Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “raw materials”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

471 records · Page 27
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Specifications of FIPD Fission Gas Release Data

All fission gas release data stored in the Fuels Irradiation & Physics Database (FIPD) was originally measured using the Gas Assay, Sample and Recharge (GASR) System in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF). It is therefore called GASR data in FIPD. During the measurement of a sample, such as an irradiated EBR-II fuel element/capsule, a pinhole-sized region near the top of the element plenum was melted by a laser. Plenum gas then expanded into a calibrated volume (note: in this document, “sample” and “capsule/element” are used interchangeably consistent with GASR documents in FIPD). The pressure rise in the volume was recorded. Helium backfilling and expansion was then performed to determine the sample (e.g., fuel element plenum) volume using Boyle’s Law and assuming ideal gas behavior at constant temperature. With the plenum volume and the recorded pressure rise, the sample (e.g., fuel element plenum) pressure was derived with assumption of ideal gas law behavior. The plenum volume and pressure as well as the cladding temperature during the measurement were collected (GASR data in FIPD). Other records associated with the fission gas release data include: raw GASR data records including volumes and post-puncture pressures of seal head/sealing head and manifold, calibration data, backfilling gas pressure data, and the data analysis records. A sample(s) of the fission gas released from the plenum was collected by the GASR system into sample bottles. The chemical and isotopic composition of the gas sample was analyzed separately from GASR data, and will be discussed in a separate specification. The plenum volume, pressure, and cladding temperature during the measurement are typically utilized to determine the number of moles of gas in the plenum. This quantity is often compared to the number of moles of gas generated by fission events. However, calculating these values and their associated uncertainty is beyond the scope of this document, as it necessitates additional assumptions. The most important document to understand the FIPD fission gas data is the GASR operational manual (title: Gas Assay, Sample and Recharge System (GASR) operation and maintenance manual, HFEF/N OMM 4381, DOC. NO. W0018-0032-ES-00). This manual provides: (1) description of the GASR and the functions of each component (laser drilling, welding, seal head/sealing head, manifold, vacuum system, sample system, purge and gas tag system, etc.); (2) step-by-step guidance on calibrations, operations, and measurements; and (3) maintenance procedures and other details relating to the structure and operation of the GASR. Note that the original GASR operated until 2020. A new GASR with the same design and measurement methodology was installed in 2021. The specifications of the GASR presented on the HFEF website at this time are consistent with the ones given in the operational manual. The methods to calculate the plenum volume and pressures were not included in the operational manual, but were recorded in the legacy data analysis files. Details of the methods are given in Chapter 3.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Polysulfide entrapment and retardation in gel electrolyte Li–S batteries: experiments and modeling

Gelling the electrolyte in lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries provides advantages in terms of safety and mitigating polysulfide shuttling leading to reduced side reactions and dendrite growth on the anode side. In the current study, organic and ceramic crosslinkers have been used to improve the entrapment of polysulfides and prevent them from shuttling to the anode side. However, the performance of gel electrolytes is still far from being on par with liquid electrolytes in terms of raw capacity. The discharge curves exhibit an extended first plateau for gel electrolyte batteries compared to liquid electrolytes, showing that polysulfides are better trapped in the gel system. Yet, in the conversion of soluble polysulfides into insoluble polysulfides, the second plateau was delayed. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the polysulfide diffusion in the liquid electrolyte and gel electrolyte systems were also conducted to predict the relative diffusivity ratio between the liquid electrolyte and gel electrolyte for simulation. To probe what happens at the end of the discharge, where the mass transport in the gel electrolyte appears to be slow, a modified discharge procedure was used where the cell is first paused after discharge and then discharged a second time before recharging normally. Coin cell tests for two gel electrolytes in addition to liquid electrolyte show up to 7% capacity recovery after the pause, which indicates that the diffusion of species during the pause is responsible for the failure recovery. Additionally, the recovery is higher for gel electrolytes compared to liquid, for higher C-rates, and for longer pause times. To better understand this behavior, a Li–S numerical model with mass transport limited reactions was used to examine the polysulfide diffusion coefficients expected in different electrolyte systems. The model is able to reproduce the trends seen in experiments and yields a higher recovery for smaller Li 2 S 4 diffusion coefficients, suggesting that insufficient Li 2 S 4 mass transport is responsible for failure at the end of discharge. By identifying the effect that gel electrolytes have on the state of the battery during discharge using both experimental and simulation methods, this work is a step towards leveraging the advantages of gel electrolytes and mitigating their weaknesses.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Basin and Range Investigation for Developing Geothermal Energy: Exploration Data

This data package includes exploration material from the Basin & Range Investigation for Developing Geothermal Energy [in Hidden Systems] project (BRIDGE), which is part of a broader initiative to advance the exploration of hidden geothermal resources in the Basin & Range Province of the western U.S. Data modalities include a helicopter-borne time-domain electromagnetic survey, magnetotellurics, 2-meter temperature measurements, ground-based gravity and legacy aeromagnetic surveys, geochemistry, geologic mapping, LiDAR analysis, 3D models, associated geospatial data, and a bibliography of existing data and references utilized in prospect characterization and conceptual modeling. Key files are in CSV, Geosoft, and Geotools formats. Please refer to READMEs for dataset-specific information. Where applicable, acquisition data and inversion models for a particular prospect or area of interest are organized separately. This BRIDGE data package is the product of a collaboration led by Sandia National Laboratories with partners from Geologica Geothermal Group, Inc., the U.S. Navy Geothermal Program Office, and consultants Steven Sewell (Australis Geoscience Ltd) and William Cumming (Cumming Geoscience). The project's areas of interest (AOIs) are based off priority areas of interest in the southwestern portion of the Nevada Play Fairway map, distribution across tectonic provinces, accessibility, and the project team's extensive experience in the region. AOIs cover about a dozen basins that include unexplored prospects, partially explored prospects, and some developed analogue resources that provide validation cases. Many unexplored and partially explored prospects are on U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) land, though adjacent lands are included as well.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗