Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “flow physics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29

High-Order Finite-Difference Large-Eddy Simulations of a Supersonic Nozzle

Large-eddy simulations of the flow emanating from supersonic nozzles were carried out for the 6th Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop to be held at the AIAA SciTech Conference. The purpose of the work is to detail the ability of a high-order of accuracy finite-difference based numerical scheme to accurately compute this flow. Results for both a perfectly expanded and over-expanded flow case are presented. Several complicating factors are discussed: 1) the limitations on the computational grid imposed by the numerical method, 2) the effect of additional dissipation necessary to resolve shock waves and 3) the effect of the nozzle boundary layer on the flow. Results indicate that the simulations replicate the basic flow physics, but there is room for improvement in accuracy. Areas for future study are outlined.

turbulence↗

Space Launch System Core Stage Green Run Base Heating: Anomaly, Mitigation and Flight Redesign

The NASA Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle is composed of four RS-25 liquid oxygen and hydrogen rocket engines in the Core Stage (CS). The SLS Core Stage went through Green Run hot-fire testing at NASA Stennis Space Center’s B-2 test facility in 2021. The main goal of this testing was to confirm Core Stage tanking, propulsion and thrust vector control systems operations and performance to verify with predicted models. Two hot-fire (HF) test sequences were performed with the first one (HF1) in January for a test duration of 70 seconds and the second (HF2) testing completed in March for a test duration of 500 seconds. This paper focuses on the base heating anomalies observed during HF1 and HF2 where an extensive fire was observed along the Core Stage base heat shield during test operations. This environment was not anticipated and led to extensive unplanned damage to the thermal protection system which was augmented for flight. Green Run observations also led to a reassessment of flight environments for Artemis I. This paper discusses the potential cause of the anomalies, the flow physics, the reconstructed base environments, and mitigation plans for HF2 and flight.

aerothermodynamics↗

Space Launch System Core Stage Green Run Base Heating: Anomaly, Mitigation and Flight Redesign

The NASA Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle is composed of four RS-25 liquid oxygen and hydrogen rocket engines in the Core Stage (CS). The SLS Core Stage went through Green Run hotfire testing at NASA Stennis Space Center’s B-2 test facility in 2021. The main goal of this testing was to confirm Core Stage tanking, propulsion and thrust vector control systems operations and performance to verify with predicted models. Two hot-fire (HF) test sequences were performed with the first one (HF1) in January for a test duration of 70 seconds and the second (HF2) testing completed in March for a test duration of 500 seconds. This paper focuses on the base heating anomalies observed during HF1 and HF2 where an extensive fire was observed along the Core Stage base heat shield during test operations. This environment was not anticipated and led to extensive unplanned damage to the thermal protection system which was augmented for flight. Green Run observations also led to a reassessment of flight environments for Artemis I. This paper discusses the potential cause of the anomalies, the flow physics, the reconstructed base environments, and mitigation plans for HF2 and flight.

aerothermodynamics↗

Advances in Stereo Photogrammetry Capabilities for in-Situ Ejecta Measurements in Lunar Plume-Surface Interactions

Plume-surface interaction is a critical topic of interest as human spaceflight programs establish a renewed presence on the Moon and push onwards to Mars. The erosion of regolith and high-speed ejection of soil and rocks which occurs during a powered spacecraft landing on lunar or terrestrial bodies can pose serious risks to the vehicle during landing and to existing ground assets. Ground testing campaigns have provided data sets in relevant environments (e.g., low pressure) in tandem with predictive computational model validation. To-date, limited in-situ flight data exists to inform the study of the key phenomena of plume-surface interaction: plume-flow physics, soil erosion, and ejecta dynamics. In two upcoming lunar missions, erosion of the lunar regolith will be measured in-situ using the stereo photogrammetry technique as part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) Program. The Stereo Cameras for Lunar Plume Surface Studies (SCALPSS) will use a multiple-camera system to measure the erosion of the lunar regolith due to the vehicles’ rocket engine plumes during descent and after landing. The application of stereo photogrammetry to accurately measure a realistic eroded shape has been validated in laboratory work ahead of the scheduled flights. In preparation for future CLPS, Artemis, or other lunar science missions, recent advancements have been made to measure the ejecta structure and particle dynamics in addition to the erosion of regolith using a SCALPSS-like photogrammetry system. The thickness and ejection angle of entrained soil and dust produced during plume-induced erosion can be used to determine how far debris will travel, and thus how it may impact nearby infrastructure or the landing vehicle itself. The present work highlights the development of this new flight instrumentation capability and its value to advancements in the plume-surface interaction measurement topic for lunar or planetary landings.

Olivia K. Tyrrell↗

Lunar Water Extraction Via Lunar Auger Dryer ISRU (LADI)

In 2009, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) provided definitive proof of water in the Lunar’s southern permanently shadowed region (PSR)1. Both the 2020 NASA Technology Taxonomy2 and the Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative (LSII) team identified capability gaps in icy regolith transfer and reactor processing in Permanently Shadowed Region (PSR) environmental conditions. A water processing plant operating inside the PSR can continuously process water (and volatiles) for both breathable air and propellant. NASA’s Johnson Space Center (JSC) fabricated a unique breadboard test stand for validating the feasibility of this concept,developed a lunar auger dryer sizing tool, and identified the physical flow and thermal models required to design an Engineering Development Unit (EDU) for environmental testing. Over the two years this project was active, models were developed including: a) a sizing tool that scales the auger parameters based on production targets, b) accurate thermal models in both lab and lunar conditions, c) a Discreet Element Model (DEM) for observing particle effects in low-g, and d) incorporated these subsystem models into a MATLAB parametric Modular Open System Approach (MOSA) system model. These models were validated by testing the auger in both a mechanical and thermal system configuration. The results of this testing increased the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of the Lunar Auger Dryer ISRU (LADI) system to TRL 4.

Lunar↗

Space Launch System Base Aerothermodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I

Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2023. The integrated test flight is composed of launch and ascent of the SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2023. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf is powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, base flow environments for this vehicle are highly complex and extreme. SLS base aerothermodynamics covers rocket plume-induced convection and radiation of the vehicle’s aft region during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This is the first time in-depth base heating flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.

aerothermodynamics↗

Summary of the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop Nozzle Test Case: Heated Supersonic Axisymmetric Jets

This paper summarizes findings from the sixth AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW) nozzle test case. The focus of the workshop participants was turbulent supersonic round jets with variation in jet Mach number and jet heating. Three nozzles were utilized with on-design jet Mach numbers of 1.36, 1.63, and 2.00. A heated jet for each of these three nozzles at on-design conditions, a temperature matched on-design condition at Mach 1.63, and an off-design heated condition for the Mach 1.63 nozzle were the five cases examined. Workshop participants utilized Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) based techniques. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions were compared with non-intrusive measurements of velocities and temperatures, including both mean values and turbulence statistics. In general, the RANS approaches were unable to capture the trend of reduced mixing as the jet Mach number increased. Incorporation of compressibility corrections improved the agreement with experimental measurements in terms of trends with varying jet Mach number, but also increased the jet potential core lengths to be in worse agreement with data. RANS methods were able to reasonably capture trends of jet heating. The LES-based approaches as a whole were able to capture the effects of compressibility more accurately. Effects of jet heating were captured well by LES. None of the LES approaches introduced disturbances from the wall boundary layers of the nozzle into the jet mixing layer, which would affect the jet flow physics modeling in the initial part of the jet shear layer, but would be very computationally demanding.

supersonic jet↗

Development Efforts and Status of Plume-Surface Interaction Capabilities for Propulsive Landing Systems

Rocket plume-surface interaction is a multi-phase problem characterized by plume flow physics, erosion physics, and ejecta dynamics. All propulsive landers will experience plume-surface interaction. The risks posed by such effects can vary greatly as a function of the local environment, lander concept of operations, configuration, and physical scale. Prior Lunar and Martian landers have overcome challenges posed by these environments, on the basis of scaled ground testing and subsequent flight experience, but the landing systems for present and future missions are planning to operate increasingly outside of NASA's current experience with plume-surface interaction. This presentation discusses the current efforts and status of activities within NASA to progress understanding of fundamental plume-surface interaction physics, the capability to predict resulting environments and effects, and the definition of implications for current and future Lunar and planetary landing systems.

Landing↗

Space Launch System Base Aerodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I

Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2022. The integrated test flight was composed of launch and ascent of SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2022. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf was powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, the base flow field had highly complex phenomena and regimes. SLS base aerodynamics covers vehicle base pressure and integrated axial force during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This was the first time in-depth base aerodynamics flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.

aerothermodynamics↗

Space Launch System Base Aerothermodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I

Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2023. The integrated test flight is composed of launch and ascent of the SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2023. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf is powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, base flow environments for this vehicle are highly complex and extreme. SLS base aerothermodynamics covers rocket plume-induced convection and radiation of the vehicle’s aft region during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This is the first time in-depth base heating flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.

aerothermodynamics↗

Base Aerodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I

Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2022. The integrated test flight was composed of launch and ascent of SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2022. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf was powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, the base flow field had highly complex phenomena and regimes. SLS base aerodynamics covers vehicle base pressure and integrated axial force during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This was the first time in-depth base aerodynamics flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.

aerothermodynamics↗

LES Analysis of Loss Anomaly in a Turbine Blade with Large Trailing Edge Radius

There is great interest in the usage of Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMC) as a turbine blade material. CMCs can tolerate higher temperatures than alloyed metallic blades, resulting in better thermal efficiency of gas turbine engines. However, depending on the manufacturing process of the CMC, blades may have a larger trailing edge thickness. The design space therefore needs to be updated due to the resulting flow physics. Recently, experimental results acquired at NASA Glenn Transonic Turbine Blade Cascade Rig showed that a loss measure generally increased with increasing trailing edge thickness. For one case however, the losses initially decreased with increasing Reynolds number but rose and peaked at Re ~1.24x10 6 and then subsequently dropped to the original pre-peak trend. A possible cause of this intriguing phenomenon was speculated to be transonic vortex shedding, which is the mechanism of vortex shedding promoted by reflected shed pressure waves at the trailing edge at relatively high Reynolds numbers and higher Mach numbers. A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) analysis or a low-resolution large eddy simulation (LES) does not reproduce this apparent anomaly and thus it is worth performing a wall-resolved LES (the total mesh count of ~290 million cells) to investigate the aerodynamics of the CMC blade in the context of transonic vortex shedding. Our numerical results at Re=1,246,350 show that the pressure waves generated by the vortex shedding in the wake travel upstream and significantly influence the transition and separation on the suction side thus enhancing the said vortex shedding in the wake. This feedback seems not to hold under a low-Re condition (Re=621,900). The Reynolds number dependence was also examined by numerical perturbation of the pressure waves in the wake and by examining how such perturbation attenuates or endures. It is confirmed that the perturbation of the pressure waves is quickly damped.

LES↗

ELISA: A Tool for Optimization of Rotor Hover Performance at Low Reynolds Number in the Mars Atmosphere

The Evolutionary aLgorithm for Iterative Studies of Aeromechanics (ELISA) was developed in support of the Rotorcraft Optimization for the Advancement of Mars eXploration (ROAMX) project. ELISA was developed to enable aerodynamic rotor hover optimization for low Reynolds number flows in the Mars atmosphere. The first objective of the algorithm allows for unconventional airfoil parameterization and multi-objective airfoil geometry optimization using OVERFLOW. The Pareto-optimal airfoil sets are converted to a set of Pareto-optimal airfoil decks, providing the lowest drag air foil geometry for each angle of attack, removing the need to arbitrarily select the airfoils to be used in the rotor optimization. The second objective allows for rotor geometry optimization with simultaneous maximization of blade loading and minimization of rotor power using the comprehensive analysis CAMRADII. The result is a Pareto-optimal rotor set, providing the lowest power rotor for each attainable blade loading, and one of the first tools for hover-optimized rotors for high-subsonic low Reynolds number conditions. The airfoil thickness can be modified after the airfoil optimization is complete, allowing for a post-airfoil-optimization adjustment of blade thickness to facilitate conforming to external structural analyses requirements. The relevance of the code is demonstrated with case studies for the ROAMX rotor optimization for Ingenuity-sized single rotors in the Mars atmosphere, a performance study optimizing the chord and twist of Ingenuity’s coaxial rotor resulting in the Sample Recovery Helicopters candidate rotor, and high-subsonic low Reynolds number airfoil optimization providing novel insights for higher-efficiency low Reynolds number airfoil geometries and flow physics.

ELISA↗

NASA Phase2 Unlimited Rights Final Report Research and Technology for Aerospace Propulsion Systems (RTAPS) Task Order: ERA Advanced Core Compressor Technology Program

As part of the NASA Integrated Systems Research Program (ISRP), Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project, NASA GRC and GE Aviation have partnered to investigate the technology barriers associated with improved fuel economy of large gas turbine engines. Crucial to improving fuel economy is the increase in pressure ratio (PR) of the core high pressure compressor (HPC). A key enabler to increasing HPC pressure ratios are new technology front stage airfoil designs that have higher efficiency, higher pressure ratios and improvements in front stage part-power operability. The purpose of this work is to design and test two high pressure ratio, high efficiency front block designs. The baseline design, hereafter referred to as Build 1, is similar to what would be found in a high efficiency 30:1 PR class HPC. A redesigned front block with improved blading will also be tested and hereafter be referred to as Build 2. The goal of Build 2 is to increase stage aero loading (increase stage pressure ratio) beyond Build 1 while maintaining equivalent efficiency and stall margin. The detailed inter-stage and traverse data from the two builds will be used to improve understanding of the complex flow physics at high-speed and part-speed conditions that impact performance and operability. By addressing, understanding and solving the challenges associated with aerodynamic losses and stage matching better design strategies can be incorporated in future core compressors with higher efficiency, thereby enabling improvement in mission fuel burn while still meeting operability requirements.

Axial Compressors↗

Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core (HyTEC) HyTEC Phase 1 – Advanced Aerodynamics Final Report

The objective of the Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core (HyTEC) – Advanced High Pressure Turbine (HPT) Aerodynamics project is to develop technology for a compact core that contributes to significant fuel burn reductions of 5-10% over current generation technologies. To accomplish this, the HPT is incorporating a range of aerodynamic features and technologies to improve component efficiency and provide favorable systems level trades. In particular, this project explored low solidity airfoils, advanced tip treatments, platform contouring, and advanced ceramic matrix composite (CMC) Stage 2 Nozzle (S2N) airfoils to eliminate the need for post throat cooling in a compact core environment. The maturation of these technology areas is expected to provide a significant improvement in component efficiencies, and consequently reductions in fuel burn, over the current state of the art (SoA). To mature these technologies to Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 4, a test campaign was performed that consisted of four tests at three facilities. TRL 3 testing was performed in the CW22 linear cascade at NASA Glenn for blade and nozzle technologies, TRL 4 nozzle testing was performed at GE Aerospace (GEA) Test Cell A8, and TRL 4 blade testing was performed at the Notre Dame Turbomachinery Laboratory (NDTL) using the Transonic Research Turbine (TRT) rig. Low solidity was successfully demonstrated to a TRL 4 level. Low solidity nozzles showed benefits in line with pre-project expectations, while low solidity blades were shown to have an aerodynamic penalty. Crucially, this program only considered the aerodynamic losses, and systems trades such as reductions in cooling flows are expected to continue to make low solidity blades a net positive. By successfully quantifying the aerodynamic performance in this project, these trades can be conducted to determine where in the engine architecture low solidity blades will contribute positively to system operation. Platform contouring was demonstrated to a TRL 4 level, with performance in line with the lower end of the pre-project expected range. Advanced tip treatments performance levels were indeterminate, showing the expected improvements to flow physics but with a performance level confounded by several rig issues including whirl mode induced variation in tip clearance. The elimination of post-throat cooling on the S2N was successfully demonstrated to provide a performance benefit, however that benefit was approximately half the level that was expected in pre-project predictions. Overall, the technology maturation plan for HyTEC Phase 1 was successful, bringing the suite of technologies to TRL 4.

High pressure turbine↗

An Application of CFD to Guide Forced Boundary-Layer Transition at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds for a Lambda-Wing Configuration

A hybrid transition trip-dot sizing and placement test technique was extended to support recent experimental research on a moderately-swept hybrid wing-body Uninhabited Combat Air Vehicle configuration under study in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization Applied Vehicle Technology task group. The approach combines traditional test techniques with Computational Fluid Dynamics. The application had three-dimensional boundary layers that were simulated with either fully turbulent or mixed laminar-turbulent flow models using established Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes methods. Forced transition effectiveness was verified experimentally using sublimating chemicals during low-speed and transonic wind tunnel tests. Assessments were performed between tripped low Reynolds number data and un-tripped high Reynolds number data. The hybrid test technique is based on fundamental flow physics and as such could be applicable to other configurations.

UCAV↗

NASA HECC Geometry and Performance Review Part 2: Geometric Differences Between the As-Manufactured and Design-Intent Impeller Geometry and their Effects on the Vaneless Diffuser Configuration Performance

An investigation of the NASA High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) vaneless diffuser configuration was performed. This multipart investigation focused on validating the computational model against experimental data. The validated model was then used to explore the effects of observed geometric differences between the As-Manufactured and Design-Intent impellers. Lastly, the validated model was used for comparison against an experimental tip clearance study. Part II of the investigation of the NASA HECC vaneless diffuser configuration focused on understanding the differences in geometry and performance between the As-Manufactured impeller and the Design-Intent impeller. This was achieved through comparison of the As-Manufactured HECC vaneless computational model, developed from the solid model of the impeller and validated in Part I, against a new model developed from the Design-Intent blade sections published in NASA/CR-2014-218114/Rev1. The 1D performance values showed that the As-Manufactured impeller underperformed compared to the Design-Intent for all four speedlines that were simulated. Further investigation of profiles, loading and contours showed consistent underperformance of the As-Manufactured relative to the Design-Intent. An investigation into the source of the performance differences led to the discovery of several significant variations in the impeller geometries. The differences that were observed can be summarized into four categories: fillets, trailing-edge exit radii variation, dissimilarity in the splitter leading-edge geometry and main blade thickness differences. The investigation then shifted its effort to quantify the performance effects caused by geometric differences. The investigation showed that out of the four geometric differences that were explored, the differences in the splitter blade had the largest impact. These differences most notably changed flow physics near the splitter leading edge, especially near the tip of the impeller.

centrifugal compressor↗

HLPW-5: Overview and Workshop Summary

The Fifth AIAA CFD High-Lift Prediction Workshop was held with the goal of assessing the numerical prediction capability of current-generation computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology for swept, medium/high-aspect-ratio wings in high-lift configurations. A key aspect of this endeavor was the use of Technology Focus Groups (TFG), which included both mesh generation and flow-solver experts working together to accelerate advancements for their particular CFD methodology, by addressing key questions of importance prior to the workshop. The high-lift version of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM-HL) configuration was the focus of this workshop, and was used for three unique test cases. Wind-tunnel data were available for comparison for one of the test cases. Altogether, 365 datasets of CFD results were submitted by 47 teams, with 41 teams contributing to the multiple configurations of Case 1, 40 to Case 2, and 18 to Case 3. This paper provides a high-level summary of the results and conclusions from the workshop. As concluded from past workshops, fixed-grid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes methods continued to be inaccurate and inconsistent for high-lift flows near maximum lift. However, application of mesh-adaptation technology helped to achieve improved consistency. Scale-resolving methods appeared most promising for predicting high-lift flow physics, particularly at maximum lift. Best practices for these methods were refined over the course of the workshop and new challenges were identified.

Adam M Clark↗