Characterization of the Uranium-Bearing Products of the Ammonia Injection Remediation Method - 15707
Commissioned in 1943, the Hanford Site is the home of the world's first full-scale nuclear production facility. After more than 40 years of processing, improper discharge and failed storage tanks have resulted in the contamination of the Hanford vadose zone with radiologically contaminated waste. Remediation methods considered for the area include sequestration of the mobile uranium by injection of ammonia (NH{sub 3}) gas. Injection of this reactive gas increases the pore water pH, promoting the dissolution of soil minerals; a subsequent re-establishment of natural conditions is believed to result in the recrystallization of those soil minerals and the co-precipitation of uranium phases. Characterization of the precipitates formed when the ammonia (NH{sub 3}) injection method, proposed for the Hanford vadose zone, is applied to synthetic pore water on a laboratory scale. This involves: Identification of the uranium-bearing phases; A study of the effect of pore water constitution on the phases produced. Synthetic pore water solutions were prepared to mimic selected constituents of the pore water from the Hanford 200 Area: Varying constituent concentrations; Observations led to modifications to increase relative uranium content: 200 ppm → 500 ppm U; Substituted sodium silicate for silicic acid. Dried samples were analyzed by SEM-EDS and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD). A suspension in ethanol was prepared and analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) with Selective Area Electron Diffraction (SAED). Studied and applied geochemical modeling software (Visual Minteq and Geo-chemist's Workbench) for speciation and prediction of potential species formed. Discussion/Conclusions: - SEM-EDS Analysis: Scanning electron microscopy revealed areas of high average atomic weight which would be confirmed to be uranium-rich by energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis. The samples prepared with a more than two-fold increase in uranium concentration did not show the crystal-like forms spotted in the lower [U] samples. The samples prepared with silicic acid substituted in showed little to no uranium precipitation [not shown]. - Diffraction Analysis: Powder XRD analysis of the low [U] samples confirmed the presence of repeating crystalline patterns in the precipitate samples. Nitratine (NaNO{sub 3}) showed a massive presence, potentially obscuring significant peaks in the low [U] samples. Though it was not predicted, there was a tentative match for cejkaite (Na{sub 4}(UO{sub 2})(CO{sub 3}){sub 3}). Elevated uranium samples showed none of the needle-like crystalline shapes [diffraction data pending]. TEM - SAED confirmed the presence of a polycrystalline phase. Data analysis is complex but a comparison of average d-spacings with those of reference minerals could further support a match with cejkaite. - Geochemical Modeling: The system conditions were input into geochemical modeling software to predict the forms present throughout the reaction process. The model was used to demonstrate that the pH of the system could be increased using [NH{sub 4}{sup +}] in solution to better represent the system. Using the [NH{sub 4}{sup +}] increase, the changes in significant species with increasing pH were observed. Future Work: Repeat samples will be prepared and analyzed to bolster any potential identification. Promising samples will be submitted to the PNNL's EMSL facility, which is better equipped to perform the required analyses. An expanded study on the impact of carbonate (CO{sub 3}{sup 2-}) on the phases produced.