SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The outlook for aviation fuels through the turn of the century is briefly discussed and the general objectives of the NASA Lewis Alternative Aviation Fuels Research Project are outlined. The NASA program involves the evaluation of potential characteristics of future jet aircraft fuels, the determination of the effects of those fuels on engine and fuel system components, and the development of a component technology to use those fuels.
The transient processes involving lean blowout (LBO) in a RQL combustor such as the single cup combustor in the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program (NJFCP) referee rig are simulated with the reduced mechanisms based on Hybrid Chemistry for two different fuels, Cat-A2 and Cat-C1. Cat-A2 fuel is Jet-A with average or nominal properties based on a survey of the Petroleum Quality Information System database. The Cat-C1, an alternative jet fuel, is a GEVO alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) fuel composed almost entirely of two highly-branched C12 and C16 iso-paraffins. Experiments conducted in the NJFCP referee rig established a stable flame at an equivalence ratio of 0.096 (the near LBO condition) as the starting condition for LBO tests performed with all Category A and C fuels. Simulations of the approach to LBO verify that a stable flame is established at the near-LBO condition for each fuel before reducing fuel flow rate (and thus equivalence ratio) in a step-wise manner. At each new equivalence ratio, the global heat release rate and total fuel evaporation time histories are monitored to verify a new stable flame condition has been established before performing the next reduction in equivalence ratio until the flame is approaching the blowout. Main conclusions are threefold: (1) For Cat-C1 fuel the equivalence ratio for LBO is around 0.087. (2) For Cat-A2 fuel the equivalence ratio for LBO is either 0.082 or 0.078 depended on the time span of equivalence ratio of 0.085. (3) The averaged difference from LES on LBO for Cat-C1 relative to Cat-A2 is 8.75% versus 7.8% from the experimental data.
In support of the Vehicle Technology Office’s goal for future U.S. economic growth, the Advanced Engine and Fuel Technologies Program focuses early-stage research and development on improving the understanding of combustion processes, fuel properties, and emissions control technologies, generating knowledge and insight necessary for industry to develop the next generation of engines and fuels for the efficient, cost-effective, and secure transportation of people and goods across America.
Highly branched iso-alkanes are an important class of hydrocarbons found in conventional petroleum-derived and alternative renewable fuels used for combustion applications. Recognizing that chemical kinetics for most of these iso-alkanes, especially at low-to-intermediate temperatures, has not been well studied, an experimental and modeling investigation of two selected iso-alkanes, iso-octane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane, iC8) and iso-dodecane (2,2,4,6,6-pentamethylheptane, iC12), is conducted to understand the fuel molecular structure effect on their autoignition characteristics. Using a rapid compression machine (RCM), the ignition responses of iC8 and iC12 at varying pressures, temperatures, and equivalence ratios are characterized and compared. The newly-acquired experimental ignition delay times have been compared with the literature RCM and shock tube data, demonstrating the complementary nature of the current dataset. Further comparison of the experimental pressure traces and ignition delay times illustrates the reactivity crossover between iC8 and iC12. Namely, there exists a temperature window in the negative temperature coefficient regime within which iC12 is less reactive than iC8, but iC12 becomes more reactive outside this temperature window. Furthermore, a chemical kinetic model of iso-alkanes including both iC8 and iC12 is developed. Simulated results using this model are then compared to the experimental data obtained in this study and available in the literature, showing its ability to predict the experimental trends. Chemical kinetic analyses have also been conducted to identify the important reaction pathways controlling autoignition at varying conditions, and to elucidate the underlying mechanism leading to different reactivity trends between iC8 and iC12.
The Launch Alaska Transportation and Energy Accelerator (LATEA), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Technology Commercialization’s Energy Program for Innovation Clusters (EPIC),advanced deployment of innovative and efficient transportation and energy technology in Alaska from October 2021 through June 2025. The project was designed to leverage Launch Alaska’s accelerator model to identify, recruit, and support transportation technology companies with novel solutions to market needs while building the stakeholder networks, demonstration opportunities, and institutional capacity necessary to accelerate commercialization in one of the most challenging operating environments in the United States.
This paper offers a first look at some recently acquired optical data. The effect of reference velocity on flame thickness, fuel atomization, and relative speciation of OH, CH, C2, and soot for two National Jet Fuel Combustion Program (NJFCP) fuels are explored in this paper. The NJFCP fuels are an average Jet-A, designated A-2 with a derived cetane number (DCN) of 49, and an isoparaffinic kerosene, C-4. C-4 fuel is made up primarily of C9 - C13, and C16 isoparaffins and is a combination of 60% Sasol IPK and 40% GEVO alcohol-to-jet (ATJ). C-4 has a DCN of 28. Both fuels begin distillation at about the same temperature, but C-4 completes about 30 degrees Celsius lower than A-2. Chemiluminescence images were acquired in a 5-atm gas turbine flame tube combustor using the NASA 7-point lean direct injector (LDI). The flame characteristics were determined through imaging with three scientific cameras. OH*, CH*, and C2* chemiluminescence were collected through narrow bandpass filters centered at 313nm, 430nm and 515nm onto an intensified high-speed camera framed at 8-kHz. A second high-speed camera collected color flame images at rates between 40 and 50 kHz. An ICCD camera framed at 20 Hz was used to record planar laser scatter from liquid fuel. Differences in speciation for the chemiluminescent species was observed between the two fuels. Some reasons for the differences are explored in this paper.
This fact sheet provides an overview of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Vehicle Technologies Office Clean Cities Coalition Network, which boosts the country's economic vitality, energy security, and quality of life by advancing the deployment of affordable, efficient, and clean transportation fuels and technologies. Coalitions provide the technical expertise local decision makers and fleets need to understand and implement alternative and renewable fuels, electric vehicles, idle-reduction measures, fuel economy improvements, new mobility choices, and emerging transportation technologies.
High injection pressure in diesel engines can lead to cavitation-induced erosion in injector nozzles. One important factor affecting the severity of erosion is the fuel and its properties. Traditionally, modeling and simulation studies have used single-component representations of fuels, but realistic fuels feature a multitude of components and can even include volatile additives such as water and alcohol. To provide realistic benchmarks and comparisons, experimental measurements quantifying erosion characteristics were made using ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) and two alternative diesel fuels (ADF). X-ray imaging and computed tomography were used to investigate cavitation-induced erosion onset and progression. Hard X-ray tomography revealed injector internal geometry, including details such as surface marks from the manufacturing process and erosion patterns from repeated injections. Erosion progression was measured using X-ray tomography and imaging performed between injections. The critical erosion site was found to be similar across different fuel blends, while the erosion rate and incubation time were sensitive to the fuel blend. The injector geometry and the erosion characteristics were also prepared for numerical model development and validation.
To fully evaluate energy and emission impacts of advanced vehicle technologies and new transportation fuels, the fuel cycle from wells to wheels and the vehicle cycle through material recovery and vehicle disposal need to be considered. Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Argonne has developed a full life-cycle model called GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies). It allows researchers and analysts to evaluate various vehicle and fuel combinations on a full fuel-cycle/vehicle-cycle basis. The first version of GREET was released in 1996. Since then, Argonne has continued to update and expand the model. GREET.Net provides the user with an easy to use and fully graphical toolbox to perform life cycle analysis simulations of alternative transportation fuels and vehicle technologies in a matter of a few clicks. It provides a comprehensive, life-cycle-based approach to compare the energy use and emissions of conventional and advanced vehicle technologies. The tool includes the data of both fuel-cycle (fuel production and vehicle operation) and vehicle-cycle (vehicle material recovery and production, vehicle component fabrication, vehicle assembly, and vehicle disposal/recycling). This public domain model is available free of charge for anyone to use.
To fully evaluate energy and emission impacts of advanced vehicle technologies and new transportation fuels, the fuel cycle from wells to wheels and the vehicle cycle through material recovery and vehicle disposal need to be considered. Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Argonne has developed a full life-cycle model called GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies). It allows researchers and analysts to evaluate various vehicle and fuel combinations on a full fuel-cycle/vehicle-cycle basis. The first version of GREET was released in 1996. Since then, Argonne has continued to update and expand the model. GREET.Net provides the user with an easy to use and fully graphical toolbox to perform life cycle analysis simulations of alternative transportation fuels and vehicle technologies in a matter of a few clicks. It provides a comprehensive, life-cycle-based approach to compare the energy use and emissions of conventional and advanced vehicle technologies. The tool includes the data of both fuel-cycle (fuel production and vehicle operation) and vehicle-cycle (vehicle material recovery and production, vehicle component fabrication, vehicle assembly, and vehicle disposal/recycling). This public domain model is available free of charge for anyone to use.
To fully evaluate energy and emission impacts of advanced vehicle technologies and new transportation fuels, the fuel cycle from wells to wheels and the vehicle cycle through material recovery and vehicle disposal need to be considered. Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Argonne has developed a full life-cycle model called GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies). It allows researchers and analysts to evaluate various vehicle and fuel combinations on a full fuel-cycle/vehicle-cycle basis. The first version of GREET was released in 1996. Since then, Argonne has continued to update and expand the model. GREET.Net provides the user with an easy to use and fully graphical toolbox to perform life cycle analysis simulations of alternative transportation fuels and vehicle technologies in a matter of a few clicks. It provides a comprehensive, life-cycle-based approach to compare the energy use and emissions of conventional and advanced vehicle technologies. The tool includes the data of both fuel-cycle (fuel production and vehicle operation) and vehicle-cycle (vehicle material recovery and production, vehicle component fabrication, vehicle assembly, and vehicle disposal/recycling). This public domain model is available free of charge for anyone to use.
To fully evaluate energy and emission impacts of advanced vehicle technologies and new transportation fuels, the fuel cycle from wells to wheels and the vehicle cycle through material recovery and vehicle disposal need to be considered. Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Argonne has developed a full life-cycle model called GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies). It allows researchers and analysts to evaluate various vehicle and fuel combinations on a full fuel-cycle/vehicle-cycle basis. The first version of GREET was released in 1996. Since then, Argonne has continued to update and expand the model. GREET.Net provides the user with an easy to use and fully graphical toolbox to perform life cycle analysis simulations of alternative transportation fuels and vehicle technologies in a matter of a few clicks. It provides a comprehensive, life-cycle-based approach to compare the energy use and emissions of conventional and advanced vehicle technologies. The tool includes the data of both fuel-cycle (fuel production and vehicle operation) and vehicle-cycle (vehicle material recovery and production, vehicle component fabrication, vehicle assembly, and vehicle disposal/recycling). This public domain model is available free of charge for anyone to use.
This paper presents an approach for creating common weather avoidance reroutes for multiple flights and the associated benefits analysis, which is an extension of the single flight advisories generated using the Dynamic Weather Routes (DWR) concept. These multiple flight advisories are implemented in the National Airspace System (NAS) Constraint Evaluation and Notification Tool (NASCENT), a nation-wide simulation environment to generate time- and fuel-saving alternate routes for flights during severe weather events. These single flight advisories are clustered together in the same Center by considering parameters such as a common return capture fix. The clustering helps propose routes called, Multi-Flight Common Routes (MFCR), that avoid weather and other airspace constraints, and save time and fuel. It is expected that these routes would also provide lower workload for traffic managers and controllers since a common route is found for several flights, and presumably the route clearances would be easier and faster. This study was based on 30-days in 2014 and 2015 each, which had most delays attributed to convective weather. The results indicate that many opportunities exist where individual flight routes can be clustered to fly along a common route to save a significant amount of time and fuel, and potentially reducing the amount of coordination needed.
Advanced diesel combustion, accomplished via a single pulse fuel injection and high levels of exhaust gas recirculation (referred to as “PCCI”, partially-premixed charge compression ignition), is shown to be a path to reduce oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter simultaneously. This is well established in the literature. Less established is the extent to which such dilute combustion processes influence soot formation and affect soot that is emitted from diesel engines under such combustion modes. This work focuses on characterization of the nanostructure and oxidative reactivity of soot generated by a light-duty turbodiesel engine operating under a PCCI combustion mode, a dilute, low-temperature combustion process. Previous work on a type of PCCI combustion, referred to as high-efficiency clean combustion (HECC), showed soot samples having a fullerenic nanostructure, characterized by high levels of tortuosity of the fringe layers as seen in transmission electron micrograph images and as quantified using an image processing algorithm. Thermogravimetric analysis of the HECC mode soot samples showed that they displayed higher rates of oxidation than soot samples from a conventional diesel combustion mode. The present work returns to PCCI combustion, considering the timing of the main fuel injection, and the effects of operating on fuels rich in n-alkanes, particularly a fuel produced from a low temperature Fischer-Tropsch process (LTFT) and a renewable diesel fuel (RD) produced via hydrodeoxygenation of a plant oil. PCCI combustion conditions yield soot that shows higher reactivity compared to soot from the conventional combustion mode regardless of fuel type. LTFT and RD fuels produce soots with lower reactivity compared to ULSD. Soots produced from PCCI combustion have higher surface oxygen concentration and higher proportion of amorphous carbon. In addition, TEM images show that PCCI soots from all three fuels have smaller primary particle and particle aggregate sizes, and smaller graphene layers. These properties explain the higher reactivity of soot from PCCI combustion. The less reactive soots, which are produced from LTFT and RD fuel under conventional combustion, show internal burning during oxidation. However, soots with higher reactivity which are produced from late injection PCCI combustion and ULSD show shrinking core oxidation, most likely because of their overall amorphous structure.
Fuel sensitivity of gaseous emissions, approach to lean blowout and combustion dynamics are evaluated in this study. Experiments were conducted at the NASA Glenn Research Center's CE-5 flame tube test facility with a 9-point Swirl-Venturi Lean Direct Injection (SV-LDI) combustor. A reference jet fuel (A2) and two test fuels (C1 and C3) from were provided by the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program (NJFCP). C1 is essentially a 2-component iso-paraffin test fuel with a low cetane number of 17, and C3 is a high viscosity test fuel. Approach to lean blowout was monitored in terms of the rapid increase in CO emissions index as equivalence ratio decreased, but testing did not proceed all the way to lean blowout (LBO). Burning C1 was found to produce lower NOx emissions, but C1 flame temperatures were about 25 K higher relative to A2 at near LBO points (where CO emissions increased very rapidly). The NOx emissions of C3 were similar to A2. At low power conditions where fuel injector performance is not optimized for this 9-point LDI combustor, C3 had higher CO emissions than A2 and C1, likely due to C3's higher viscosity relative to A2 and C1. No discernable difference in combustion dynamics was observed between the three fuels tested in the 9-point LDI combustor. While a systematic ignition test campaign was not conducted, it was observed that C1 required a higher equivalence ratio and inlet air temperature for test rig ignition compared to A2 and C3.
Fuel sensitivity of gaseous emissions, approach to lean blowout and combustion dynamics are evaluated in this study. Experiments were conducted at the NASA Glenn Research Center's CE-5 flame tube test facility with a 9-point Swirl-Venturi Lean Direct Injection (SV-LDI) combustor. A reference jet fuel (A2) and two test fuels (C1 and C3) from were provided by the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program (NJFCP). C1 is essentially a 2-component iso-paraffin test fuel with a low cetane number of 17, and C3 is a high viscosity test fuel. Approach to lean blowout was monitored in terms of the rapid increase in CO emissions index as equivalence ratio decreased, but testing did not proceed all the way to lean blowout (LBO). Burning C1 was found to produce lower NOx emissions, but C1 flame temperatures were about 25 K higher relative to A2 at near LBO points (where CO emissions increased very rapidly). The NOx emissions of C3 were similar to A2. At low power conditions where fuel injector performance is not optimized for this 9-point LDI combustor, C3 had higher CO emissions than A2 and C1, likely due to C3's higher viscosity relative to A2 and C1. No discernable difference in combustion dynamics was observed between the three fuels tested in the 9-point LDI combustor. While a systematic ignition test campaign was not conducted, it was observed that C1 required a higher equivalence ratio and inlet air temperature for test rig ignition compared to A2 and C3.
The EV Shuttle Bus Pilot dataset contains data and analysis from Hocking-Athens-Perry Community Action's demonstration of an electric bus on routes of their rural Athens Public Transit system. The vehicle used in the demonstration was a Ford E-450 cutaway equipped with an electric drivetrain, a 127-kWh battery system by Motiv Power Systems, and a cabin upfit by Turtle Top. Data gathered include route assignments, running time and distance, fuel economy, and charge cycles. A comparison of the vehicle's observed duty cycle with duty cycle modeling from other rural transit fleets in the National Transit Database is included to help better understand the rural adoption potential for this fleet technology.
Assumptions for this work was collected and the analysis was completed in FY22. This contains information for more than 20 types of medium and heavy duty vehicles. Vehicles with various levels of hybridization, electric and fuel cell powertrains are considered in this work. More details are available in the report published by Argonne accessible from https://vms.taps.anl.gov/research-highlights/u-s-doe-vto-hfto-r-d-benefits/. TechScape, a convenient data visualization tool is also provided by Argonne for this data, accessible from [TechScape Web](https://vms.taps.anl.gov/data/techscape-web-2023/).