Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Adsorptive Removal of Cs-137 and Sr-90 from Water in the Spent Fuel Pool of Taiwan Research Reactor - 18169

The cleanup of spent fuel pool in Taiwan Research Reactor (TRR) is a significant milestone in the decommissioning project of TRR. Due to the water was polluted by the ruptured spent nuclear fuel rods, the fission products and actinides were required to be removed from the water prior to transporting the water to the radioactive liquid wastes treatment plant. A granular aluminosilicate adsorbent (namely GWC) was loaded into a special designed water submersion adsorber to remove radionuclides from water in consideration of the subsequent retrieving after used. The unit is able to be placed underwater without heavy shield shroud, and easily to be assembled and disassembled. More than 95% of β-emitters had been removed from the 980 m{sup 3} of contaminated water in the SFP and generated about 1.5 m{sup 3} of spent GWC which adsorbed with 4*10{sup 12} Bq of radionuclides. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Decommissioning Concept of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facility - 18255

As the Korean Nuclear Safety Act was revised, it is urgent to prepare a decommissioning plan for the nuclear fuel cycle facilities operated by the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, KAERI. First, the basic concepts necessary for dismantling each facility and the order of dismantling for each dismantling work were determined. In this paper, we consider the disassembly order of the nuclear fuel cycle facilities such as the post irradiation fuel examination facility, the research reactor fuel production facility, the radioactive waste treatment facility, the radioactive waste form examination facility. The decommissioning plan for the research nuclear fuel cycle facilities will be based on the abovementioned dismantling basic concept and disassembly sequences. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Hydraulic Properties of Grout Monoliths Containing Organic Ion Exchange Resin - 18369

The Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) at Hanford is being constructed to treat 56 million gallons of radioactive waste currently stored in underground tanks at the Hanford site. Operation of the WTP will generate several solid secondary waste (SSW) streams including spent spherical resorcinol formaldehyde cation exchange resin (IXr). The current plan for safe disposal of IXr is solidification in cementitious material (CM) typically comprised of cement, fly ash and blast furnace slag. Three CM formulations were tested to stabilize IXr for long-term land disposal. Two IXr loading rates, 0.1 and 0.3 v/v IXr:grout were used with the three CM formulations to prepare simulated waste form monoliths for hydraulic property testing. Following curing, the monoliths were removed from molds and tested to determine saturated hydraulic conductivity (K{sub sat}) and water retention properties. K{sub sat} was measured using a standard flexible permeameter method ASTM D-5084-10. A constant vapor pressure (CVP) method was used to determine van Genuchten parameters for desorption moisture retention curves for each of the SSW grout formulations. For the CVP method, vacuum saturated, intact wafers approximately 1.25 cm thick were placed above a saturated salt solution inside a sealed container for equilibration. Each saturated salt solution has an associated vapor pressure related to relative humidity in the container. Visual examination and three-dimensional x-ray micro computed tomography (μCT) indicated that the IXr was uniformly distributed in the cured waste form. Saturated hydraulic conductivity was within the range previously reported by Flach et al. in a study of the hydraulic properties of 98 pastes and grouts. The solidification of IXr in CM resulted in a waste form with water retention properties similar to cementitious pastes. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Multi-Faceted Approach to Evaluate Discharge Locations at a FUSRAP Site - 18421

Following the completion of a Soil and Groundwater Remedial Investigation by USACE at a FUSRAP site located in Nassau County, New York, groundwater data indicated the presence of contaminant source(s) that had not been identified. As a result, a targeted investigation was undertaken to understand how materials were handled and disposed of at a site located in Nassau County, Long Island, New York. The FUSRAP site is a 4.3-hectare (10.5-acre) site encompassing three parcels which had historically been utilized as a nuclear materials manufacturing facility (e.g., cores, slug, and fuel elements) for reactors used in both research and electric power generation in early 1950's until late 1960's; however, the targeted investigation was on the southern-most parcel known as the '70 Property' (the Site). The 70 Property contained a building that was used for atomic fuel-element manufacturing from 1958 until 1966 under license to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and involved the use of natural, enriched, and depleted uranium as well as lesser amounts of thorium. The major contaminants of concern are tetrachloroethene, nickel, uranium and thorium. During the RI, significant sources of contamination were not found in Site soils despite records indicating that chemicals and radionuclides had been disposed of on the property. In addition, downgradient groundwater data indicated a source(s) on the 70 Property that could not be identified by known sources on other the other FUSRAP parcels or from adjacent sites. This conclusion was further supported following development of groundwater contaminant transport and flow models. The main objective of the targeted investigation was to evaluate the potential discharge points on the 70 Property that may have been utilized for liquids waste disposal. However, several challenges existed including 1) lack of building construction details; 2) historical changes to Site building and property; 3) the use of the Site by various tenants; and 4) the commingling of Site contaminants with impacts from multiple sources. To overcome these challenges, historic documents/reports with information about the handling and disposal of liquid wastes were reviewed to evaluate quantities, contents and locations of waste disposal. Thereafter, an investigation was undertaken that included geophysical surveys; pipe tracing and video inspection; in-situ smoke and water testing; installation of test trenches and soil borings; and, sampling sludge residuals, soils and water within the various drainage structures that were located. This paper describes the multi-faceted investigation approach that was utilized to overcome the challenges faced during the investigation as well as insights into the waste disposal practices of the time period and the findings of the investigation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Immobilization of Radioactive Materials Using Porous Iron Composite Media - 18582

High levels of nitrate (NO{sub 3}) derived from agriculture and naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM), primarily uranium (U) and natural decay chain products that have been mobilized by the influx of oxygenated, high-alkalinity water, are a threat to shallow groundwater resources in California. Porous Iron Composite (PIC) materials were evaluated as a water treatment option in a series of batch experiments. While the use of Zero Valent Iron (ZVI) to address groundwater contaminated with NO{sub 3} or U has been demonstrated, the ability of PICs to chemically reduce and immobilize U and other associated contaminants in oxygenated alkaline groundwater where soluble uranyl-carbonate species dominate and high NO{sub 3} levels may compete for reductive capacity remain a concern. Additionally, ZVI materials have been used to immobilize other redox sensitive radionuclides (e.g., technetium-99 ({sup 99}Tc)) with limited success. Batch tests were conducted using an artificial groundwater surrogate (i.e., CAGW for California Groundwater) containing ∼ 100 mg L{sup -1} NO{sub 3}{sup -}, 200 mg L{sup -1} alkalinity, 100 μg L{sup -1} U, 100 μg L{sup -1} rhenium (Re) as a non-radioactive surrogate for the nuclear fission product technetium-99 ({sup 99}Tc), 100 μg L{sup -1} stable strontium (Sr) as a surrogate for radium (Ra) and the fission product strontium-90 ({sup 90}Sr), and 50 μg L{sup -1} arsenic (As), a common groundwater contaminant. Five gram samples of the PIC material were reacted with 200 mL of CAGW under two different atmospheric conditions to evaluate the impact of O{sub 2}. Batch tests were also conducted in the presence and absence of another oxidized species, NO{sub 3}. At specific time intervals, a small aliquot was collected from each batch treatment for chemical analysis (i.e., U, Re, As, Fe, NO{sub 3}, etc.) and the pH and ORP of the remaining suspension was measured. The PIC was effective at fully reducing NO{sub 3}{sup -} levels over the extended reaction time, even though the reactor pH quickly increased above 8.0 during equilibration. Soluble levels of U and Re decreased in a similar fashion to NO{sub 3}{sup -} in the presence and absence of O{sub 2}. Soluble As levels decreased more rapidly than other contaminants, but remained at ∼ 1 μg L{sup -1}. Very little nitrite (NO{sub 2}{sup -}) was detected in the batch tests, with NH{sub 4}{sup +} levels consistent with the amount of NO{sub 3}{sup -} reduced. Similar rates of immobilization for U, Re, and As were observed in the presence and absence of NO{sub 3}{sup -}. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Infrastructure and Mission Capability at Hanford - 19048

As Hanford celebrates its 75. anniversary, the challenge to complete the cleanup mission and simultaneously prepare for new nuclear operations puts increasing pressure on an infrastructure system that in some places is nearly the same age. While the cleanup mission began in earnest in 1989 and continues today, completing construction of the country's largest Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant will put nuclear operations back into the Hanford footprint. Ensuring that the infrastructure originally built to support plutonium production as part of the Manhattan Project is the right size and reliable for the remaining missions is a delicate balance of funding priorities, strategy and a predictable project delivery. The DOE Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and other sites across the DOE complex have recognized the need for increased investment in site infrastructure. Combined with this increasing need is the funding reality of variable fiscal budgets that creates challenges for even the best strategists. The current Hanford infrastructure priority list has approximately 100 reliability projects with a combined value over $380 million dollars. At current funding levels, there is a 10 to 15-year backlog. To meet this challenge head on, DOE-RL and Mission Support Alliance (MSA) regularly evaluate project priorities and ongoing maintenance actions to ensure the highest risk systems are addressed. This is done by integrating historical and operational knowledge, system health reports, and maintenance records then coordinating with the Facility Information Management System (FIMS). Sometimes with decades old infrastructure, it can seem as if everything is a number one priority. Recently, in a random testing of approximately 20% of the wooden power poles on site, approximately 92% of the poles were found to be in satisfactory condition with 8% percent failing. MSA Electrical Utilities group immediately replaced one pole, found to have only 8% strength remaining. This type of severely degraded infrastructure is not conducive to reliable mission execution. Given the historical prioritization of funding for cleanup, then operations, followed by infrastructure, it is not surprising that the commitment of funds on infrastructure projects such as sewer collection systems or replacing old electrical transformers has been hard fought. The acknowledgement and re-prioritization of limited funds will work towards creating a more reliable and sustainable infrastructure portfolio that will support and even enhance the cleanup and operations missions. This paper/presentation will outline Hanford's approach to executing reliability projects that will serve the remaining missions on site for years to come. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Radionuclide Behaviour During Thermal Treatment of LLW and ILW Using In-Container Vitrification - 19239

Thermal treatment is being considered in the UK for the treatment of a wide range of low and intermediate level wastes (LLW and ILW). To support this objective, a range of in-container vitrification trials were conducted to test a wide range of simulated waste streams. The vitrified products have been visually inspected and samples removed for chemical analysis. This paper presents preliminary results of this analysis with some comment on the spatial and chemical heterogeneity of the products. Treatment of a sludge simulant in a steel skip failed to fully melt the metal and produced a glass encapsulated waste-form with clearly visible porosity. Clinoptilolite produced a dense uniform glass but with some chemical heterogeneity. Some operational issues were encountered when treating water-rich sludge, but these were successfully resolved and resulted in a broadly homogenous vitrified product. Melting simulated mixed decommissioning waste produced a chemically homogenous product, despite the heterogenous nature of the waste stream. Uranium and concrete contained in a steel 'top hat' presented significant treatment issues. The top hat failed to fully melt, and this appears to have prevented the waste contained within the top hat from mixing with the glass external to the top hat. As with the steel skip containing sludge, this again left a glass encapsulated, rather than fully vitrified, product. Attempts to melt bulk PVC (an analogue of soft PCM) initially led to significant operational issues with the melt being terminated early and the waste apparently combusting rather than melting. This was resolved by pre-treating the PVC by shredding it and mixing this with the frit to give a larger contact area for melting. This approach produced a homogenous well mixed glass. Overall it appears the properties of the melt product are highly dependent on the physical and chemical properties of the waste stream being treated. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Solidification of Low and Intermediate Level Waste - A Comparison between Different Methods - 19584

The treatment of radioactive materials results in products that have to be suitable for a period of interim storage as well as for disposal in a repository. Considering available options for treatment of radioactive waste, future disposal also has to be taken into account. Up to now, only cementation and encapsulation in geopolymer (only to limited extent) are relevant treatment methods for the solidification of German waste for disposal in the repository Grube Konrad. However, a synopsis of other solidification technologies is considered to be helpful in order to be prepared for future developments in the fields of radioactive waste treatment. Treatment methods addressed in this paper are: - Cementation; - Encapsulation into geopolymer matrix; - Vitrification; - SYNROC; - Geomelting. The criteria for evaluation of the treatment methods are as follows: - Requirements concerning waste properties; - Safety of treatment facilities; - Fulfillment of waste acceptance criteria for repository Grube Konrad; - Fulfillment of requirements for near surface disposal; - Suitability for long-term interim storage. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Field-Scale Lysimeter Studies of Glass and Cementitious Waste Forms at the Hanford Site - 20392

The Hanford site Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) will receive waste forms from vitrification activities at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The waste form inventory to be disposed of at the IDF will consist of vitrified low-activity waste (LAW) in glass forms and solidified (or encapsulated) secondary wastes in cementitious forms. The IDF is a near-surface burial facility located near Hanford's Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant in the 200 East Area of the site's Central Plateau. An extensive set of laboratory experimental data has been collected to support IDF performance assessment calculations of the eventual degradation of waste forms and mobility of contaminants. This paper describes the start of a field experiment to generate waste-form performance data on a larger scale (tens of centimeters), over a longer duration (five years or more), and under field conditions representative of the IDF. Results from this study are expected to improve model descriptions of contaminant mobility, reduce uncertainties about the representativeness of laboratory results in the IDF performance assessment, improve stakeholder confidence in the safe disposal of treated waste at the IDF, and facilitate the adoption of informed facility designs with the potential to reduce operational costs. A lysimeter test facility near Hanford's 200 West Area has been repurposed to carry out long-term assessments of waste forms buried in sediments excavated from the IDF. The waste forms are buried in large drainage lysimeters, open caissons that are two meters in diameter and three meters deep. Waste forms are buried in up to six locations in each lysimeter. Samplers collect pore water and drainage water beneath the waste forms and air from the pore space adjacent to waste forms. Sensors measure temperature, soil water content, soil water tension, and drainage flux. One lysimeter containing cementitious waste forms and one containing glass waste forms have been completed, along with a control lysimeter (without waste forms). The cementitious waste forms are Cast Stone grout formulations using a liquid secondary waste simulant and a generic Hanford high-salt simulant, as well as a hydrated lime-based grout formulation using a liquid secondary waste simulant. Technetium-99 and iodine-127 were added as tracers to monitor contaminant mobility. Glass waste forms were fabricated in two formulations (LAWA44 and ORLEC28), with rhenium and molybdenum tracers to monitor waste form degradation. The predicted performance of the waste forms in the lysimeters was modeled prior to installation to determine waste form size, tracer concentration/activity, and locations of sensors and samplers. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 88: Waste Management from Remediation of Legacy Sites or Unplanned Releases

This panel focused on the progression of cleanup on the Hanford Site, Washington, USA, from establishing the regulatory framework necessary for cleanup, to understanding the risks and addressing near-term hazards, to moving to 24/7 operations as cleanup focuses on tank waste treatment and co-located risk reduction efforts as the active cleanup footprint shrinks. Panelists with presentations: Hanford: Past, Present, Future (Brian Vance); Protecting the River (L. Ty Blackford); Hanford Tank Farms (John Eschenberg Jr.); The Hanford Site (Robert Wilkinson); The Hanford Site (Valerie McCain)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Stabilization/Solidification of Tritiated Water - 20135

Tritiated water was stabilized/solidified by using calcium oxide and a polymer. First, tritiated water was changed into the powder form of calcium hydroxide by addition of tritiated water into calcium oxide. Then the produced calcium hydroxide was solidified in waste form by using a polymer binder. The specimens of waste form prepared by surrogate calcium hydroxide were subjected to compressive strength testing and water immersion testing. In addition, the specimens of waste form prepared by tritiated calcium hydroxide were subjected to leach testing. The mean compressive strength of the specimens containing 40 wt % of the surrogate calcium hydroxide was about 98.5 MPa (14,300 psi). After water immersion testing, there was no distinct change in the appearance of the specimens. The mean compressive strength of the specimens after water immersion was 79.1 MPa (11,470 psi). The mean diffusion coefficient of tritium for the specimens containing 40 wt% of tritiated calcium hydroxide was 5.4 x 10-10 cm{sup 2}/s. These findings indicate that the waste form has enough mechanical integrity and durability for final disposal and releases tritium very slowly. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Requalification and Declaration of High-alpha Cemented TRU-waste from the Late 70's and Early 80's - 20499

KTE and Siemens launched a project to qualify a series of 391 waste drums and 115 concrete containers produced from 1979 to 1984. The waste is characterized by a high content of long-lived alpha-nuclides (TRU-waste - Pu, U, Am in the range of 1 E+11-1 E+12 Bq/ drum. This high radionuclide inventory requires a special packaging according to the waste acceptance criteria (WAC) of the repository Konrad [1] despite the fact, that the waste was treated manually. The raw waste originally was delivered in nitric acid solution and was solidified using ordinary Portland cement. The existing documentation comprises analyses, transfer documentation for the nuclear fuel nuclides and waste treatment documentation yielding information, which waste was treated together in a batch. Additionally all drums were subjected to non-destructive gamma-spectrometry assay. A small number of 7 drums were opened and sampled to support the existing declaration. For the entire series the waste products were attributed to defined batches using the accountancy data supported by the analyses and the gamma-spectrometry. Each batch was produced from a homogeneous stock of waste solution and can therefore be declared and documented together. The declaration concept is based on the gamma spectrometry results performed on the entire drums, which were corrected and extended for the uncertainty of the analyses. The declaration concept is verified by the regulator and its independent expert. The state of the project is in the documentation of the solidification campaigns followed by the planning of the container configuration. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2012

Regulations, Policies and Strategies for LLRW Management in Bangladesh - 12368

Low level radioactive waste (LLW) is generated from various nuclear applications in Bangladesh. The major sources of radioactive waste in the country are at present: (a) the 3 MW TRIGA Mark-II research reactor; (b) the radioisotope production facility; (c) the medical, industrial and research facilities that use radionuclides; and (d) the industrial facility for processing monazite sands. Radioactive waste needs to be safely managed because it is potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. According to Nuclear Safety and Radiation Control Act-93, the Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission (BAEC) is the governmental body responsible for the receipt and final disposal of radioactive wastes in the whole country. Waste management policy has become an important environmental, social, and economical issue for LLW in Bangladesh. Policy and strategies will serve as a basic guide for radioactive waste management in Bangladesh. The waste generator is responsible for on-site collection, conditioning and temporary storage of the waste arising from his practice. The Central Waste Processing and Storage Unit (CWPSU) of BAEC is the designated national facility with the requisite facility for the treatment, conditioning and storage of radioactive waste until a final disposal facility is established and becomes operational. The Regulatory Authority is responsible for the enforcement of compliance with provisions of the waste management regulation and other relevant requirements by the waste generator and the CWPSU. The objective of this paper is to present, in a concise form, basic information about the radioactive waste management infrastructure, regulations, policies and strategies including the total inventory of low level radioactive waste in the country. For improvement and strengthening in terms of operational capability, safety and security of RW including spent radioactive sources and overall security of the facility (CWPSF), the facility is expected to serve waste management need in the country and, in the course of time, the facility may be turned into a regional level training centre. It is essential for safe conduction and culture of research and application in nuclear science and technology maintaining the relevant safety of man and environment and future generations to come. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

New Tank Mapping Method Improves Waste Removal Process

Savannah River Mission Completion is the Liquid Waste (LW) contractor at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The LW mission is tasked with treating and disposing of legacy nuclear waste. There are multiple facilities involved in this work, including the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF), the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), and the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). The CSTF includes 43 underground waste tanks used to store and support processing of radioactive liquid waste. Waste removal activities, such as salt dissolution campaigns and sludge agitation, are conducted within the CSTF waste tanks to convert the waste into a form that allows for downstream processing at other LW facilities. While performing these waste removal campaigns, camera inspections are performed to assess the quantity and distribution of the remaining waste within the waste tank (i.e. saltcake or sludge). Understanding the quantity and distribution of the salt/sludge within the waste tanks allows for improved waste removal strategies (e.g. mixing pump operation) and refined safety controls. Typically, several camera inspections are performed during a waste removal transfer to verify the elevation of the visible salt/sludge mounds against the known elevation of the liquid surface. The camera inspection footage must then be interpreted by a trained engineer who will develop a 2-D map that depicts the waste distribution at various elevations within the waste tank. This tank mapping is then used in conjunction with conservative assumptions to evaluate the volume of saltcake or sludge that is present within the waste tank.

Mini, Melany↗