Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “drops”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2017

International Space Station (ISS) Bacterial Filter Elements (BFEs): Filter Efficiency and Pressure Drop Testing of Returned Units

The air quality control equipment aboard the International Space Station (ISS) and future deep space exploration vehicles provide the vital function of maintaining a clean cabin environment for the crew and the hardware. This becomes a serious challenge in pressurized space compartments since no outside air ventilation is possible, and a larger particulate load is imposed on the filtration system due to lack of sedimentation. The ISS Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLS) system architecture in the U.S. Segment uses a distributed particulate filtration approach consisting of traditional High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters deployed at multiple locations in each U.S. Seg-ment module; these filters are referred to as Bacterial Filter Elements, or BFEs. In our previous work, we presented results of efficiency and pressure drop measurements for a sample set of two returned BFEs with a service life of 2.5 years. In this follow-on work, we present similar efficiency, pressure drop, and leak tests results for a larger sample set of six returned BFEs. The results of this work can aid the ISS Program in managing BFE logistics inventory through the stations planned lifetime as well as provide insight for managing filter element logistics for future exploration missions. These results also can provide meaningful guidance for particulate filter designs under consideration for future deep space exploration missions.

ISS Air Quality↗
NASA NTRS2018

Full-Scale Drop Test of a Fokker F28 Wingbox Fuselage Section

During the summer of 2017, a vertical drop test was conducted on a partial section of a Fokker F28 MK4000 aircraft as a part of a joint NASA/FAA effort to investigate the performance of transport category aircraft under realistic crash conditions. Ten Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs, a.k.a. crash test dummies) ranging from 5th to 95th percentile sizes were used for the collection and comparison of occupant loads. Additionally, overhead bin mass simulators were added to achieve a realistic fuselage configuration. The section was dropped with a downward facing pitch angle onto a sloping soil surface in order to simulate a local horizontal velocity in the airframe. Instrumentation consisting of accelerometers was installed to measure floor, seat track, ATD, and overhead bin acceleration responses. Self-contained data recorders logging accelerations and rotational rates were also used on the seat tracks and lower structure as evaluations for crash recording devices in potential future use cases. The right side of the section was painted with a stochastic black and white speckle pattern for use in full field photogrammetric imaging techniques. Results collected from the airframe accelerometers will be presented, and deformation and failures of the test article structure will be discussed. Finally, an examination of the test article motion will be presented using derived components of local velocities with their effect on the impact acceleration and airframe response.

Littell, J. D.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Vertical Drop Test and Simulation of a Fokker F-28 Fuselage Section

In March 2017, a vertical drop test of a 3.048-m(10-ft) section of a Fokker F-28 aircraft was conducted as a part of a joint NASA/FAA effort to investigate the performance of transport aircraft under realistic crash conditions. The section was configured with two rows of aircraft seats, in a triple-double configuration. A total of ten Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) were secured in the seats using standard seat belt restraints. The section was also configured with luggage in the cargo hold. Two hat racks were added, each with mass loading of 37.2-kg per linear meter (25-lb/ft). The drop test was performed at the Landing and Impact Research facility located at NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. The planned impact velocity was 9.144-m/s (360-in/s) onto soil. A second objective was to assess the capabilities of finite element simulations to predict the test response. A finite element model was developed for execution in LS-DYNA, a commercial explicit nonlinear transient dynamic code. The model contained accurate representations of the airframe structure, the hat racks and hat rack masses, the floor and seat tracks, and the luggage in the cargo hold. Concentrated masses were used to represent the inertial properties of the seats, restraints, and ATD occupants. The model was executed to generate analytical predictions of airframe responses, which were compared with test data to validate the model.

Jackson, K. E.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Microgravity Liquid-Gas Two-Phase Flow: Review of Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer Correlations and Guidelines for Equipment Operability

In this report we have catalogued the flow regimes observed in microgravity, summarized correlations for the pressure drop and rate of heat transfer that are commonly used, and discuss the validation of a few correlations from available experimental results. Two-phase flow through some specific components such as bends, tees, filters and pumps are discussed from a physical perspective to guide the designer on how reduced gravity might affect their performance. Phase separation in zero gravity is addressed through the behavior and basic design concepts for devices based on passive centrifugal action, capillary forces, gas extraction through a membrane installed in a channel wall and the use of a syringe with a perforated piston to remove bubbles from small liquid volumes. We address the common instabilities that develop in flow loops owing exclusively to the two-phase nature of the flow, e.g., Ledinegg instability and concentration waves. Finally we briefly review flow metering and gauging; two-phase flow through porous media, where pressure drop and flow regime map correlations in zero-g are a current research topic; and basic operation principles of heat pipes and capillary pumped loops.

liquid-gas↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

CFD Modeling of Phase Change and Pressure Drop during Violent Sloshing of Cryogenic Fluid in a Small-Scale Tank

This paper presents the development of a two-phase CFD model that is used to study sloshing of a cryogenic fluid (LN2) undergoing phase change generated by lateral acceleration and its effects on the ensuing heat and mass transfer and pressure drop in a small-scale tank. In this model the interface is captured using the volume-of-fluid (VOF) method [1]. Kinetic-theory based Schrage relation [2] is used for calculating phase change mass transfer at the liquid-vapor interface. Computational results are compared to the data provided by a non-isothermal sloshing experiment with phase change conducted by the University of Tokyo and JAXA in 2018 using liquid Nitrogen in a transparent tank. The effect of different thicknesses of a liquid temperature stratification layer created at the interface on the pressure drop during sloshing was studied experimentally. CFD results for interface movement and tank pressure are presented and compared in this paper to experimental data for the cases with the smallest and largest liquid temperature stratification thickness.

phase change↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15µm to 460 µm. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

Icing cloud instruments↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15m to 460 m. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

o Aircraft Icing↗
NASA NTRS2021

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15um to 460 um. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

o Aircraft Icing↗
NASA NTRS2017

Creating a Bimodal Drop-Size Distribution in the NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel

The Icing Research Tunnel at NASA Glenn has demonstrated that they can create a drop-size distribution that matches the FAA Part 25 Appendix O FZDZ, MVD40 m normalized cumulative volume within 10. This is done by simultaneously spraying the Standard and Mod1 nozzles at the same nozzle air pressure and different nozzle water pressures. It was also found through these tests that the distributions that are measured when the two nozzle sets are sprayed simultaneously closely matched what was found by combining the two individual distributions analytically. Additionally, distributions were compared between spraying all spraybars and also by spraying only every-other spraybar, and were found to match within 4. The cloud liquid water content uniformity for this condition has been found to be excellent: 10. It should be noted, however, that the liquid water content for this condition in the IRT is much higher than the requirement specified in Part 25 Appendix O.

drop-size↗
NASA NTRS2017

Creating a Bimodal Drop-Size Distribution in the NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel

The Icing Research Tunnel at NASA Glenn has demonstrated that they can create a drop-size distribution that matches the FAA Part 25 Appendix O FZDZ, MVD <40 microns normalized cumulative volume within 10%. This is done by simultaneously spraying the Standard and Mod1 nozzles at the same nozzle air pressure and different nozzle water pressures. It was also found through these tests that the distributions that are measured when the two nozzle sets are sprayed simultaneously closely matched what was found by combining the two individual distributions analytically. Additionally, distributions were compared between spraying all spraybars and also by spraying only every-other spraybar, and were found to match within 4%. The cloud liquid water content uniformity for this condition has been found to be excellent. It should be noted, however, that the liquid water content for this condition in the IRT is much higher than the requirement specified in Part 25 Appendix O.

bimodal distribution↗