Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “aeroelastic”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28

Trim and Structural Optimization of Subsonic Transport Wings Using Nonconventional Aeroelastic Tailoring

Several minimum-mass aeroelastic optimization problems are solved to evaluate the effectiveness of a variety of novel tailoring schemes for subsonic transport wings. Aeroelastic strength and panel buckling constraints are imposed across a variety of trimmed maneuver loads. Tailoring with metallic thickness variations, functionally graded materials, composite laminates, tow steering, and distributed trailing edge control effectors are all found to provide reductions in structural wing mass with varying degrees of success. The question as to whether this wing mass reduction will offset the increased manufacturing cost is left unresolved for each case.

Stanford, Bret K.↗

Level-Set Topology Optimization with Aeroelastic Constraints

Level-set topology optimization is used to design a wing considering skin buckling under static aeroelastic trim loading, as well as dynamic aeroelastic stability (flutter). The level-set function is defined over the entire 3D volume of a transport aircraft wing box. Therefore, the approach is not limited by any predefined structure and can explore novel configurations. The Sequential Linear Programming (SLP) level-set method is used to solve the constrained optimization problems. The proposed method is demonstrated using three problems with mass, linear buckling and flutter objective and/or constraints. A constraint aggregation method is used to handle multiple buckling constraints in the wing skins. A continuous flutter constraint formulation is used to handle difficulties arising from discontinuities in the design space caused by a switching of the critical flutter mode.

Dunning, Peter D.↗

A Method of Reducing Aeroelastic Effects of Highly Swept Wings

The greatest efficiency for a lifting surface at supersonic speeds, according to the theoretical considerations of reference 1, can be attained if the leading edge is swept well behind the Mach cone and the highest aspect ratio which is structurally possible is employed. Such a wing, designed for a Mach number of 3.0, would have 80 deg. of sweepback. Aeroelastic effects have < been shown 3 to be considerable for a wing with 60deg of sweepback and designed for a Mach number of 2.0. The wing shown was found theoretically to have considerable loss in maximum lift-drag ratio attributable to aeroelasticity. This wing has 12-per cent-thick Clark-Y airfoils normal to the wing leading edge. If it were of solid aluminum and flying at a dynamic pressure of 2,400 lbs./sq.ft. (flexibility parameter qb(exp. 4) /El(0) = 7.8), analysis indicates that the wing would deflect so as to reduce the maximum lift-drag ratio about 30 per cent.

Hopkins, Edward J.↗

Aeroelastic Response of the Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge Transtition Section

The Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge demonstrator was a joint task under the Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project in partnership with the Air Force Research Laboratory and FlexSys, Inc. (Ann Arbor, Michigan), chartered by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to develop advanced technologies that enable environmentally friendly aircraft, such as continuous mold-line technologies. The Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge demonstrator encompassed replacing the Fowler flaps on the SubsoniC Aircraft Testbed, a Gulfstream III (Gulfstream Aerospace, Savannah, Georgia) aircraft, with control surfaces developed by FlexSys, Inc., a pair of uniquely-designed, unconventional flaps to be used as lifting surfaces during flight-testing to substantiate their structural effectiveness. The unconventional flaps consisted of a main flap section and two transition sections, inboard and outboard, which demonstrated the continuous mold-line technology. Unique characteristics of the transition sections provided a challenge to the airworthiness assessment for this part of the structure. A series of build-up tests and analyses were conducted to ensure the data required to support the airworthiness assessment were acquired and applied accurately. The transition sections were analyzed both as individual components and as part of the flight-test article assembly. Instrumentation was installed in the transition sections based on the analysis to best capture the in-flight aeroelastic response. Flight-testing was conducted and flight data were acquired to validate the analyses. This paper documents the details of the aeroelastic assessment and in-flight response of the transition sections of the unconventional Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge flaps.

ground vibration test↗

A Nonlinear Modal Aeroelastic Solver for FUN3D

A nonlinear structural solver has been implemented internally within the NASA FUN3D computational fluid dynamics code, allowing for some new aeroelastic capabilities. Using a modal representation of the structure, a set of differential or differential-algebraic equations are derived for general thin structures with geometric nonlinearities. ODEPACK and LAPACK routines are linked with FUN3D, and the nonlinear equations are solved at each CFD time step. The existing predictor-corrector method is retained, whereby the structural solution is updated after mesh deformation. The nonlinear solver is validated using a test case for a flexible aeroshell at transonic, supersonic, and hypersonic flow conditions. Agreement with linear theory is seen for the static aeroelastic solutions at relatively low dynamic pressures, but structural nonlinearities limit deformation amplitudes at high dynamic pressures. No flutter was found at any of the tested trajectory points, though LCO may be possible in the transonic regime.

Goldman, Benjamin D.↗

Comparison of Curvilinear Stiffeners and Tow Steered Composites for Aeroelastic Tailoring of Transports

A series of aeroelastic optimization problems are solved on a high aspect ratio wingbox of the Common Research Model, in an effort to minimize structural mass under coupled stress, buckling, and flutter constraints. Two technologies are of particular interest: tow steered composite laminate skins and curvilinear stiffeners. Both methods are found to afford feasible reductions in mass over their non-curvilinear structural counterparts, through both distinct and shared mechanisms for passively controlling aeroelastic performance. Some degree of diminishing returns are seen when curvilinear stiffeners and curvilinear fiber tow paths are used simultaneously.

Stanford, Bret K.↗

Data Comparisons and Summary of the Second Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop

This paper presents the computational results generated by participating teams of the second Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop and compare them with experimental data. Aeroelastic and rigid configurations of the Benchmark Supercritical Wing (BSCW) wind tunnel model served as the focus for the workshop. The comparison data sets include unforced ("steady") system responses, forced pitch oscillations and coupled fluid-structure responses. Integrated coefficients, frequency response functions, and flutter onset conditions are compared. The flow conditions studied were in the transonic range, including both attached and separated flow conditions. Some of the technical discussions that took place at the workshop are summarized.

Heeg, Jennifer↗

Passive Aeroelastic Tailoring

The Passive Aeroelastic Tailoring (PAT) project was tasked with investigating novel methods to achieve passive aeroelastic tailoring on high aspect ratio wings. The goal of the project was to identify structural designs or topologies that can improve performance and/or reduce structural weight for high-aspect ratio wings. This project considered two unique approaches, which were pursued in parallel: through-thickness topology optimization and composite tow-steering.

Smith, Benjamin↗

Theodorsen's and Garrick's Computational Aeroelasticity, Revisited

This paper describes a multiyear effort to recompute all of the numerical flutter results contained in Theodore Theodorsen’s and I.E. Garrick’s (“T&G’s”) groundbreaking trilogy of National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics technical reports on aeroelastic flutter (NACA Reports 496, 685, and 741). The paper includes overviews of T&G’s aeroelastic equations and solution methods, comparisons between the original and recomputed numerical results, and instances of errors and tripping points (potentials for confusing the reader) in the original NACA reports.

Flutter↗

TURBOMAT-FR: Turbomachinery Aeroelastic Forced Response Analysis Automation Using MATLAB® Part 2

The primary aim of this effort is to develop a software tool named “Turbomachinery Aeroelastic Analysis Tool for Forced Response (TURBOMAT-FR)” using MATLAB® (The MathWorks, Inc.) scripts. The tool will aid in performing routine forced response analysis of turbomachinery fan blades with the aid of the modal summation method (MSUM). The MSUM approach requires a modal solution consisting of modal displacements, frequencies, and stresses. The MATLAB® scripts facilitate easy extraction of the required quantities from the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and MSC Nastran (Hexagon AB) solution files. These quantities are subsequently utilized by the MSUM approach to perform a complete forced response analysis using the MATLAB® scripts. The MATLAB® scripts in TURBOMAT-FR are utilized in postprocessing of the MSC Nastran finite element analysis outputs in three types of solutions or steps, namely (1) stresses and displacements from static or steady response solution, (2) unsteady stresses and displacements from direct forced response solution, and (3) modal solution containing modal displacements and modal stresses. In step (4), separate MATLAB® scripts are also developed to read the processed outputs in step (3) and perform forced response analysis using MSUM. It should be noted that the direct forced response solution from step (2) will provide for a comparison with those obtained from the MSUM approach in steps (3) and (4). The TURBOMAT-FR MATLAB® scripts mentioned previously are presented in two reports designated Parts 1 and 2. Part 1 presents the scripts needed to accomplish steps (1) and (2). The current report, Part 2, presents the scripts needed to accomplish steps (3) and (4), noted previously. The TURBOMAT-FR MATLAB® scripts provided here in Part 2 facilitate the calculation of unsteady stresses using MSUM and provide an automated procedure associated with aeroelastic forced response analysis with different pressure files. The unsteady stresses calculated using MSUM can be compared with those presented in Part 1. A cantilevered blade-alone model subjected to a realistic pressure loading to a boundary was used for static and unsteady direct forced response analysis to demonstrate the effectiveness of the TURBOMATFR MATLAB® scripts.

T S R Reddy↗

Ongoing Aeroelastic Prediction and Validation Activities at NASA Langley Research Center

Current and future transonic aircraft concepts of interest to NASA may be susceptible to complex aeroelastic failure mechanisms that are difficult for computational tools to adequately predict. As such, a direct accounting of transonic flutter behavior has not historically been conducted at early design stages, where problems are less expensive to address. This paper summarizes efforts within NASA Langley's Aeroelasticity Branch to improve this situation, through advancements in computational prediction and optimization of transonic flutter behavior, in addition to planned wind tunnel tests aimed at providing a greater wealth of experimental data to validate predictions.

Bret K Stanford↗

Generalized Predictive Control for Active Stability Augmentation and Vibration Reduction on an Aeroelastic Tiltrotor Model

Tiltrotor aircraft are defining the state-of-the-art in vertical lift technology as they have the potential to greatly expand rotary-wing operational boundaries. However, they are often limited in forward flight speed due to complex coupled rotor and wing dynamic instabilities. The U.S. Army and NASA have been developing a new wind tunnel model, the TiltRotor Aeroelastic Stability Testbed(TRAST), to test proprotors in the NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) to investigate aeroelastic stability in cruise. The test is intended to provide high-quality research data for analytical tool development and validation. In addition, the TRAST model will support, develop, and mature new technologies for the design of advanced proprotor aircraft. Stability augmentation and vibration reduction during testing is planned with the use of an active control methodology known as Generalized Predictive Control(GPC). GPC is an autoregressive control law that experimentally acquires a system identification to derive the input-output relation of controls and corresponding sensors. This type of control law is especially useful for complex dynamic interactions that are difficult to explicitly model such as proprotor pylon instability, often referred to as whirl flutter. GPC has been successfully employed on other tiltrotor vehicles to suppress whirl flutter instabilities and vibrations. To aid in the characterization of the wind-tunnel model and in tool development, an analytical representation of the wind-tunnel model was developed using the rotorcraft comprehensive analysis system (RCAS) that simulates structural dynamics and aerodynamics. RCAS was used to derive state-space estimates of the physical plant at various flight conditions to test control law effectiveness. This paper will present an overview of the test article development, a description of RCAS, an explanation of the GPC methodology, and results of GPC being applied to state-space plant estimates of the TRAST model. In these simulations, GPC was effective at stabilizing the aircraft beyond the whirl-flutter boundary while simultaneously reducing vibrations across the flight regime. Additionally, a modern advancement to GPC, termed advanced GPC (AGPC), is introduced that enables a self-adapting system identification. Preliminary results show that AGPC is successful at self-correction as the plant changes from what was used for system identification.

tiltrotor↗

Progress on Flutter Analysis of the X-56A for the Third Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop

An aeroelastic analysis is presented for the X-56A test case of the upcoming third aeroelastic prediction workshop. Results using the FUN3D linearized frequency-domain solver are shown for four different structural models corresponding to increasing fuel loads. The present study is blind since only redacted and normalized flight test data have been published. However, trends in body-freedom flutter mode frequencies and damping with respect to fuel load are seen to agree well with previously published redacted flight test data.

Steven J Massey↗

High Fidelity Adaptively Refined CFD and Reduced Order Models of a High Aspect Ratio Aeroelastic Wing Wind-Tunnel Model

The NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) goal of reduced fuel burn for transport aircraft has led to the NASA N+3 High Aspect Ratio Wing (HARW) subproject. This project requires identifying, developing, and demonstrating key technologies and integrated multidisciplinary solutions to enable a safe, high performance, aeroelastic wing. Since this aircraft will have a high aspect ratio wing, aeroelasticity is expected to be a major issue in the design. In this paper high fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is performed with flow adapted meshes. A system identification of the aerodynamics is developed using both a multi-modal multi-sine time-marching and a multi-mode linear frequency domain method. GLA, MLA and flutter suppression simulations will be performed.

Robert Bartels↗

Comparing wind turbine aeroelastic response predictions for turbines with increasingly flexible blades

Highly flexible blades are becoming more prevalent designs as a potential solution to the transportation challenges associated with large-scale wind turbine rotors. However, there is currently no quantitative definition of “highly flexible” blades. To further develop turbines with highly flexible blades, a precise definition of the term and accurate simulations of turbines with such blades are required. Assumptions made in the traditional aerodynamic model, Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory, are violated in turbines with flexible blades. However, Free Vortex Wake (FVW) methods can more accurately model these turbine designs. Though more computationally expensive than BEM, FVW methods are still computationally tractable for use in iterative turbine design. The purpose of this work was to determine the blade flexibility at which BEM and FVW methods begin to produce diverging aeroelastic response results. This was accomplished by simulating the BAR-DRC reference turbine with increasingly flexible blades in a range of steady, uniform inflow conditions using OpenFAST, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s physics-based turbine engineering tool. Blade-tip deflections confirmed that BEM and FVW results diverge as blade flexibility increases. For the 212 m rotor diameter turbine used in this study, the two methods largely agreed for smaller blade deflections. But their results differed by an average of 5% when the out-of-plane blade-tip deflections exceeded 5% of the blade length and in-plane blade-tip deflections exceeded 1.25% of the blade length, with percent differences approaching 25% at the largest deflections.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

Challenges and Possible Solutions in Aeroelastic Modeling for the Distributed Wind Industry

Aeroelastic modeling (AM) is the primary methodology for structural and performance assessment of any wind turbine; it provides an understanding of the impact of design parameters on turbine loading and power response before witnessing it in the field. Despite these advantages, the use of AM in the distributed wind technology (DWT) sector is limited. This article represents a short summary of an in-depth assessment by the authors of the status of AM and its role within the distributed wind technology design standards. The research gathered input and feedback from a large number of U.S. and international stakeholders, reviewed technical strengths and weaknesses of the current edition of the design standards, analyzed the minutes from recent industry workshops and meetings, collected publicly available AM templates, and provided an evaluation of the existing AM codes. Several goals were achieved including providing strategies for the load assessment categorization of turbines based on rotor swept area and archetype, and guidance for AM verification and validation. Recommendations within this study will advance the value and the ease-of-use of AM, thereby allowing the industry to better capitalize this underutilized tool, resulting in a more efficient design process, an easier path to certification, and overall better and more reliable distributed wind technology products.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

Aeroelastic Modeling for Distributed Wind Turbines: March 11, 2021 - November 10, 2021

Aeroelastic modeling (AM) is the primary methodology for structural and performance assessment of any wind turbine whereby providing an understanding of the impact of design parameters on its loading and power response before witnessing it in the field. Despite these advantages, the use of AM in the Distributed Wind Technology (DWT) sector is limited, especially within the less established manufacturers. This project represents an in-depth assessment of the status of AM and its role within the Standards for the DWT industry. The study gathered input and feedback from a large number of national and international stakeholders, reviewed technical strengths and weaknesses of the current edition of the design standards, analyzed recent industry workshops' and meetings' minutes, collected publicly available AM templates, and provided an evaluation of the existing AM codes. The study achieved several goals including providing strategies for the load assessment categorization of turbines based on rotor swept area and archetype, and guidance for AM verification and validation (V&V), which includes discussions of measurement requirements and a sample test-plan useful for future V&V campaigns and design standard development. This document summarizes the different tasks conducted in the course of the project and highlights the steps required to improve the AM adoption based on a multifaceted approach that encompasses: 1) augmenting AM software capabilities, 2) publishing AM best-practices and design-basis, 3) creating new model templates, 4) providing guidance for V&V of codes and specific turbine models leveraging field testing best-practice, and 5) addressing weaknesses in the current standards. Many of the future objectives identified in this study could leverage NREL's upcoming testing campaigns of three modern distributed wind turbines. Recommendations within this study will advance the value and the ease-of-use of AM, thereby allowing the industry to better capitalize this underutilized tool resulting in a more efficient design process, an easier path to certification, and overall better and more distributed reliable wind turbine products.

17 WIND ENERGY↗