SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This report summarizes analytical results and meets the requirements of Section 7.6.2 of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permit (NEV HW0101) and Section B.20.i.2 of the RCRA Part B Permit Application for Waste Management Activities at the Nevada National Security Site Explosive Ordnance Disposal Unit.
Purpose: Provide data from a water run of the LLNL tissue digestor to confirm operational status for possible extension of Medical Waste permit, since the annual recertification maintenance and testing could not take place due to the shelter-in-place of the tissue digester vendor who is located outside of California. This is a unique medical waste device and the vendor who certifies our other medical waste equipment (permitted autoclaves), does not service the tissue digester.
With a multi-lab and university team, we propose to develop new methods for a Hydrodynamic and Radiographic Toolbox (HART) that will enable a fuller and more extensive use of experimental radiographic data towards better characterizing and reducing uncertainties in predictive modeling of weapons performance. We will achieve this by leveraging recent developments in areas of computational imaging, statistical and machine learning, and reduced order modeling of hydrodynamics. In terms of software practices, by partnering with XCP (RISTRA Project) we will conform to recent XCP standards that are inline with modern software practices and standards and ensure compatibility and ease of inter-operability with existing codes. Three new activities under this proposal include (a) the development and use of deep learning-based surrogates to accelerate reconstruction and variational inference of density fields from radiographs of hydrotests, (b) a model-data fusion strategy that couples deep learning-based density reconstructions with fast hydrodynamics simulators to better constrain the reconstruction, and (c) a method for treating asymmetries using techniques adopted from limited view tomography. All three new activities will be based on improved treatment of scatter, noise, beam spot movement, detector blur, and flat fielding in the forward model, and a use of sophisticated priors to aid in the re construction. The improvements to the forward model and improved algorithmic design of the reconstruction when complete will be contained in the iterative reconstruction code SHIVA—a code project that we have recently initiated. The many ways in which machine learning can be used in the reconstruction work will be contained in a code HERMES that has been initiated with DTRA support. For example, the significant levels of acceleration that will likely be achieved by the use of machine learning techniques will permit us (and are required) to quantify uncertainties in density retrievals. Next, the two-way coupling between density reconstruction and model-based simulation of the hydrodynamics will be contained in code EREBUS, and will permit a fuller realization of the potential of the data to constrain the hydrodynamic model and better address issues related to asymmetries in the problem. Finally, we anticipate that the better consistency with physics achieved in our reconstructions will allow them to be used by X-Division more so than today.
Purpose: Provide data from a water run of the LLNL tissue digester to confirm operational status for possible extension of Medical Waste permit, since the annual recertification maintenance and testing could not take place due to the shelter-in-place of the tissue digester vendor who is located outside of California. This is a unique medical waste device and the vendor who certifies our other medical waste equipment (permitted autoclaves), does not service the tissue digester.
Purpose: Provide data from a water run of the LLNL tissue digester to confirm operational status for possible extension of Medical Waste permit, since the annual recertification maintenance and testing could not take place due to the shelter-in-place of the tissue digester vendor who is located outside of California. This is a unique medical waste device and the vendor who certifies our other medical waste equipment (permitted autoclaves), does not service the tissue digester.
Purpose: Provide data from a water run of the LLNL tissue digester to confirm operational status for possible extension of Medical Waste permit, since the annual recertification maintenance and testing could not take place due to the shelter-in-place of the tissue digester vendor who is located outside of California. This is a unique medical waste device and the vendor who certifies our other medical waste equipment (permitted autoclaves), does not service the tissue digester.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) collects effluent samples from its sewer outfall at the B196 Sewer Monitoring Station (SMS). Effluent flow-proportional composite samples are collected at the SMS on a daily (midnight-to-midnight), weekly (Thursday through Wednesday), and “monthly” (composited from daily) basis; effluent grab samples are also collected each month at that same location. Certified contract laboratories analyze these compliance samples, and results are used to establish LLNL compliance with the 2019 - 2020 Wastewater Discharge Permit (Permit 1250) granted by the City of Livermore Water Resources Division (WRD). Supplemental analyses for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) are performed onsite and reported for the calculation and assessment of sewer service charges. Quarterly, effluent is sampled for metals (24-hour composite) and cyanide (grab sample) concentrations (mg/L).
In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 403.12(e), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) submits a semiannual monitoring report regarding federally regulated wastewater generating processes (categorical processes) that discharge wastewater to the sanitary sewer system. Attachments A-2 and A-3 of the 2019-2020 Wastewater Discharge Permit #1250 granted to LLNL by the City of Livermore Water Resources Division (WRD) also mandate submission of this report. The LLNL Livermore Site is required to monitor identified electrical and electronic components processes (40 CFR Part 469) and metal finishing processes (40 CFR Part 433) semiannually and to submit monitoring reports in January and July of each year. Under authority delegated to enforce compliance with these regulations, the WRD reviews this report. This report provides information on the significant metal-finishing operations and electrical and electronic component operations located at the Livermore Site during the period from December 1, 2019 through May 31, 2020 and includes descriptions of the LLNL regulated (categorical) processes that discharge to the sanitary sewer. Attachments A-2 and A-3 of the 2019-2020 Wastewater Discharge Permit #1250 provide the list of categorical processes and the required self-monitoring program for point-source discharges at LLNL. The monitoring data collected for this report documents compliance with all federal and local pretreatment limits. Compliance certification accompanies this report, as required by federal regulations.
The US energy landscape has undergone major changes over the past 10 years and will continue to see significant changes in future decades as the power grid increases its reliance on variable renewable energy resources. Because of the inherent variability of these resources, renewable energy growth may require additional energy storage capacity to provide flexible load-following capabilities and other grid services that can quickly adjust to changes in energy demand and generation. Pumped storage hydropower (PSH)—one such energy storage technology—uses pumps to convey water from a lower reservoir to an upper reservoir for energy storage and releases water back to the lower reservoir via a powerhouse for hydropower generation. PSH facility pump and generation cycling often follows economic and energy demand conditions. Across the United States, 43 PSH facilities are in operation and 55 projects are in various permitting or licensing stages. Altogether, the 43 operational projects provide the wide majority (95%) of utility-scale electricity storage in the United States. These facilities also provide significant power and nonpower grid benefits, including large-scale electrical system reserve capacity, grid reliability support, and electricity supply-demand balancing through quick-response capabilities and operational flexibility. PSH systems can accomplish these at a scale (e.g., size) and cost that makes these systems highly attractive from a technical standpoint. Although these research concepts are still in their infancy, they demonstrate promising potential as future PSH energy storage technologies. Although PSH has many advantages, development in the United States has effectively stalled since the 1990s, partially because of the magnitude of project costs and financing interest during development and construction, the length of time from project investment until project revenue begins, permitting challenges, construction risks, competition from other storage technologies (e.g., batteries, hydrogen storage), and electricity market evolution and uncertainty. In short, the time, cost, and risk associated with modern PSH development have resulted in limited growth in the United States recently, despite the growing energy storage demand stemming from increased wind and solar power deployment. Technology innovation is needed to help reduce PSH commissioning time, cost, and risk, particularly during the post-licensing phase of project development. To address challenges facing the PSH industry and to improve PSH commissioning timelines, the US Department of Energy (DOE) Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO) initiated the PSH Furthering Advancements to Shorten Time to (FAST) Commissioning Prize project.
Tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, is typically confined within one or more confinement barriers. Tritium readily reacts with oxygen to form tritiated water or can exchange with protium or deuterium atoms in water to create tritiated water which is around 10,000 times more toxic than elemental tritium. Primary tritium confinement systems can create small volumes of highly tritiated water. Secondary confinement systems, like inert gloveboxes, will produce larger volumes of lower concentration tritiated water. Much larger volumes of tritiated water of very low tritium content are produced by tritium permeation/diffusion. Tritium from inside primary and secondary confinement barriers will diffuse from these systems into cooling water systems. Closed loop, recirculating cooling water systems will slowly accumulate tritium and create concentrations which exceed drinking water (or permitted discharge) concentrations. The cooling water systems designed as series of interconnected cooling loops that can slowly transfer tritium from one cooling loop to another cooling loop through heat exchangers. These large volumes of tritiated water may be above federal discharge limits and also lack convenient disposition pathways. This document will discuss tritiated water management strategies from the perspective of large volume, low tritium concentrations that exceed drinking water or permitted discharge limits. Applicable US regulatory requirements for a Molybdenum-99 (Mo-99) production facility concerning tritiated water are also cited. Tritiated water disposition options, based on typical waste minimization strategies will guide dispositions options. A Case Study example is presented to illustrate the pros and cons of several disposition options. The report does not recommend any particular disposition pathway but discusses strategies to be explored by a producer to guide selection of processes which best fits the needs of a particular waste stream.
This report summarizes a risk informed, performance-based and technology-inclusive approach to determine source terms for dose related assessments at advanced nuclear facilities. This approach uses a graded process which allows both the non-mechanistic source terms calculation methods, which adopt conservative approaches and assumptions based on known physical and chemical principles, and more importantly the mechanistic source term calculation methods, which consider design-specific scenarios and use best estimate models with uncertainty quantification for a range of licensing basis events (LBEs), to be used for the design and licensing of advanced nuclear technologies. The source terms developed with this graded approach, and radionuclide inventories elsewhere in the facility that are determined during source term analysis, can be used to address licensing issues to support the application processes of 10 CFR Part 50 for a construction permit and operating license or 10 CFR Part 52 for a Combined Operating License (COL), Standard Design Certification, Early Site Permit, Standard Design Approval or Manufacturing License. They can also be used for other purposes including equipment environmental qualification, control room habitability analyses, and assessments of severe accident risks in environmental impact statements. There are many advanced reactor concepts being developed including high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HGTR), sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR), lead-cooled fast reactor (LFR), molten salt reactor (MSR), micro-reactor, etc. The graded approach presented in this report for source terms determination is, to the extent possible, generic to any of these reactor designs and to future reactor designs. This report provides information on the review of the regulatory foundation for use of conservative bounding source terms as well as event-specific mechanistic source terms for advanced nuclear reactor designs.
This report is designed to address barriers and solutions to modern pumped storage hydropower (PSH) development by establishing baseline project development knowledge, defining key aspects of project development, and identifying opportunities to reduce project timelines, costs, and risks. This report’s scope includes post-licensing activities and excludes factors related to permitting or licensing. The U.S. PSH fleet is composed of 43 projects providing the majority (95%) of utility-scale electricity storage in the US. However, only one new PSH facility has become operational in the past 20 years. Several factors contribute to diminishing PSH growth in the US, including the magnitude of project costs and financing interest during development and construction; the length of time from project investment until project revenue; permitting challenges and construction risks; competition from other storage technologies; and unrecognized energy storage valuation. Although innovative PSH concepts (including underground, small, and modular systems) have been investigated, widespread application has yet to occur. In short, the time, cost, and risk associated with modern PSH development has resulted in limited recent growth in the United States, despite the rising energy storage demand from increased deployment of variable renewable technologies. To address these challenges, the US Department of Energy’s (DOE) Water Power Technologies Office initiated the PSH Furthering Advancements to Shorten Time to (FAST) Commissioning project, aimed at catalyzing new solutions, designs, and strategies to accelerate PSH development. This report uses available data from previous license applications, ongoing project cost data, and other global PSH project information based on a typical closed-loop PSH project.
A site-specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is needed for most construction activities/projects that disturb one (1) acre or more of land to meet the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated With Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (General Permit) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board). This Order No. 2009-0009- DWQ was adopted by the State Board on September 2, 2009 and became effective July 1, 2010
Vacuoles are essential in plants and serve roles in both protein and organelle degradation for reutilization and storage of high energy molecules such as storage proteins which are critical for seed germination under normal and stress conditions and impact biomass production and nutrition. In addition, plants secrete many different molecules such as cell wall components, lipids, waxes and others that are important for plant protection, structure and biomass. Vacuole accumulation and secretion are closely linked and highly regulated pathways within the endomembrane trafficking network. We have discovered many drug-like synthetic small molecules that can suppress vacuole trafficking and enhance secretion; other chemicals can enhance vacuole trafficking and suppress secretion. The ability of our compounds to modulate these pathways indicates that these pathways are tightly coupled and highly regulated. Thus, to achieve the goals of enhanced energy reserves or enhanced secretion it is essential to understand how this dynamic is controlled. Bioactive chemicals have provided us unique insight into natural mechanisms controlling the dynamics of vacuole trafficking and secretion that was not possible previously. One such compound, ES2, negatively modulates secretion while enhancing vacuole trafficking. This is the first compound discovered that targets an essential secretory complex known as the exocyst and will reveal important regulatory domains controlling secretion and vacuole trafficking. During the current funding period, we determined the structure of the EXO70A1 in plants and identifying its binding site. To understand the dynamics of vacuole trafficking it is key to have compounds that inhibit vacuole trafficking as well as enhancing it (ES2). We have used sophisticated image analysis to identify another novel compound ES17 that enhances secretion while negatively modulating vacuole trafficking (opposite of ES2). We have already made rapid progress. Our preliminary data indicates that ES17 very specifically targets a late stage of vesicle fusion with the tonoplast which is highly regulated. Thus, ES17 is an ideal compound to dissect the regulation of vacuole targeting dynamics. In addition, we have now synthesized a biotinylated version of ES17 that is fully functional, permitting the use of chemical proteomics to identify the cognate target with a high probability of success. We propose to investigate the ES17 target which can negatively modulate vacuole trafficking and combine this with knowledge of the ES2 target which can promote vacuole trafficking. Dissecting the mechanisms controlling the dynamics of secretion vs vacuole accumulation and the use of synthetic modulators will permit us to understand and regulate trafficking to enhance secretion to the plasma membrane and cell wall or the accumulation of biological energy reserves for increased biomass, nutritional value, stress resistance, and the secretion of specialized plant products.
This report serves as the combined annual report for post-closure activities in compliance with the requirements listed in Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Permit Number NEV HW0101 associated with the following closed corrective action units (CAUs): 1) CAU 90, Area 2 Bitcutter Containment. 2) CAU 91, Area 3 U-3fi Injection Well. 3) CAU 92, Area 6 Decon Pond Facility. 4)CAU 110, Area 3 WMD U-3ax/bl Crater. 5) CAU 111, Area 5 WMD Retired Mixed Waste Pits. 6) CAU 112, Area 23 Hazardous Waste Trenches. The locations of the sites are shown in Figure ES-1. This report covers calendar year 2020. The post-closure requirements for these sites are described in RCRA Permit NEV HW0101 and are summarized in each CAU-specific section of this report. The results of the inspections, a summary of maintenance activities, and an evaluation of monitoring data are presented in this report.
This project advances a small-scale gasification unit as the first step in syngas-based hydrogen, chemicals, and synthetic fuels production. This unit is associated with an enhanced flexibility to different carbonaceous feedstocks including different types of coals, biomass, and plastics. The purpose of the project was to demonstrate feasibility and efficiency of coal pyrolysis in an auger reactor (pyrolyzer); supplemental methane and pyrolysis gas conversion into syngas in a proprietary non-catalytic converter; combined performance of pyrolyzer and non-catalytic converter to convert coal into syngas The proposed technology is based on an application of an intermediate speed pyrolysis at the temperature range 400-600°C as the first stage of biomass processing. At an industrial scale, an incorporation of coal pyrolysis into a feeding machine – auger-reactor allows to decrease its capital cost. At a pilot scale, it permits to employ electricity to build a compact device for testing of downstream equipment. The auger-reactor (pyrolyzer) generates pyrolysis gas and char practically from any carbonaceous feedstocks but their compositions and quantities are determined by their types. Pyrolysis gas is converted into syngas (mix of H 2 and CO) in a novel, proprietary hydrogen flame assisted non-catalytic converter which employs O 2 instead of air as an oxidizer. This reactor (converter) allows an easy adjustment to different pyrolysis gas compositions and tolerates a presence of sulfur and nitrogen contaminants. Our technology assumes carbonaceous feedstocks gasification with oxygen to allow the products H 2 , CO or CO 2 to be not diluted in N 2 and ready for the following synthesis of chemicals and fuels. Due to the same reason, it permits a more efficient CO 2 capture for its transport and storage. An implementation of our small-scale gasification process may overcome economic constrains by a flexible acceptance of coal, biomass, and plastics as well as their unsorted mixtures to make syngas for the following production of pure hydrogen, chemical and/or synthetic fuels.
Most construction projects at LANL are subject to a EPA regulated storm water discharge permit (NPDES Construction General Permit). Each identified non-compliance is a regulatory liability to both the subcontractor & Triad.
The Grizzly code is being developed to address degradation issues in nuclear reactor structures and components. For light-water reactors, Grizzly currently has capabilities to simulate degradation processes and their effects on structural integrity in two key areas: reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) and reinforced concrete structures. This report documents improvements made to Grizzly’s ability to address both of these structural systems. For RPVs, the reduced-order models (ROMs) used in fracture mechanics calculations have been expanded to allow their application over a broader range of the parameter space than was permitted by the previous models. The ROMs currently used in Grizzly for the evaluation of flaws that are fully embedded within the RPV (as opposed to surface-breaking flaws) are based on a model that is known to be conservative, indicating higher stress intensity factors than would be obtained from direct simulations. A more accurate model that eliminates these excess conservatisms has been recently included in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code but was not applicable for flaws near the RPV surface, which is where the most critical flaws are usually located. That model has recently been extended for increased applicability in this near-surface region. The ROMs for embedded flaws in the Grizzly code have been expanded to include these recent extensions, which permit their use in a much broader set of cases than previously possible. Direct 3D simulations have been used to check these ROMs and have shown good agreement in most cases, although there are still some cases that need further investigation. There are considerable benefits to using these these more accurate and less conservative ROMs for embedded flaws. On a benchmark probabilistic fracture mechanics problem tested here, the conditional probability of fracture initiation computed for a population of flaws in a single plate in an RPV decreased by over a factor of 3. To address aging in reinforced concrete structures, a capability to simulate multiple degradation mechanisms, including alkali-silica reaction and radiation-induced volumetric expansion has been developed in Grizzly over the past several years. This had previously been demonstrated on laboratory-scale specimens but not on full-scale nuclear concrete structures with reinforcement. To demonstrate the applicability of Grizzly to the analysis of large-scale structures of interest, a full 3D model of a representative reinforced concrete structure, including a complex arrangement of reinforcing bars, was developed and demonstrated in Grizzly.