Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “isolation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2000

Blade-Vortex Interaction of an Isolated Full-Scale XV-15 Tilt-Rotor

Blade-vortex interaction noise of an isolated full-scale XV-15 tilt-rotor was investigated in the NASA Ames 80- by 120-Foot Wind Tunnel. The objective was to establish the baseline BVI noise signature of a fullscale tilt-rotor and to investigate several noise reduction concepts, including blade-tip subwings, reduced tip Mach number, and the addition of a fourth blade to the rotor system. At the nominal tip Mach number of 0.691, the peak BVI levels were found to occur at a tip-path-plane angle of 4-deg and at the highest advance ratio tested of 0.2. The BVI noise levels were found to be weakly dependent on CT/s. As would be expected, reducing tip Mach number, either of the baseline 3-blade rotor, or in conjunction with a 4-blade rotor, was found to be an effective way to significantly reduce noise. The addition of the tested subwings did not seem to be an effective strategy for noise reduction, and they incurred a performance penalty.

AEROMECHANICS↗
NASA NTRS2016

Parametric Investigation of the Effect of Hub Pitching Moment on Blade Vortex Interaction (BVI) Noise of an Isolated Rotor

At the most fundamental level, main rotor loading noise is caused by the harmonically-varying aerodynamic loads (acoustic pressures) exerted by the rotating blades on the air. Rotorcraft main rotor noise is therefore, in principle, a function of rotor control inputs, and thus the forces and moments required to achieve steady, or "trim", flight equilibrium. In certain flight conditions, the ensuing aerodynamic loading on the rotor(s) can result in highly obtrusive harmonic noise. The effect of the propulsive force, or X-force, on Blade-Vortex Interaction (BVI) noise is well documented. This paper presents an acoustics parametric sensitivity analysis of the effect of varying rotor aerodynamic pitch hub trim moments on BVI noise radiated by an S-70 helicopter main rotor. Results show that changing the hub pitching moment for an isolated rotor, trimmed in nominal 80 knot, 6 and 12 deg descent, flight conditions, alters the miss distance between the blades and the vortex in ways that have varied and noticeable effects on the BVI radiated-noise directionality. Peak BVI noise level is however not significantly altered. The application of hub pitching moment allows the attitude of the fuselage to be controlled; for example, to compensate for the uncomfortable change in fuselage pitch attitude introduced by a fuselage-mounted X-force controller.

Parametric Investigation↗
NASA NTRS2018

Analytical Performance, Loads, and Aeroelastic Stability of a Full-Scale Isolated Proprotor

The prediction of the performance and loads of a full-scale isolated proprotor and the calculation of whirl flutter stability of the rotor installed in a wind tunnel are considered in this study. The comprehensive analysis CAMRAD II is used. The test article is a research proprotor based on the Bell 609 rotor and the wind tunnel test apparatus is the newly developed Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) installed in the USAF NFAC 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. The performance and loads predictions and the stability calculations cover the following operating conditions: hover, cruise, conversion, and helicopter mode. These pre-test analytical results are being obtained to identify test operating limits, ensure a safe wind tunnel test and predict test results. Eventually, the goal is to perform a correlation study, identify shortfalls in the analytical model and introduce improvements to the analytical model. Performance and loads test results to date show that rotor torque (and yoke lag moment) may limit the test envelope. Shake test data based stability analysis shows that the TTR/609 is solidly stable within the test envelope.

Proprotor↗
NASA NTRS2019

Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of a Full-Scale Isolated Proprotor on the Tiltrotor Test Rig

A full-scale isolated proprotor test was recently conducted in the USAF National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames. The test article was a 3-bladed research rotor derived from the right-hand rotor of the AW609. For this test, the NASA Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) and rotor were installed in the 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. This paper covers the analyses and testing done to prepare for a safe entry. Included are brief descriptions of the following: NASTRAN models of the TTR, ground vibration tests of the TTR (and resulting modal data), loads analyses, and stability predictions using the comprehensive analysis CAMRAD II. The evolution of these analyses from early in the TTR program until the initiation of actual testing is also discussed. The intent is to show how all of these efforts were integrated to ensure a successful test. This paper includes stability predictions based on NASTRAN modal data and worst-case damping test data. The stability predictions covered all test conditions: hover, cruise (airplane mode), conversion, and helicopter mode. The predictions showed that the TTR and rotor are stable within the test envelope.

Full-Scale Isolated Proprotor↗
NASA NTRS2019

Correlation of Full-Scale Isolated Proprotor Performance and Loads

A full-scale isolated proprotor test is currently being conducted in the USAF National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames. The test article is a 3-bladed research rotor derived from the right-hand rotor of the AW609; this rotor was manufactured by Bell Helicopter under contract to NASA. In this paper, this research rotor is referred to as "699". The test, nearly completed, is an integral part of the initial checkout test of the newly developed Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR), whose purpose is to test advanced, full-scale proprotors in the NFAC. Figure 1 shows the TTR/699 installed in the 40- by 80-Foot test section. The TTR rotor axis is horizontal and the rig rotates in yaw on the wind tunnel turntable for conversion (transition) and helicopter mode testing. To date, a substantial amount of wind tunnel test data has already been acquired. The completed operational conditions include hover, airplane mode (cruise, wind tunnel airspeed V=61 to 267 knots), and the helicopter and conversion conditions (with a comprehensive sweep of the TTR yaw angle ranging, to date, from 90-deg yaw helicopter mode to 30-deg yaw conversion mode, at varying airspeeds). This 699 proprotor performance and loads correlation study uses these newly acquired wind tunnel test data. This paper represents the third analytical study, coming after two earlier analytical studies on the TTR/699; that is, a 2018 paper on pre-test predictions of 699 performance and loads, Ref. 1, and an upcoming January 2019 paper on aeroelastic stability analysis of the TTR/699 installed in the 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel, Ref. 2. Reference 8 will present an overview of the entire TTR/699 test program. For completeness, Ref. 3 addresses the development and initial testing of the TTR. Background information on the TTR effort at NASA Ames can be found at the Aeromechanics website: https://rotorcraft.arc.nasa.gov/Research/Facilities/ttr.html. To the authors' knowledge, the full-scale results presented in this paper are the first of their kind. A literature survey brought up several existing correlation studies, but these were either based on small-scale test data (for example, the studies performed by the University of Maryland) or full-scale aircraft flight test data (for example, flight tests conducted by Bell Helicopter). Separately, the 2009 NASA study involving the JVX rotor is relevant (see Ref.4). The JVX is closely similar to the 699 in size and aerodynamics, and is accordingly a good reference for performance calculations. In Ref. 1 (as mentioned above), pre-test reality checks of the current analytical model were made by comparing JVX and 699 predictions in hover and forward flight (airplane mode).

Isolated Proprotor Performance↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Behavioral Medicine Risks and Mitigations in Isolated, Confined, and Extreme Environments

Human spaceflight beyond low Earth orbit will present unique environmental challenges to astronauts’ operational performance and well-being. Crews will need to work and live in confined and hazardous environments for prolonged missions that involve variable workloads and limitations to privacy, food options, exercise capabilities, leisure outlets, and communication with ground support personnel and loved ones. Currently, behavioral and cognitive risks of spaceflight are mitigated by selecting exceptionally resilient crews and providing extensive individual and team skills training pre-mission, as well as in-mission crew support via a suite of countermeasures targeting sleep and performance optimization, stress management, family support, and team cohesion. However, current countermeasures are difficult or impossible to implement in long-distance exploration as they require real-time communication with Earth and routine resupply. New countermeasure approaches are needed to adapt and enhance the current complement for the new challenges ahead. NASA therefore conducts research at ground-based spaceflight analogs to aid in characterizing the behavioral and cognitive risks of living and working in isolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) operational environments. Antarctic research stations are among the few long-duration ICE analogs in existence and are therefore uniquely positioned to support behavioral medicine research to enable human exploration beyond Earth. In this review, we will discuss previous and ongoing efforts to better understand spaceflight behavioral medicine risks, as well as validate new countermeasure approaches for future missions to the moon and Mars.

Behavioral Health↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Teal Cycle Ergometer Vibration Isolation and Stabilization System Human-in-the-Loop Ground Evaluation for Long-Duration Spaceflight

Purpose: To counter the deleterious effects of weightlessness on the cardiopulmonary system, astronauts living on the International Space Station exercise on a variety of countermeasure equipment including the Cycle Ergometer Vibration Isolation and Stabilization System (CEVIS). Operational since 2001, the onboard CEVIS will be replaced by a new model, known as Teal CEVIS (TC). As a part of ground evaluation, TC hardware underwent human-in-the-loop (HITL) testing to verify the TC hardware produces workloads that elicit physiologic responses comparable to a laboratory cycle ergometer (LAB). Methods: Seven subjects (5 M/2 F) performed submaximal cycle ergometer testing with indirect calorimetry measures on TC and LAB on separate test days. Testing consisted of graded 30 watt increases in workload until subjects reached 85% of age-predicted max heart rate (HR). Exercise outcomes included rate of oxygen uptake (VO2; liters/min), rate of energy expenditure (REE; kcal/min), and HR (beats/min). Linear mixed models (LMM) were fitted to compare VO2, REE, and HR responses between devices across power outputs with fixed effects for power (P) and device (D) and with random effects for subject. LMM effect coefficients (β), std errors (SE), pseudo-partial R2 of effects (pR2), and model likelihood ratio statistics (χ2, Pr(> chisq); α<.05) are provided. Results: LMM main effects for P and D were observed for VO2 (βp=.0107, SE = .0002, pR2=0.97; βd = -0.075, SE = 0.019, pR2=0.14; χ2(1)= 13.57, p<.001), such that VO2 was higher across stages on TC. Main effects of P and D were observed for REE (βp= .0586, SE = 0.001, pR2= 0.97; βd = -0.33208, SE = 0.099, pR2= 0.056; χ2(1)=10.481, p < .01), such that REE was higher across power outputs on TC. A P x D interaction was observed for HR, along with main effects for P and D (βp x d =-0.048, SE = 0.02, pR2=0.048; βp= 0.42, SE = 0.016, pR2=0.87; χ2(1) = 5.398, p = 0.02), such that higher workloads elicited a greater difference in HR between devices. Conclusions: HITL results show, TC elicits greater physiologic responses across power outputs compared to LAB. However, pR2 for device effects show small differences between devices. Therefore, TC can be expected to provide appropriate physiological stimulus across workloads and be considered a reliable tool to mitigate the effects of weightlessness.

Cycle Ergometer Vibration and Isolation System↗