SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Moose”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2018

Evaluation of statistical variation of microstructural properties and temperature effects on creep fracture of Grade 91

This report describes three improvements made to a physically-based model for creep and creep rupture in Grade 91 steel developed as part of the Advanced Reactor Technologies program: 1. Progress on transitioning the model framework to the MOOSE finite element package to improve parallel scalability, increase the physical size of the simulations, and incorporate multiphysics effects into the model. 2. The development of a physically-based method of scaling the model parameters to accurately capture creep in Grade 91 for temperatures in the range of 450° to 500° C. 3. Extending the model to account for microstructural statistical variations, specifically capturing the effect of grain boundary energy on the physical parameters underling the model for grain boundary void nucleation and cavitation. Put together, these improvements result in an accurate, predictive model for the physical response of Grade 91 steel over the expected use temperature range for the material in future liquid metal cooled fast reactors. The model can be used to more accurately predict engineering properties of the material for very long service lives, which could lead to safer, more economical future advanced reactors.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Modeling and Validation of Irradiation Damage in Ni-based Alloys for Long-Term LWR Applications (Final Report)

As light water reactor (LWR) plant lives are extended, the need for predictive modeling tools for materials degradation increase in order to ensure safe operation and plan for component replacements. The Grizzly code, which is built on the MOOSE multi-physics simulation environment, is being developed for exactly this purpose. To extend Grizzly to include capabilities for modeling Ni-based alloys, we propose a US/UK integrated program to address thermal and irradiation-induced transformations mechanisms of Alloys 690 and 625. Alloy 690 is widely used in existing LWR plants due to its superior stress corrosion cracking (SCC) resistance compared to Alloy 600. Alloy 625 is used in more limited applications but offers the benefits of both high strength (in the aged condition) and corrosion/SCC resistance. Research has shown that both alloys can undergo phase changes due to thermal or irradiation exposure. In the precipitation-hardened condition, Alloy 625 “softens” during neutron irradiation as the strengthening precipitates decompose and metastable precipitates form. However, the nature and rates of these transformations as a function of exposure conditions are not well understood. Similarly, the effects of these thermal and irradiation-induced microstructural changes on mechanical properties require evaluation. The proposed program combines thermal and irradiation experiments, mechanical testing, microstructural characterization using state-of-the art analytical techniques, atomistic modeling, micro-and macro-scale modeling via Grizzly. This multi-pronged approach yields several benefits: 1) atomistic scale models capture the physics of the mechanisms of phase transformations, which can be generalized to other systems, 2) the modeling results (from atomistic to continuum) will be validated experimentally to ensure the predictive aspect, 3) the microstructure/property relationships captured with mechanical testing provides information at the engineering scale that is needed to validate the integration of the proposed new capability into Grizzly

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Development of Heat Pipe Reactor Modeling in SAM

System Analysis Module (SAM) is under development at Argonne National Laboratory as a modern system-level modeling and simulation tool for advanced non-light water reactor safety analyses. It utilizes the object-oriented application framework MOOSE to leverage the modern software environment and advanced numerical methods available in PETSc. The capabilities of SAM are being extended to enable the transient modeling, analysis, and design of various advanced nuclear reactor systems. This report presents the development of new capabilities for modeling the heat pipe type reactor systems. The need for power at remote locations away from a reliable electrical grid is an important niche for nuclear energy. Heat pipe-cooled fast-spectrum nuclear reactors are well suited for these applications. The key feature of the heat pipe reactors is the use of heat pipes for heat removal from the reactor core. The heat pipe makes use of the phase change of the working fluid and transports a large amount of heat from the evaporator to the condensation end with very small temperature drops. In contrast to the traditional nuclear reactor system that makes use of pumped loop for extracting the thermal power, the heat pipe reactors make use of hundreds of heat pipes for removing the thermal power (including the decay heat) passively. This could potentially significantly improve the reliability and safety of the reactor systems. The essential part in the analysis of a heat pipe type reactor is the modeling of heat transport inside the heat pipe. The capability of SAM is extended in this work to enable the modeling of the conventional heat pipe. Two alternative modeling options, 2D-RZ Heat conduction and 3D-1D coupling, are developed, which are both based on the assumption that the heat pipe vapor core can be modeled as a superconductor of extremely high thermal conductivity. Both modeling options are verified with a simplified thermal resistance model. The heat pipes are also coupled with the fuel region of a prototype micro reactor under both normal and off-normal conditions. It is confirmed that both modeling options can correctly model the heat transport in the heat-pipe reactors.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2019

SAM User's Guide

The System Analysis Module (SAM) is a modern system analysis tool being developed at Argonne National Laboratory for advanced non-LWR safety analysis. It aims to provide fast-running, whole-plant transient analyses capability with improved-fidelity for Sodium-cooled Fast Reactors (SFR), Lead-cooled Fast Reactors (LFR), and Molten Salt Reactors (MSR) or Fluoride-cooled High-temperature Reactors (FHR). SAM takes advantage of advances in physical modeling, numerical methods, and software engineering to enhance its user experience and usability. It utilizes an object-oriented application framework (MOOSE), and its underlying meshing and finite-element library (libMesh) and linear and non-linear solvers (PETSc), to leverage the modern advanced software environments and numerical methods. This document provides a user’s guide, which will help users understand the input description and core capabilities of the SAM code. A brief overview of the code is presented, as well as how to obtain and run it. The input syntax for various parts of the code is provided. Additionally, a number of example problems, starting with simple unit component problems to problems with increasing complexity, are provided. Because the code is still under active development, this SAM User’s Guide will evolve with periodic updates.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

DOE OSTI2019

Improvements to Bison Validation Base for LWR Fuel

The Bison fuel performance code is being developed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to analyze a wide range of fuel forms and operating conditions with the flexibility to conduct simulations in 1D through 3D geometries. Bison plays an important role in the development of advanced fuel with improved accident tolerance for existing light water reactors (LWRs), the improved understanding of mechanisms in fuel designs in a wider range of operating conditions, and the facilitation of future development of fuel for advanced reactor designs. Additionally, industry interest in advanced fuels has also driven Bison development for advanced fuels in the last few years. All of these factors combine to create a potential increase of new Bison users. These new users will potentially be interested in the Bison LWR validation base for examples of Bison's capabilities and how to use Bison. Current users also rely on the Bison validation base as a demonstration of the best practices settings and material behavioral models. Bison, both through direct updates to the Bison source code and to the nearly daily changes and improvements in the underlying MOOSE framework source code, undergoes nearly continuous changes. It is necessary that these source code changes are reflected with updated input files in the Bison validation base. Periodic updates of the validation case input files should also be accompanied by a review and revision of the validation case documentation on which our users rely. Therefore our efforts under this milestone were guided by two objectives: (1) Update the Bison LWR validation input files to use current Bison simulation settings, and (2) Enhance the ease-of-use for Bison through improved documentation These objectives build on the goals identified FY18 CASL milestone reports. During FY18 we addressed issues with the robustness of Bison and identified a need to migrate the assessment suite to the more reliable tensor mechanics module system and set a goal of standardizing the Bison input files. The FY18 CASL milestone report on updates to the Bison documentation system listed continued development of user-focused guides and examples along with revisions to the validation case documentation as future development goals. During FY19 we have separated these two objectives into four different focus areas for our work on this milestone. Our first two focus areas target the existing Bison validation suite: update the existing LWR validation cases and the accompanying documentation. The second two focus areas center on adding new capabilities: a new Bison LWR validation case and expansion of user support documentation. In the following report each of these four focus areas are discussed as a separate section. We conclude the report with a summary of potential future work to build on the efforts of this year.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Updates and Verifications of the PROTEUS Suite in FY19

In FY19 efforts were made on updating and verifying the PROTEUS suite in terms of depletion and fuel cycle capabilities, updated MSR capabilities, improving code usability, and supporting simulation of micro reactors. The fuel reloading and shuffling schemes as well as the built-in depletion solver were implemented to add the fuel cycle capability to PROTEUS-NODAL. PERSENT can run with PROTEUS-NODAL which now produce the CCCC interface files. The MSR simulation capability was further updated by making PROTEUS-NODAL coupled with SAM via the MOOSE wrapper. The high fidelity solvers of PROTEUS were updated to support the multiphysics simulation of SFRs and micro reactors. The coupled system of PROTEUS / FLUENT / ANLHTP was developed using Python-based external drivers, demonstrating the coupled simulation for small 3D test problems with heat pipe failure transients. In addition, the gamma transport capability was implemented to compute the detailed gamma distributions that determines the primary heat sources for the fuel assembly structure and non-fueled assemblies. Verification tests using fuel assembly and 2D core problems indicated very good agreement in heating distributions between PROTEUS and VARIANT / GAMSOR solutions. For user support, the NEAMS Workbench was updated to include PROTEUS-NODAL and further extended to handle PROTEUS-MOC for which the support of Workbench is limited, instead requiring the off-line generation of mesh files and corresponding cross section sets. The utility tools of PROTEUS were also updated to support users to model and simulate complicated and non-conventional geometry cores.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Summary of Grizzly Development for Advanced Reactor Structural Materials

This summary report contains an overview of work performed during Fiscal Year 2019 under the Nuclear Engineering Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Fuels Product Line work package entitled "MS-19IN020106 - GRIZZLY - INL". Grizzly is a code based on the MOOSE framework that has been under development for several years funded by the US Department of Energy’s Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) program. Prior to 2019, Grizzly development was focused on development of capabilities needed to simulate the effects of aging mechanisms in light water reactor (LWR) components. The goal of this LWR-focused work has been to develop tools that can be used to assess the ability of existing LWRs to perform safety in long term operation (LTO) scenarios. This LWR-focused work has primarily focused on the effects of reactor pressure vessel (RPV) embrittlement and aging of reinforced concrete structures. Grizzly development to support LWR degradation needs is still ongoing, but starting in 2019, Grizzly’s capabilities are being expanded to also meet growing needs for a tool to address structural component integrity and degradation in advanced reactors. A simulation capability for advanced reactor components has many of the same basic requirements that one for LWRs does, such as the ability to solve coupled systems of partial differential equations that arise from the fact that many of the problems of interest involve multiple coupled physics. The materials issues also inherently involve multiple length scales, with the response at the engineering scale being strongly affected by mechanisms occurring at atomistic and mesoscopic scales.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2019

SAM Developments to Support Transient Safety Analysis of Advanced non-LWRs

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Recent SAM Code Improvement to Heat Transfer Modeling Capabilities

System Analysis Module (SAM) is currently under development at Argonne National Laboratory as a modern system-level modeling and simulation tool for advanced non-light water reactor (non-LWR) safety analyses. It utilizes the object-oriented application framework MOOSE to leverage the modern software environment and advanced numerical methods. The capabilities of SAM are being extended to enable the transient modeling, analysis, and design of various advanced nuclear reactor systems. This report summarizes recent SAM code improvement to heat transfer modeling capabilities to support system and core thermal-hydraulics analysis for advanced nuclear reactor systems. These new capabilities include implementation of the energy equation for solid structure in porous medium and its coupling with porous medium flow energy equation; coupling between one-dimensional flow equation and three-dimensional heat conduction equation; coupling between two-dimensional heat structure and three-dimensional porous medium flow equations; and implementation of effective thermal conductivity correlations for solid pebble beds and its validation against High Temperature Test Unit (HTTU) experimental data. Demonstration or validation test problems are also included in this report to confirm the successful implementation of these capabilities.

1D/3D coupling↗

DOE OSTI2019

Integration of the Nek5000 Computational Fluid Dynamics Code with the NEAMS Workbench

The mission of the US Department of Energy’s Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program is to develop, apply, deploy, and support state-of-the-art predictive modeling and simulation tools for the design and analysis of current and future nuclear energy systems using computing architectures ranging from laptops to leadership-class facilities. NEAMS is organized into three product lines: the Fuels Product Line (FPL),the Reactors Product Line (RPL), and the Integration Product Line (IPL). The FPL and RPL focus on the development of high-fidelity tools such as the MOOSE-based applications BISON and MARMOT [3, 9] at Idaho National Laboratory, and the PROTEUS neutronics code and the NEK5000 computational fluid dynamics code from the Simulation-based High-efficiency Advanced Reactor Prototyping (SHARP) framework [10]. The NEAMS IPL will enable users to apply high-fidelity simulations to inform lower order models for the design, analysis, and licensing of advanced nuclear systems.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Modeling Metallic Fuel using Peridynamics

Based on available modeling and simulation capabilities of peridynamics module in MOOSE framework for oxide fuel, the overall goal of this project is to further develop the peridynamics capabilities for modeling metallic fuel. It includes two major tasks: 1) develop validated scheme to handle the shape tensor singularity due to insufficient active neighbors of a material particle in the peridynamic correspondence model for fracture problems, and 2) develop failure modeling scheme including failure criterion for metallic fuels. Before the peridynamics can be applied to model metallic fuel, the formulation instability of the peridynamic correspondence model should be addressed. The PI first worked on developing new stabilization method to improve the performance of the peridynamic correspondence model and reduce the possibility of getting a singular shape tensor while applying the model for fracture problems. The new stabilization scheme uses bond-associated weight function rather than bond-associated horizon. Compared to bondassociated horizon stabilized method, this new stabilization scheme has better performance with improved prediction accuracy and reduced free surface effect. Using this newly developed stabilization, materials models from BISON can be directly used in peridynamics for metallic fuels, such as fission rate and burnup dependent creep and swell models. Publication of this work is under preparation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Microstructure, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties Relationships in U and UZr Alloys (Final Report)

Uranium-zirconium (U-Zr) alloys are candidate fuel systems for transmutation based reactors that can be used to burn long-lived minor actinides and fission products in fast spectrum reactors. Metallic fuels have also been gaining more recent attention for applications as accident tolerant fuels, as well as for use in small modular reactors. This research focused on a “science-based” approach to capture the connections between U and U-Zr alloys’ three-dimensional (3-D) microstructure, thermal properties, and mechanical properties through closely coordinated experiments and modeling efforts from the unirradiated to the irradiated fuels. Advanced characterization and modeling techniques were used to understand irradiation-induced microstructural evolution and its direct impact on the thermal and mechanical properties of U and U-Zr fuel. Closely coordinated experiments and modeling were performed to provide crucial data that does not currently exist. Overall, this research spanned multiple length and time scales within the models and experiments. The scope of the research encompassed the understanding of the irradiation effects in U and various U-Zr alloys with particular attention paid to three task areas: (1) microstructural evolution, (2) in-situ/ex-situ thermal and mechanical properties, and (3) multiscale modeling connections to microstructure, thermal, and mechanical properties. This research resulted in (1) the 3-D characterization of neutron irradiated U-Zr fuel in multiple phase regions to better understand fission gas swelling and constituent redistribution, (2) development of a microstructural model linking thermal and mechanical properties via in situ Raman and nanoindentation, (3) and mesoscale phase field modeling was coupled with the AEH method in the MOOSE framework was used to calculate the effective thermal conductivities of U-Zr fuels consisting of α-U and δ-UZr 2 heterogeneous microstructures.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Engineering scale molten salt corrosion and chemistry code development

A new engineering scale transport code Mole is described. Mole was developed using the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework for solving species transport problems in flowing liquid. It is applied to leaching of Cr from alloys into molten salts part a of a multi-physics, multi-scale approach for coupling chemistry with mechanical behavior modeling. Demonstrations of the leaching phenomenon were benchmarked to experimental data provided by the Molten Salt Reactor campaign and the results are presented.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2020

SAM Plug-in Development (Phase I Final Report)

The DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) has created an extensive set of advanced modeling and simulation tools for nuclear engineering analysis. The advanced capabilities of these newer analysis codes require more in-depth training, skills, and knowledge in order to effectively utilize them for the design, analysis, and licensing of advanced nuclear systems and experiments. A high learning curve for inexperienced users may deter organizations from incorporating these tools into their internal processes. This project involved development of a plug-in to the Symbolic Nuclear Analysis Package (SNAP) for the System Analysis Module (SAM) tool. SAM is an advanced system analysis tool for reactor transient analyses being developed at Argonne National Laboratory under the U.S. DOE Office of Nuclear Energy’s Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program. SAM utilizes an object-oriented application framework (MOOSE), and its underlying meshing and finite-element library (libMesh) and linear and non-linear solvers (PETSc), to leverage modern advanced software environments and numerical methods. SNAP provides a highly flexible framework for creating, modifying and documenting input for engineering analysis codes such as SAM as well as extensive functionality for submitting, monitoring, and interacting with the codes through an intuitive graphical user interface (GUI). The common user interface provided by SNAP minimizes the learning curve for engineers starting with a new analysis code and provides an intuitive framework for transitioning between different analysis codes. SNAP provides a powerful but intuitive interface to facilitate access to advanced modeling and simulation tools for inexperienced users. Unlike many “form based” GUI’s, SNAP maps each engineering code’s component input to an internal database which manages all component input parameters along with component interconnections. This level of abstraction permits SNAP to support several advanced capabilities such as renodalization, model validation and consistency checks, embedded documentation, model notebook generation, data ownership and reviewer tracking, and variable assignment for inputs to name a few. SNAP includes a built-in Python interpreter and is interfaced to several commercial and open source packages including CPython, MATLAB/OCTAVE, Microsoft Office, Open Office, and SANDIA’s DAKOTA package which provides Uncertainty Quantification analysis through the SNAP plug-ins. Phase I of this project involved development a fully functional basic SAM plug-in to SNAP. This plug-in provides the ability to import existing models, graphically construct, edit and submit models using SNAP’s extensive functionality.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Multiscale-Informed Modeling of High Temperature Component Response with Uncertainty Quantification

This report summarizes a joint effort between Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory, and Los Alamos National Laboratory to develop and deploy constitutive models targeted at predicting the life of Grade 91 alloy components subjected to high temperature environments typical of those that structural components in advanced nuclear reactors would experience. Two distinct, but complementary constitutive modeling approaches have been taken here. The first employs a phenomenological viscoplastic model for which parameters have been calibrated based on experimental data for a wide range of Grade 91 alloy that has undergone a variety of processing. A Bayesian approach was used to derive distributions of uncertain parameters for this model based on this data set. The second approach is a reduced order model suitable for engineering-scale analysis that is based on the results of a large set of mesoscale simulations. Mesoscale models allow for the microstructure and composition of a particular alloy to be directly taken into account in the computation of the viscoplastic response, but are computationally expensive, which makes it impractical to directly call those models for the material constitutive response in an engineering-scale simulation. The reduced-order representation of the response of the underlying model used here allows for an engineering-scale model to take into account the characteristics of the underlying microstructure, while only incurring a reasonable computational expense. Both of these approaches have different strengths, and are applicable for different parts of the design/analysis process. The phenomenological models can be readily parameterized based on a set of experimental data for a given class of materials and used for scoping calculations. Once a specific material is chosen and adequately characterized, the reduced order models can accurately predict the response of that specific alloy, and because the models are based on predictive models of the underlying microstructure, they can be used to more confidently predict the response under conditions in regions where there is limited experimental data. Both of these models have been integrated in the Grizzly code, which is used here to perform proof-of-concept uncertainty quantification analyses of a simple component under prototypical conditions. The built- in stochastic analysis capabilities in the MOOSE framework that Grizzly is built on are used here to run large sets of simulations for this uncertainty quantification analysis. As would be expected, because the reduced order models are developed for a much more tightly defined alloy, they predict tighter distributions of the time to failure than the phenomenological models, which are calibrated to a broader set of data. Also important is that these simulations demonstrate that a reduced order modeling approach can be successfully deployed to propagate uncertainties from the material scale to practical engineering-scale component simulations.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2020

Benchmark Modeling and Simulation of the FFTF LOFWOS Test #13 Using SAM

The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) was a 400 MW thermal powered, oxide-fueled, liquid sodium cooled test reactor, built to assist development and testing of advanced fuels and materials for fast breeder reactors. In July 1986, a series of unprotected Loss of Flow Without Scram (LOFWOS) transients were performed in FFTF as part of the Passive Safety Testing (PST) program. The LOFWOS Test #13, which was initiated at 50% power and 100% flow with the pump pony motors left off, has been chosen as a benchmark case by IAEA to support collaborative efforts within international partnerships on the validation of simulation tools and models in the area of sodium fast reactor passive safety in an IAEA Coordinated Research Project (CRP), launched in October 2018. The System Analysis Module (SAM) is an advanced and modern system analysis tool under development at Argonne National Laboratory for advanced non-LWR safety analysis. It utilizes the object-oriented application framework MOOSE to leverage the modern software environment and advanced numerical methods. The capabilities of SAM are being extended to enable the transient modeling, analysis, and design of various advanced nuclear reactor systems. To participate the IAEA CRP and enhance the SAM validation base for advanced reactor transient safety analysis, benchmark simulations of the FFTF LOFWOS Test #13 are performed using the SAM code. In this first phase of the validation effort, the thermal-hydraulic behavior of the reactor system is the focus and the reactor kinetics is not considered in the SAM FFTF model. Instead, the results of Argonne’s neutronics calculations are directly used, including the power shape of the active core region and the power history during the transient. The simulation results of FFTF at steady state agreed well with the measured data from the test. During the transient, reasonably good agreement were also obtained. Future work to improve the model will focus on introducing the reactivity predictions into the model, as well as better understanding or resolving the current discrepancies with the measured data.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Sockeye Theory Manual

Sockeye is an application that models heat pipe performance, based on the MOOSE framework. Its primary focus is on liquid-metal heat pipes with annular screen or porous wick structures, with the intended application being the simulation of heat pipes in microreactors. The purpose of this capability is to evaluate and understand heat pipe performance under different conditions. Furthermore, this heat pipe performance is intended to be coupled to multiphysics applications for modeling microreactors, so that the effects of heat pipe performance on the larger reactor system can be simulated.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2020

FY20 SAM Code Developments and Validations for Transient Safety Analysis of Advanced non-LWRs

The System Analysis Module (SAM) is under development at Argonne National Laboratory as a modern system-level modeling and simulation tool for advanced non-light water reactor safety analyses. It utilizes the object-oriented application framework MOOSE to leverage the modern software environment and advanced numerical methods. The capabilities of SAM are being extended to enable the transient modeling, analysis, and design of various advanced nuclear reactor systems. This report summarizes major progress in SAM code development, capability enhancements, demonstration, and validation to support transient safety analysis of advanced non-LWRs. Rapid developments continued in fiscal year 2020 (FY20) to support various needs of the advanced reactor community, especially the NRC and industry on the licensing safety analysis of advanced reactor designs. Significant code changes were made to provide various capability enhancements, bug fixes, and user friendliness improvements. Major code updates are summarized in Section 1, while four important enhancements are detailed in Sections 2-5, including a multi-dimension flow model; reactivity feedback and decay heat models; control and trip system modeling, and additional fluid and solid thermophysical property models. Code validation activities in FY20 include using test data from the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF), the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF), and several separate effects test facilities for pebble-bed modeling.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗