SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2021

A Bi-Layer Dense/Porous Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Enhanced Lithium-Metal Stability

Due to its high theoretical capacity and low electrochemical potential, lithium metal is a highly investigated anode for next-generation high-energy batteries. However, the unstable chemical and topographical heterogeneous surface of lithium gives rise to safety and efficiency concerns that prevent it from being utilized in practical applications. Exposure to electrolyte leads to non-uniform, mixed organic-inorganic solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation, starting a cascading to non-uniform flux distribution, consumption of active materials, and dendrite growth. The SEI is the key feature that will lead to harnessing the capabilities possible with lithium metal. In this work, the formation of a closed-host bi-layer solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) improves the stability of lithium anode. This is successfully realized by forming an interconnected porous LiF-rich artificial SEI in contact with Li metal, and a dense, stable in-situ formed upper layer SEI. The porous layer increases the number of Li/LiF interfaces, which reduces local volume fluctuations and improves Li+ diffusion along these interfaces. Additionally, the tortuous porous structure guides uniform Li+ flux distribution and mechanically suppresses dendrite propagation. The dense upper layer of the SEI accomplishes a closed-host design through reaction with LiNO3 additive and prevents continuous consumption of active materials seen without the additive included in the electrolyte. The duality of a dense top layer with porous bottom layer led to extended cycle life and improved rate performance, evidenced with symmetric cell testing, as well as full cell testing paired with sulfur and LiFePO4 (LFP) cathodes. This work is a good example of a rational design of the SEI, based on comprehensive consideration of various critical factors to improve Li-metal anode stability, and highlights a new pathway to improve cycling and rate performances of Li metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2022

Combined Effects of Uniform Applied Pressure and Electrolyte Additives in Lithium-Metal Batteries

The development of lithium-metal batteries with good performance and long lifetimes requires fundamental insight into the mechanisms underlying performance improvements from individual design strategies and the interactions between multiple improvement approaches. Here, in this work, we investigated the individual and combined effects of applied pressure and a LiAsF 6 electrolyte additive on the performance of anode-free lithium-metal batteries; we employed various pressure application methods, which vary both in magnitude and uniformity. Both approaches individually improve cycling performance of anode-free lithium-metal batteries. Pressure increases the cycling efficiency at both the anode and cathode by promoting improved morphologies, while the LiAsF 6 additive additionally improves performance at the anode by enhancing the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) properties. The combination of uniform applied pressure and a LiAsF 6 electrolyte additive produces lithium-metal batteries with cycling performance higher than can be achieved with either approach alone. This additional performance improvement is able to be realized due to the complementary rather than competitive nature of the mechanisms underlying applied pressure (lithium morphology) and electrolyte additives (SEI properties). Our results highlight the importance of moving beyond the investigation of isolated design strategies and demonstrate that superior cycling can be achieved by combining multiple approaches.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2025

The detrimental ratio ( ρ ): A critical metric complementing coulombic loss for long calendar-life silicon-based lithium-ion batteries

Silicon (Si) is a promising high-capacity anode in lithium-ion batteries but suffers from chronic chemical degradation and capacity fading during calendar aging, greatly hindering its automobile applications. Electrolyte engineering currently relies on conventional evaluation criteria of reducing coulombic consumption, which implicitly presume its equivalence to irreversible capacity loss and complicates battery development. Here, we introduce the detrimental ratio p to quantify the fraction of parasitic species that permanently degrades active material. This metric is independent and crucially complements total coulombic consumption for accurate performance evaluation. We systematically investigate multiple electrolyte formulations using high-precision leakage current measurements, open-circuit-voltage experiments, and post-mortem characterizations. Although some electrolytes exhibit similarly low coulombic consumption, they diverge significantly incapacity retention and p. Especially, dimethyl-carbonate-based localized-high concentration electrolyte can synergically achieve low coulombic consumption and detrimental ratio p during calendar aging, owing to its chemically inert and structurally resilient solidelectrolyte interface with minimal isolated Si material. By contrast, increasing fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) additive content suppresses electrolyte breakdown but suffers aggravated chemical degradation of more LixSi isolation for irreversible capacity loss with arising p. This study critically reveals that the chemistry-characteristic detrimental ratio p establishes physically informed performance evaluation to pave the way for accelerating battery development.

Calendar aging↗

DOE OSTI2024

High voltage electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries with micro-sized silicon anodes

Abstract Micro-sized silicon anodes can significantly increase the energy density of lithium-ion batteries with low cost. However, the large silicon volume changes during cycling cause cracks for both organic-inorganic interphases and silicon particles. The liquid electrolytes further penetrate the cracked silicon particles and reform the interphases, resulting in huge electrode swelling and quick capacity decay. Here we resolve these challenges by designing a high-voltage electrolyte that forms silicon-phobic interphases with weak bonding to lithium-silicon alloys. The designed electrolyte enables micro-sized silicon anodes (5 µm, 4.1 mAh cm −2 ) to achieve a Coulombic efficiency of 99.8% and capacity of 2175 mAh g −1 for >250 cycles and enable 100 mAh LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 pouch full cells to deliver a high capacity of 172 mAh g −1 for 120 cycles with Coulombic efficiency of >99.9%. The high-voltage electrolytes that are capable of forming silicon-phobic interphases pave new ways for the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries using micro-sized silicon anodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2025

Examples of X-Ray Characterization Techniques in Energy Storage Research

Lithium-ion batteries have revolutionized the portable electronics and transportation sectors. Their performance is often critically dependent on the crystal structures of the anode and cathode electrode materials, which must enable the transport and reversible storage of lithium ions into and out of the lattice. Because lithium is a low-Z element, characterization of materials for lithium-ion batteries can be particularly challenging. Regardless, X-ray techniques enable analysis of material structures to better understand how battery materials perform and degrade, particularly when combined with other materials characterization and electrochemical characterization techniques. While X-ray techniques are most often used in battery research for phase identification of crystal structures, X-ray characterization techniques are also used for a wide variety of other purposes. I will discuss several examples from my research with various collaborators on several projects that highlight the impact that X-ray characterization techniques can have on battery research. The first example will focus on low-temperature microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis of vanadium-doped LiFePO4 cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. (1,2) Through a combination of electrochemical and materials characterization, we determined that low temperature synthesis resulted in metastable phases that enabled incorporation of higher dopant levels than resulting from high-temperature synthesis of thermodynamically stable phases. Rietveld refinement of X-ray diffraction data enabled understanding of how lattice parameters changed with doping levels and synthesis temperature. X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy enabled understanding of the vanadium and iron oxidation states to confirm how vacancies in the structure caused by doping were charge compensated. This was important to understand because the literature suggests doping can improve LiFePO4 electrical conductivity, which improves battery charge and discharge rates. The second example will focus on understanding residual strain in lithium metal anodes. Lithium-ion batteries typically use graphite anodes, but the charge-storage capacity can be theoretically improved ~10x by using lithium metal as the anode material instead. However, lithium anodes suffer from growth of high-aspect-ratio features, such as dendrites, that can pierce nanoporous polymer separators and lead to short circuits and fires. External pressure is commonly applied to cells to enable better morphological control. We hypothesized that applied pressure may promote strain and possibly work hardening during electrochemical cycling, which motivated us to look for evidence of residual strain in lithium metal cycled under applied pressure using X-ray diffraction and sin2(..psi..) analysis. We found that lithium electrodeposited under high pressure exhibited in-plane compressive strain and that that lithium electrodeposited under low pressure did not. (3) The residual strain that accompanies electrodeposition under high pressure may lead to work hardening, which may explain how a soft metal like lithium can puncture separators and why higher pressure does not always decrease short circuits. (4-6) References: 1) Harrison, K. L.; Manthiram, A. Microwave-Assisted Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Metastable LiFe1- x (VO) x PO4 Cathodes. Inorganic chemistry 2011, 50(8), 3613-3620. 2) Harrison, K. L.; Bridges, C. A.; Paranthaman, M. P.; Segre, C. U.; Katsoudas, J.; Maroni, V. A.; Idrobo, J. C.; Goodenough, J. B.; Manthiram, A. Temperature Dependence of Aliovalent-Vanadium Doping in LiFePO4 Cathodes. Chemistry of Materials 2013, 25(5), 768-781. 3) Rodriguez, M. A.; Harrison, K. L.; Goriparti, S.; Griego, J. J.; Boyce, B. L.; Perdue, B. R. Use of a Be-Dome Holder for Texture and Strain Characterization of Li Metal Thin Films via Sin2 (..psi..) Methodology. Powder Diffraction 2020, 35(2), 89-97. 4) Jungjohann, K. L.; Gannon, R. N.; Goriparti, S.; Randolph, S. J.; Merrill, L. C.; Johnson, D. C.; Zavadil, K. R.; Harris, S. J.; Harrison, K. L. Cryogenic Laser Ablation Reveals Short-Circuit Mechanism in Lithium Metal Batteries. ACS Energy Letters 2021, 6(6), 2138-2144. 5) Harrison, K. L.; Merrill, L. C.; Long, D. M.; Randolph, S. J.; Goriparti, S.; Christian, J.; Warren, B.; Roberts, S. A.; Harris, S. J.; Perry, D. L. Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Reveals That Applied Pressure Promotes Short Circuits in Li Batteries. Iscience 2021, 24(12). 6) Harrison, K. L.; Goriparti, S.; Merrill, L. C.; Long, D. M.; Warren, B.; Roberts, S. A.; Perdue, B. R.; Casias, Z.; Cuillier, P.; Boyce, B. L. Effects of Applied Interfacial Pressure on Li-Metal Cycling Performance and Morphology in 4 M LiFSI in DME. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13(27), 31668-31679.

batteries↗

DOE OSTI2022

Nanoscale Three-Dimensional Imaging of Degradation in Composite Si-Containing Anodes

The use of silicon (Si) in next-generation lithium-ion battery (LIB) anodes has the potential to dramatically improve electrochemical performance over current LIB graphite (Gr) anodes, due to silicon’s higher specific capacity.1 However, widespread implementation of Si-containing anodes is inhibited by issues such as significant Si volume expansion during lithiation and an unstable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), resulting in unreliable performance and poor cycle life. Currently, composite anodes with both Si and graphite active materials are used to increase capacity and mitigate some of the limitations associated with Si. In composite electrodes with a heterogeneous distribution of components with varying electrical properties (including Si, Gr, conductive carbon additive, and binder), it is important to understand the local distribution of each component to correlate with electrochemical processes, particularly localized degradation and heterogeneous aging, and to optimize performance. To investigate Si-containing composite anodes in the nanoscale, we use scanning spreading resistance microscopy (SSRM), a form of scanning probe microscopy (SPM) that probes local electronic resistivity. By examining the intrinsic electronic resistivity contrast between the anode components, separate phases can be distinguished and understood within the composite structure.2 This work studies the effect of electrochemical cycling in two different electrolytes on component distribution and aging by comparing the electrical and structural evolution of composite Si-graphite electrodes and SEI before and after charge-discharge cycling. 1. W. J. Zhang. A review of the electrochemical performance of alloy anodes for lithium-ion batteries J. Power Sources 196 13–24 (2011). 2. C. Stetson, Z. Huey, A. Downard, Z. Li, B. To, A. Zakutayev, C.-S. Jiang, M. Al-Jassim, D. Finegan, S.-D. Han and S. DeCaluwe: Three-Dimensional Mapping of Resistivity and Microstructure of Composite Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano Letters Accepted (2020).

ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Improved Performance of Silicon-Containing Anodes with Organic Solvent-Solubilized Lithium Nitrate

Three different organic solvents (dimethylacetamide (DMAc), dimethylformamide (DMF), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)) were used to improve the solubility of LiNO 3 in a standard carbonate-based electrolyte with lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) as the salt. Together, the LiDFOB and organic-solvent solubilized LiNO 3 preferentially reduce on the surface of silicon-containing anodes to create an SEI rich in oxalates, nitrate decomposition species, and B-F species. The improved stability of the SEI throughout the first 100 cycles results in silicon and silicon/graphite composite anodes with better capacity retention than observed with standard electrolytes or fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) containing electrolytes. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the use of non-traditional electrolyte solvents in the improvement and optimization of lithium ion-battery electrolytes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2023

Utilizing Conjugated Imine Polymers to Stabilize Nanoparticle Silicon Anodes

Silicon anodes provide a compelling route towards delivering high-capacity lithium-ion batteries, however they are notoriously difficult to stabilize in conventional liquid electrolytes that are compatible with high performance cathodes. Furthermore, the drastic changes in volume that occur as silicon is lithiated and delithiated can lead to rapid cell failure and novel polymeric binders are known to help mitigate mechanical issues. We have recently developed a novel method to synthesize the conjugated polymer phenylmethylimine (polyPMI) using an imine metathesis reaction. We have demonstrated that this polymer can be used to stabilize silicon nanoparticles to produce a composite lithium-ion battery anode that is electrochemically stable for hundreds of lithiation and delithiation cycles with a Coulombic efficiency that is greater than 99.95% in a traditional carbonate liquid electrolyte. This work covers the structure and properties of polyPMI within the context of the unique mechanical and electrochemical requirements of nanoparticle silicon anodes. The electrochemical behavior of this polymer also offers new opportunities as an organic lithium-coordinating material that can be used to stabilize a variety of other battery electrodes. More broadly, we posit that this solution-processed, ionically conductive, and electronically conductive polymer is applicable for a variety of energy storage and conversion technologies. Finally, this work demonstrates how this novel polymer chemistry provides additional opportunities for tuning electrode architecture to target high energy full cells.

conjugated polymers↗

DOE OSTI2020

Enhanced Interfacial Stability of Si Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries via Surface SiO2 Coating

Silicon is a promising alloying anode for lithium-ion batteries owing to its high capacity and low cost. However, its use has been hampered by mechanical failure arising from the large volume change upon cycling and by an insufficiently stable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). SEI formation depends on the Si surface, which is often an oxide (SiO x ). In this study we compare three different Si surfaces using Si wafers: 1.3 nm native SiO x , 1.4 nm thermally grown SiO2, and a SiOx-free surface. The oxide-free surface showed the worst electrochemical performance, never exceeding 94% Coulombic efficiency (CE). Furthermore, it also exhibited the thickest SEI and the highest overpotential for lithiation, which correlated with uninhibited electrolyte reduction and the incorporation of P-F species into the SEI. The oxide-coated surfaces performed significantly better, demonstrating a CE above 99% beyond the second cycle, low overpotential for lithiation, and a thinner and more stable SEI. The oxides lower the onset potential for electrolyte reduction, and yield an SEI with fewer P-F species. However, it was found that the CE with the native oxide surface decays from the fifth cycle onwards and correlates with a resurgence of electrolyte reduction. A 1-2 nm thermal SiO 2 coating is optimum for achieving a stable SEI that minimizes side reactions and sustains efficient cycling.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2021

Lithium substituted poly(amic acid) as a water-soluble anode binder for high-temperature pre-lithiation

Multifunctional binders hold great promise in advanced electrode designs for both fundamental research and practical utilization of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The reactions between Si/SiO x -dominated anodes with lithium are expected to be exothermic in principle, while the thermal tolerance along with the volume change makes high-temperature binders attractive for large scale roll-to-roll manufacturing. For instance, if a high temperature binder is also water soluble, it can be compatible with the current graphite-based anode manufacturing process. In this work, we present a water-soluble poly(amic acid)-based binder, which can withstand high temperature for industrial pre-lithiation process and effectively hold active materials together during repeated charge and discharge cycles. This lithium substituted poly(amic acid) binder (denoted as Li-Pa) can serve as a drop-in replacement for environmentally friendly electrode fabrication in large scale by providing aqueous solubility, exceptional thermal stability and mechanical flexibility.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2023

Nanoparticle Surface Passivation Strategies to Improve the Cycle and Calendar Lifetime of Silicon Anodes in Standard Carbonate Electrolytes

Silicon Lithium alloys (SiLix) as the anode active material in a Li-Ion battery configuration offer possible energy densities paralleled only by pure lithium metal. However, the extreme mechanical deformation of alloying and dealloying SiLix through charge/discharge cycles paired with the highly reactive interface of SiLix which generates an interfacial layer known as the solid-electrolyte-interphase are large barriers to industrial adoption of high-silicon-content negative electrodes. Moreover, these challenges are magnified when the thickness of the electrode is brought to relevant levels (>3 mg/cm2). Here, I describe our efforts to address these challenges by utilizing single-nanometer-scale silicon nanoparticles to reduce capacity fade related to mechanical failure. I also detail our efforts to modify the silicon surface through interfacial chemical engineering strategies to passivate the silicon surface. This development three different majority silicon electrodes (50-74 wt%) to achieve cycle capacity retention of greater than 73% through 1000 charge/discharge cycles against capacity-matched NMC-based cathodes and calendar lifetimes greater than one year. This research is a part of the multi-national lab Silicon Consortium Project.

anodes↗

DOE OSTI2022

Electrodes, lithium-ion batteries, and methods of making and using same

Described herein are improved composite anodes and lithium-ion batteries made therefrom. Further described are methods of making and using the improved anodes and batteries. In general, the anodes include a porous composite having a plurality of agglomerated nanocomposites. At least one of the plurality of agglomerated nanocomposites is formed from a dendritic particle, which is a three-dimensional, randomly-ordered assembly of nanoparticles of an electrically conducting material and a plurality of discrete non-porous nanoparticles of a non-carbon Group 4A element or mixture thereof disposed on a surface of the dendritic particle. At least one nanocomposite of the plurality of agglomerated nanocomposites has at least a portion of its dendritic particle in electrical communication with at least a portion of a dendritic particle of an adjacent nanocomposite in the plurality of agglomerated nanocomposites.

Yushin, Gleb↗

DOE OSTI2022

Electrodes, lithium-ion batteries, and methods of making and using same

Yushin, Gleb↗

DOE OSTI2023

Electrodes, lithium-ion batteries, and methods of making and using same

Yushin, Gleb↗

DOE OSTI2023

Electrodes, lithium-ion batteries, and methods of making and using same

Yushin, Gleb↗

DOE OSTI2022

Quantifying Lithium Ion Exchange in Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) on Graphite Anode Surfaces

Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) has been identified as the most important and least understood component in lithium-ion batteries. Despite extensive studies in the past two decades, a few mysteries remain: what is the chemical form of and degree of mobility of Li + in the interphase? What fraction of Li + is permanently immobilized in the SEI, while the rest are still able to participate in the cell reactions via the ion-exchange process with Li + in the electrolyte? This study attempted to answer, in part, these questions by using 6 Li and 7 Li-isotopes to label SEIs and electrolytes, and then quantifying the distribution of permanently immobilized and ion-exchangeable Li + with solid-state NMR and ToF-SIMS. The results showed that the majority of Li + were exchanged after one SEI formation cycle, and a complete exchange after 25 cycles. Ion exchange by diffusion based on concentration gradient in the absence of applied potential also occurred simultaneously. This knowledge will provide a foundation for not only understanding but also designing better SEIs for future battery chemistries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2023

A reactive wetting strategy improves lithium metal reversibility

The cycling of lithium metal (Li 0 ) anode is often accompanied by irregular lithium plating/stripping, leading to poor Li 0 reversibility, and posing a grand challenge to constructing reliable Li 0 batteries. Hereby, we report a reactive wetting strategy to enable conformal and highly reversible Li 0 plating/stripping through a lithium-reactive substrate. In this study, the reactive wetting, smooth nucleation, and conformal growth behaviors of Li 0 are visualized through in-situ transmission electron microscopy, ex-situ scanning electron microscope, and in-situ optical microscope characterizations. Based on the reactive wetting substrate, high average Coulombic efficiencies (99.0% at 0.5 mA cm -2 for 400 cycles) are realized for Li 0 anodes. By pre-plating Li 0 into the reactive wetting substrate as anodes and leveraging LiFePO 4 as cathodes, high capacity retention (76.0% after 200 cycles in low N/P ratio conditions) is also achieved in the as-constructed Li 0 full cells. This work establishes a fundamental understanding of reactive wetting dynamics of Li 0 and provides a drop-in solution to improving Li 0 reversibility.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2026

Spinel high-entropy oxides (FeNiCrMnZnX) 3 O 4 (X = Al, mg) as anode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries

To address the high cost, cobalt dependency, and resource constraints typical of conventional high-entropy oxide (HEO) anodes, this study reports the successful synthesis of two Co-free, six-component spinel-type HEOs(FeNiCrMnZnAl) 3 O 4 (HEO-Al) and (FeNiCrMnZnMg) 3 O 4 (HEO-Mg), via a sol-gel method. The distinct effects of Al 3+ and Mg 2+ incorporation on the electrochemical performance and lithium storage kinetics were systematically investigated. XRD, Raman, and TEM characterizations confirm that both materials possess a pure spinel phase, uniform particle size, and homogeneous elemental distribution. Notably, electrochemical evaluations reveal that HEO-Al delivers a superior reversible capacity of 480.7 mAh g −1 after 100 cycles at 0.1 A g −1 , and maintains 354.5 mAh g −1 after 1000 long-term cycles at 1 A g −1 , significantly outperforming HEO-Mg. Kinetic analysis indicates that HEO-Al exhibits lower charge transfer resistance, a higher Li + diffusion coefficient, and a pseudocapacitive contribution of up to 82%. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate that Al substitution effectively optimizes the structural stability and lithium storage kinetics of Co-free HEOs, providing a viable strategy for designing low-cost, highly stable HEO anode systems.

Anode materials↗