SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “catalysis”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Palladium-Coated Platinum Powders with Tunable, Nanostructured Surfaces for Applications in Catalysis
Simultaneous control of nanoscale surface morphology and composition remains a challenge in preparing bimetallic catalysts, particularly at the large scale required for industrial application and with high-surface-area substrates. Atomic layer electroless deposition (ALED) is a scalable approach to prepare surface-modified metal powders in which elements more noble than the surface hydrides of the substrate metal are deposited layer-by-layer in a surface-limited fashion. In this paper, we demonstrate that high-surface-area Pt powder is a viable substrate for controlled deposition of Pd adlayers using this technique, with the potential for large-scale preparation, for use in electrocatalytic and catalytic applications such as fuel cells and functionalization of petrochemical feedstocks. Two different growth mechanisms have been proposed based on bulk and surface Pd atomic fractions obtained from atomic absorption spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. Further, spectral simulations were performed to strengthen the proposed growth mechanisms, favoring conformal growth in initial deposition followed by island formation in subsequent cycles. Observation of multiple pathways suggests a means of controlling adlayer surface morphology of ALED materials, in which an initial cycle of deposition sets the fractional coverage and subsequent cycles tune adlayer thickness.
Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane to Propylene with Soft Oxidants via Heterogeneous Catalysis
Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene can be achieved using conventional, oxygen-assisted dehydrogenation of propane (O 2 –ODHP) or via the use of soft oxidants, such as CO 2 , N 2 O, S-containing compounds, and halogens/halides. The major roles of soft oxidants include inhibiting overoxidation and improving propylene selectivity, which are considered to be current challenges in O 2 -assisted dehydrogenation. For both CO 2 – and N 2 O–ODHP reactions, significant efforts have been devoted to developing redox-active (e.g., chromium, vanadate, iron, etc.), nonredox-type main group metal oxide (e.g., group IIIA, gallium), and other transition metal/metal oxide catalysts (e.g., molybdenum, palladium platinum, rhodium, ruthenium, etc.), as well as zeolite-based catalysts with adjustable acid–base properties, unique pore structures, and topologies. Metal sulfides have shown promising performance in DHP, whereas the development of suitable catalysts has lagged for SO 2 - or S-assisted ODHP. Recently, significant efforts have been focused on homogeneous and heterogeneous ODHP using halogens (e.g., Br 2 , I 2 , Cl 2 , etc.) and hydrogen halides (e.g., HCl and HBr) for the development of facile processes for C 3 H 6 synthesis. This work aims to provide a critical, comprehensive review of recent advances in oxidative dehydrogenation of propane with these soft oxidants, especially highlighting the current state of understanding of the following factors: (i) relationships between composition, structure, and catalytic performance, (ii) effects of the support, acidity, and promoters, (iii) reaction pathway and mechanistic insights, and (iv) the various roles of soft oxidants. Theoretical and computational insights toward understanding reaction mechanisms and catalyst design principles are also covered. Future research opportunities are discussed in terms of catalyst design and synthesis, deactivation and regeneration, reaction mechanisms, and alternative approaches.
Capturing the Catalytic Proton of Dihydrofolate Reductase: Implications for General Acid–Base Catalysis
Not Available
A Review on the Impact of SO 2 on the Oxidation of NO, Hydrocarbons, and CO in Diesel Emission Control Catalysis
A high-efficiency after-treatment technology has been required to meet the increasingly stringent regulations on the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO x ), hydrocarbons (HCs), and carbon monoxide (CO) exhausts from diesel engine vehicles throughout the world. The diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) is an indispensable part of a diesel-fueled exhaust system, which mainly functions in the oxidation of unburned HCs and CO to CO 2 and H 2 O (in the case of HCs) and a proportion of NO to NO 2 . However, the DOC will unavoidably be poisoned by trace gaseous SO 2 or accumulated sulfur on the catalyst under real operational conditions and hence impair the overall purification efficiency of the aftertreatment system. There have been significant research efforts from both academia and industry involving sulfur-relevant diesel oxidation chemistry and development of robust sulfur-resistant oxidation catalysts. In this review, we focus on recent advances in the study of SO 2 effects on the catalytic oxidation of NO, HCs, and CO over DOCs, with particular attention to the fundamentals beneath apparent observations of sulfur influence on PGM-based and non-noble metal-based catalysts in the different oxidation reactions. Regeneration methods and design rationale for sulfur-resistant catalysts are also covered. Several challenges in the future research regarding microscopic insights into the SO 2 -influencing mechanism and next-generation sulfur-resistant DOC design are highlighted toward real-world practice.
Diverse Mechanistic Pathways in Single-Site Heterogeneous Catalysis: Alcohol Conversions Mediated by
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
(CAAC)Copper Catalysis Enables Regioselective Three-Component Carboboration of Terminal Alkynes
Here, cyclic(alkyl)(amino)carbene (CAAC) ligands are found to perturb regioselectivity of the copper-catalyzed carboboration of terminal alkynes, favoring the less commonly observed internal alkenylboron regiosomer through an α-selective borylcupration step. A variety of carbon electrophiles participate in the reaction, including allyl alcohols derivatives and alkyl halides. The method provides a straightforward and selective route to versatile tri-substituted alkenylboron compounds that are otherwise challenging to access.
Plasma Catalysis for Hydrogen Production: A Bright Future for Decarbonization
Not Available
The Conundrum of “Pair Sites” in Langmuir–Hinshelwood Reaction Kinetics in Heterogeneous Catalysis
Not Available
How Solvent Mediates the Catalytic Fate of 2-Methoxyphenol in Hydrodeoxygenation Catalysis?
Kinetic and isotopic assessments combined with theoretical calculations shed light on the mechanistic differences in terms of the number of hydrogen addition steps and the electronic charges of reactive hydrogen in the catalytic sequence leading to the Ar−OCH 3 scission of 2-methoxyphenol occurring at various interfaces of vapor−Ru, cyclohexane−Ru, and water−Ru. At vapor−Ru and cyclohexane−Ru interfaces, the initial hydrogen adatom (H*) additions on the phenyl ring disrupt its aromaticity, as a step required to occur before kinetically relevant Ar−OCH 3 scission on an ensemble of Ru sites. The number of H* addition events prerequisite to the formation of the kinetically relevant Ar−OCH 3 scission transition state, however, is larger at the cyclohexane−Ru interface than those at the vapor−Ru and water−Ru interfaces. The preferential solvation of 2-methoxyphenol derived reaction precursors and H* weakens their adsorption on Ru sites, which leads to a decrease in the activation barrier for the third H* addition step and in turn a larger number of H* additions. At the water−Ru interface, water as a polar protic solvent promotes the Ar−OCH 3 scission by enabling a mechanistically distinct catalytic route an adjacent water molecule from the solvent layer assists with the intramolecular proton shuttling from the hydroxyl group (−OH) to the vicinal methoxy group (−OCH 3 ) of 2-methoxyphenol, evolving a highly charged transition state that is further stabilized by the water solvent layer, thereby leading to Ar−OCH 3 scission rate constants that are much higher than those at the vapor−Ru interface and, when comparing at the same H 2 chemical potential, higher Ar−OCH 3 scission turnovers. Furthermore, these distinct mechanistic details of the Ar−OCH 3 scission at various reaction interfaces, inferred from experiment and theory, illustrate how a solvent either solvates reaction intermediates and transition states or directly participates in the formation of kinetically relevant transition states, leading to changes in the free energy landscape, thus rewriting the catalytic fates in hydrodeoxygenation reactions.