and three dimensional orientation are modeled and simulated in STAR-CCM+ to compare their ability to remove heat and mitigate pressure drop. Following the simulations, models are selected and manufactured for the helium flow loop tests. Simulations initially focus on a hydrodynamic study to determine the appropriate mesh and physics models and then add a heat flux to analyze the heat transfer abilities of the models. The simulations are run in steady state and use a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes k-ε turbulence model. The helium is modeled as an ideal gas. The simulation explores models of geometries that enhance the heat transfer and decrease pressure drop with an overall goal of increasing fluid collision with the wall. Enhanced geometries are simulated to select appropriate designs for manufacturing, and preliminary experimental results are used to validate the simulations. Furthermore, the factors that are being analyzed in the comparison between the experimental and the simulated results include matching thermocouple temperatures, pressure drop, roughness, and fluid velocity.

42 ENGINEERING↗

CFD Simulations of Molten Salts Within Plasma-Facing Components with Twisted Tape Inserts Under One-Sided–Heated Conditions

For liquid immersion blankets (LIBs), the heat removal within different plasma-facing components (PFCs) requires substantial heat removal capabilities that could benefit from the usage of heat transfer enhancements. Of consideration are twisted tape insert heat transfer enhancements that are ribbon-like metal pieces inserted within cooling channels that increase fluid mixing, resulting in higher heat transfer and pressure drop. Unlike traditional applications, PFCs such as divertor coolant tubes experience a significantly higher heat flux on one side versus the other or entirely one-sided heating. These conditions are not well studied for molten salts where the higher Prandtl numbers characteristic of the fluids are significantly higher than water, gases, and liquid metals. As an effort to study this knowledge gap, large eddy simulations were done with Prandtl numbers representative of FLiBe at proposed operating conditions. In this study, the effects of applying a surface heat flux to one side of a tube versus the entire tube with a twisted tape insert were investigated for the heat transfer coefficient and effects on the temperature profile. The findings of the study suggest that for Prandtl number fluids above unity, the Nusselt number was largely unaffected by the change in boundary condition. Both boundary conditions showed good agreement with the Manglik and Bergles Nusselt number correlation for tight-fitting twisted tapes. Finally, the outcomes of this study will be useful for future design studies of LIBs to provide fundamental guidance implementing twisted tape inserts and their performance in one-sided–heated conditions.

molten salts↗

Investigation of Point-Contact Strategies for CFD Simulations of Pebble-Bed Reactor Cores

This study numerically investigated the effects of various contact strategies on the thermal hydraulic behavior within a structured bed of 100 explicitly modeled pebbles. Four contact strategies and two thermal hydraulic conditions were considered. The strategies to avoid contact singularities include decreasing the pebble diameter, increasing the pebble diameter, bridging the pebble surfaces near the contact region, and capping the pebble surfaces near the contact region. One strategy, Strategy 3a, which involves bridging with a cylinder equal to 10% of the pebble diameter, was selected as the baseline strategy because it addressed the contact singularity while minimizing the geometric changes that affect the bed porosity. The two thermal hydraulic conditions were full-power operation (Case 1) and pressurized loss of forced cooling or PLOFC (Case 2). Simulations of the conjugate heat transfer within the structured bed were performed using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes approach with the realizable k-ϵ turbulence model and two-layer all y + wall treatment. The thermal-fluid quantities of interest were compared between the contact strategies for each case. In Case 1, the hydraulic behavior was sensitive to the contact strategy, with large differences in the pressure drop (30%) and volume-average velocity (4%). The thermal behavior was not sensitive, with less than a 0.5% difference across the strategies. To better understand the separate effects of each heat transfer mode, Case 2 was divided into the following subcases: conduction (Case 2a); conduction/radiation (Case 2b); and conduction/radiation/convection (Case 2c). Case 2a represents an early phase of the PLOFC transient. Case 2b represents an intermediate phase of the PLOFC transient, with the pebble temperatures sufficiently high for the radiative heat transfer to be non-negligible. Case 2c represents a late phase of the PLOFC transient after the establishment of the natural circulation of the heat transfer fluid. For Case 2, large differences in the contact strategy were observed only in Case 2a with only conduction. The difference in the maximum pebble temperature was 23% in Case 2a, 2% in Case 2b, and 0.3% in Case 2c.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗