Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Lithium Battery”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Electrospun Separator Based on Sulfonated Polyoxadiazole with Outstanding Thermal Stability and Electrochemical Properties for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Traditional polyolefin separators used in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are seriously limited by the issues of inferior security and poor electrolyte wettability. Most of the very promising candidate separators based on heat-resistant polymers are, however, inherently difficult to process. Herein, a unique sulfonated aromatic heterocyclic polymer, lithiated poly(diphenyl ether oxadiazole) sulfonate (Li-SPEOD), was synthesized through a simple one-pot method and further electrospun to act as a novel separator (es-Li-SPEOD) for LIBs. In this work, the prepared Li-SPEOD possesses a high degree of sulfonation with a high molecular weight (M w = 4.31 × 10 5 ). The es-Li-SPEOD separator exhibits excellent mechanical and fire-resistance properties and is able to maintain dimensional stability at a temperature of even up to 400 °C in air. The ionic conductivity (3.57 mS cm –1 ) and lithium-ion transference number (0.37) of the es-Li-SPEOD with an electrochemical stability window of 4.5 V vs Li + /Li can be improved by 382.4 and 32.1%, respectively, compared to those of Celgard-2500 in the LiPF 6 electrolyte. The enhanced rate capability and cycle performance of the LiFePO 4 –Li half-cell are therefore obtained. Moreover, the es-Li-SPEOD displays an outstanding dendrite-suppressing effect for the lithium metal anode. This research proves that the Li-SPEOD-based separator has a broad application perspective in next-generation lithium batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Terminally fluorinated glycol ether electrolyte for lithium metal batteries

Despite being an excellent candidate for lithium metal batteries due to its stability towards lithium metal, ethereal solvent suffers from relatively low anodic stability, rendering it incompatible with high voltage cathode. Although the anodic stability of ethereal solvent can be enhanced by fluorination, the lithium solvating ability of fluorinated ethers is largely reduced. As a result, common hydrofluoroethers, such as 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropylether (TTE) and bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) ether (BTFE) are not able to dissolve any lithium salt, albeit enhanced oxidation potential. Therefore, new fluorinated glycol ethers were synthesized in this research. The diglyme analog, which was terminally fluorinated, demonstrated high anodic stability and excellent capability to facilitate lithium plating/stripping. Unlike its non-fluorinated counterpart, the fluorinated diglyme analog displayed outstanding compatibility with lithium hexafluorophosphate, which is an essential salt in lithium-ion batteries. Here it was shown that the electrolyte based on fluorinated diglyme analog with fluoroethylene carbonate as co-solvent enabled highly stable cycling of Li-metal batteries pairing with layered oxide cathode.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Impact of secondary particle size and two-layer architectures on the high-rate performance of thick electrodes in lithium-ion battery pouch cells

Increasing lithium-ion battery gravimetric energy density to > 300 Wh/kg, while simultaneously meeting a cost target of $80/kWh, is of paramount importance to increasing the driving range and affordability of electric vehicles. One way to address this goal is to reduce inactive components by increasing electrode areal capacities, but conventional thick electrode designs typically perform poorly at high discharge rates due to Li + mass transport limitations. Here we compare the rate capability and cycle life of NMC 532/graphite pouch cells made with five different thick cathode and anode designs paired together in 25 combinations. We find that using different particle sizes to structure both the cathode and anode architectures in two-layer configurations results in a 2X capacity improvement over the worst-performing combination at high discharge rates (97 vs. 46 mAh/g at 2C). These different cathode/anode designs also translate to different cycle life performance, with many cells cycled at C/2 achieving ~80% capacity retention after 1000 cycles, and cells cycled at 2C showing different degrees of capacity fade. Altogether, these results demonstrate that simple, scalable changes in electrode design can significantly improve the performance of thick electrodes for high energy density batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Dynamic spatial progression of isolated lithium during battery operations

The increasing demand for next-generation energy storage systems necessitates the development of high-performance lithium batteries. Unfortunately, current Li anodes exhibit rapid capacity decay and a short cycle life, owing to the continuous generation of solid electrolyte interface and isolated Li (i-Li). The formation of i-Li during the nonuniform dissolution of Li dendrites leads to a substantial capacity loss in lithium batteries under most testing conditions. Because i-Li loses electrical connection with the current collector, it has been considered electrochemically inactive or ‘dead’ in batteries. In this work, contradicting this commonly accepted presumption, we show that i-Li is highly responsive to battery operations, owing to its dynamic polarization to the electric field in the electrolyte. Simultaneous Li deposition and dissolution occurs on two ends of the i-Li, leading to its spatial progression toward the cathode (anode) during charge (discharge). Revealed by our simulation results, the progression rate of i-Li is mainly affected by its length, orientation and the applied current density. Moreover, we successfully demonstrate the recovery of i-Li in Cu–Li cells with >100% Coulombic efficiency and realize LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC)–Li full cells with extended cycle life.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Coal-derived carbon anodes for lithium-ion batteries: Development, challenges, and prospects

Lithium-ion battery (LIB) development has increased rapidly, requiring low-cost anode materials with a high capacity, high-rate performance, and stable lifespan. Carbon-based anodes possess various exceptional morphologies and structures, making them promising candidates for meeting the technical demands; however, conventional synthetic carbon anode processes need expensive feedstocks that increase anode cost and limit commercialization. Coal, the most affordable and abundant carbon resource, has attracted increasing attention as the primary feedstock for producing high-value carbon anode materials. This article reviews the lithium storage mechanisms, characteristics, and productions of some high-valuable carbon anode materials for LIBs from coal and coal derivatives. The high-value carbon anode materials reviewed in this article are graphite, graphene, mesophase microbeads (MCMB), carbon fiber, and hard carbons. Furthermore, the remaining challenges and prospects of using coal-derived carbon materials to create high-performance and low-cost lithium-ion batteries are also discussed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Synergistic Anion and Solvent-Derived Interphases Enable Lithium-Ion Batteries under Extreme Conditions

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) face increasingly stringent demands as their application expands into new areas, including extreme temperatures and fast charging. To meet these demands, the electrolyte should enable fast lithium-ion transport and form stable interphases on electrodes simultaneously. In practice, however, improving one aspect often compromises another. For instance, the trend toward electrolytes forming anion-derived interphases typically reduces transport efficiency due to weak-solvating solvents. Here, we propose that instead of relying on anions to form the interphase, leveraging both solvents and anions to form interphases can potentially lead to a balancing point between robust interphase formation and effective ion transport. Guided by this design principle, 2,2-difluoroethyl ethyl carbonate (DFDEC) was identified as the promising solvent. With the new electrolyte using DFDEC as the major solvent and lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl) imide (LiFSI) as the salt, graphite||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) full cells are capable of fast charging and demonstrate long-term cycling stability with a cutoff voltage of 4.5 V. Notably, the battery shows a capacity retention of 84.3% after 500 cycles with an average Coulombic efficiency (CE) as high as 99.93%. This new electrolyte also enables stable battery cycling across a wide temperature range (-20 to 60 °C), with excellent capacity retention.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2026

Metal–Organic Framework-derived Atomic Metal Sites Promoting Sulfur Cathode for All-Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

All-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs) offer high energy density and intrinsic safety; however, they still face major challenges, including sluggish redox kinetics and poor sulfur utilization. Incorporating conductive materials into sulfur cathodes is an effective strategy to mitigate these limitations. Here, a highly conductive cobalt–nitrogen–doped carbon (Co–NC) derived from a metal–organic framework (MOF) is introduced to accelerate charge transfer and promote reversible sulfur conversion. Co−NC provides atomically dispersed Co–N sites and conductive carbon pathways that correlate with improved charge transfer, sulfur utilization, and rate capability. Co–NC@S cathode delivers 1499 mAh g–1 at C/20 with a high sulfur loading (5 mg cm–2) and retains 1292 mAh g–1 after five cycles (vs 443 mAh g–1 without Co–NC). Moreover, Co–NC derived ASSLSB achieves 903 mAh g–1 at 5C at 60 °C. This work provides a practical and effective approach to develop high energy, high-rate ASSLSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Structural, Electrochemical, and (De)lithiation Mechanism Investigation of Cation-Disordered Rocksalt and Spinel Hybrid Nanomaterials in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Significant demand for lithium-ion batteries necessitates alternatives to Co- and Ni-based cathode materials. Cation-disordered materials using earth-abundant elements are being explored as promising candidates. Here, in this paper, we demonstrate a coprecipitation synthetic approach that allows direct preparation of disordered rocksalt Li 2.4 Fe 1.0 Ti 1.0 O 4.7 (r-LFTO·C) and spinel structured hybrid Li 0.5 Fe 1.0 Ti 0.9 O 3.2 ·C (s-LFTO·C) nanoparticles with a conformal conductive carbon coating. High-angle annular dark-field imaging coupled with electron energy loss spectroscopy mapping shows uniform Fe/Ti distribution with minor compositional variation among particles. Cation disorder was confirmed for both of the materials at an atomic level, with a short-range order more pronounced in r-LFTO·C. Operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy, ex situ hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ex situ soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and ex situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction were used to investigate (de)lithiation in the bulk and at the surface. Structurally, the r-LFTO·C demonstrated reversible partial Fe center migration between octahedral and tetrahedral sites during (de)lithiation. The r-LFTO·C evidenced that the redox of O was coincident with iron redox during initial electrochemical cycling, while iron redox dominated later cycling. In contrast, s-LFTO·C electrochemistry involved iron redox throughout the cycling process. The findings rationalize the differences in the electrochemistry where r-LFTO·C shows higher initial capacity yet poorer capacity retention over a voltage window where O redox can be accessed, while the s-LFTO·C shows lower initial capacity yet improved capacity retention.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

High-entropy electrolytes for practical lithium metal batteries

Electrolyte engineering is crucial for improving battery performance, particularly for lithium metal batteries. Recent advances in electrolytes have greatly improved cyclability by enhancing electrochemical stability at the electrode interfaces, but concurrently achieving high ionic conductivity has remained challenging. Here we report an electrolyte design strategy for enhanced lithium metal batteries by increasing the molecular diversity in electrolytes, which essentially leads to high entropy electrolytes (HEEs). We find that in weakly solvating electrolytes, the entropy effect reduces ion clustering while preserving the characteristic anion-rich solvation structures, which is characterized by synchrotron-based X-ray scattering and molecular dynamics simulations. Electrolytes with smaller- sized clusters exhibit a 2-fold improvement in ionic conductivity compared to conventional weakly- solvating electrolytes, enabling stable cycling at high current densities up to 2C (6.2 mA cm -2 ) in anode- free LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 (NMC622)||Cu pouch cells. In conclusion, the efficacy of the design strategy is verified by performance improvements in three disparate weakly solvating electrolyte systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Understanding effects of conductive additives in lithium-sulfur batteries

Since 2009, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have been attracting much research interest, ascribed to their high energy density and cost-effectiveness. However, their S cathodes are harassed by the poor conductivity, shuttling of lithium polysulfides (LPSs), and large volume change. In improving conductivity of S cathodes, carbon materials are widely used as conductive additives. However, there still lacks a comparative study on their geometric and structural effects in Li-S batteries. To this end, a systematic investigation is conducted on two different typical conductive additives, carbon black (CB) 1 and nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets (N-GNS) 2 . This work reveals that, compared to the zero-dimensional (0D) CB nanoparticles, the two-dimensional (2D) N-GNS is structurally less defective and has a larger surface area. Furthermore, as a result, the 2D structure of the N-GNS helps achieve higher capacity retention but inhibits Li-ion transportation. In comparison, the 0D structure of the CB facilitates the transportation of Li-ions with a higher initial capacity but exposed to a severer shuttling behavior of LPSs. It is also found that a combination of the CB and N-GNS enables better performance of Li-S batteries, in terms of sustainable capacity, Coulombic efficiency, and rate capability. This study is inspiring for designing better S cathodes for Li-S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Deep eutectic solvent-based polymer electrolyte for solid-state lithium metal batteries

Poly(ethylene) oxide (PEO)-based electrolytes have been widely studied for solid-state lithium batteries while their ionic conductivity and lithium-ion transference number still need to be further improved. Herein, using the combined experimental and theoretical approach, we demonstrate a novel, solid-state PEO-deep eutectic solvent (DES) electrolyte for the first time. We found that the in situ formation of DES can reduce the crystallinity of PEO matrix and more Li + ions can move freely owing to the weakened coordination between ether oxygens and Li-ions. Besides, we show that more Li + ions can be dissociated from Li salts in PEO-DES electrolyte using the molecular dynamics simulations. Such liquid-free PEO-DES electrolytes showed good ionic conductivity (2.1 × 10 −4 S cm −1 ) which is 160% higher than that of conventional PEO-LiTFSI (8.1 × 10 −5 S cm −1 ) electrolyte at 60 °C. Additionally, the PEO-DES electrolyte showed 136% increase of Li-ion transference number (0.33) compared with ionic liquid-doped PEO-LiTFSI (0.14) at 60 °C. Moreover, the PEO-DES exhibited good compatibility with Li metal and stable Li plating/stripping behavior with little morphology change of Li metal. In conclusion, this research also provides new insights into the enhancement mechanisms of novel polymer electrolytes, improving our fundamental understanding of critical challenges that have impeded the adoption of solid-state lithium metal batteries.

Deep eutectic solvent↗
DOE OSTI2020

Lithium ion battery

A multi-core lithium ion battery includes a sealed enclosure and a support member disposed within the sealed enclosure. The support member includes a plurality of cavities and a plurality of lithium ion core members which are disposed the plurality of cavities. The battery further includes a plurality of cavity liners, each of which is positioned between a corresponding one of the lithium ion core members and a surface of a corresponding one of the cavities.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Safety issues of defective lithium-ion batteries: identification and risk evaluation

Lithium-ion batteries inevitably suffer minor damage or defects caused by external mechanical abusive loading, e.g. , penetration, deformation, and scratch without triggering a hard/major short circuit. The replacement of cells becomes a dilemma if the safety risk of the defective batteries remains unknown. Herein, by introducing a representative defect form, i.e. , screw indentation, we demonstrate the safety characteristics of defective batteries. We prove that defective batteries have a significantly increased thermal risk and deteriorated mechanical integrity, but can go undetected due to prompt voltage recovery and insignificant local temperature increase. We discover that the voltage curve within the first few cycles contains sufficient information to identify defective batteries from otherwise good ones and propose methodologies to monitor the cells. Capacity loss and current leakage are two characteristics that can be estimated using the voltage curve. According to the defect size and position, the capacity loss could be 1 to 10 2 mA h and the leakage current could be 5–50 mA. Results remove the barriers for defective battery safety risk evaluation, enabling identification, monitoring, and early warning of minor damaged batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Lithium ion battery

A multi-core lithium ion battery includes a sealed enclosure and a support member disposed within the sealed enclosure. The sealed enclosure may further include at least two support members housed within individual compartments, separated by shared wall(s). The support member(s) includes a plurality of cavities and a plurality of lithium ion core members which are disposed within the plurality of cavities. The battery may further include a plurality of cavity liners, each of which is positioned between a corresponding one of the lithium ion core members and a surface of a corresponding one of the cavities. The hermetically sealed enclosure may be formed using a clamshell configuration. Structures may be included in proximity to or in contact with the lithium ion core members to control gas/fluid flow therefrom.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Lithium ion battery

A multi-core lithium ion battery includes a sealed enclosure and a support member disposed within the sealed enclosure. The sealed enclosure may be fabricated with a clamshell configuration. The sealed enclosure may further include at least two support members housed within individual compartments, separated by shared wall(s). The support member(s) includes a plurality of cavities and a plurality of lithium ion core members which are disposed within the plurality of cavities. The battery may further include a plurality of cavity liners, each of which is positioned between a corresponding one of the lithium ion core members and a surface of a corresponding one of the cavities. The hermetically sealed enclosure may be formed using a clamshell configuration. Structures may be included in proximity to or in contact with the lithium ion core members to control gas/fluid flow therefrom.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Self-Healing Lithium Dendrites through Spontaneous Passivating Layer Formation for Stable Solid-State Lithium–Metal Batteries

All-solid-state lithium–metal batteries have attracted significant attention, owing to their high energy density and superior safety. However, lithium–metal penetration through the solid electrolyte, leading to short-circuiting, remains a critical failure mode that demands comprehensive mitigation strategies. Most existing strategies are effective only prior to the initiation of lithium-dendrite formation and fail once dendrites begin to propagate through the electrolyte. In this study, we propose a self-healing mechanism in which the penetrated lithium reacts with a self-healing agent to form a passivating layer along the particle boundaries. Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) was incorporated into a Li 6 PS 5 Cl solid electrolyte as the self-healing agent to suppress lithium-dendrite propagation even after dendrite formation initiated under high current densities. The self-healing induced by LiTFSI was verified through comprehensive experimental analyses and was further demonstrated in a full-cell configuration. Moreover, LiTFSI incorporation plays an important role in increasing the critical current density by reducing the overall electronic conductivity of the solid electrolyte and facilitating the formation of a robust LiF-containing solid-electrolyte interphase.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Analysis of Degradation and Electrochemical Behavior of Lithium–Oxygen Batteries under Lean Electrolyte Conditions

Lithium-oxygen batteries have garnered much attention in the past decades due to their high energy density and active material abundancy. Decreasing the electrolyte volume is critical to achieving a high energy density for practical applications. Recent works have demonstrated a serious performance limitation at lower electrolyte fillings. Here, in this work, we study specifically the difference between flooded and lean electrolyte lithium-oxygen batteries by systematically tracing the source of performance degradation. We find that the key contributor to the decrease in performance under lean electrolyte conditions stems from the lithium metal anode rather than the cathode. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) compositionally appears to be the same from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy but the coverage is less uniform, and impedance is much higher under lean electrolyte conditions. Such an effect likely produced the observed poorer cycle performance at 10 μL cm -2 (similar to 28% cathode's pore volume filled) vs 100 μL cm -2 (278% of cathode's pore volume) at a capacity of 1.0 mAh cm -2 (0.1 mAh cm -2 ) using an electrolyte composition of 1 M LiTFSI in TEGDME.

Córdoba, Daniel [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)↗