Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “FUSION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

Fusion of Visible and Thermal-Infrared Imagery for SLAM for Landing on Icy Moons

This paper addresses the problem of localization for landing on the surface of icy moons, like Europa or Enceladus. Due to the possibility of specular reflection as well as high bulk albedo, icy surfaces present new challenges that make traditional vision-based navigation systems relying on visible imagery unreliable. We propose augmenting visible light cameras with a thermal-infrared camera using inverse-depth parameterized monocular EKF-SLAM to address problems arising from the appearance of icy moons. Results were obtained from a novel procedural Europa surface simulation which models the appearance and the thermal properties simultaneously from physically-based methods. In this framework, we show that thermal features improve localization by 23% on average when compared to a visible camera. Moreover, fusing both sensing modalities increases the improvement in localization to 31% on average, compared to using a visible light camera alone.

thermal vision↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Predicting Cognitive States Using Machine Learning Fusion Paradigms to Reduce Model Uncertainty

The development of a synergetic system between humans and technology is a challenge that the scientific community has been facing for many years. Our aeronautic research aims to enhance this synergy between humans and machines through predictive human performance modeling for systems to mitigate high-risk situations. By being able to predict and anticipate human states, the crew monitoring system should be able to adjust and support the pilot for aviation safety. Our work focusing on attention-related human performance-limiting states (AHPLS) that impact a pilot’s performance and introduce high-risk catastrophic situations [1]. For example, AHPLS has been cited as a causal factor in more than 50% of all loss control in flight and thus contributes significantly toward commercial aviation fatalities [1, 2]. Cognitive state and its physiological fingerprint can be valuable information for this detecting AHPLS, but human cognitive state detection is still a major limitation for these crew monitoring systems.

machine learning↗
NASA NTRS2020

NASA GRC Hosts Lattice Confinement Fusion Virtual Workshop

For several years (since 2014) the Advanced Energy Conversion (AEC) Project has examined novel nuclear reactions in materials that absorb large quantities of deuterium fuel tightly held in a lattice. These experiments culminated in a bremsstrahlung irradiation campaign that repeatedly induced nuclear reactions in deuterated metals.

Theresa L Benyo↗
NASA NTRS2019

Differences Between OCO‐2 and GOME‐2 SIF Products From a Model‐Data Fusion Perspective

Space-borne retrievals of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) over land surfaces have recently become a resource for studying and quantifying the broad scale dynamics of gross carbon uptake (gross primary productivity—GPP) across ecosystems. To prepare for the assimilation of SIF data in terrestrial biosphere models, we examine how differences between SIF products (due to differences in acquisition characteristics and processing chain) may affect the optimization of model parameters and the resultant GPP estimate. We compare recent daily mean SIF products (one from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 [OCO-2] and two from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment–2 [GOME-2], GlobFluo [GF] and NASA-v28 [N28], missions), averaged at 0.5° × 0.5° spatial resolution and 16-day temporal resolution, at the biome level. Phase differences between these products are relatively small. A first-order correction of the difference in spectral sampling between the two instruments shows that OCO-2 and N28 are consistent in terms of magnitude and amplitude, while GF is twice as large as the others. Using a bias-blind toy data assimilation framework, we analyze how biases between SIF products, and between model and products, can be partially alleviated by optimizing the slope and intercept parameters of a linear GPP-SIF operator. As observation biases can transfer to biases in other optimized process-based parameters and to modeled carbon fluxes— thereby resulting in unidentified inaccurate parameter values—we argue that potential SIF biases should be treated cautiously in real-world experiments in order to achieve realistic and reliable future simulations.

Gross primary production↗