Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Hanford Site Ground Squirrel Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2021

The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) conducts ecological monitoring on the Hanford Site to collect and track data needed to ensure compliance with an array of environmental laws, regulations, and policies governing U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) activities. Ecological monitoring data provide baseline information about the plants, animals, and habitat under DOE-RL stewardship at the Hanford Site required for accurate ecological impact assessment decision making under the National Environmental Policy Act and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. In addition, ecological monitoring helps ensure that DOE-RL, its contractors, and other entities conducting activities on the Hanford Site are in compliance with DOE/EIS- 0222-F, Hanford Site Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). DOE-RL places priority on monitoring those plant and animal species or habitats with specific regulatory protections or requirements; that are rare and/or declining (federal or state listed endangered, threatened, or sensitive species); or of significant interest to federal, state, or Tribal governments or the public.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Hanford Site Revegetation Monitoring Report for Fiscal Year 2022

This report describes the monitoring of areas revegetated by various contractors on the Hanford Site. Revegetation sites include those revegetated by the River Corridor Closure Contractor and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company that were transitioned to Mission Support Alliance (MSA) in 2017. These sites, along with sites revegetated by MSA between 2017 and 2020, were transitioned to Hanford Mission Integration Solutions (HMIS) in 2021. HMIS performs revegetation monitoring activities for these transitioned sites and for sites revegetated by HMIS and other contractors in subsequent years to determine revegetation site success. This report contains data collected in 2022 documenting the recovery of revegetation areas associated with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 cleanup of National Priorities List waste sites and restoration of lands disturbed by ongoing mission activities at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. It contains vegetation monitoring data for 53 sites selected to be representative sites for areas planted between the years of fiscal year (FY) 2007 and FY 2022.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Hanford Site Revegetation Monitoring Report for Fiscal Year 2021

This report describes the monitoring of areas revegetated by the River Corridor Closure Contractor (RCCC) and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) that were transitioned to Mission Support Alliance (MSA) in 2017. These sites, along with sites revegetated by MSA between 2017 and 2020, were transitioned to Hanford Mission Integration Solutions (HMIS) in 2021. Site monitoring is a continuance of efforts performed by the RCCC from fiscal year (FY) 2007 through FY 2020. This report contains data collected in 2021 documenting the recovery of revegetation areas associated with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 cleanup of National Priorities List waste sites and restoration of lands disturbed by ongoing Site mission activities at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. It contains vegetation monitoring data for 52 sites selected to be representative sites for areas planted between the years of FY 2007 and FY 2021.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Hanford Site Revegetation Monitoring Report for Fiscal Year 2020

This report describes the monitoring of areas revegetated by the River Corridor Closure Contractor (RCCC) and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) that were transitioned to and monitored by Mission Support Alliance (MSA) in 2020, along with sites revegetated by MSA. Site monitoring is a continuance of efforts performed by the RCCC from fiscal year (FY) 2007 through FY 2020. This report contains data collected in 2020 documenting the recovery of revegetation areas associated with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 cleanup of National Priorities List waste sites and restoration of lands disturbed by ongoing Site mission activities at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. It contains vegetation monitoring data for 41 sites selected to be representative sites for areas planted between the years of FY 2007 and FY 2020.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Hanford Site Post-Fire Vegetation Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2023

The Hanford Site is comprised of an expanse of shrub-steppe habitats that provide exceptional value to plants and animals located on the Hanford Site and in the surrounding greater Columbia Basin. The greatest threat to this habitat is fire-related conversion to a cheatgrass-dominated monoculture. To decrease future fire risk and to disrupt the positive feedback cycle between cheatgrass and fire, land managers can make efforts to restore native vegetation following a fire. The goal of this report is to summarize fires and fire monitoring efforts that occurred in 2023 and analyze vegetation recovery post-fire in both restored and unrestored areas to inform future post-fire response actions.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Hanford Site Post-Fire Vegetation Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2022

The Hanford Site is comprised of an expanse of shrub-steppe habitats that provide exceptional value to plants and animals located on the Site and in the surrounding greater Columbia Basin. The greatest threat to this habitat is fire-related conversion to a cheatgrass-dominated monoculture. In order to decrease future fire risk and to disrupt the positive feedback cycle between cheatgrass and fire, land managers can make efforts to restore native vegetation following a fire. The goal of this report is to analyze vegetation recovery post-fire in both restored and unrestored areas to inform future post-fire response actions.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Hanford Site Post-Fire Vegetation Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2021

The Hanford Site presents an expanse of shrub-steppe habitat that provides exceptional value to plants and animals located on the Site and in the surrounding greater Columbia Basin. The greatest threat to this habitat is fire-related conversion to a cheatgrass-dominated monoculture. In order to decrease future fire risk and to disrupt the positive feedback cycle between cheatgrass and fire, land managers can make efforts to restore native vegetation following a fire. The goal of this report is to analyze vegetation recovery post-fire in both restored and unrestored areas to inform future post-fire response actions.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2025

Hanford Site Rare Plant Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2023-2024

This report summarizes rare plant monitoring data collected in calendar years (CY) 2023 through CY 2024 and provides management recommendations accordingly. DOE/RL-2021-35, Central Hanford Rare Plant Management Plan, guides the approach to rare plant monitoring and management at the Hanford Site. In CYs 2023 and 2024, rare plant monitoring efforts occurred on the portion of the Hanford Site managed by the Hanford Field Office (HFO; Figure 1-1), referred to herein as Central Hanford. The goal of monitoring is to collect data to evaluate the conservation status of rare plant species. Surveys conducted in CY 2023 through CY 2024 built on previous monitoring efforts, tracking the abundance and distribution of rare plants at Central Hanford. Results from previous monitoring efforts are included for reference. Monitoring data are submitted to the Washington Natural Heritage Program (WNHP) to evaluate statewide conservation statuses.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Hanford Site Rare Plant Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2022

Rare plants are monitored on the Hanford Site as distribution and abundance data of current and historic rare plant populations are necessary to make well-informed environmental and ecological resource management decisions. The Central Hanford Rare Plant Management Plan (DOE/RL-2021-35) guides rare plant monitoring methodology in the context of resource management at the Hanford Site. In 2022, a rare plant monitoring effort occurred on the portion of the Hanford Site (referred to herein as Central Hanford) managed by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL; Figure 1). The goal of this effort was to revisit known occurrences of upland rare plant populations on Central Hanford to improve baseline information on locations of rare plant populations on the Hanford Site. Rare upland plants were thoroughly surveyed in 2021 but unusually low precipitation that year limited germination of many upland annual plants. Surveys in 2022 focused on rare upland annual species after the Hanford Site received higher than average spring precipitation that was expected to increase germination. Rainfall from April 2022 to June 2022 was 76% higher than average; however, these months were also colder than average. Winter rainfall from January 2022 to March 2022 was 84% lower than average. The high spring precipitation in 2022 appears to have triggered the germination of some populations of rare upland annuals but the dry winter and cold spring may have inhibited others. Population stability, viability, and threats were evaluated and will be used to inform future management of rare plant species.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Hanford Site Rare Plant Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2021

In 2021, a rare plant monitoring effort occurred on the portion of the Hanford Site (referred to herein as Central Hanford) managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL; Figure 1). The goal of this effort was to revisit known occurrences of upland rare plant populations on Central Hanford to improve baseline information on locations of rare plant populations on the Hanford Site. Additionally, population stability, viability, and threats were recorded and will be used to inform future management of rare plant species.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Hanford Site Rare Plant Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2016

In 2016, a rare plant monitoring effort occurred on the portion of the Hanford Site (referred to herein as Central Hanford) managed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The goal of this effort was to revisit known occurrences of upland rare plant populations on Central Hanford to improve baseline information on locations of rare plant populations on the Hanford Site. Additionally, population stability, viability, and threats were recorded and will be used to inform future management of rare plant species.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Hanford Site Rare Plant Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2016

In 2016, a rare plant monitoring effort occurred on the portion of the Hanford Site (referred to herein as Central Hanford) managed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The goal of this effort was to revisit known occurrences of upland rare plant populations on Central Hanford to improve baseline information on locations of rare plant populations on the Hanford Site. Additionally, population stability, viability, and threats were recorded and will be used to inform future management of rare plant species.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Hanford Site Rare Plant Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2015

In 2015, two separate rare plant monitoring efforts occurred on the portion of the Hanford Site managed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (referred to herein as Central Hanford). 1. Upland plants of conservation concern were inventoried concurrently with efforts to map plant communities on Central Hanford. Plants were selected based on 2015 status with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program (WNHP) listings, which are summarized in the bullets below. This effort was led by Mission Support Alliance (MSA) and subcontracted personnel from SEE Botanical Consulting.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2025

​​Updates to Anaerobic Digestion Pathways for Animal Manure in R&D GREET 2025​

Livestock and poultry manure management in the U.S. is a greenhouse gas (GHG) intensive process, emitting 81.7 MMT CO 2 e in 2022 (1.5% of net U.S. GHG emissions). The primary GHG is methane (CH 4 ), with 2,312 kt released in 2022 (9% of U.S. CH 4 emissions). Manure management methods are commonly categorized by whether they are anaerobic (“wet”) or aerobic (“dry”) techniques. Although dry methods manage the largest share of manure, the majority of GHG emissions are generated during storage of manure in anaerobic conditions – typically in water-filled tanks, pits, or lagoons. There has been a 65% increase in emissions from 1990, primarily due to an increasing cattle population. Also, this rise in population has been coupled with a rise in animal confinement and density, which typically adopt wet manure management methods. Within wet methods, anaerobic bacteria proliferate and decompose volatile solids (VS) within the manure in a process called anaerobic digestion to produce roughly equal mixtures of CH 4 and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). These GHGs are fugitive, in that they are assumed to be released to the atmosphere and contribute to GHGs within U.S. GHG inventories. If the methane is captured and purified (i.e., “upgraded”) this simultaneously mitigates GHGs that would have otherwise been released and produces a valuable energy product known colloquially as Renewable Natural Gas (RNG). Such processes are acknowledged by U.S. policy through programs such as the U.S. Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS), the federal Clean Fuel Production Credit (45Z), and state clean fuel standards (CFS). In the 45Z and CFS schemes, the GHG emissions of the business-as-usual (BAU) manure management system is taken as a baseline, and credits are received based on GHG reductions relative to this baseline. Thus, estimating the GHG emissions of the BAU scenario (also known as the “counterfactual”) is necessary.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Townsend's Ground Squirrel Conservation on the Hanford Site for Calendar Year 2025

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Hanford Field Office (HFO) conducts ecological monitoring on the DOE-managed portion of Hanford Site (hereby referred to as Central Hanford) to collect and track data needed to ensure compliance with an array of environmental laws, regulations, and policies governing HFO activities. Ecological monitoring data provides baseline information about the plants, animals, and habitat under HFO stewardship on the Hanford Site, which is required for accurate ecological impact assessment decision making under the National Environmental Policy Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. In addition, ecological monitoring helps ensure that HFO, its contractors, and other entities conducting activities on the Hanford Site are in compliance with DOE/EIS-0222-F, Final Hanford Comprehensive Land Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement. HFO places priority on monitoring plant and animal species or habitats that have specific regulatory protections or requirements; that are rare and/or declining (federal or state listed endangered, threatened, or sensitive species); or are of significant interest to federal, state, or tribal governments or to the public.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2026

Outcomes of PAX sapiens-Supported Global Wildlife Data Sharing Conferences for Enhanced One Health Security (GWDSC)

Across two consecutive Global Wildlife Data Sharing Conferences supported by PAX sapiens—Year 1 (May 2024) at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Year 2 (2025) in Ciudad Real, Spain—the initiative converted wildlife data sharing from aspiration into operational reality, producing measurable impacts in platform development, data mobilization, standards harmonization, and international partnership formation. The conferences addressed a critical gap in global health security: while 75% of emerging infectious diseases affect both humans and animals and over 60% originate in wildlife, wildlife health surveillance has historically lagged behind human and agricultural sectors due to fragmented databases, inconsistent terminology, uneven capacity, and limited cross-border coordination. By convening practitioners, government agencies, international organizations, academic institutions, and NGOs, the GWDSC catalyzed trust-based relationships and practical workflows that enable earlier detection, better risk assessment, and more effective prevention of threats at the wildlife–domestic animal–human–environment interface.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2026

Hanford Site Mule Deer Monitoring Report for Fiscal Years 2024 and 2026

The U.S. Department of Energy, Hanford Field Office (HFO) conducts ecological monitoring on the Hanford Site to collect and track data needed to ensure compliance with environmental laws, regulations, and policies governing Department of Energy activities. The vision for the HFOmanaged portion of the Hanford Site, hereby referred to as Central Hanford, focuses not only on the cleanup of nuclear facilities and waste sites but on the protection and restoration of the Hanford Site lands. As the HFO moves toward accomplishing this vision, understanding of the ecological resources present and the need for conservation and/or protection of those resources will be critical for making informed decisions for responsible site stewardship. Ecological monitoring data provides baseline information about the plants, animals, and habitats under HFO stewardship at Central Hanford required for decision-making under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Coupling Remote Sensing and Sonar Measurements to Estimate Availability of Suitable Backwater Nursery Habitat for Colorado Pikeminnow

Low-velocity channel-margin habitats serve as important nursery habitats for the endangered Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) in the middle Green River between Jensen and Ouray, Utah. These habitats, known as backwaters, are associated with emergent sandbars and are shaped and reformed annually by peak flows. Recent knowledge about backwater characteristics and dynamics was summarized in a synthesis report (Grippo et al. 2015) that was based on detailed annual survey data collected from a relatively small sample of backwaters between 2003 to 2014 and reach-wide evaluations of backwater surface area based on manual interpretation of aerial and satellite imagery. Methods that bridge the gap between the detailed surveys from a small number of backwaters and reach-wide assessments of their surface area would enable an improved assessment of the availability of backwater habitats that provide suitable depths for young-of-the-year (YOY) Colorado pikeminnow.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗