Effect of fuels and fuel-nozzle characteristics on performance of an annular combustor at simulated altitude conditions
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Methods of introducing and distributing air and fuel in turbojet-engine combustors were evaluated with two fuels, AN-F-32 and AN-F-58. Investigations were made with two single-annulus liners in a one-quarter sector of a 25 1/2-inch-diameter turbojet combustor. Altitude performance data for these combustors are compared with existing data for a production-model double-annulus combustor. Altitude operating limits and combustion efficiencies of both single-annulus combustors were considerably higher than those of the double-annulus combustor; combustion efficiencies were insensitive to changes in fuel-air ratio.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An investigation was made comparing the performance of JFC-2 fuel and unleaded, clear gasoline in a 3000-pound-thrust turbojet engine. The JFC-2 fuel was a blend of percent diesel fuel and 25 percent aviation gasoline. Engine combustion efficiency was equal to that obtained with gasoline at rated engine speed and altitudes up to 35,000 feet, but at lower engine speeds or at higher altitudes the JFC-2 fuel gave lower combustion efficiency. No discernible difference was obtained in starting or low-speed combustiion blow-out characteristics of the two fuels. Turbine-discharge radial temperature profiles were nearly the same at altitudes up to 35,000 feet.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.