DOE OSTI2020
Four fracturing fluids; water, CO2, CO2 with water, and CO2 with an aqueous solution of a CO2-reactive polymer, poly(allylamine) (PAA, 1wt%) were evaluated using a high-temperature true-triaxial fracturing apparatus and ½ foot side granite cubic samples. All three CO2-based fracturing fluids, CO2, CO2 with water, and CO2 with aqueous PAA fractured granite at higher breakdown pressures, high transient flow rates, and produce higher-conductivity fractures as compared to water. Additionally, faster pressurization rates with CO2-based fracturing fluids (obtained when fracturing at constant flow rate mode) are found to be associated with higher fracture conductivities. When partially saturating the rock sample with PAA solution followed by fracturing with CO2, the volume expansion caused by CO2-induced cross-linking of PAA leads to a faster pressure increase due to the associated stress generated and increase in viscosity. It was also found that CO2 as a fracturing fluid injected in hot dry rock (HDR) attain the highest fracture conductivity only when injected at very high flow rates, followed very closely by the CO2/PAA fracturing fluid system that generates fractures with, on average, similarly high conductivity values though independently of injection flow rate and using 1/6 of the mass of CO2 as compared to CO2 in HDR. Breakdown pressures were also similar for CO2 stimulation in HDR and CO2/PAA fluid system under identical injection flow rates. It is concluded that CO2 (when injected in HDR) and CO2/PAA are the fluids of choice for stimulation of granitic rock samples under the studied geothermal P/T conditions. CO2/PAA, however, offer the following three additional advantages; 1) it requires significantly lower volumes of CO2, 2) fracture permeability is independent of injection flow rate, and 3) the reversible (previously reported) viscosity increase is beneficial to transport proppants if they are ever developed enhanced geothermal systems.