Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “negotiation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Criticality Safety Evaluation Project Development for University of California Berkely Nuclear Criticality Safety Pipeline Course

The Nuclear Criticality Safety Division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has taken a unique approach to developing criticality safety evaluation topics in support of the University of California Berkeley criticality safety pipeline course. The evaluation topics are designed to go beyond the typical evaluation examples used for many training courses including vault storage and variations on storage arrays. These types of evaluations provide in-depth analysis into the fundamentals of criticality safety and are complex but may be far off from what a new criticality safety engineer may actually be evaluating. To provide more practical examples of criticality safety evaluation topics that are better fit for the knowledge level of a criticality safety engineer in-training, variations of current and future operations and research operations performed at LLNL are used as evaluation topics. Additionally, an emphasis on research is included in all evaluation topics as it allows students to take advantage of the concepts learned in class to apply them for process improvement, engineering equipment that is favorable for criticality safety, and negotiation tactics to work with operations personnel. The process used by LLNL to develop project topics for the pipeline course is provided in this paper. The intent is to provide an alternative technique for training students and potentially younger staff members in criticality safety on developing criticality safety evaluations.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2013

A fair compromise to break the climate impasse. A major economies forum approach to emissions reductions budgeting

Key messages of the study are: Given the stalemate in U.N. climate negotiations, the best arena to strike a workable deal is among the members the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate (MEF); The 13 MEF members—including the EU-27 (but not double-counting the four EU countries that are also individual members of the MEF)—account for 81.3 percent of all global emissions; This proposal devises a fair compromise to break the impasse to develop a science-based approach for fairly sharing the carbon budget in order to have a 75 percent chance of avoiding dangerous climate change; To increase the likelihood of a future climate agreement, carbon accounting must shift from production-based inventories to consumption-based ones; The shares of a carbon budget to stay below 2 deg C through 2050 are calculated by cumulative emissions since 1990, i.e. according to a short-horizon polluter pays principle, and national capability (income), and allocated to MEF members through emission rights. This proposed fair compromise addresses key concerns of major emitters; According to this accounting, no countries have negative carbon budgets, there is substantial time for greening major developing economies, and some developed countries need to institute very rapid reductions in emissions; and, To provide a 'green ladder' to developing countries and to ensure a fair global deal, it will be crucial to agree how to extend sufficient and predictable financial support and the rapid transfer of technology.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2013

Risk-Based Remediation Approach for Cs-137 Contaminated Sediment/Soils at the Savannah River Site (SRS) Lower Three Runs Tail (U) - 13348 - SRNS-RP-2012-00546

Lower Three Runs is a large blackwater stream that runs through the eastern and southern portion of the Savannah River Site. The Lower Three Runs watershed includes two SRS facility areas: P Area (P Reactor) and R Area (R Reactor) that provided effluent discharges to Lower Three Runs. During reactor operations, effluent discharges were well above natural (pre-industrial) or present day stream discharges. The watershed contains a 2,500-acre mainstream impoundment (PAR Pond), several smaller pre-cooler ponds, and a canal system that connects the pre-cooler ponds and discharges surface water to PAR Pond. From the PAR Pond dam, Lower Three Runs flows approximately 36 kilometers braiding through bottom-land/flood-plain forests before it enters the Savannah River. About eight kilometers downstream from the PAR Pond dam, the SRS boundary narrows (termed the Lower Three Runs tail) providing a limited buffer of DOE property for the Lower Three Runs stream and associated flood-plain. Previous screening characterization efforts revealed Cs-137 contamination in the sediment/soils of the flood-plain. As a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act stimulus package, a comprehensive characterization effort was executed on the sediment/soils of the Lower Three Runs tail flood-plain providing a comprehensive look at the contaminant signature of the area. As a follow-up to that characterization, a regulatory decision Core Team, comprised of members of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Environmental Protection Agency - Region IV, and DOE, conducted negotiations on a risk-based approach to address the level of contamination found in the tail flood-plain as an early action that provided a long-term solution to exposure scenarios. For evaluation purposes, the adolescent trespasser was selected as the most likely human receptor for the Lower Three Runs tail portion because of the natural attractiveness of the area for recreational activities (i.e., hunting, fishing, hiking etc.) and access from public property. Exposure of the adolescent trespasser to Cs-137 contaminated sediment/soil at concentrations greater than 23.7 pico curies per gram have been calculated to result in an unacceptable cancer risk (> 1 x 10{sup -4}). Comparing the characterization sampling results conducted in 2009 with the benchmark concentration of 23.7 pCi/g, identified elevated risk levels along three sampling areas in the Lower Three Runs tail portion. On January 5, 2012, it was agreed by the core team that a Removal Action in the Lower Three Runs tail was to be conducted for the identified soil/sediment locations in the three identified areas that exceed the 1 x 10{sup -4} risk (23.7 pCi/g) for the adolescent trespasser receptor. The addition of Land Use Controls following the Removal Action was appropriate to protect human health and the environment. A systematic screening matrix was initiated at the identified hot spots (i.e., sampling points with Cs-137 activities greater than 23.7 pCi/g) to identify the limits of the excavation area. Sediment/soil within the defined removal areas would be excavated to the depth necessary to achieve the cleanup goal and disposed of in a CERCLA Off-Site Rule approved disposal facility. It was agreed that this removal action would adequately reduce the volume of available Cs-137 in the Lower Three Runs tail and consequently residual activities of the Cs-137 would decay over time reducing the amount of Cs-137 available in the tail which would curtail risk. The Land Use Controls consist of installation of an additional seven miles of fencing at major road crossings, utility easements, and at areas that showed a higher probability of access. In addition, signs were placed along the entire SRS perimeter of the Lower Three Runs tail approximately every 200 feet. Sign posts included both a No Trespassing sign and a Contaminant Warning sign. The project initiated a subcontract for both the removal action and the installation of fencing and signs on May 1, 2012. All field activities were completed by July 26, 2012. The project excavated and disposed of over 2700 cubic yards of contaminated sediment/soil, erected approximately seven miles of fence and placed over 2,000 signs demonstrating DOE's commitment to protect human health and act as a good neighbor to residents in the area. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Taming the Wild World of Management, Performance and Communication - 13459

Management has evolved a long way from its original meaning of 'governing a horse'. The industrial revolution fostered 'scientific management'; 1930's Hawthorne studies discovered that people's social interactions could alter productivity; and the dawn of the computer age in the post-war 1950's brought general systems theory into management thinking. Today, mobile wireless connectivity aims to transform ever-changing networks of players, mandates, and markets into something that can be 'managed'. So why is there no clear and simple recipe for how to practice management? We talk about financial management, safety management, and operations management, but surely the 'management' part of those endeavors will share the same set of practices. Instead, we are still arguing for 'management' to include everything from developing people to negotiating contracts. A manager's job may include many things, but one of them, the job of management, needs to be nailed down. Three standard practices for managing in a network are developed: (a) support the dialogues that connect people vital to accomplishing a goal or objective; (b) develop and sustain the scoreboards that serve as a road-map to reach the goal; and (c) control the feedback to 'govern the horse'. These three practices are useful for more than reaching goals, as they also support coordinating across boundaries and running productive meetings. The dialogues for productive relationships, scoreboards for goals and deliverables, and feedback for performance together constitute a recipe for managing in a networked world. (authors)

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2013

Remediation of Centre Pier, Port Hope, Ontario: Historical, Logistical, Regulatory and Technical Challenges - 13118

Centre Pier is a 3.9 ha property owned by the Commissioners of the Port Hope Harbour in the Municipality of Port Hope, Ontario, Canada. It is centrally located on the Port Hope waterfront and is bounded on the west by the Port Hope Harbour, on the east by the Ganaraska River, on the south by Lake Ontario, and on the north by a railway corridor. The property is currently leased by the Commissioners of the Port Hope Harbour to the Cameco Corporation which owns the four onsite building that are used as warehouse space for their uranium conversion facility located on the western side of the Harbour. Remediation of this site forms part of the Port Hope Project being undertaken by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) and Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) as part of the Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI). Soil impacts include radiological, metals and petroleum hydrocarbons resulting from long term historical industrial use. Radiological impacts in soil extend across most of the site primarily within the upper metre of fill. Metals-contaminated soil is present across the entire site in the underlying fill material. The metals-contaminated fill extends to a maximum depth of 2.0 m below grade at the north end of the site which is underlain by peat. However, the metals-contaminated soil could extend to the top of the bedrock on the remainder of the site. Based on the elevation of the bedrock in the adjacent river and Harbour Basin, the metals-contaminated soil may extend to a depth of 5.6 m or 6.5 m below existing grade. Petroleum-contaminated soil is present on the southeast side of the site, where a storage tank farm was previously located. Challenges include: - The complex history of the site both relating to site use and Pier construction. Pier development began in the 1800's and was undertaken by many different entities. Modifications and repairs were made over the years resulting in several different types of Pier walls and fill that must be considered during remediation. A wide variety of industrial activity on the Pier including extensive foundry operations as well as the industrial nature of the fill used to construct the Pier has resulted in extensive contamination distribution. The Pier structure will require reinforcement to permit both the remediation of the Pier and the adjacent Harbour and remediation techniques will need to be well suited to minimize disruption of wall structures as well as being able to deal with fill ranging from ash to boulders. - Multiple stakeholders are responsible for building demolition, remediation of radiological impacts, remediation of industrial impacts and the use of the site as a staging area for Harbour sediment remediation. The successful remediation of the Centre Pier will require careful negotiation and planning for the various remediation activities noted above. - The depth of contamination on the Pier would result in the complete removal of the Pier if all contamination were to be excavated. Therefore, a Risk Assessment will be conducted to determine the appropriate means for in situ risk management for materials to be left in place below a proposed depth of 1.5 m below current grade. With the concurrence of the property owners and Provincial regulators, the Risk Assessment will be undertaken in accordance with the Provincial requirements that will ensure adequate protection of the environment and future users of the site. - The end use of the Pier has yet to be confirmed by the Municipality. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Strategies and Lessons-Learned for the Successful Alignment of Contract Cost with the Contract Budget Base (CBB) within the First Year of Contract Award - 13154

In order to provide a sound basis and foundation for integrated Project and Contract change management, it is imperative to ensure the alignment of the Negotiated Contract Costs (NCC) with the Contract Budget Base (CBB), where CBB is defined as the Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) plus Management Reserve (MR). The achievement of this alignment assures customer and contractor agreement on scope, requirements, quantities, schedule and cost, which facilitates the identification of change conditions and ultimate agreement on the value of changes to the NCC and the CBB. Delays in contract/CBB true up/reconciliation can negatively effect measurement of project progress, limiting owner understanding of liability, and may result in increased contract disagreements and potential claims. The Department of Energy Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (OR-EM) and URS - CH2M Oak Ridge LLC (UCOR) achieved alignment of the NCC with the CBB within 10 months of UCOR taking over work on the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) cleanup contract by: 1. Managing as a discrete project; 2. Establishing expectations and setting tone of interactions; 3. Using personnel experienced with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); 4. Partnering; 5. Establishing ombudsmen. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Groundwater Monitoring Optimization of Post Closure Waste Sites at SRS - 13184

Groundwater monitoring at the Savannah River Site (SRS) is required at dozens of waste sites and includes sampling at over 1,000 monitoring wells. The expected longevity of groundwater contamination and associated groundwater monitoring and reporting constitutes a significant long-term cost that represents an increasing proportion of the environmental management budget as surface waste units are closed. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of the monitoring program for eighteen regulated waste units was conducted to identify areas where monitoring could be optimized. The units evaluated varied considerably in the scope of monitoring; ranging from two wells to hundreds of wells. In order to systematically evaluate such disparate monitoring networks, SRS developed a decision-logic analysis using flow sheets to address potential areas of optimization. Five areas were identified for evaluation, including: (1) Comparison of current monitoring to regulatory requirements, (2) Spatial distribution, (3) Temporal sampling, (4) Analyte requirements, and (5) Reporting frequency and content. Optimization recommendations were made for fifteen of the eighteen groundwater units. The spatial evaluation resulted in recommendations to suspend sampling in 79 wells and add sampling at 16 wells. The temporal evaluation resulted in recommendations to reduce the number of well visits per year by 504. Analyte reductions were recommended at three groundwater units, with increases at three other units. Reporting frequency reductions were recommended for five units. Approximately $700,000 (direct dollars) of potential annualized cost savings were identified for these groundwater units, provided all recommendations are approved. The largest area of savings was associated with reducing the reporting frequency. The optimization approach has been presented to the EPA and South Carolina Department of Environmental Control (SCHDEC), with unit-specific recommendations approved for all five units presented. This approach can be expected to be highly successful for sites with rich historical data sets and where the requirements in regulatory monitoring plans can be negotiated. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Long-Term Stewardship at Hanford - 17023

The Hanford Site's Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program is responsible for 220 square miles of the Site's River Corridor, which includes 1,527 waste sites, 6 Manhattan Project Era production reactors that have been placed in interim safe storage, and 46 miles of Columbia River shoreline. More than 24,000 cleanup and historic documents have been identified, indexed, and tagged in the LTS records and document libraries. The LTS program, operated by the Mission Support Alliance, LLC (MSA) manages and provides surveillance and maintenance of facilities and institutional controls and all associated monitoring to ensure continued protectiveness of human health and the environment. Since 2010, through collaborative efforts with DOE and its prime contractors, land in 14 geographic areas and six cocooned reactor facilities were transitioned (mid-contract) from the River Corridor Closure Contractor to the LTS program. This accomplishment relied heavily on Site contractors and DOE working together to address challenges. Other stakeholders were informed of LTS progress through the Hanford LTS web site, presentations, and briefings. Hanford's LTS program is responsible for ensuring the protectiveness of cleanup remedies and the management of institutional controls once cleanup objectives have been achieved. LTS accomplishes this by adhering to post-cleanup requirements specified in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) cleanup decision documents. The LTS program conducted inspection and surveillance and maintenance (S and M) activities of the cocooned 105-F Reactor in October 2014 and the other five reactors in 2015 and 2016. Reactor entries and internal inspections typically are conducted at 5-year intervals to assess the condition of the structures and evaluate potential deterioration of the reactor core, shield walls, and roof. The cocooning process is designed to protect the reactor for 75 years while radioactive decay continues, ultimately making the structures safe for demolition and removal. The results of the recent 5-year inspections allowed DOE to negotiate an extended 10-year inspection cycle, which led to a $5 million avoidance in lifecycle inspection costs. Hanford's LTS program is successfully shifting from a program focused on transitioning land and waste sites to a program focused on data management and S and M activities for those buildings and waste sites within the program. This paper will highlight the accomplishments and collaborative efforts in addressing the challenges faced by Hanford's LTS program. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Biofuel Air Emissions Analysis

U.S. has goals to produce 3 billion gallons of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) annually by 2030, increasing to 35 billion gallons by 2050 to decarbonize the aviation sector. Meeting these production targets will require large number of biorefineries to be set up. However, ability to comply with federal air quality standards is prerequisite to being issued a construction permit. Negotiating the permitting process for a new biorefinery can be quite onerous and cost the investors significant time and money. Although there can be numerous reasons for delayed biorefinery construction, air permitting is fraught with pitfalls because the permitting process relies on precedence, which the future SAF biorefineries lack. NREL's Biofuel Air Emissions Analysis project is unique and innovative in terms of the tools, approaches, and analyses provided. NREL is the only national laboratory that is actively working at the intersection of Federal air quality regulations, emissions and air quality analysis across the supply chain, and process design. This project is focused on providing much needed data and analyses that address biorefinery air permitting. This project develops models and quantitative analyses and measures progress towards meeting air quality regulatory requirements. These models and methods are applied to analyze air permitting related to wastewater sludge to biofuel conversion pathways using hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL), impacts of HTL pathway on local and regional air quality including an assessment of health and equity impacts. In addition to filling research gaps, this project also disseminates the findings to the relevant stakeholders at BETO, other national labs, and regulatory agencies.

air quality↗
DOE OSTI2015

Achieving groundwater monitoring optimization at SRS: a core team process based on rigorous technical assessment - 15273

The optimization of groundwater monitoring at Savannah River Site (SRS) was achieved through a core team process based on the application of a comprehensive, technical evaluation of individual regulated groundwater units. Groundwater monitoring at SRS is required at dozens of waste sites and includes about 4,000 samples annually. The expected longevity of groundwater contamination and associated groundwater monitoring and reporting constitutes a significant long-term cost to the environmental management budget. The core team, consisting of representatives from the Department of Energy (DOE); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA); and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), recognized that monitoring needs for individual plumes evolve as remediation work progresses. The technical evaluation plan was generally based on the availability of many years of monitoring data. In addition, it was recognized that the well network, sampling frequency, and analytical suite had been the same for years and warranted evaluation to determine if the existing monitoring was meeting the current objectives. In order to systematically evaluate monitoring at eighteen different groundwater units, SRS developed a decision-logic analysis using flow sheets to address five areas of optimization identified with core team agreement, including: (1) current monitoring vs regulatory requirements, (2) spatial optimization, (3) temporal assessment, (4) analyte assessment, and (5) reporting assessment. The evaluation resulted in SRS proposing changes in the spatial, temporal, analyte, and reporting aspects of groundwater monitoring for fifteen of the eighteen individual groundwater units evaluated. Overall, these changes have resulted in annual savings of $370 K to date, with an additional $200 K in annual savings pending. Early and frequent core team deliberations helped ensure the success of this optimization effort. The technical evaluation was conducted after receiving core team buy-in for the goals and methods of the project. Technical evaluations for each unit were proposed to the regulators in unit-specific regulatory submittals. The technical justifications and core team decisions were all documented and implemented in accordance within the framework of the SRS Federal Facility Agreement or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Permit process. This optimization approach can be expected to be highly successful for sites with rich historical data sets and where the requirements in regulatory monitoring plans can be negotiated. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

The development and initial testing of the Ice Pig cleaning method for nuclear reprocessing plants - 15363

There are numerous situations throughout the nuclear industry where it would be advantageous to clean out enclosed systems, e.g. ducts and pipes, to remove sediments and radioactive contamination. However, conventional flushing methods result in the production of significant volumes of contaminated liquor. The wall Shear achieved with water flushing is insufficient to remove and carry dense deposits often found in nuclear facilities. Conventional mechanical pigs can be propelled through the duct by application of a driving medium such as compressed air or water. These are able to achieve very high wall shears, but can also get physically stuck where there is variation in the pipe / duct diameter or small radius bends. The field of application is best suited to straight constant diameter systems with no discontinuities such as Tee pieces, valves and in-pipe instrumentation. Driven by the desire to clean and displace radioactive materials from complex topology ducts and pipes, without the risk of having conventional pigs becoming lodged in a plant and coupled with the need to minimize effluent volumes, the UK Nuclear Industry led by Sellafield Limited (on behalf of the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority), has worked to demonstrate and underpin the use of the ice pigging technology for the nuclear industry. It is found that high ice fraction slurries flow as viscous liquids that exhibit a number of mechanical properties that offer much higher shear rates. The 'Ice Pig' exerts shear rates on pipe walls which are typically 1000 times greater than those achieved with water flowing at the same velocity. The 'Ice Pig' is able to negotiate almost any topology, flow through pipe networks of vastly differing diameter, through heat exchangers and in-line instrumentation etc. Experimental data and operational experience from other industries demonstrates that whilst there is high shear, the 'Ice Pig' does not damage the surface of the pipe wall. A further attractive characteristic of the 'Ice Pig' is that it eventually melts rendering it a simple effluent for processing by downstream processes. Due to the special nature of ice slurry, its unique rheological and physical characteristics, together with the complementary underpinning experimental work undertaken by Sellafield Limited enables the Ice Pigging process to move from an 'interesting' technology to one suitable for use by the nuclear industry for operations, Post Operational Clean Out (POCO) and decommissioning. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Using Salmon as a Bio-indicator of the Health of the Columbia River at Hanford - 15534

Assessing human, ecological, and cultural health and well-being on- and off-site is an important aspect of managing legacy wastes and environmental remediation on U.S. Department of Energy sites. Such an assessment is especially important at places such as Hanford because the Columbia River runs through the site. The Columbia River is central to the culture and economy of the northwest, especially to the Tribes. While a full range of other bio-indicators are used to determine the health of the river with respect to contaminants, salmon are the iconic, keystone species in the Columbia River of concern to the full range of regulators, managers, Tribes, and the public. A bio-monitoring plan that will assure the public and others that the activities of DOE are not adversely impacting the salmon populations in the Columbia River is critical for long term stewardship, both of the Hanford Site and the River and its resources Numerous factors affect salmon populations, including different life stages, habitat variables, and anthropogenic effects, including hexavalent chromium. Based on a literature review of the factors affecting populations, a conceptual model was developed for effects on salmon population stability. Salmon have a life history that includes laying eggs in gravel (redds) at the river bottom and then spending several life stages in fresh water and maturing in saltwater before they return to their natal streams or rivers to breed. All of these phases are potentially vulnerable to a range of natural and anthropogenic factors. Eggs in redds in the river bottom are vulnerable to water erosion, dewatering, oxygen levels, predators, and contaminants, while juveniles (fry, parr, smolts) are vulnerable to water currents, oxygen levels, predators, contaminants, and negotiating dams. When adults return to the river up to 7 years later, they face these same factors, as well as intense fishing pressures. The major factor affecting salmon populations may well be the fight to swim upstream, around dams, to reach traditional spawning grounds. While the data provided in this study relate to salmon at Hanford, the overall conceptual framework provides a paradigm for evaluating other sensitive indicators at other Department of Energy sites. The framework provides a method to insure the Tribes and public that the health and well-being of an important economic, cultural, and aesthetic species is being adequately addressed, and suggests the types of data needed to address the issue. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Remote-Handled TRU Storage Challenges at Sandia National Laboratories/ New Mexico - 16071

The events at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in February 2014 had a significant impact on the packaging, storage, and disposal options at Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (Sandia) as with other transuranic generator sites. In 2012, Sandia had identified accountable material for disposal, fresh and irradiated mixed oxide (MOX) and uranium oxide (UO{sub 2}), which had been used in experiments conducted in the 1970's and 1980's. During the 2012/2013 timeframe, discussions with WIPP determined the samples and experimental vessels qualified as remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste for disposal at WIPP. Sandia began discussions with WIPP to determine the process to repackage and characterize the material for disposal at WIPP in addition to obtain funding to complete the project. By January 2014, Sandia had contracted with Nuclear Waste Partnerships, LLC (NWP) to provide Central Characterization Program (CCP) certified visual examination (VE) and dose-to-curie (DTC) support to package and certify the accountable material/waste. Work began on February 3, 2014 with the arrival of two VE operators. On February 5, 2014, a salt truck caught fire in the underground and on February 14, 2014, the radiological release occurred at WIPP initiating a suspension of shipments. The length of the suspension was not known at the time. Sandia was only a couple of days into this long-term project, had signed a contract with NWP for support, and was still responsible for meeting earlier negotiated milestones. There were 37 parent containers which included experimental vessels from 3 to 10 feet long and unused material pieces. The original plan was to package each of the 37 parent containers separately, but several issues, including the suspension of shipments, made it imperative that a new path forward be developed. Because space is limited in the Auxiliary Hot Cell Facility (AHCF), the storage configuration for criticality safety and material-at-risk was of the highest importance. Therefore, packaging in the fewest number of containers without exceeding WIPP limits, keeping the accountable items together, and not violating any safety basis requirements was Sandia's goal. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Sustainable Remediation of Radionuclides By a Common Sense Approach to Enhanced Attenuation - 16441

Development of in situ and relatively passive remedies for treatment of groundwater contaminated by metals and radionuclides is becoming more important because of the difficulty and cost - both to the environment and financially -- of removing these types of contaminants from the subsurface by pump-and-treat or excavation. In situ technologies rely on reactions that tend to remove contaminants from groundwater by partitioning them to solid phases in the aquifer. Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) relies solely on natural reactions to achieve remedial goals. Enhanced attenuation (EA) uses engineered approaches to supplement remediation when MNA is not sufficient to meet remedial goals. Both approaches leave contaminants in the subsurface and require a high burden of proof that contaminants will not be mobilized and become a risk in the future. Proof of the sustained effectiveness of an EA remedy is made much easier by strategic design. In multi-contaminant plumes, it is important to prioritize contaminants according to the risk they pose, with the recognition that one remedy rarely treats all contaminants. The goal for the engineered portion of the remedy should be maximum risk reduction with minimal engineering. Natural attenuation or negotiated alternate concentration levels will often allow low risk contaminants to go untreated. Whenever possible, the remedy should be consistent with the geochemical evolution of the waste site, insuring that the treated immobilized contaminants are likely to remain relatively immobile for long time frames. Finally, use what nature provides geologically, hydrologically, geochemically, or microbiologically in the remedy design. One of the impediments faced by waste site managers in implementing EA remedies is paralysis by perceived complexity. There are things that must be known to design an effective EA remedy, but there is always the temptation to know everything to eliminate the possibility of failure. Furthermore, there are plenty of people warning of failure if all is not known and they are usually willing to help the design team know all, for a price. Yet, the price of trying to eliminate all risk is never implementing an innovative remedy. All parties involved -- scientists/engineers, waste site managers, regulators and stakeholders must assume some degree of risk to deploy an EA remedy. If all parties are to assume some risk, then trust built through close communication from the start is required. The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management has funded an applied field research initiative for several years focused, in part, on developing EA remedies for metals and radionuclides using these guiding principles. This approach to EA remedies grew out of developing and deploying a remediation strategy to replace a pump-and-treat system at the F-Area Seepage Basins on the Savannah River Site. The pump-and-treat system was energy intensive, produced several thousand cubic feet of solid radioactive waste per year, and cost $ 1 million per month to operate. The EA remedy that replaced the pump-and-treat is energy efficient, produces no waste, and costs approximately $1 million per year to maintain. At the F-Area Seepage Basins approximately 7 billion liters of low level radioactive waste solutions were disposed in three unlined basins resulting in contaminated groundwater containing various radionuclides and other contaminants. The primary contaminants of concern are tritium, strontium-90, uranium, and iodine-129. Other key features of the contaminant plume are its acidic nature with pH values as low as 3.2, its vertical stratification in the water table aquifer, and the tendency of the most contaminated portions to follow troughs in the top of the clay separating the upper aquifer zone from the lower aquifer zone. The geology was exploited by installing a funnel-and-gate system into the clay with the barrier portion blocking contaminant flow paths in the troughs in the clay. This forces the most contaminated water to flow through the gates where it encounters an in situ treatment zone created by periodic injections of alkaline solution. The flux of tritium has been reduced significantly by the barrier walls. Strontium-90 and uranium are treated by enhanced sorption in the circum-neutral pH treatment zone, consistent with natural geochemical evolution of the waste site from acidic to more neutral pH. An additional in situ treatment zone was created up-gradient of the one of the gates to treat iodine-129. Sub-micrometer diameter silver chloride particles were injected into the aquifer by direct push methods to create the treatment zone. In the laboratory and in a field pilot test the poorly soluble silver chloride particles reacted with iodide to form much less soluble silver iodide. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the silver chloride is ongoing. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Innovative Approach for Technetium-99 Disposal Reduces Operational Impacts - 16460

The Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) on the Oak Ridge Reservation began receiving and disposing waste with elevated technetium-99 (Tc-99) activities on November 11, 2013. Prior to receipt, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation expressed concerns about potential releases of this highly mobile radionuclide into the environment and requested additional safeguards to minimize potential releases. Several additional requirements were negotiated to address these concerns and allow this waste lot to be safely disposed at EMWMF. Because of the 130-cm (51-inch) annual average precipitation at the landfill, the potential release of Tc-99 (above the release criterion) to surface water during the EMWMF water management activities was of the greatest concern. The EMWMF Operations staff developed an innovative approach to resolve regulator concerns regarding disposal of low-level waste containing elevated levels of Tc-99 at EMWMF. This approach minimized the spread of contamination and the generation of water that contacted the Tc-99 waste. Lessons learned and recommendations are being implemented for the next, more challenging elevated Tc-99 waste from the K-27 Building, currently scheduled for early 2016. These lessons learned are also applicable to other sites looking to minimize operational impacts from disposal of waste with elevated activities of Tc-99 or other highly mobile contaminants. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Disposition of Chicago Pile 5 (CP-5) Converter Tubes in the 10-160B Cask - 16632

This paper will focus on the unique characterization, packaging, and transportation issues associated with the disposition of the two CP-5 Converter Tube assemblies from Argonne National Laboratory. The converter tubes were constructed of combinations of HEU and alloys of zirconium, and were part of the original research facilities attached to the CP-5 reactor during operating evolutions. These assemblies were heavily irradiated during their operational lifetime, and were segregated from the balance of irradiated test specimens when the reactor was deactivated and slated for Decontamination and Demolition (D and D). In addition, the substantial contribution of fissile material to the assemblies' inventory made the potential disposition pathways extremely challenging. As a result, these items became part of Argonne's legacy 'nuclear footprint', and were added to the Nuclear Footprint Reduction Project scope for disposition. The Project was responsible for the size reduction and characterization of these items, as well as the ultimate disposition. After negotiating a disposal pathway for these tubes, there were significant transportation issues that required a small team to overcome, in order to successfully ship these items to the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The Project team at Argonne, technical support from transportation specialists, licensing support from the 10-160B license owner, the Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) Packaging Certification Team (PCT, and the DOE EM-33 staff contributed to license and safety analysis report amendments that eventually authorized the shipment of the material. The paper will identify the organizations, and the specific actions, required to successfully make three 'one of a kind' shipments of irradiated test specimen material. This will include the unique packaging configurations, contents modification for the cask license (via the Amendment process), criticality evaluations, and associated review and approval processes. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

96 Park Way Vicinity Property Remediation Challenges at the FUSRAP Maywood Superfund Site, Maywood, New Jersey - 19216

The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Maywood Superfund Site (FMSS), 'the Project,' was transferred to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in 1997. Shortly thereafter, USACE initiated FUSRAP remediation efforts on 24 commercial and residential properties and, in addition, the Project team evaluated properties previously addressed at the FMSS. One of those properties was located at 96 Park Way in Rochelle Park, New Jersey. The property history included removal of contaminated soil in 1985 by the US Department of Energy (US DOE). Soil sampling performed after removal of contaminated soil indicated the cleanup met applicable guidelines in place at the time. A Five-Year Review of the FMSS conducted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in 2009 found that 96 Park Way did not meet the current residential cleanup levels for the site and recommended additional study and remediation, if warranted. The current levels are established in the approved cleanup plan for the FMSS (known as the Record of Decision [ROD]) issued in 2003. Based on USEPA's recommendation, USACE carefully reviewed all available records for the property. The review considered the differences between the soil cleanup standards used in the 1980's and the 2003 ROD standards, which are slightly more restrictive for deeper soils. The USACE conducted detailed field studies at 96 Park Way in 2014-15 to address the USEPA findings. This work included gamma walkover surveys and soil sampling to depths of approximately 3.5 meters. The results identified three discrete areas at depth that did not meet the ROD residential soil cleanup standard: two areas bordering an adjacent highway (New Jersey Route 17) and one along railroad property adjacent to the site. To address these areas, soil removal actions were conducted in 2016-17. The principal challenge with construction, engineering, and community relations was the property housed two sensitive facilities: a long-term assisted care living facility and a short-term post-surgery rehabilitation center. The operations at these facilities could not be interrupted in any way during FUSRAP activities. The three FUSRAP-impacted areas were addressed and restored in coordination with the USEPA, property management, and local officials. Site restoration presented a particular challenge well after the remedial action was completed, as the property owner and the government disagreed on the level of restoration. Those negotiations are ongoing as of this writing. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

International Standards as Critical Enablers to Development and Diffusion of D and D Technologies - 19372

The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (DOE EM) has taken a leading role in investing in the research and development (R and D) of critical technologies to support the safe and efficient decommissioning of legacy nuclear facilities. In order to facilitate the complex-wide deployment and adoption of those technologies from the laboratory to end users, and to maximize return on investment of government-sponsored R and D projects, DOE EM proactively solicits and evaluates initiatives intended to enhance achievement of these goals. One such case study emerged and involved the successful deployment of an intumescent fixative technology in support of the SRS 235-F PuFF Facility Risk Reduction Program. A detailed analysis confirmed that a critical enabler and key contributor to this effort was a deliberate, methodical approach to leverage an international, consensus-based standards organization from the onset. There is a substantial body of literature that supports the crucial role of standards in technology programs across all phases of development - from concept, to deployment, to large-scale diffusion - in other industries. Formal standards are the result of a consensual negotiation process carried out by producers, regulators, end users and other interested stakeholders in a voluntary process within standardization organizations (WTO, 2011). Therefore, standard setting is often viewed as a self-regulatory process (Gupta and Lad, 1983), and can often yield better acceptance of technologies in certain industries, particularly if those standards are further referenced in government directives and regulations. This analysis connects several theoretical concepts: information asymmetry, risk adverse markets, and technology diffusion. It is complimented by some initial, rudimentary survey results in a burgeoning academic study conducted by the author, and reinforced by the aforementioned case study on the deployment of a fixative technology at the SRS 235-F PuFF Facility. The importance of managing a holistic technology development program that focuses on not just the technical aspects of the technology itself, but the critical enablers as well, is emphasized. This effort has direct application to potentially enhancing DOE EM technology development programs across the complex. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗