Agricultural impacts on nitrogen cycling: climate and air pollution
Ratios of key soil nitrogen fluxes from two terrestrial ecosystem models (TEMs) are compared to observational values in the literature. The fluxes included nitrification, denitrification, mineralization, immobilization and plant uptake, with the latter two fluxes partitioned into NH 4 + and NO 3 -. The two TEMs, ELMv1-ECA and CLM5.0, originated from a common model but have diverged in their handling of plant/microbe competition for soil mineral N. Both models predict unrealistically low assimilation (i.e, immobilization) of NO 3 - by soil bacteria compared to literature values and unrealistic dominance of plant uptake by a single form of mineral nitrogen (NO 3 - for ELM, NH 4 + for CLM5.0). Global ratios of net mineralization (i.e., gross mineralization – gross immobilization) appear unrealistically high in both models compared to literature values while rates of nitrification/gross mineralization appear unrealistically high (ELM) and low (CLM5.0). The ratio of denitrification/nitrification is likely high in both models (3:1 ELM; 2:1 CLM5.0), but few experimental data exist to evaluate these ratios, in part because nitrification and denitrification are quantified with different techniques and generally are not measured simultaneously. The same is true of plant N uptake and microbial N assimilation. Single grid point experiments with CLM5.0 at the Hubbard Brook long-term ecological research site in New Hampshire indicate that the parameterization of nitrification is a potentially important focus area that can bring soil nitrogen flux ratios into better agreement with observations. The current flux ratios raise questions about the credibility of present and future simulations of mineral N limitation on the carbon cycle.