Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “SOL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

The Dynamic Atmospheric and Aeolian Environment of Jezero Crater, Mars

Despite the importance of sand and dust to Mars geomorphology, weather, and exploration, the processes that move sand and that raise dust to maintain Mars’s ubiquitous dust haze have not been well quantified in situ, with missions lacking either thenecessary sensors and/or a sufficiently active aeolian environment. Perseverance rover’s novel environmental sensors and Jezero crater’s dusty environment remedy this. In Perseverance’s first 216 sols, four convective vortices raised dust locally, while on average four passed the rover daily, over 25% of which were significantly dusty (‘dust devils’). More rarely, dust lifting by non-vortex wind gusts was produced by daytime convection cells advected over the crater by strong upslope winds, which also control aeolian surface features. One such event covered ten times more area than the largest dust devil, suggesting dust devils and wind gusts could raise equal dust.

Claire E Newman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimizing Surfactant Templating of Yttria-stabilized Zirconia Aerogels for High-temperature Applications: Effect of Anionic & Nonionic Surfactant

Aerogels are useful thermal insulators due to low density, low thermal conductivity, and a tortuous path for solid conduction. However, the formulation must be optimized to increase thermal stability as drastic densification and surface area decrease is often exhibited after high-temperature exposure. Current research investigates yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) aerogels for expected use between 600°C and 1000°C. We anticipate that new sol-gel chemistries will yield YSZ aerogels with retained mesoporous structure, increased surface area, and minimized shrinkage upon high-temperature exposure. This work investigates the anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and the nonionic surfactant, Pluronic® P-123, as templating agents to prevent the collapse of the aerogel pore structure upon gelation and drying. To determine the effect of surfactant, characterization techniques such as nitrogen physisorption, x-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy are used. By optimizing surfactant concentration, the thermal stability of YSZ aerogels can be enhanced, producing more efficient thermal insulators.

Rebecca C. Walker↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Isochemical Characteristics of the Clay-Sulfate Transition in Gale Crater, Mars: APXS Results From Mont Mercou to the Marker Band Valley

During sols 3052-3572 (March 2021 to August 2022), Curiosity traversed a region in Gale crater where orbital observations predicted a vertical stratigraphic transition from a phyllosilicate unit to the overlying layered sulfates of Mt. Sharp [1, 2]. This region was informally named the clay-sulfate transition (CST). The Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer (APXS) was systematically deployed to sedimentary bedrock and selected diagenetic features to analyze possible chemical changes with increasing elevation (a proxy for increasing stratigraphic position). The occurrence of Ca- and Mg-sulfate was a particular focus. Here, we present results from the APXS investigation of the CST, as well as results from the first targets of the sulfate unit located in Marker Band Valley (MBV).

J.A. Berger↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Variability in Mt. Sharp Group Bedrock as Seen By ChemCam Passive and Active Spectra

The Curiosity rover landed in Gale crater in August 2012 and has since been travelling up the central sedimentary mound known as Mt. Sharp. The ChemCam instrument on Curiosity was designed primarily for the use of Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS), where a laser ablates a small amount of material from the target and the spectrum of the resulting plasma yields elemental abundance data. ChemCam’s three spectrometers range from 240-905 nm and can also take passive spectra (without the use of the laser). The spectral range ChemCam passive spectra observe is sensitive to charge-transfer and crystal field absorptions related to iron-bearing minerals. In the first 2934 sols of Curiosity’s mission, 9,400 passive spectra were taken of bedrock targets in Mt. Sharp’s Murray and Carolyn Shoemaker formations. We examine these spectra using spectral slope/ratio and band depth calculations as well as Principal Component Analysis (PCA). For the first time, paired passive spectra and LIBS elemental abundances are compared on a large scale. Finally, CheMin data are compared to ChemCam passive observations to understand sources of spectral variability.

H T Manelski↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of the Bedrock Geochemistry and Mineralogy Observed By Supercam During Perseverance’S Delta Front Campaign

In February 2021, the Perseverance rover landed in Jezero crater, Mars. The crater floor was found to be composed of lava flows and cumulate rocks. These magmatic rocks appear to have undergone some limited aqueous alteration; however, it is not clear whether this alteration is related to the lacustrine phase of the crater. After completing its exploration of the crater floor, Perseverance reached the foot of the Jezero western fan in late April 2022 (sol ~422). Long-distance images acquired earlier in the mission had already confirmed the deltaic nature of the fan, which had long been suspected from orbital observations. Between April and December 2022, Perseverance investigated the basal layers of the delta at two locations named Hawksbill Gap and Cape Nukshak, which are ~400 m apart. Here, we present an overview of the geochemistry and mineralogy of the delta rocks as observed by SuperCam and show that these rocks record a diversity of past aqueous alteration environments.

E. Dehouck↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Petrogenetic History of the Jezero Crater Delta Front From Microscale Observations By the Mars 2020 PIXL Instrument

On ~sol 370 of the Perseverance rover mission, the Mars 2020 Science Team completed its investigation of igneous units of the Jezero crater floor and directed Perseverance to drive towards the topographic scarp that marks the interface between the crater floor and Jezero’s western delta. The “Delta Front Campaign” consisted of close-up investigation and sampling of lithologies located there. Here, we report on the major findings relevant to the provenance and diagenetic history of these lithologies deduced from measurements made by the Planetary Instrument for X-ray Lithochemistry (PIXL), a microfocus X-ray fluorescence (XRF) microscope. Data were collected from two sections at Cape Nukshak and Hawksbill Gap; outcrop and member names are from. Lithologies are described here in order from base to top of each section. For investigation locations, see: https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/mission/.

J.A. Hurowitz↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Sedimentology and Stratigraphy of the Lower Delta Sequence, Jezero Crater, Mars.

In April 2022, the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover arrived at the base of the ancient delta in Jezero crater after completing the first year of its mission exploring and sampling aqueously altered igneous rocks of the present-day crater floor. Perseverance then spent ~200 sols exploring the lower ~25 m of rock exposed within the eastern scarp of the Jezero delta, a sedimentary sequence informally named the ‘Shenandoah’ formation. This study describes the sedimentology and stratigraphy of the Shenandoah formation explored by Perseverance at two sections—'Cape Nukshak’ and ‘Hawksbill Gap’—including a description, interpretation, and depositional framework for the facies that comprise it.

K. M. Stack↗
NASA NTRS2022

Integrated Precision Landing Performance and Technology Assessments of a Human- Scale Mars Lander Using a Generalized Simulation Framework

Human-scale missions to Mars will likely require multiple landers delivered precisely to designated locations. The current NASA human Mars reference architecture assumes delivery of three 25 t payloads from a 1- or 5-Sol orbit to the surface with a landing precision of 50 m to ensure logistics are located near the habitat. While initial navigation estimates improve with on-orbit ground tracking, errors increase during post-deorbit coast. Likewise, Mars atmospheric variability and forecasting uncertainty means that the entry vehicle guidance, navigation, and control systems must be robust to accommodate landing during any time of day or Mars year, including during dust storms. Precision landing technologies are currently being assessed to determine if onboard navigation sensors are sufficient to enable the landing accuracy required or if additional navigation aids such as surface or orbiting beacons will be needed. This study evaluates the system performance requirements to meet the desired landing accuracy for the reference vehicle design and entry, descent, and landing concept of operations. A detailed six degree-of-freedom integrated performance simulation framework is used to perform the assessment and demonstrate that under current assumptions, onboard navigation sensors are sufficient to support precision landing.

Chen, Po-Ting↗
NASA NTRS2022

Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover Surface Operations Commissioning Phase Overview

This paper presents work done by the Mars 2020 Project to plan, test, and execute the Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover surface operations commissioning phase. Immediately after the successful landing of Mars 2020 Perseverance rover at Jezero Crater on February 18, 2021, the rover autonomously initiated mission critical commanding necessary to transition the vehicle from a Cruise/EDL to Surface operations configuration. This began the surface operations commissioning phase, referred to as Surface Operations Transition (SOX). The objective of SOX phase is to establish vehicle health and safety and to verify that the operational characteristics of the vehicle, now operating in the Martian environment, are as-expected and safe to proceed into nominal operations. The SOX commissioning phase is organized into six logical sub-phases occurring in the following chronological order; (1) SOX1a, (2) FSW Transition, (3) SOX1b, (4) SOX2a, (5) Heli, (6) SOX2b. In total, the SOX commissioning phase was expected to take up-to 111 sols (Martian days). The Perseverance rover is an extremely complex, highly-integrated, robotic system-of-systems that requires numerous activities to incrementally and methodically verify their safe operations. This paper will discuss the development process used to plan, test, and execute the SOX commissioning phase for Mars 2020 Perseverance rover surface operations. We will discuss key challenges associated with SOX development as well as actual operations execution experience.

Koch, Justin↗
NASA NTRS2022

COCPIT: Collaborative Activity Planning Software for Mars Perseverance Rover

Since landing on the Martian surface, the Perseverance rover has relied on a distributed team to generate commands for exploring its new environment each sol (Martian day). The team uses a complex suite of software tools to accomplish this challenging task in time for the next window of opportunity to send commands to the rover. A key piece of this software ecosystem is COCPIT (Component-based Campaign Planning, Implementation, and Tactical). COCPIT is part of the next generation of planning and scheduling software tools developed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in partnership with NASA's Ames Research Center. COCPIT is a web-based application that allows users to collaboratively view and update the Perseverance rover's activity plans, continuously verify that the plan satisfies constraints, assign targets for directing scientific instruments, document science intent, and model power and data resources. Mars Surface Operations requires diverse expertise from team members within the Engineering, Science, Robotic, and Instrument Operations groups, distributed across North America and Europe. In order to improve efficiency and reduce risk, all teams are able to review and edit their activities simultaneously and see the effects on the plan in its entirety. As part of the Ground Data System (GDS) tool suite, COCPIT is responsible for the activity plan. It provides specialized views that allow operators to understand where there may be room for additional observations, see whether any planning constraints are being violated, and confirm that energy usage and data generation are within the defined limits. It contains details such as which filters a camera will use for a given observation, what the resolution of the images should be, where to store the data onboard, and how long the observation is expected to take. It predicts when specific data will be downlinked from the rover to a passing orbiter, so that the team knows when to expect that data on Earth for evaluation in future planning. Ultimately the information from the COCPIT plan is translated to sequences that will be bundled and radiated to Perseverance for execution. The COCPIT tool is used throughout all planning phases.

Kanefsky, Bob↗
NASA NTRS2022

Perseverance Rover’s Robotic Arm and Turret Mounted Instruments’ Surface Commissioning

The Robotic Arm (RA) on the Perseverance rover is an integral component of the Sampling and Caching System necessary for completing the science goals of the Mars 2020 mission. While the Perseverance rover was based on the Curiosity rover which landed in 2012, the Robotic Arm was redesigned to carry a much larger turret with a new suite of payloads. Shortly after Perseverance landed in Jezero Crater, a series of checkouts was completed with the RA during the first 100 sols of the mission in order to ensure proper functionality of the RA and the instruments mounted on the turret. This period of time in the mission was called Surface Operations Transition (SOX). The objective of SOX was to systematically execute checkout activities for all the basic functionality so that the RA and instruments, as well as other rover components, could be released for scientific exploration.RA activities during SOX can be divided into a few different categories: Mechanism Checkouts, Rover Visual Inspections, Performance Characterization, and Instrument Functional Checkouts. Many of these checkouts built off of each other such that each subsequent activity would verify incrementally complex functionality. Many of the defined activities were executed several times throughout the development of the rover and served as a check that the RA’s performance is consistent with testing on Earth. Other activities were developed uniquely for SOX to respond to challenges discovered during development. They were designed to be verifiable without the help of ground support equipment or previous executions on the flight hardware to compare against.This paper discusses the formulation and conception of the various RA SOX checkout activities, verification and testing required to certify them for flight, execution of the activities on Mars, issues encountered, and finally results and findings as the mission transitioned to nominal science operations. We will be presenting the results and analysis using downlinked imaging and data from the flight vehicle to show how we verified the performance of the Robotic Arm and the turret mounted instruments in order to transition to science operations with a clean bill of health.

Edgett, Kenneth↗
NASA NTRS2022

Making or Breaking a Rover: System Engineering Parameters On-Board the Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover

On February 18, 2021, Perseverance, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s (JPL’s) Mars 2020 Rover, successfully landed on Mars with all systems nominal, despite the risk surrounding the over 200,000 internal flight parameters that had to be properly configured. The Perseverance team defines these parameters as software variables that are configurable, commandable and retrievable from Earth. In 2015, the Mars 2020 project leaders focused on improving systems engineering of parameters based on their experiences from parameter management on previous Mars rovers (Curiosity, Opportunity, Spirit, and Pathfinder) and parameter failures of past missions, such as the mission-ending parameter of the Mars Climate Orbiter. The new rigorous development process allowed for efficient certification and effective implementation of the parameters, allowing the rover to approach and land on the red planet (the most challenging phase of the mission) with zero parameter issues. Although successful, the Perseverance team learned many lessons for how to better manage parameters for the continued surface operations of the Mars 2020 mission and future missions. This paper will discuss eight parameter-management topics for the Perseverance Mission. The first is parameter definition: how we define parameters on our mission, where they are physically located on the vehicle, and why we have so many of them. The second topic is the updated parameter flight software module from Curiosity, including details on the 99% reduction in parameter commands, new bulk configuration capabilities, and improved parameter traceability. The third topic is parameter selection for different mission phases; this includes improving and tweaking our preferred parameter settings until they become certification candidates and managing parameter configurations based on test venue throughout the mission life cycle. The fourth topic is our flight certification process; this includes certification of flight values for four different epochs in the mission: Launch, Entry Decent and Landing (EDL) - 6days, Landing + 5 Sols (Martian Days, still on Cruise Flight Software), and once are on Surface Flight Software (FSW). The fifth topic covers in-flight command implementation, along with details on testing, validation, and verification of those commands. In the sixth section, we will explain our use of open-source management tools, including how we used GitHub for version control and management approvals. The seventh topic will describe the ground tools used in operations, including capabilities of the in-house built tool called Parasol. The eighth and final topic will dig into lessons learned for improving parameter management in the future of this mission and others.

Roth, Brian↗
NASA NTRS2022

Making or Breaking a Rover- Systems Engineering Parameters On-Board the Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover

On February 18, 2021, Perseverance, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s (JPL’s) Mars 2020 Rover, successfully landed on Mars with all systems nominal, despite the risk surrounding the over 200,000 internal flight parameters that had to be properly configured. The Perseverance team defines these parameters as software variables that are configurable, commandable and retrievable from Earth. In 2015, the Mars 2020 project leaders focused on improving systems engineering of parameters based on their experiences from parameter management on previous Mars rovers (Curiosity, Opportunity, Spirit, and Pathfinder) and parameter failures of past missions, such as the mission-ending parameter of the Mars Climate Orbiter. The new rigorous development process allowed for efficient certification and effective implementation of the parameters, allowing the rover to approach and land on the red planet (the most challenging phase of the mission) with zero parameter issues. Although successful, the Perseverance team learned many lessons for how to better manage parameters for the continued surface operations of the Mars 2020 mission and future missions. This paper will discuss eight parameter-management topics for the Perseverance Mission. The first is parameter definition: how we define parameters on our mission, where they are physically located on the vehicle, and why we have so many of them. The second topic is the updated parameter flight software module from Curiosity, including details on the 99% reduction in parameter commands, new bulk configuration capabilities, and improved parameter traceability. The third topic is parameter selection for different mission phases; this includes improving and tweaking our preferred parameter settings until they become certification candidates and managing parameter configurations based on test venue throughout the mission life cycle. The fourth topic is our flight certification process; this includes certification of flight values for four different epochs in the mission: Launch, Entry Decent and Landing (EDL) - 6days, Landing + 5 Sols (Martian Days, still on Cruise Flight Software), and once are on Surface Flight Software (FSW). The fifth topic covers in-flight command implementation, along with details on testing, validation, and verification of those commands. In the sixth section, we will explain our use of open-source management tools, including how we used GitHub for version control and management approvals. The seventh topic will describe the ground tools used in operations, including capabilities of the in-house built tool called Parasol. The eighth and final topic will dig into lessons learned for improving parameter management in the future of this mission and others.

Roth, Brian↗
NASA NTRS2022

New Rover Conops with High-Performance Onboard Computing: Give Up Raw Data to Reduce Ops Cost and Do More Science

A major portion of time during the tactical operation of Mars rovers is spent for selecting, prioritizing, and coordinating sciences and engineering activities such that they fit within resource constraints, including the downlink data volume, energy, and time. In particular, the downlink data volume constraint is getting particularly tighter in recent missions because modern instruments produce increasingly high data volume while the communication bandwidth is essentially bounded by the law of physics. Tactical operation would be substantially simplified, hence the operation cost could be reduced, if the data volume constraint is relaxed or even removed. In this abstract, we propose a new operation paradigm for achieving this goal. The key observation is that, both in science and engineering applications, the bit size of raw data is typically much greater than the volume of processed information that is needed for scientific or engineering analysis. For example, a full-resolution image from Mastcam-Z, the main science camera on Perseverance, is about 700 kB in volume and we downlinked 29,685 images up to Sol 243, totaling ~20 GB of data. But of course, scientists do not use every pixel of these images; what they really look for in the images are geological features, typically represented by specific geometric configurations or textures. An end product after processing hundreds of Mascam-Z images could be a single geological map summarizing the spatial distribution of the features. For another example, a 100-meter drive of Perseverance produces 7-12 MB of drive telemetry, which records every detail of the rover's motion at 8 Hz, including position, attitude, steering angles, encoder readings, motor currents and many other information. But what the ground engineers eventually pay attention to is the signs of anomaly, such as excessive motor currents or high slip; if a drive is nominal, the vast majority of this data is unused. What if, then, we process the raw data onboard and only downlink the processed data that is relevant to scientific or engineering analyses, such as a list of detected science features (with cropped images) or a list of potential signs of anomaly while driving? A major roadblock for such onboard, high-level information processing has been the onboard computational resource. RAD750, the main onboard computer of Perseverance, is obviously not sufficient for performing complex image or signal processing such as object detection, semantic segmentation, or anomaly detection. Interestingly, RAD750 is not the best processor that Perseverance has; Qualcomm's Snapdragon 801, a modern mobile processor, is on her Heli Base Station, a device for communicating with Mars Helicopter Ingenuity; also, Intel's Atom E3845 processors are on engineering cameras. In the reminder of this paper, we will introduce two particular uses cases of these high-performance co-processors (meaning auxiliary CPU, GPU, or other types of processors that are separate from the main processor that runs the main flight software) for lowering operation cost and accommodating more science activities for a given communication constraint.

Didier, A.↗
NASA NTRS2023

Results from InSight Robotic Arm Activities

The InSight lander carried an Instrument Deployment System (IDS) that included an Instrument Deployment Arm (IDA), scoop, five finger “claw” grapple, forearm-mounted Instrument Deployment Camera (IDC) requiring arm motion to image a target, and landermounted Instrument Context Camera (ICC), designed to image the workspace, and to place the instruments onto the surface. As originally proposed, the IDS included a previously built arm and flight spare black and white cameras and had no science objectives or requirements, or expectation to be used after instrument deployment (90 sols). During project development the detectors were upgraded to color, and it was recognized that the arm could be used to carry out a wide variety of activities that would enable both geology and physical properties investigations. During surface operations for two martian years, the IDA was used during major campaigns to image the surface around the lander, to deploy the instruments, to assist the mole in penetrating beneath the surface, to bury a portion of the seismometer tether, to clean dust from the solar arrays to increase power, and to conduct a surface geology investigation including soil mechanics and physical properties experiments. No other surface mission has engaged in such a sustained and varied campaign of arm and scoop activities directed at such a diverse suite of objectives. Images close to the surface and continuous meteorology measurements provided important constraints on the threshold friction wind speed needed to initiate aeolian saltation and surface creep. The IDA was used extensively for almost 22 months to assist the mole in penetrating into the subsurface. Soil was scraped into piles and dumped onto the seismometer tether six times in an attempt to bury the tether and ∼ 30% was entrained in the wind and dispersed downwind 1-2 m, darkening the surface. Seven solar array cleaning experiments were conducted by dumping scoops of soil from 35 cm above the lander deck during periods of high wind that dispersed the sand onto the panels that kicked dust off of the panels into suspension in the atmosphere, thereby increasing the power by ∼15% during this period. Final IDA activities included an indentation experiment that used the IDA scoop to push on the ground to measure the plastic deformation of the soil that complemented soil mechanics measurements from scoop interactions with the surface, and two experiments in which SEIS measured the tilt from the arm pressing on the ground to derive near surface elastic properties.

Mars↗
NASA NTRS2023

Dust Lifting Observations with the Mars Science Laboratory Navigation Cameras

Martian dust lifting is believed to occur through two primary mechanisms: dust devils and wind stress forced dust lifting. Gale Crater's varied terrain and meteorology provide a unique in situ perspective on Martian dust lifting, with the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover passing through both conditions and locations detrimental to dust lifting (e.g., the crater floor) and those with active sand motion and frequent dust lifting (e.g., the Bagnold Dunes). Between L s = 248° in Mars Year 33 and L s = 51° in Mars Year 37, over ∼3.5 Mars years and 2,300 sols, the rover's Navigation Cameras took 1,260 dedicated image sequences to search for dust lifting. Approximately 42.7% of all sequences, and 9.5% of the total images have shown active dust lifting, both dust devils and linear/straight-line wind stress dust lifting. 79% of dust lifting events are classified as dust devils, while ∼16% are linear wind stress dust lifting and the remainder are of an indeterminate type. We analyze this large catalog of dust lifting events to provide ground truth on theoretical and model expectations of dust lifting and show that dust lifting in Gale Crater occurs throughout the Martian year, is strongly peaked in frequency near solar noon (even after accounting for observational biases), and that dust lifting shows an affinity for sand-covered surfaces which highlights the importance of saltating sand grains for Martian dust lifting in both dust devils and wind stress forced lifting.

Scott D. Guzewich↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mineral composition of Al-rich float rocks in Jezero crater as seen by Super-Cam

During its traverse across the Jezero crater floor and western fan, the Perseverance rover encountered > 4000 float rocks – of variable size (up to ~ 50 cm) scattered on the ground without apparent connection to the surrounding stratigraphy [1]. Analysis performed using the SuperCam instrument’s [2,3,4], Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) revealed a high concentration of Al 2 O 3 , Cr, Ti and Ni [5], and very low of Fe, Mg, Ca and Na [5, 1]. SuperCam’s infrared reflectance spectroscopy (IRS, between 1.3 and 2.6 μm) showed the presence of Al-rich aqueous alteration minerals (characteristic absorption bands of kaolinite and Al-smectites at 1.4 and 2.2 μm) as well as some (likely Cr-) spinels, identified uthrough their broad asymmetric 2 μm band, responsible for the concavity of IR spectra. These mineral species alone do not fully account for the spectral shapes; hence, the objective is to further investigate spectral modeling to determine the most probable mineral assemblages. Here, we present the results of modeling 17 light-toned float rocks, up to Sol 924, complementary to [1].

C. Royer↗
NASA NTRS2024

Fe-Phosphates in the Jezero Crater Fan: Implications for Habitability and Sample Return

In the ~1000 sols since the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover landed on the floor of Jezero crater, it has traversed >23 km, carrying out analyses of the crater floor and western fan. The fan is comprised of sediments transported and deposited by streams that once flowed into Jezero crater in the late Noachian to early Hesperian[1]. Detailed investigation of the sediments and rocks of the western fan can thus provide insights into ancient fluvial to lacustrine environments on Mars, whether they were habitable, and/or if biosignatures maybe preserved.

T V Kizovski↗